Misplaced Pages

User talk:Justice007

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Justice007 (talk | contribs) at 08:34, 22 November 2012 (→Reverting my cleanup of Abhay Kumar: Typo). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 08:34, 22 November 2012 by Justice007 (talk | contribs) (→Reverting my cleanup of Abhay Kumar: Typo)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
This is Justice007's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.
This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.
  • If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, as I am watching it.
  • If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, so please add it to your watchlist.
  • Please click here to leave me a new message.
Archiving icon
Archives

ANI

Just to let you know, I have mentioned your name in this discussion Misplaced Pages:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#User:Viriditas_and_User:Anupam. IRWolfie- (talk) 22:19, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--Juristicweb (talk) 12:00, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

Barnstar

The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
Dear Justice007, thank you for the kindness that you showed to me recently. I really appreciate your efforts to stand up for me and ensuring that the community realizes that my intention is to make Misplaced Pages a better place. It means a lot to me. I hope to see kind spirited editors like yourself editing on Misplaced Pages. Your friend, Anupam 18:51, 9 May 2012 (UTC)


Final !!!

Mr. Justice, Rather than giving the funny names to article section of Muhammad Iqbal you, kindly do some constructive work to develop the article. If you keep on reverting my constructive edits, You will leave no option for me rather than take your case to Misplaced Pages:RFC or WP:DRN, where you will be stopped from editing on particular or WP articles until you develop your skills, and the entire article of Muhammad Iqbal will be tagged with multiple remarks if the case reaches at Misplaced Pages:RFC or WP:DRN, and before reaching Misplaced Pages:RFC or WP:DRN, I supposed to warn you for the consequences of it, rest is upto you. Best wishes. --Omer123hussain (talk) 14:26, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

Orissa and Odisha

Please go through this discussion to know about the name change discussion. thanks for contributions to wikipedia. --Mrutyunjaya Kar (talk) 14:01, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Do not involve in edit warring

You removed template

Main article: Muhammad Iqbal Urdu work

, from the article Muhammad Iqbal, with the edit summary of Copy edit, and main article mentioning as reference for further study is itself stub article unsourced ,not clear notability,and just newly created by Omer123hussain Please discuss on talk page for this and next time you do any edit first discuss on talk page to avoid edit warring. :))--Omer123hussain (talk) 09:33, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Do not apply blogs as a Source.

In your recent edits at Tarana-e-Milli, you had applied a blog as an source here, which will put the article in more trouble. Blogs cannot be applied as an source, (except in very rare exceptional cases). Please stop this !!!, Please read and understand WP:MOS before you make any edit. :) Cheers.--Omer123hussain (talk) 12:52, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

June 2012

Welcome to Misplaced Pages. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors, as you did on Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Tarana-e-Milli. Please comment on the content and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. You are welcome to rephrase your comment as a civil criticism of the article. Thank you. Darkness Shines (talk) 14:04, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

MPhill Thesis for Idris Azad BioGraphy

i have cited or ref the mphil thesis of Abbas, Mohisn (Urdu adab kay faroog may Khushab ka hissa)and it is published from Allama Iqbal Open University. is it not a worthy reference to any content?? kindly plz tell me how can i cite this so that it is acceptable ?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Qasimyad (talk • contribs) 12:33, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

Tehelka

Thanks a tonne , and I would be happy to learn from you. Woh to dost hain nahin jo haste meri gaflat pe hain, Zindadilon se dosti , nacheez ka bhi shauq hai Realnews7 (talk) 10:32, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

Shreya

Thanks for cleaning up this article. Just wanted to remind you that the formatting should be italics for film titles and quotes "" for song titles. Please don't change that. BollyJeff | talk 13:05, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 28

Hi. When you recently edited Nazia Iqbal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sharjah (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:24, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

The Deity

Please will you explain why you have reverted my edits to this article. If you fail to do so and revert my next edit I will report you to administration. 81.106.127.14 (talk) 22:43, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

  • Because you added the content without providing reliable sources, and removal of anything needs sources too,and all changes should be first discussed on the talk page of the article, not on my talk page. Thanks. Justice007 (talk) 09:18, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

Well, The Oxford English Dictionary is the most authoritative dictionary of the English language. There simply is not a more reliable source in existence. Secondly, your claim that any change to an article must be discussed on the article's talk page is also untrue. This would be an extremely laborious protocol would it be[REDACTED] policy. Fortunately no such policy exists. 81.106.127.14 (talk) 17:25, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

Sandra Seaton Revision

Dear Justice007, I see that you commented on the need for revisions to the article about Sandra Seaton. I just noticed that your recommendation to revise the article by adding more documentation and references has been followed through on. There are now more references and footnotes. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lavender21 (talk • contribs) 23:34, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
Excellent work keeping out POV and poorly formatted edits out of Pakistan, Allama Iqbal and many other articles. lTopGunl (talk) 16:43, 4 July 2012 (UTC)


  • You're welcome. You've done quite some work around keeping the poor edits out and further improving the articles.. this was long due. Cheers. :] --lTopGunl (talk) 17:46, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Comma in Pakistan

Hi Justice007. Actually, TopGun was right to revert it. Commas are only correct where there is one of quite a small number of specific reasons for them. If you're interested, this page gives a very clear, accurate introduction. Cheers, --Stfg (talk) 10:45, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

Dunes Review

Justice, could you check out my other article, Dunes Review User:Guillaume2303 deleted the whole thing from a starter class down to nothing and then put it up for deletion. Dunes Review is the first and only literary magazine in Michigan NOT controlled by a government educational institution. --David Holmer (talk) 20:09, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

Justice, just read your comment about staying away... I'm sure you have the articles best interest at heart. I will stay away. If I made things worse, please be bold and edit it out. --David Holmer (talk) 23:04, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
  • Article is notable in my view according to reliable sources.Thanks for staying away, it's better because creator of the subject should not much involve in the discussion, let's do other editors.Justice007 (talk) 23:13, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
Please look over my comments did they make it worse? Should I delete? or is it fine the way it stands now?--David Holmer (talk) 23:20, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

Remove everything or just my undecided comment?--David Holmer (talk) 23:27, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

Thanks Justice, I appreciate it.--David Holmer (talk) 23:36, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

  • Justice007, it really is very inappropriate to change another user's comments in an AfD discussion. I see from the discussion above that you did this with David's agreement, but people at the AfD will only see that you changed his comments and that doesn't look good. In future, it's better if David would do these things himself. --Guillaume2303 (talk) 08:40, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
Guillaume, I just wasn't sure the policy about removing my inappropriate comments.
Justice, I removed the other comments after thinking about it. They were in response to JoannaSerah's comment about my person. --David Holmer (talk) 15:23, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
The Article Rescue Barnstar
Great job saving Dunes Review from deletion at AFD – David Holmer 09:53, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

Edit warring

Hey, you are involving in edit warring, by reverting poets name here, Kindly clear your misunderstanding that this is a list of poets, but not the list of poets who have article on WP. Please self revert your edit, rather than involving in edit warring. lastly do maintain the adequate and mannerism in your edit summary. :)--Omer123hussain (talk) 23:24, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

  • I think you need rest, on wikipedia, everthing should be according to wiki rules, and stop posting "Edit warring",that is not, you cannot add the red links, those do not have the notability.Justice007 (talk) 23:31, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
Omer you are mistaken. The talk page clearly prohibits red links, as well as the hidden comments in the list--which you had to have seen. Omer: if you want to add red links you must gain consensus on talk first. Justice: just because someone is ignoring consensus and you know they're ignoring consensus and I know they're ignoring consensus is not a justification for edit warring. Put a warning on their talk, post a message on WPIndia, or go to ANI to report disruptive editing. I'm not watching that article--but feel free to drop a note if there's any more trouble. – Lionel 02:09, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

(Edit conflict):* This is not a first time, that kind of "Edit warring", I am receiving from him every time, which I am ignoring of his lack of the wiki-knowledge. Thank you for your notice of that disruptive behaviour.Justice007 (talk) 09:27, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

@Justice stop hounding on editors, and I don't think but I believe that you need a complete rest forever :)
@Justice If it is redlink, remove the link, do not revert the work, And one more advice to you, do some research before blindly reverting any edit.
@ Lionelt, you are mistaken, Is it better to revert or to develop the contents? My intention was not to make it a redlink but to correct and restore that poet with reliable sources 1, 2, and before I could work it out, The reverting editor (Justice) jumped in between like an illiterate and without discussing or trying to know my cause, started edit warring, before I could complete the work.
@ Lionelt, I think you missed to read this text on article, according to which I wanted to apply sources, any way If you are talking about this consensus read it properly, the editors agreed for the redlinks if it is a notable poet based on this Misplaced Pages:REDLINK#When to create red links. :)--Omer123hussain (talk) 09:08, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
You reverted simple text, and You are arguing that you reverted REDLINK, (see your brilliant work once again, this one what you placed above), Really it proofs what you are ??? :)
Well if you want details see below :),
  • :: I ( Omer123hussain ) made a edit at 22:57, 13 July 2012.
  • :: and you ( Justice007) reverted that edit at 22:59, 13 July 2012.
  • :: Before I could apply reliable source, with in difference of 2 minutes of my edit you reverted it, is it not edit warring???
Please stop playing on WP, I am really fed up with your non-scene, false blaming and edit warring. and as I advices you above, Please please please do some research before blindly reverting any edit. It is not you but me who is ignoring your edit warring. But this is last time, next time If you blame it will be reported further.
* NOTE: Seen you edit once again what you reverted REDLINK or Simple text, okay I will link it for you here. :)--Omer123hussain (talk) 10:53, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
  • You are realy confused, before reverting I wikified the name, that was red, and it is the name of author or poet but not text, red links or black links have not notability. I am very cool person, I am here to help everyone and improving and expanding the articles. Please think twice before writing or speaking your views.Thanks.Justice007 (talk) 13:46, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
No one bothers if you are cool or what ever, just discuss according to WP policy, and please as I told you make it your last excuse. And if you do not understand any thing please feel free to discuss. Regards :) --Omer123hussain (talk) 21:08, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 14

Hi. When you recently edited Lymari Nadal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ponce (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:17, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

Rebecca Hammond Lard

Was curious as to how/how often the wiki-class on articles is checked/changed. I was thinking that this article was getting close to a C-class, but it is still a Stub? --David Holmer (talk) 07:08, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

Justice, the major edit changes were made for the assessment from Stub class to Class-C. Please don't undo... at least discuss before changing it back, it's scheduled for assessment. Thanks. --David Holmer (talk) 10:23, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

It is NOT redundant... the info is different. It is a summary look at Walt Whitman PLEASE!--David Holmer (talk) 10:33, 17 July 2012 (UTC) Justice, Why are you NOT communicating with me? Why don't you look at the article I suggested? Why don't you want this article to improve? Please, TALK TO ME !!!!!!!!!!!!!!! --David Holmer (talk) 10:37, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

YOU DONT OWN IT EITHER... Gillaume was assessing it for C-class until you started undoing all the work of improvement!--David Holmer (talk) 10:45, 17 July 2012 (UTC) You are suppose to IMPROVE the article NOT maintain it at STUB-CLASS !!!--David Holmer (talk) 10:47, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

  • * Adding multiple sections with redundant content do not make it klass-C, I do not think Gillaume will do that. I do not own it too, but you created the article, leave it to others if you cannot expand and improve it properly.Justice007 (talk) 10:54, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
I am NOT going to argue with you, I will ask Guillaume to step in and compare both edits, and will abide by his decision--David Holmer (talk) 11:02, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

I'm done with Misplaced Pages. Spangle has ruined Rebecca Lard... sounds like sh!t because he can't speak English and shouldn't be working on an English site. I am tired of having to argue and explain proper English to people who are too lazy to put forth the effort to listen or learn how to speak it properly. Congrats on the saving of Dunes Review. I just wanted to stop by and thank you for being the sole editor that I truly enjoyed meeting on here. Thanks again for your efforts! --David Holmer (talk) 00:15, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

Burden

Read WP:BURDEN and do not restore source misrepresentation and WP:SYNTHESIS--DBigXray 12:55, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

Edit warring

There is a report regarding you at WP:AN3. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ 15:24, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

afd

Please read and follow WP:DISCUSSAFD --DBigXray 18:46, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry

Hi Justice, you may want to defend yourself here on an SPI report initiated by Omerhussain123. Just bringing it to your attention since he did not notify you. Mar4d (talk) 20:10, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

If I can suggest something Justice, don't even bother commenting there unless there is something really egregious. I don't think this will go anywhere, so don't even get upset. Nolelover 20:47, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

Awards

Salaam Justice007, I noticed that you added your awards to your talk page. I added some additional ones from your archives! I hope this helps! With regards, Anupam 01:59, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

Re:Barnstar

Dear User:Justice007, thank you for your kind barnstar. I'm glad to know that I'm making a difference here and appreciate the fact that editors like yourself notice my work! I hope you have a nice day! With regards, Anupam 06:38, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject Wikify: July Newsletter and August Drive

The Wikifier
Your Wikification Newsletter – Volume II, Issue I, July 2012


Front Cover • From the editor • General news

Membership • June drive results

Hi there! I thought you might be interested in WikiProject Wikify's August Wikification Backlog Elimination Drive. We'll be trying to reduce the backlog and we need your help! Hard-working participants in the drive will receive awards for their contributions. If you have a spare moment, please join and wikify an article or tell your friends. Thanks!
Note: The drive starts August 1, and you can sign up anytime!
EdwardsBot (talk) 21:27, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

Jinnah

Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. DBigXray 13:04, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

  • I have not been through cited sources, I am just copy editing and making layout.What you reverted that passage was not added by me I just reverted someone els edit, and you seem to agree with my concerns. I will look at the references that are not cited to any passage (though not mentioned by you.) Justice007 (talk) 13:17, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
If you are reverting/undoing an edit, you should say so in your edit summary , the edit summary here was misleading.--DBigXray 13:59, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

 Done self reverted and restored your edits, cheers--DBigXray 14:03, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Justice007. You have new messages at TopGun's talk page.
Message added 16:27, 2 August 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

A cup of coffee for you!

Thanks for Helping :) Zunaira jamil (talk) 03:30, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

Comment on the Content not on contributors

To prevent the WP:Drama WP:Comment on content, not on the contributor Please read and follow this , You may rephrase your recent comment on Talk:Anti-Pakistan_sentiment--DBigXray 18:35, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

Please

Explain how you got to this article and why you reverted me. Darkness Shines (talk) 18:56, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

  • I have nearly 2000 pages to my watch list, especially Pakistan related articles, is it objectionable?. I undid your reverting because of illegitimate revertion, while there is reliable source available.I hope this helps. Justice007 (talk) 19:07, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
You have never edited said article with this account before, how does it come to be on your watchlist? Darkness Shines (talk) 19:09, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Yes I never edited that, but well I watch every time all edits all of editors who contribute the Pakistan and India related articles, where I think, is appropriate to contribute, I do without any hesitation, assuming of course good faith.Justice007 (talk) 19:27, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Bull, it is not possible to watch all edits by all editors in this topic area, especially as you have never been to this article before under this account. Given there has been a fair few edit wars on it since you joined Misplaced Pages it strikes me as strange you should suddenly turn up now. Please disclose any account you used previously with which you edited this article. Darkness Shines (talk) 19:45, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Further, to say you saw this on RC rings hollow. Your contributions history shows no evidence of an active RC patrol, nor could you have seen that edit fully three quarters of an hour after I made it on RC, it would have dropped off the list. Darkness Shines (talk) 19:49, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Don't be suspisious, I patrol all pages thoroughly that I have on my watch list,or I glance at. It is not necessary to go everywhere,but you must know every editor has right to be bold to edit everywhere, there are no any restrictions, regulations and limitations about, whether to do or not. If you have any concerns relating that, please go to file at proper notice board rather than wasting my time that I can use to improve and expand other articles.I have replied you in very clear way, if you don't believe me that is your matter not mine. I hope this is enough to help you. Thanks. Justice007 (talk) 22:24, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for not even remotely responding to my questions. All you have managed with your prevarication is to ensure that you are in fact a sock or a rather unfortunate meatpuppet. Darkness Shines (talk) 23:45, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Justice should this persist, take it up to ANI. You might not be aware, but calling established editors a sock is a personal attack and is blockable, esp for some one with the history like DS. You don't have to explain anything to another editor on how you get to another articles. Stalking is only brought into account when the two editors have a history of disputes or when you have a pattern of appearing at new articles one editor edits. --lTopGunl (talk) 17:41, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

Hi

Hi User, you have reverted my work (rather than discussing it on the talk page) with some abusive and humiliating sort of edit summary.

Omer, I found nothing in WP:MOS to substantiate your position. However WP:IC says "Misplaced Pages does not have a '"one inline citation per sentence" or "one citation per paragraph"' rule." That said, it is always best to discuss issues on the talk page. And Justice, it's always better to talk about the edit, not the editor. Hope this helps! – Lionel 01:24, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
@Lionelt; I clearly mention c/e (copy editing), any way what is the logic of repeating same single source 3 times in the two line sentence? and abusing/discriminating the editors through edit summaries, without discussing or bothering to discuss. Regards :)--Omer123hussain (talk) 22:06, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

Not guilty!

The Purple Barnstar
Awarded for bravely asserting your innocence and mounting a powerful defense against the charges brought against you.
– Lionel 01:52, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

August 2012

Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors, which you did not do on WP:Articles for deletion/India and state sponsored terrorism. Thank you.

P.S. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Mrt3366 09:16, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

Hi Justice, updated article on P.K. Kaul

I've been working on a number of India related articles, and have recently updated and improved the article on P.K. Kaul. Would appreciate it if you could take a look and leave your comments on the talk page on how it may be further improved. Any edits and modifications/improvements to the article would be most welcome. I am still looking for a free image to post on Pratap Kishen Kauls wiki page. Any help in this regard would also be welcome. Thanks. -Ambar (talk) 02:57, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

Muhammad Iqbal Page

Dear Justice 007, Not sure why you revert my edit. Iqbal is known as the 'Poet of the East' only among the Urdu-Hindi speakers. Arabs, Farsi-speakers, Chinese, and other Eastern linguistic groups have no clue Iqbal is being hailed as the 'Poet of the East' by the Urdu speakers. Please provide references showing other linguistic groups calling Muhammad Iqbal the 'Poet of the East', if you really have such a belief. warm regards, Cemendtaur — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cemendtaur (talk • contribs) 14:26, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

  • Source 9 states only Poet of East, we have to follow that, not personal view point or description in this regard that you are doing,I have also replied you on the talk page of Muhammad Iqbal. May I ask you why you are especially interested to make him limited??.Justice007 (talk) 14:44, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

Malik Ram

Malik Ram's surname is Baveja and not Ram; Ram is part of his first name; he is to be addressed as Malik Ram. Kindly restore to Malik Ram from Ram. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Soni Ruchi (talk • contribs) 03:45, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

  • I know, and personally I have no problem what should be the name, our subject of area uses the names differently, but I change the name according to wiki rule WP:surname, about same problem I had once with an editor clashing arguments, because I had same idea that you have now. I am going to ask him for more clarity of the policy, may be we find some solution in this regard.Justice007 (talk) 18:00, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Malik Ram was always known as Malik Ram in the literary world, not Malik and not Ram. A lot of people in India have Ram as part of their given first name e.g. |Jagjivan Ram (called Jagjivan Ran and not Ram). In fact, even Malik Ram's mother always called him Malik Ram, according to a biography I have read and never Malik or Ram. Malik Ram is listed under M in official literary lists and library catalogues. No one has heard of him as Malik, the Urdu scholar or Ram, the Urdu writer. He is always called Malik Ram. I agree with Soni Ruchi.
In this interview he gave, the interviewers call him Malik Ram and, having read the WP guidelines regarding usage of names, Malik Ram appears to be appropriate.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vs9iWrPfzhI--Zananiri (talk) 19:14, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Thanks for your efforts. I have had a look and don't agree. The WP guidelines say:
"People who are best known by a pseudonym should be subsequently referred to by their pseudonymous surnames, unless they do not include a recognizable surname in the pseudonym (i.e. Madonna, Snoop Dogg, The Edge), in which case the whole pseudonym is used."
Malik Ram is actually one name. Ram, as Soni Ruchi, who created the article, and I have pointed out, is not his surname. Malik Ram should be regarded as one pseudonymous name in this case, according to the guidelines. I consider the remark about the number of edits one has made facetious. Quality not quantity is what matters when editing. I don't think you yourself have to change names elsewhere if you change this!--Zananiri (talk) 21:21, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
  • I realy do not know any thing other than that, if you think Malik Ram is one name then go ahead and revert that, I will not object, but do not know about other editors what they think. Cheers.Justice007 (talk) 21:54, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Thanks. Will do so some time next week, as I am away for a few days. Perhaps Soni Ruchi can do it, if she sees this. Also, do we still need the tag you added yesterday, as all the reflinks have been edited and refined since you posted it?--Zananiri (talk) 22:08, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Poet of the East

The two sources I gave are solid, dunno why that guy is still belaboring the point. Who did you think it was a sock of? Darkness Shines (talk) 06:48, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

  • Your given sources support the content, but he is not going to understand, why?, that I don't know. Well I consider his act and repeated question as a pretended ignorance. I am going to talk page of Iqbal to comment there too. Justice007 (talk) 18:11, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
And you think he is a sock of? Darkness Shines (talk) 19:11, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Martand Sun Temple, my recent improvements

My edits (improvements and additions) to the Martand Sun Temple article are in the attempt to make a category A (or better) article. How are the articles rated, btw ? -Ambar (talk) 08:17, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

Please Note

Please make sure you won't make comments like this ever again.You are supposed to be civil and calm + Make sure you use better language while defending your claim.Remember that you were even dragged to SPI for having similar language as that of some IPs. Cheers TheStrikeΣagle 07:26, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject Wikify and the future of wikification

Hi! There is an ongoing proposal at the project talkpage concerning the future of wikification, including possible deprecation of the {{wikify}} template which is being discussed at Misplaced Pages:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 August 10. Your input would be greatly appreciated!

You are receiving this message because you are listed as an active member of the wikify project. To update your status, go here.

Delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 15:46, 12 August 2012 (UTC) on behalf of Project Wikify

About İlknur Melis Durası's page

Hi there,

Thank you for helping me out with Melis's page. I don't know how to add the citation for her paper. It was at HIBIT conference Izmır/Turkey 2011 and her publication's name was IDENTIFICATION OF TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR BINDING SITES IN PROMOTER DATABASES if you can add it that would be great. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kurgu Karga (talk • contribs) 08:34, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Zia Fatehabadi

Greetings. The Mehr Lal Soni Zia Fatehabadi article has had that tag for a very long time. I think it should be removed now. Please have a look.--Zananiri (talk) 16:46, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

 Done.Justice007 (talk) 19:18, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

{{BLP sources}}

Hi, Justice007. I noticed you reverted my edit to Joseph Noiret, stating in your edit summary, "Of course BLP sources, it is bio article". However, according to Template:BLP sources, "In non-BLP articles that require additional sources, the {{refimprove}} template should be used instead." As Noiret is not living, shouldn't {{refimprove}} be used? HueSatLum 21:05, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 19

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Martand Sun Temple (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to John Briggs
Murray Feingold (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to United State
Talib Chakwali (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Punjab

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 04:06, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Citation needed templates

Dear user:Justice007, I for one find it very helpful, in an article that has a template at the top indicating a lack of reliable sources, to see where other editors have recommended the references should be added. I'm sure this helps others aside from me. I often then try to find references to replace the templates. Of course, I also do so regardless of existing templates, but I do find it helpful if others have marked the path (so to speak). Anyway, these are just my thoughts. I hope you don't mind me adding them here. Keep up the great work. Best wishes, George Custer's Sabre (talk) 15:20, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

Imran Abbas Naqvi

The edit I made to the above article corrected grammar errors, not factual errors. You have just replaced the errors. Thank you. Denisarona (talk) 15:29, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Ahmad Adaya (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to United State
M. Afzal Hossain (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Bangladeshi
Michele Stratico (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Turkish
Zaytuna College (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Guardian

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:19, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

ANI

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Wildthing61476 (talk) 12:22, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

Yusuf Estes

Dear User:Justice007, I hope you are well. I feel powerless to prevent the vandalism occuring on the Yusuf Estes page. An editor -- User:Muslim Online -- repeatedly posts unreferenced and clearly partisan POV material that violates WP:BLP guidelines. I could continue to revert the edits to remove this content in accordance with the ruling that "contentious material about living persons (or recently deceased) that is unsourced or poorly sourced—whether the material is negative, positive, neutral, or just questionable—should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion", but I am afraid that my own actions might be misconstrued as edit warring and that I could be accused of violating Misplaced Pages's three-revert rules.

