This is an old revision of this page, as edited by O.Koslowski (talk | contribs) at 20:41, 26 January 2013. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 20:41, 26 January 2013 by O.Koslowski (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)January 2013
Hello, I'm Racerx11. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, RacerX Talk to me 20:20, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages, as you did at Global warming with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. RacerX Talk to me 20:20, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Misplaced Pages, as you did to Global warming with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Eyesnore 20:28, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
This is your last warning; the next time you disrupt Misplaced Pages, as you did at Global warming with this edit, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. O.Koslowski (talk) 20:38, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
There is nothing unethical about naming people who oppose certain views. This is especially true in the scientific field. You have been reverted by three different users now. It's about time you call it a night and think about your modus operandi here. -- O.Koslowski (talk) 20:41, 26 January 2013 (UTC)