Misplaced Pages

User talk:Duffycharles

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Duffycharles (talk | contribs) at 11:46, 28 September 2014 (September 2014). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 11:46, 28 September 2014 by Duffycharles (talk | contribs) (September 2014)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Welcome!

Hello, Duffycharles, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Unitarian Universalism. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Mmyotis 13:46, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

September 2014

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at India Against Corruption shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. DeCausa (talk) 11:46, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.

Template:Z33 Dougweller (talk) 10:32, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for personal attacks, battleground editing, bloat and disruption on Talk:India Against Corruption. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Bishonen | talk 11:13, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Personal message for Blocking Admin "Bishonen"

I have done my best to communicate with the racist editors at Misplaced Pages who despise Indians. The matter will now of course have to move on to criminal actions under Britain's gift to India - the Indian Penal Code, and its so neat that WMF's female pornographer trustee in India who runs several pornographic websites eg. is your (ie. Bishonen's) conspirator in these criminal actions against the one and only IAC which will surely also affect WMF's 501(c)(3) tax free status since you Bishonen have seriously blundered. Duffycharles (talk) 11:46, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
User talk:Duffycharles Add topic