Please see if you can help, or at least give me some useful advice.

Thanks you and best wishes, George Custer's Sabre (talk) 20:10, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

Shafiq-ur-Rehman (humorist)

Could you please make clear your justification for moving Shafiq-ur-Rehman (humorist) to Shafiq-ur-Rahman (humorist). Just saying it's wrong is not a sufficient reason, WP:RS are required. SamuelTheGhost (talk) 15:20, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

  • Well, SamuelTheGhost, as I am belonging to that part of the world, and I am also much familair to the Urdu, Arabic and Persian languages, and its grammar. "Rahman" is an Arabic word, it pronounces 'Rahman' but not 'Rehman'. Though mostly in India and Pakistan, it is commonly wrong pronouced, and translated into incorrect spelling. Academics do not make the mistake but having poor knowledge writers do that. When I come across that kind of translated wrong spelling, I make that correct, that's all, and for that there is no need of RS. Please take a look at these correct spelling articles of the same name: Ahfaz-ur-Rahman,Hamoodur Rahman, Tariq Rahman, Rahman Syed, Bushra Rahman, Rahman Baba. If you are native speaker of English, then I can imagine, and that makes me no surprise, but if you are from there, then I will suggest you please improve your knowledge of languages. I hope this helps. Cheers.Justice007 (talk) 16:17, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
    • No I'm afraid it does not help. Editors in[REDACTED] are self-selected and anonymous except where they choose to identiy themselves. I have not published my qualifications, my native language, or any other languages I know. If I did publish them, other editors would still have no way of knowing whether I had told the truth about them. The only evidence acceptable under[REDACTED] policy is WP:RS, not personal knowedge. These considerations apply equally to me and to you. WP:RS is the only evidence we can take any notice of.
Of course I am aware that the scholarly transliteration of Template:Lang-ar is ar-Rahman or, more carefully, ar-Raḥman, but[REDACTED] policy for names is to use the transliteration found in the sources, whether or not they are "correct". In the case of Shafiq-ur-Rehman, English-language sources are using the form ur-Rehman, and apparently no other, so[REDACTED] policy is quite clear that that is the form we should be using. SamuelTheGhost (talk) 18:26, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
  • I do not agree with you, please indicate, that where RS allow the incorrect spelling, there is also a rule WP:common sense, I do not know that we should use or not, before I go futher to discuss this issue with you, first you provide the reliable sources to support your concerns, while the article's subject has no any reliable sources to even pass the notability, I do not see and find any one there. If you are so strict and fair to the policies, you must nominate the article for deletion because it falls under the criteria for proposed deletion.Justice007 (talk) 19:10, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
Well, on a quick search I found the following three, where the first at least must count as WP:RS
There are plenty more using that spelling to sell his books. SamuelTheGhost (talk) 20:59, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
  • You even didn't bother to read the common sense, it is waste of time to search the skin of the hair. I have used my best judgment to correct the wrong translated spelling of the name, as I said you it is very common blunder in India and Pakistan, even in the media. There are many articles that need to be corrected , as I have done, Ahmed to correct Ahmad, for both wrong and correct spelling, there are reliable sources, on this point, we have to use common sense and our best judgment. What you have provided the sources, only one is reliable, and that can be use for the notability of the subject to save from deletion, other two are blogs, that are not reliable sources, I have also searched, but there are not much reliable sources, it is a great pity, that that notable and great humorist has no reliable sources?. As you provided, here are from me too, with correct spelling this and that. Again the main purpose is to the correct and best judgment that I have done.Hope this helps. Justice007 (talk) 22:39, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

Note

I have moved the discussion from my talk page to relevant talk page of the article. Please discuss there. Thanks.Justice007 (talk) 22:51, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Harry Gill, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bisley (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:30, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

Ratan Pandoravi

Brother,this article is not about a living person. The subject died in the year 1998.Soni Ruchi (talk) 09:57, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

WP:VAND

Not vandalism, good faith edits never are. You could lose access to twinke if you use it in such a manner to often, use the rollback AGF option instead. Facts, not fiction (talk) 23:05, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

  • Hi, good patrolling, his edits are not based on good faith, he has the history of spoiling the article, nevertheless, I will care next and act as you said. Thanks for care. Justice007 (talk) 23:21, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Undeleting Nandini Sahu

I have been going through the discussion page (http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Nandini_Sahu) and it amuses me that the administrator Joe Decker assumes there can be only one Nandini Sahu. If someone made a wrong referencing to the TOI article, then it should not be treated as a judgment for deciding the authenticity of the page. The correct referencing to the TOI article is (http://epaper.timesofindia.com/Default/Scripting/ArticleWin.asp?From=Search&Key=TOIH/2011/01/24/32/Ar03201.xml&CollName=TOI_HYDERABAD_ARCHIVE_2009&DOCID=269529&Keyword=(%3Cmany%3E%3Cstem%3Enandini%3Cand%3E%3Cmany%3E%3Cstem%3Esahu)&skin=pastissues2&AppName=2&ViewMode=HTML). A few other online references to the subjest are as under :

1) http://www.worldofmanojdas.in/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=286:on-folk-in-modern-indian-literature&catid=54:interviewcat&Itemid=132

2) http://www.boloji.com/index.cfm?md=Content&sd=Writers&WriterID=941

3) http://www.isahitya.com/index.php/english-sahitya/467-secrecy-of-being-a-poet-a-conversation-with-nandini-sahu

4) http://www.boloji.com/index.cfm?md=Content&sd=PoemArticle&PoemArticleID=97

In continuation to the references to the literary work of the subject, please find the below list which are articles in hard copy (might be non-online) :

