This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 69.73.201.85 (talk) at 03:26, 21 October 2014 (→James Harrison (blood donor) fact check: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 03:26, 21 October 2014 by 69.73.201.85 (talk) (→James Harrison (blood donor) fact check: new section)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) | This page is currently inactive and is retained for historical reference. Either the page is no longer relevant or consensus on its purpose has become unclear. To revive discussion, seek broader input via a forum such as the village pump. |
 Manual Archives |
This page was formerly used as a way to make it easier to open requests for comment. It was depreciated on 1 September 2014 as a result of this discussion. Previous requests are documented in the archives.
James Harrison (blood donor) fact check
If James Harrison produced strong Anti-Rh (Anti-D) antibodies, he would genotypically be Rh (-) or D(-). RhoGAM is only given to Rh(-) mothers as prophylaxis. If mother and father are both Rh (-), it is genotypically impossible for the baby to be Rh (+), and his daughter's life would never have been "saved" by his "contributions". Unless it's not his child.
Category: