This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Cwobeel (talk | contribs) at 05:05, 16 August 2014. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 05:05, 16 August 2014 by Cwobeel (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Hi CFredkin, regarding the career: total net worth - the figures come from totaling up the figures on the rather lengthy 49-page document rather than from a single line buried in the disclosure document. The referenced article includes these figures as well from the same source -- end of the 5th paragraph. Do you agree?
Have a good one.
I would appreciate some support in the Benghazi article for including an image of the Rhodes’ email secured by Judicial Watch by lawsuit under the provisions of FOIA. I enumerated my reasons for including the imaging in “Talk” under “Judicial Watch”. Mark Miller, GabrielleF and now NorthBySouthBaranof have all deleted the image without discussion or with weak rationale, e.g., “image waste space” & “replacing image with previous image”. Aspencork (talk) 01:40, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
References
Lee Zeldin
Please do not add or change content, as you did to Article, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Misplaced Pages:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. BlueboyLI (talk) 03:45, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Misplaced Pages, as you did to Article, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. BlueboyLI (talk) 03:53, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Misplaced Pages, as you did to Lee Zeldin, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. BlueboyLI (talk) 03:59, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did to Tenure, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Misplaced Pages:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. BlueboyLI (talk) 04:17, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Misplaced Pages, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. BlueboyLI (talk) 05:13, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Misplaced Pages, as you did at Lee Zeldin. BlueboyLI (talk) 04:20, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
Lindsey Graham
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Misplaced Pages articles. Doing so violates Misplaced Pages's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Please do not remove information from articles. Misplaced Pages is not censored, and content is not removed on the sole grounds of perceived offensiveness. Please discuss this issue on the article's talk page to reach consensus rather than continuing to remove the disputed material. If the content in question involves images, you also have the option to configure Misplaced Pages to hide the images that you may find offensive. Thank you. Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Misplaced Pages, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Reading your talk archives, you've clearly been doing this for a long time; cut it out. 59.97.33.75 (talk) 06:47, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Iraqi Kurdistan
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Iraqi Kurdistan. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Misplaced Pages:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
Please comment on Misplaced Pages talk:Identifying reliable sources
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Misplaced Pages talk:Identifying reliable sources. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Misplaced Pages:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
Carl DeMaio
CFredkin, I am doing my best to prevent edit warring at this article. (I am neither pro-DeMaio or anti-DeMaio; I am just pro-Misplaced Pages, in particular its principles of Neutrality and Verifiability, and its process of Consensus.) I could see that this article was in danger of edit warring, so at my urging, recent changes, even trivial ones, were discussed at the talk page before implementing them. Please do not go reverting things or inserting your own preferred wording; instead let's talk it out at the talk page and reach a consensus. --MelanieN (talk) 16:39, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
- User:MelanieN, I appreciate your efforts in this regard. However I don't see any discussion of the Prop B cost/savings estimates that were added to the article. Am I missing something?CFredkin (talk) 16:48, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you for coming to the talk page. I see that you went there even before I posted this note, so I apologize for the unnecessary message. We'll work it out. It's my experience that it's usually possible to find wording that everyone can accept even if their viewpoints are different. --MelanieN (talk) 16:59, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:The Zeitgeist Movement
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:The Zeitgeist Movement. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Misplaced Pages:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
July 2014
Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Mitch McConnell. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Misplaced Pages this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Misplaced Pages is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block.
You have twice deleted the characterization of Wilbur Ross. This is a slow-motion edit war. Please discuss on the talk page and get consensus. Robert McClenon (talk) 19:11, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
- I suggest a Request for Comments. Robert McClenon (talk) 19:13, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
Are you aware that you have breached 3RR? It may be a good idea to self-revert. - Cwobeel (talk) 19:19, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Operation Protective Edge
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Operation Protective Edge. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Misplaced Pages:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
Scott Walker
CFredkin, you have reverted my edit without reason. When I restored my edit, you referred me to WP:BRD. However, BRD clearly says: "Consider reverting only when necessary. BRD does not encourage reverting, but recognises that reverts will happen. When reverting, be specific about your reasons in the edit summary and use links if needed." So please explain your specific reasons for the revert. Seen a Mike (talk) 22:48, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
Nathan Deal
Hi CFredkin, you have reverted my addition to the Nathan Deal article a number of times despite my careful citation of a major news organization's article outlining the allegations. Could you clarify why you keep changing this edit? Thanks! RosieTheRiveting (talk) 21:15, 7 August 2014 (UTC)RosieTheRiveting
Please comment on Talk:Article One of the United States Bill of Rights
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Article One of the United States Bill of Rights. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Misplaced Pages:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:2013 IRS controversy
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:2013 IRS controversy. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Misplaced Pages:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:05, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
Please comment on Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Political parties and politicians in Canada
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Political parties and politicians in Canada. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Misplaced Pages:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
John Kline's First Wife
I am serving you notice that you are being reported to Misplaced Pages for edit warring and removing VERIFIED information from PUBLIC sources. Stop. It.Hlodynn (talk) 22:12, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
RFC
An RFC on an article you recently edited is being conducted at Talk:Joni_Ernst#RfC: Can material that is critical to the subject be included in the article? - Cwobeel (talk) 03:28, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
- I think it is quite disruptive to remove an RFC because you believe it is not compliant with guidelines. I started the RFC and announced it to many people already and on the BLP/N. You can always comment and explain how the RFC can be made better. - Cwobeel (talk) 03:58, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring. Thank you. - Cwobeel (talk) 05:05, 16 August 2014 (UTC)