• “A Symphony For Shanta”, B.Venkateswara Rao, Hayathanagar. Reviewed By Nandini Sahu, Poetcrit, Maranda, July 1999.(REFEREED JOURNAL) • “Spring Time”, I. P. Deepti, Bangalore, Reviewed By Nandini Sahu, Poetcrit, Maranda, July 1999. (REFEREED JOURNAL) • “ Myth as Revelation: A Study in the Poetry of W.B.Yeats”, The Scoria, Chandigarh, May 2001.(REFEREED JOURNAL) • “Kaleidoscope of the Indian Society-The Voice of Indo-Anglian Women Poets”, The Scoria, Chandigarh, March 2001.(REFEREED JOURNAL) • “Big Things & Small Things in Arundhati Roy’s The God Of Small Things”, Indian Book Chronicle, Jaipur, July, 2001.(REFEREED JOURNAL) • “The Will”, K.B.Rai, Berhampur, Reviewed By Nandini Sahu & Padmini Sahu, Poetcrit, Maranda, July 2000.(REFEREED JOURNAL) • “Feminism: Opposing the Binary Opposition”, Pakistan Journal of American Studies, Vol-19, Spring and Fall 2001, Nos 1 & 2, Islamabad, Pakistan.(REFEREED JOURNAL) • “Rasa, Dhvani & Auchitya in the Indian & Western Poetics”, Modern Literary Criticism, Authors Press, New Delhi 2003.(EDITED BOOK) • “Love Poems: The Historical Alternative---Poems of Sylvia Plath and Kamala Das”, The Atlantic Critical Review, Volume 2, Number 2, New Delhi, India.(REFEREED JOURNAL) • “Rethinking Modernity, Rereading T.S.Eliot”, The Atlantic Critical Review, April-June 2004, Vol 3, No 2, New Delhi, India.(REFEREED JOURNAL) • “The Academics of Teaching-Literary Theory and Practice”, Creative Writing and Criticism, Vol 2, No 1, October 2004.(REFEREED JOURNAL) • “The Wild Urge of a Man on Earth to Touch the Heaven---The Extra-Literary Vision of Mulk Raj Anand”, Asian Quarterly, June- July 2005.(REFEREED JOURNAL) • “The Nostalgic Note in their Flute: A Reading of Arundhati Roy and Jhumpa Lahiri”, Indian Writings in English, Atlantic Publishers & Distributors, New Delhi, 2006.(EDITED BOOK) • “Shakespearean Heroines: The Source of Energy and Vitality”, The Atlantic Critical Review, January –March, New Delhi, 2006.(REFEREED JOURNAL) • “The Chemistry Behind Creativity: A Reading of Sylvia Plath and Ted Huges”, Creative Writing And Criticism, Sikandrabad, (U.P.) April, 2006.(REFEREED JOURNAL) • “Poetry for Life’s Sake: Voice of Judith Wright”, Explorations in Australian Literature, Sarup & Sons, New Delhi ,2006.(EDITED BOOK) • “Mother And Other Poems by –Pashupati Jha” Reviewed by Nandini Sahu, Indian Book Chronicle, Jaipur, July, 2006.(REFEREED JOURNAL) • “The Emerging Innovations in Technology and Pedagogy” Indian Book Chronicle, March 2006, Vivek Trust Publication, Jaipur, 2006.(REFEREED JOURNAL) • “The Concept of Love in Shakespearean Sonnets: A Study”, Creative Writing and Criticism, October, 2006, Sikandarabad, UP.(REFEREED JOURNAL) • “Religious Harmony and Political Cosmos: the Voice of T. S. Eliot; Ripples, Vol-I, Sep.2006 – Feb.2007.(REFEREED JOURNAL) • Folk and Tribal Culture of Orissa: Religiosity, Historicity and Oral Traditions; Tribes of India: Identity, Culture and Lore; Angik Prakashan, Guwahati, 2007.(EDITED BOOK) • The Position of Women in Oriya Literature: www.boloji.com; 16th Oct 2007. • Gurudev Tagore; The Visionary with a Mission; www.bolokids.com; 23rd Oct 2007. • Valmiki : January 5, 2008; www.bolokids.com • Panini: 10th February 2008; www.bolokids.com • Two Dispossessed Habitats: A Study of Jhumpa Lahiri’s Interpreter of Maladies and The Namesake, 17th February 2008; www.boloji.com • Double Colonization for the Marginalized Children A Literary Delineation, 3rd March, 2008; www.boloji.com • The Cultural Designation of Feminism: Theory and Praxis,18th March 2008, www.boloji.com • Santh Kabir, 3rd May 2008; www.bolokids.com • Need and Strategy for Capacity Building through Communicative Skills in Open Distance Learning – Indian Journal of Open Learning (IGNOU), Vol. 17, November 1, Jan 2008.(REFEREED JOURNAL) • Translation as Power; Dialogue,Vol-IV,No-1, 2008, Lucknow, India.(REFEREED JOURNAL) • Two Dispossessed Habitats: A Study of Jhumpa Lahiri’s Interpreter of Maladies and The Namesake. The Atlantic Literary Review, October-December 2008, Vol. 9, No. 4.(REFEREED JOURNAL) • The Cultural Designation of Feminism: Theory and Praxis, New Urges in Post Colonial Literature: Widening Horizons;Atlantic Publishers and Distributors; 2009. • Words and Silences in the Poetry of Niranjan Mohanty ; Poesie India International, Vol 44,2009.(REFEREED JOURNAL) • The Cultural Designation of Feminism: Theory and Praxis, PARNASSUS:An Innovative Journal of Literary Criticism;Vol.I,2009.(REFEREED JOURNAL) • Gerard Manley Hopkins: The Poet and the Priest: A Study of The Windhover, New Perspectives in British Literature, Atlantic Publishers and Distributors (P) Ltd., 2010 (EDITED BOOK) • Double Colonization for the Marginalized Children A Literary Delineation, Surviving Against Odds: the marginalized in a globalizing world, Ed. D.K SinghaRoy,Monohar Publications.2010. (EDITED BOOK) • Nationalism through Patriotic Books; All About Book Publishing, Aug-Sept 2010. (REFEREED JOURNAL) • Winds of Change: The Voice of Judith Wright and Kamala Das, ;The Atlantic Critical Review, April-June 2010, Volume -9, Number-2. (REFEREED JOURNAL) • Nandini Sahu in Conversation with Manoj Das, published in www.worldofmanojdas.in; 04.102011 (http://www.worldofmanojdas.in/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=286:on-folk-in-modern-indian-literature&catid=54:interviewcat&Itemid=132) • Nandini Sahu interviewed by G.S. Jolly, All About Book Publishing, Vol: II, Issue- VI, December 2011-January2012 • The Shadow of a Shadow, short story by Nandini Sahu in www.isahitya.com March, 2012 • Legitimacy and Homogeneity of Cross-Cultural Experiences—a study on ‘Language Death’, Folklore and the alternative Modernities, Vol.I, Authorspress, 2012(EDITED BOOK) • Gopinath Mohanty’s ‘PARAJA’: A Study of the Folk Culture of Orissa, Folklore and the alternative Modernities, Vol.I, Authorspress, 2012(EDITED BOOK) • Documentation within History—A Study on Language Death; Creative 

