Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Nyttend (talk | contribs) at 14:16, 17 October 2014 (→User:Javier2005 reported by User:NorthBySouthBaranof (Result: ): No action necessary). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

• WP:AN/3
• WP:AN3
• WP:AN/EW
• WP:ANEW
• WP:AN/3RR

This page is for reporting active edit warriors and recent violations of restrictions like the three-revert rule.

• See this guide for instructions on creating diffs for this report.
• If you see that a user may be about to violate the three-revert rule, consider warning them by placing {{subst:uw-3rr}} on their user talk page.

You must notify any user you have reported.

You may use {{subst:An3-notice}} ~~~~ to do so.

You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Additional notes

• When reporting a user here, your own behavior will also be scrutinized. Be sure you understand WP:REVERT and the definitions below first.
• The format and contents of a 3RR/1RR report are important, use the "Click here to create a new report" button below to have a report template with the necessary fields to work from.
• Possible alternatives to filing here are dispute resolution, or a request for page protection.
• Violations of other restrictions, like WP:1RR violations, may also be brought here. Your report should include two reverts that occurred within a 24-hour period, and a link to where the 1RR restriction was imposed.

Definition of edit warring

Definition of the three-revert rule (3RR)

Sections older than 48 hours are archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Twinkle's ARV can be used on the user's page to more easily report their behavior, including automatic handling of diffs.

User:75.162.179.246 reported by User:fierman (Result: No violation)

Page: Commodore 64 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: 75.162.179.246 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

Comments:

User has been warned for similar actions on other articles only a few days ago too . User does seem to take _any_ edit personally, making editing of the article quite hard for other users. Disruptive. (not only on this specific lemma, but on some others too)

Fierman (talk) 07:19, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

• No violation. There are only three reverts in a 24-hour window (one of the listed reverts is from October 12). Also, some leeway is given for the edit warring by the reporter while not logged in.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:11, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

User:Alexyflemming reported by User:Dr.K. (Result: Blocked)

Page

Northern Cyprus (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported

Alexyflemming (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to

Diffs of the user's reverts

1. 09:08, 15 October 2014 (UTC) "Undid revision 629683251 by Dr.K. The consensus is just opposite: The drastic Wiki users (Alexikoua, MelbourneStar) insist protecting whereas only unknown IPs (31.153.94.183, 85.179.156.55) wants removal."
2. 07:45, 15 October 2014 (UTC) "Undid revision 629651029 by Dr.K. (talk) The Arbitration Committee, in their infinite wisdom, determined that Cyprus does not fall under WP:ARBMAC discretionary sanction. See Talk page. Dr.K. was rejecte"
3. 20:16, 14 October 2014 (UTC) "Article is of NC. USA Federal Court Decision is just in the context of Northern Cyprus. USA FC: "1. Greek Cypriots cannot claim NC's government gave their homes to TCs 2. NC is a democratic republic with a president,prime minister,legislature,judiciary""
4. 17:09, 14 October 2014 (UTC) "United States Federal Court:"Greek Cypriots cannot claim that the government in control of Northern Cyprus gave their homes to Turkish Cypriots... TRNC purportedly operates as a DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC with a president, prime minister, legislature and judicia"

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning

1. 20:20, 13 October 2014 (UTC) "Warning: Edit warring on Template:Northern Cyprus-note. (TW★TW)"
2. 20:41, 14 October 2014 (UTC) "Warning: Violating the three-revert rule on Northern Cyprus. (TW★TW)"
3. 20:47, 14 October 2014 (UTC) "Warning: Violating the three-revert rule on Modern history of Cyprus. (TW★TW)"
4. 07:47, 15 October 2014 (UTC) "Warning: Violating the three-revert rule on Northern Cyprus. (TW★TW)"

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page

Comments:

Edit-warring across multiple Northern Cyprus topics. Harrassment and false allegations on Talk:Northern Cyprus and my talkpage. WP:TENDENTIOUS editing. He has been blocked before for edit-warring. Δρ.Κ.  09:13, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

15.10.2014:07.43: I added Arbitration Committee's decision "The Arbitration Committee, in their infinite wisdom, determined that Cyprus does not fall under WP:ARBMAC discretionary sanction" to Talk page of Northern Cyprus (to let Wiki users edit via keeping this in mind)
15.10.2014:07.48: Dr.K. immediately removed resulting decision of Arbitration Committee from Talk page of Northern Cyprus.
........
15.10.2014:07.47: Dr.Κ. also reverted my edit on Northern Cyprus in the pretext that "edit-war against consensus. (The reality is just the opposite. See below:) ".

But, Dr.Κ. distorted again: He presented as if there is a consensus on removing the relevant material!
14.10.2014; 20.16: (my first edit) after my first edit
14.10.2014:20.30: an unkown IP31 reverted my edit vandalistically on the pretext that "This is about a case a US court did not, actually hear.".

14.10.2014, 21.08: I then presented the USA Federal Court really heared the case and decided the verdict on Talk page. I have supplied USA Federal Court decision from the official website of the Court.

14.10.2014:21.42: Wikipedian Alexikoua reacted the unknown IP31's vandalism. (edit summary of Alexikoua: "rv essential part removal"). Alexikoua is a Hellen, but neutral like me.

15.10.2014:00.37: This time another unknown IP85 appeared and removed the edit without any edit summary. Hence, essentially removed the sourced context that Alexikoua opposes to be removed besides me.

15.10.2014:00.38: Wikipedian MelbourneStar reacted to the unknown IP85's vandalism and protected the edit.

15.10.2014:00.58: This time, Dr.K. appeared and reverted the edit with edit summary (Reverted 1 edit by MelbourneStar: Sorry Star. IP 31.xx was correct. Reverting undue POV-push by SPA. Please see Arbitration Enforcement report.) without waiting my defense in Arbitration Enforcement and the resulting decision of Arbitration Committee]].

15.10.2014:05.23: Arbitration Committee rejected Dr.K.:

15.10.2014:07.45: I replace the edit whose protection is the consensus of the known Wiki users (Alexikoua,MelbourneStar).

15.10.2014:07.47: Dr.K. reverted with edit summary "edit-war against consensus"

Since when spam-bombardments from unknown IPs (31.153.94.183, 85.179.156.55) became the definition of the consensus?! The drastic Wiki users (Alexikoua,MelbourneStar) strongly opposed the removal of the edit.

Dr.Κ., please behave by taking into account the decision of Arbitration Committee (you were rejected by Arbitration Committee! WP:DROPTHESTICK!).Alexyflemming (talk) 09:20, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

Of course, this is a misrepresentation of everything that happened. 31.153.94.183 (talk) 13:00, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

Why is this misinterpretation? This actually happened in the way I described above (click links). Also, How do we know that you (31.153.94.183, 85.179.156.55, Dr.Κ.) are all different? How do we know that there is really not a personification around of the same person (socks case!)?Alexyflemming (talk) 13:18, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

• Note. @Dr.K.: (or anyone else who knows) is the earliest edit in the revert list way above a brand new addition or the restoration of material previously removed?--Bbb23 (talk) 15:21, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

Since it's a quote from an article published only a day earlier, I don't see how it could've been a restoration. 31.153.94.183 (talk) 15:41, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

There's a pattern here: Alexy frequently dumps quotes in Northern Cyprus (and other NC-related pages) from various articles and court rulings that he thinks should prove Northern Cyprus is super legit. If you call him out on his bias, he might tell you that Greeks and Armenians gotta come to terms with reality. (Do note, the topic at hand needn't have anything to do with either. ) Isn't casual racism lovely? 31.153.94.183 (talk) 16:01, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

@Bbb23: Hi Bbb23. The SPA is on a long campaign of dumping anything on Northern Cyprus articles that smacks of approval for the regime. As IP editor 31.153.94.183 mentioned, it is part of the SPA's strategy to dump information on talkpages undeterred by reliable sources and then start the edit-warring. Please see the AE report I filed today under ARBMAC which was rejected on technical grounds due to an earlier decision not to include Cyprus topics to the wider Balkan area. This is a hotbed of sock activity, copyvios and nationalist POV-pushing and this SPA is edit-warring across many articles adding the court decision despite having some of these additions reverted by other editors such as TU-nor and the IP editor 31.xx., due to UNDUE or other issues. Please see diff1, diff2, diff3, diff4, diff5. He then edit-wars on the same articles when reverted by other editors: diff1, diff2, diff3. Now he is taunting me on many fora that the Arbitration committee has rejected me, personally, which is a lie. He is making misrepresentations that I have been rejected by the Arbitration committee on the talkpage of Northern Cyprus and edit-warring with attacking edit-summaries about the AE decision. Now he is intimidating IP editor 31.xx with clueless falsehoods about Arbcom on his edit-summary: Misplaced Pages Arbitration Committee: "In our infinite wisdom, we determine that Cyprus does not fall under WP:ARBMAC discretionary sanction.", which is clueless copying of Heimstern's comments at AE. He also accuses me of "disobeying the decisions of Arbcom". Clearly this is WP:BATTLE at its worst in a hotbed area as well as trolling. Conclusion: The SPA is edit-warring this information across multiple articles and will not stop while harassing and taunting the opposing editors. Thank you for your consideration. Δρ.Κ.  16:40, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