Writing and Criticism, Volume 9 Number 2 April 2012

• Children’s Literature: Text and Context , The Atlantic Critical Review 11:1 (Jan-March 2012). • http://www.boloji.com/index.cfm?md=Content&sd=PoemArticle&PoemArticleID=97 (Nandini Sahu in Conversation with S.K.Padhy, August 2012) • The Wild Stream, Short Story by Nandini Sahu, Rock Pebbles, June 2012



P O E M S About 200 poems published in books/journals in India (from 1995 to 2010) (in Indian Literature from Sahitya Akademi, The Quest, New Quest, Kavya Bharati,Scoria,Poetcrit, etc.) and in USA ,UK and Pakistan . o Sabata Basanta; Adhunika, Odia bi-annual journal, Spring, 2011 o Odisha Landscape, Transfire, a literary Quarterly for Translation, Oct-Dec 2011 o Haiku by Nandini Sahu, Indian Book Chronicle, Jaipur, December 2011 o Sabda, Katha Katha, Kavita Kavita,Odisha, December 2011 o Smritira Nirvana,Dhvani-Pratidhvani, 25th March 2012 o Bridge-in-Making, Syndic Literary Journal, California, No.6 , April , 2012. o Two poems, Rock Pebbles, January 2012 o Freedom, Indian Book Chronicle,37:4, April 2012 o Chahala Samaya, Nabaneeta, April-June,2012 o http://www.boloji.com/index.cfm?md=Content&sd=Poem&PoemID=12388 (poem In the Andamans, August, 2012)

BOOKS

i) Recollection as Redemption, Authors Press, New Delhi, 2004.

ii) The Other Voice, A Collection of Poems, Authors Press, New Delhi, 2004.

iii) The Silence, A Collection of Poems, Authors Press, New Delhi, 2005.

iv) Post Modernist Delegations in English Language Teaching: The Quixotic Deluge, (Ed: Dr Nandini Sahu)Authors Press, New Delhi, 2005.

v) The Post Colonial Space: Writing the Self and The Nation, (Ed: Dr Nandini Sahu) Atlantic Publishers and Distributors Pvt. Ltd. New Delhi, 2007 vi) Silver Poems on My Lips , A Collection of Poems, Authors Press, New Delhi, 2009. vii) Folklore and the Alternative Modernities(Vol. I), Authorspress, New Delhi, 2012. vii) Folklore and the Alternative Modernities(Vol. II), Authorspress, New Delhi, 2012


I think on the account of the above references, the administrator should undelete the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Poetcritic (talk • contribs) 03:31, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

September 2012

Welcome to Misplaced Pages. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Khurshid Eqbal. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Note that notability has not been established in accordance with WP:GNG or WP:AUTHOR. If you need help, please feel free to ask. Cindy(talk to me) 12:12, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
For your cleanup efforts at Mujeeb Zafar Anwar Hameedi‎, in the face of considerable adversity! Yunshui 雲‍水 12:05, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Mujeeb Zafar Anwar Hameedi

Much better now. Well done, my friend. Drmies (talk) 14:22, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Seconded. Cheers, 76.248.149.47 (talk) 14:55, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

RE: Any problem

First of all, this is a stylistic issue and certainly not worth climbing the Reichstag to make my point. It's interesting that you provide Walt Whitman to make your point; that article (as best I can see from a quick look) provides either: more than one subheading per heading, or an introductory paragraph if there is only one subheading. I have no doubt that there are hundreds (I'm not sure about thousands) of articles with examples of poor style; after all, this is the encyclopedia that has no editorial oversight, that anyone can edit, and that relies on volunteers to watch over articles. It is entirely pointless to have one subheading under a heading; the heading alone is quite sufficient to help the reader navigate; subheadings allow the reader to move quickly past other information to get to the desired information; with only one subheading that is not necessary. But as I said, Misplaced Pages is full of articles with bad style, and I don't intend to argue or edit war over a matter when there are a lot worse problems to deal with. And BTW, as for "I don't know what you are": I have no idea what your point is with that rather bizarre comment, but it is beside the point; on Misplaced Pages we all have equal status; no editor has authority over content and stylistic issues that do not violate policy. Cresix (talk) 13:51, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

"But it seems to me that you have shown your authority and choice reverting me, is it not so?": No it is not so. Read WP:BRD. One does not have to be an admin or an "authority" to follow that tried and true guideline that is used thousands of time every day on Misplaced Pages by regular editors such as you and me. Do you honestly think that you are being singled out here? I don't know how long you've been editing Misplaced Pages, but let me suggest that you read WP:5P if you have not already done so.
"but be fair, access and assess that which style was/is better": Please assume good faith. I made the revert because I thought the style I was reverting to is better. But again, this is not a battle that I find worth fighting. There are many more important things to do, both on Misplaced Pages and in the real world. Cresix (talk) 15:30, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

Indentation

Hello. Just a quick note to suggest you be a little more careful with how you indent your talk page comments - I misread this level-one bullet point as being a level-one indentation and a reply to my comment, when I think you probably meant it as a level-three indentation and a reply to another editor. It's also normal to use colons rather than bullet points, per WP:TOPPOST. --McGeddon (talk) 11:14, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

Be bold!

Re your comment at Talk:Dennis M. Lynch#Sources ... when acting as ordinary editors, administrators are just like any other editors, with no special privileges. If you see something that doesn't look right, be WP:BOLD and fix it. If it's questioned or reversed, it can always be discussed to gain consensus one way or the other from interested editors on the article talk page. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 17:32, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

Ok, next time I will be bold and thanks.Justice007 (talk) 18:29, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Paul-Henri Campbell, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page German (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

August 2012 wikification awards!