• Blocked – for a period of one week.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:00, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

User:fierman reported by User:75.162.179.246 (Result: Blocked)

The others are:

Special:Contributions/2001:982:EDC:1:CC06:8585:5674:E4D4

Special:Contributions/2001:982:EDC:1:A18A:5D03:2098:CEB7

Special:Contributions/2001:982:EDC:1:B055:C3A7:87B0:D119

Special:Contributions/2001:982:EDC:1:5070:1432:A5DC:DD4C

Page: Commodore 64 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: fierman (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), a.k.a. sock 2001:982:EDC:1:CC06:8585:5674:E4D4 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.

Comments:

User has resorted to the use of sock-puppetry in an attempt to avoid the appearance of edit-warring, but I can prove beyond a shadow of doubt that this IP address is one and the same with the person behind "fierman" (as seen on my talk page's) history.

First, shortly after I made an adjustment on Commodore 64, this fierman character came by and undid it, but then changed cloaks and walked over to my talk page to post this false accusation of my supposedly being a "sock-puppet," though, in fact, he has/is the puppet!

1. And then, after I ask him what the hell was up with that, he responds with a personal attack ("aggro," etc.) instead of just a simple explanation: 2.

Up until this point, they might've still looked like 2 people, but the bridge is when, after I made some edits at Commodore 64, he comes back and puts a false "edit-warring 'warning'" on my page using his cell-phone IP address, only to then be thinking "Oops, crap! I meant to log in as "fierman" but screwed up and used my sock puppet instead!" We can see the "OOPSIE!" changes made from 3-4 here:

3. 4. ("OOPS!") 5. (And then I remembered to look at their contribution pages until now. Here's the most telling one:) https://en.wikipedia.org/Special:Contributions/2001:982:EDC:1:CC06:8585:5674:E4D4 BINGO!

Uhuh! So user:2001:982:EDC:1:CC06:8585:5674:E4D4 is clearly (and the 4 other IPs I mentioned are likely) the puppet(s) of user:fierman! Not only that, but fierman/2001:... is accusing me of being and doing everything that *he*'s actually the one doing, which is projection (trying to deflect negative attention away from oneself by attributing the problems he/she has to another person).

Fierman/2001:... must be a very angry person. He falsely accuses me of taking every edit personally, when in fact I don't, but it's really clear that he gets--well, I would say "butt-hurt," but then that might be considered a personal attack back, so I won't say that--quite vengeful when it comes to someone who's adjusting editions that he seems to feel are very near and dear to his heart, such as things that he does not want done in Commodore 64 now just because I made a few tweaks, even though the things he's erasing had been there for months even before I came to tweak them! (Well, he does have a firey personality, and I'm guessing that's how he came up with his user name, as supposedly it was meant to look like "fireman" but is incorrectly spelled for that.)

Notice that from User talk:Materialscientist, fierman/2001:... also personally attacked me using the term "culprit," as if I were some kind of "criminal." HA!

So in summary, please understand that this is a report of: 1. edit-warring, 2. sock-puppetry, and 3. personal attacks. But I will file 2 and 3 as themselves in other areas here at the ANI.

Thanks for any help you have to offer! 75.162.179.246 (talk) 10:46, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

• Blocked – for a period of 48 hours. I agree with @75 about Fierman's reverts while not logged in.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:13, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

User:188.230.161.116 reported by User:KazekageTR (Result: Semi-protected)

Page: Volga Tatars (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: 188.230.161.116 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

Comments:

he is also using User:188.230.159.96, User:109.127.230.131 and User:109.127.224.193. kazekagetr 14:29, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

• Page protected (semi) for one week. Next time, please notify the reported user as you're required to do.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:39, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

User:Bobi987 Ivanov reported by User:Laveol (Result:blocked 1 week)

Page: Yane Sandanski (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported: Bobi987 Ivanov (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on the user's own talk page:

Comments:
I've laid out my concerns over the editor's behaviour at the incidents noticeboard. Since that report, he has been engaged in a fierce edit war on a number of articles (the most blatant example is Yane Sandanski, but there are others, such as Todor Panitsa, Boris Sarafov). Initially, I tried to contact him via the talkpage, since he was guaranteed to see it there. Later, I found out he was actually an experienced editor who was well aware of his actions. I also get the impression he is bringing his personal feud with another editor from mk.wiki to en.wiki.--Laveol 11:04, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

I just add some more useful info., and provide the sources. That's all. I never delete anything, unlike others. Bobi987 Ivanov (talk) 11:46, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

You've been adding info directly from blogs, misinterpreted and misquoted a number of sources, and you've cluttered articles with unnecessary (mis)quotes. However, this is not the topic of discussion here. The question is why you continued to revert and revert, and doing it without a proper justification. You were warned that you needed to calm down. --Laveol 11:50, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

Even if one has got impeccable sources, this is no reason to edit-war. Here's a summary of five reverts on Boris Sarafov:

5. .

At this rate (5 reverts/ 7 hours) you would break even a 15RR, if there were one. Also, you ignored my comments on the talk page. This is not the way to go. Tropcho (talk) 17:53, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

• Blocked – for a period of 48 hours
   — Berean Hunter (talk) 18:15, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

Thanks, Berean! Just so you guys know, it seems that this IP Special:Contributions/79.126.250.162 is picking up Bobi987's cause. Tropcho (talk) 23:37, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

I've increased his block time to 1 week for evasion and semi-protected a couple of articles. His IP address is hardblocked one week as well.
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 23:48, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

Many thanks! Tropcho (talk) 23:59, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

User:‎24.77.232.213 reported by User:Richard Yin (Result: blocked, 31 hours)

Page: Listen (David Guetta album) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: 24.77.232.213 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: (note that unrelated changes have been made since without being reverted)

Diffs of the user's reverts (these are unsorted, sorry):

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: Warned by C.Fred

Attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: The entire content and page history of Talk:Listen (David Guetta album), plus requests to participate on the user's talk page: .

Comments:
Looking at this page I see at least one report whose outcome was affected by the reporter continuing to edit war while logged out. There are multiple IP editors involved in the edit war I am reporting; this report only covers the one I have tried and failed to communicate with. To be clear, I have not edited while logged out since I registered this account. --Richard Yin (talk) 18:21, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

• Blocked – for a period of 31 hours. I had seen the IP's conduct independently of this thread. When s/he refused to respond to the requests of myself and other editors to discuss the edits on the talk page or even explain then in an edit summary, I ran out of options and blocked the IP to prevent further disruption of the article. —C.Fred (talk) 18:40, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

User:Javier2005 reported by User:NorthBySouthBaranof (Result: Stale)

Page

Anita Sarkeesian (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported

Javier2005 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to

Diffs of the user's reverts

1. 13:51, 17 October 2014 (UTC) "I won't give up to the truth"
2. 13:44, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
3. 13:29, 17 October 2014 (UTC) "relevant source"
4. 13:23, 17 October 2014 (UTC) "why it is not relevant? it is a relevant source"
5. 13:19, 17 October 2014 (UTC) "Utah State University statement IS RELEVANT on the section "Terrorist threat at Utah State University""
6. 13:05, 17 October 2014 (UTC) "Undid revision 629978024 by TheRedPenOfDoom (talk) relevant sourced information"
7. 12:58, 17 October 2014 (UTC) "Undid revision 629974197 by TheRedPenOfDoom (talk) relevant sourced information"

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning

1. 13:08, 17 October 2014 (UTC) "Warning: Violating the three-revert rule on Bayonetta 2. (TW)"

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page

Comments:

Warned for edit-warring on a different article, clearly should understand the rule + has flagrantly violated it. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 13:32, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

It takes two to tango (or three in this case). User:TheRedPenOfDoom and NorthBySouthBaranof were edit warring the exact same edit to remove the wrong version rather than discussing the validity of the reference as a reliable source at the talk page, as they should have done instead. They have stopped below the 3RR hard limit, but that's not an excuse for continuing an edit war. They should be engaging the new editor instead of WP:BITEing him. I'd say a WP:BOOMERANG is in place for failing to follow proper behavior policies. Diego (talk) 13:39, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

If one is being reverted by multiple users, that's a good clue that they should stop. The user made no effort to discuss the issue on the talk page and blanked all attempts at discussing the issue on his user talk page. The idea that this is a WP:BOOMERANG issue is patently absurd. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 13:42, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

If it's obvious that one editor is new to Misplaced Pages, that's a good clue to follow Don't bite newcomers and stop edit warring yourself. I've seen you making three reverts to the same edit, NeilN making two, and TheRedPenOfDoom making another three (, , ) and insulted the newcomer by implying that he had an intent to disrupt. Old-timers should know better than that, and a 24h block for edit warring would be a good reminder. Diego (talk) 14:03, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

...no. That's laughable and you know it. It's not "gaming the system" for three different people to revert an editor who is singularly edit-warring. That is literally not even a thing. The entire point of 3RR is to remind a user that if they're getting reverted multiple times by multiple editors, that they're probably edit-warring. The reported user here was reverted multiple times by multiple editors. I'll be sure to waste your time in return and make unfounded demands that you be blocked. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 14:05, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

"Old timers" should also know not to pass themselves off as neutral observers when they're clearly not. Diego was cautioned for edit warring on a related article. --NeilN 14:12, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

Has not participated in the talk page discussion here. --NeilN 13:36, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

User is now at 7 reverts and shows no sign of being interested in complying with policy; all attempts at discussion on their user talk page have been blanked. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 13:49, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

Also possibly related: User:187.210.189.223, which is repeatedly and without explanation section-blanking material on a related article that this editor had previously removed. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 13:51, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

It's worth noting that @Javier2005: has stopped edit warring after someone actually cared to explain policy instead of tagging him and trying to win. Diego (talk) 14:07, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

It's worth noting that you're playing the victim card for someone who auto-blanked anything on his talk page. You should be blocked for 24 hours as a good reminder not to support edit warriors. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 14:10, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

No action is necessary here. We give leeway to new editors, since they can't be expected to know about our policies, but experienced people should know better. Since Javier now understands and has stopped, it would definitely be wrong to block him. It's tempting to block NorthBySouthBaranof, who clearly knows better and (judging by the comment of 14:10) indeed cares more about winning, but blocks shouldn't be punitive. Nyttend (talk) 14:16, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

User:Rob898989 reported by User:Dougweller (Result: )

Page

Albinism (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported

Rob898989 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to

Diffs of the user's reverts

1. 13:18, 17 October 2014 (UTC) "Undid revision 629950277 by Dougweller (talk) Actually there's no evidence about this guy's hypothesis. There's tons of evidence they have blonde and blue or green eyes though"
2. 23:01, 16 October 2014 (UTC) "/* Genetics */"
3. 22:46, 16 October 2014 (UTC) "Undid revision 629911759 by Noq (talk) Bias reference stating some white guy's hypothesis. Facts only. No biased studies allowed"
4. 21:48, 16 October 2014 (UTC) "/* Genetics */"

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning

1. 06:13, 17 October 2014 (UTC) "Warning: Violating the three-revert rule on Albinism. (TW)"

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page

Comments:

See also where he added White people under "Delusion may also refer to:" and the same link to the dab page Trash. Probably a sock of User:Cancer322. Dougweller (talk) 13:34, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

Note talk page discussion and another revert. --NeilN 13:55, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

Everything written on the Albinism page is true. Everything they wrote is complete bullshit. Why do you think you should be able to lie on that page? Because "white people" are scared to admit that they're albino? It's the first search result for albinism, so it should be an accurate description of the disorder. It's not my fault that you have Albinism.

Rob898989 (talk) 14:12, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

User:AntiTheJakAremania reported by User:Walter Görlitz (Result: )

Page

Persib Bandung (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported

AntiTheJakAremania (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to

Diffs of the user's reverts

1. 14:01, 17 October 2014 (UTC) "Undid revision 629981499 by Walter Görlitz (talk)"
2. 07:53, 17 October 2014 (UTC) "Undid revision 629937131 by Walter Görlitz (talk)"
3. 22:17, 16 October 2014 (UTC) "Undid revision 629901345 by MbahGondrong (talk)"

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning

1. 13:40, 17 October 2014 (UTC) "Warning: Edit warring on Persib Bandung. (TW)"
2. 13:41, 17 October 2014 (UTC) "General note: Refactoring others' talk page comments. (TW)"

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page

1. 03:44, 17 October 2014 (UTC) "/* RfC: Should it be shorter? */ Reply"

Comments:

This is an edit war that goes back two days and a total of five reverts. Walter Görlitz (talk) 14:04, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

• Misplaced Pages noticeboards
• Misplaced Pages edit warring