The Working Wikifier's Barnstar
For wikifying the sixth largest amount of articles in the August 2012 drive, Justice007, I am proud to award you with the Working Wikifier's barnstar! Great job!!!
The Bronze Wikification Barnstar
For wikifying 24 articles, I also award you the Bronze Wikification barnstar!!! Congratulations!!!

Wilhelmina Will has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

I apologize for the far-too-long waiting period; I forgot that this responsibility rests on my shoulders nowadays! Like my singing? Ha-la-la-la-la-la-LA-LAAA!!! (talk) 22:21, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

My great pleasure, better late than never. Thanks for all.Justice007 (talk) 22:35, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

A Great Wiki Editor

Justice007 really is a great,noted and hard working editor.We appreciate you and your patience also.Your articles have a loyal research foe wiki readers.cheers--118.103.234.63 (talk) 00:56, 20 September 2012 (UTC)Rafi ul Haq,Tina_sthi,Jses02,118.103.225.170,111.119.186.84,yunshui

And I second this :) Nolelover 17:05, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

Special Achievements

date of birth famous writer and educationalist Mujeeb Zafar Anwar Hameedi

Date Of Birth of famous writer Mujeeb Zafar Anwar Hameedi

I think Justice007 has a rest by this link --118.103.235.143 (talk) 01:50, 24 September 2012 (UTC)Rolf Vessel

Disambiguation link notification for September 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Stephen D. Lovejoy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hollis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:57, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

Javed Malik

Hello there I see you have also been cleaning up the Javed Malik article. I have made some additions in wiki mark up, and requested some sources to support some facts so that I could help with an email I received. I will advise this new contact to read the Misplaced Pages:Starting an article and Misplaced Pages:Writing better articles as they seem to be new to wikipedia. I will also put a request on the WikiProject Biography, WikiProject Pakistan, and WikiProject Journalism talk pages to see if anyone there also wishes to help out as I am not familiar with international biographies and content to know how promotional it is. I feel the majority of sources they provided are new articles and portray a NPOV, but as I say I don't know for sure. Thank you very much for helping SriMesh | talk

Mujeeb Zafar Anwar Hameedi is really Father Of Pakistani Children Literature

Prof.Dr.Mujeeb Zafar Anwar Hameedi is reliable called Father Of Pakistani Children Literature.Prof Hamidi is avery noted and hard working teacher and children writer also.The Misplaced Pages Encyclopedia compiled a great,awasome research thesis on Mujeeb Zafar Anwar Hameedi first time,ascension high most rating w.r.to content,writing and all possible reliable references.It is a great effort of wiki team(Editors).Thanks edi, thanks Wiki! Hi justice007 ! Plz further improve it....plz... cheers :)

References Father Of Children Literature

--111.119.185.173 (talk) 04:18, 4 October 2012 (UTC) Elinor Lyon Jr 47

I am become autoconfirmed user....Aanapk (talk) 09:15, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

A bowl of strawberries for you!

Wishing you a very happy EID_UL_AZHA ..... Aanapk (talk) 15:06, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
Dear Justice007,

I would like to show my appreciation for your multiple edits.

I would like also to ask you to act on my behalf and to accept my edit request published at http://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Eric_Dill#Edit_request_on_2_November_2012

I would appreciate you understanding.

Best wishes,

Daniel Dwdimov (talk) 15:02, 5 November 2012 (UTC)


Join us at FB

Hello Pakistanis Wikipedians! Assalam-o-Alaikum, I hope you are enjoying editing Misplaced Pages and helping around. I want to join every Pakistani Wikipedian on facebook so I hope you would like to join us in our community. We would/could help each other and make Pakistani articles more better.

Join us:

And then sign my guestbook for memories.

Regards: -- Captain Misplaced Pages! 13:11, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ayub Sabir, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Punjab University (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

Reverting my cleanup of Abhay Kumar

If you are trying to clean up this page, you are not doing a very good job of it by reverting other editors efforts at cleaning up. I would like to know in what way my removal of He travelled to Nepal, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka during his Indian Foreign Service. He has also written a paper proposing a SAARC University at Nalanda. is "illegitimate". All probationers travel to the SAARC countries as part of their training so in what way is this significant? Similarly, the alleged fact that he has written a paper proposing a SAARC university at Nalanda would be notable only if such a university has come up,not otherwise. And, as I wrote in my edit summary, this piece of information has so far only been attributed to the subject and is not independently confirmed. Sesamevoila (talk) 19:42, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

Well my job is not very good, that is only your opinion. Why do you think the passage that you removed is not significant??. The source is reliable and third party, (By Ronisha Bhattacharyya (ANI)), is it not independent, then what is your description in this regard. I hope this helps.Justice007 (talk) 20:20, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
I was only trying to remind you that wiikipedia editing is a collaborative exercise and you cannot go around describing other edits as illegitimate. I have already explained why I think the passage I removed is not significant.You have not responded to the points I raised but are harping on the source. Sources are not an end in themselves and content should be added based on reliability and context. The article quoted is evidently based on an interview with the subject and there is nothing to suggest that the reporter has independently verified the claims made by the subject. Moreover, a startling claim like the one made in the passage should be quoted in more than one mainstream publication, going by Exceptional claims require exceptional sources. While you are at it, you could also take a look at Reliability in the context. I hope this helps. Sesamevoila (talk) 05:38, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
I just went back to the page and I appreciate your efforts at cleaning up but I still feel the above passage is irrelevant, and not sufficiently sourced.Sesamevoila (talk) 07:47, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
I have properly responded your raising points, I cannot understand your descriptions of the issue that you are taking serious unnecessarly. Though mentioned wiki rules by you are supporting the descriptions that I draw. To travel as a diplomate different states is not a big claim nor important issue, there is reliable source by third party, no matter as an interview or something else. It is written and published by Ronisha Bhattacharyya (ANI), and writer is telling the subject has been travelled etc, but not the subject. At the other hand if you do not consider it a third party source, then anyhow it is well primary source, that's why I have placed the BLP tag for additional sources for verification, that act exact meets the wiki policies and guidelines. I am moving that discussion on the talk page of Abhay Kumar, and that should be discussed there, not on my talk page.Justice007 (talk) 08:29, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
User talk:Justice007 Add topic