Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by BracketBot (talk | contribs) at 07:10, 25 October 2014 (Bot: Notice of potential markup breaking). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Please see my latest edit to Buddhism

Likely to be controversial.VictoriaGrayson 03:19, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Removed within half an hour... I've re-inserted your line, at another place in the lead. Best regards, Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 06:36, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Admin involvement request

Please see the Talk:India page. Since you are the last person to make a change there, am writing to you. Are you an admin? I request involvement of other wiki editors and admin to resolve points mentioned here. Can you help please? How do I go about it? Does this require going to dispute resolution? Please guide.--Mayasutra (talk) 00:22, 25 October 2014 (UTC)Mayasutra

I've answered at the talkpage. Keep calm, don't forget to breathe ;) Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 05:04, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

Clarification

Hello, please clarify this. Is it disallowed to mention verbatim what both OED and EB mention within ref tags as in this. Thanks. --Mayasutra (talk) 04:49, 25 October 2014 (UTC)Mayasutra

I think it's nonsense, and I'm looking forward to the policy which says so. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 05:01, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

Joshua, Looking at this diff, I know that it apppears that additional citations to EB and OED are being added. But that is not the case: what is happening is that existing citations to those same refeernces (using the {{sfn}} tag used throughout the article) are being duplicated (using the inconsistent and incomplete {{cite}} template). Placinng this on your page, because the discussion on Talk:India is such a lengthy mess, and because the misunderstanding seems to be raising tempers between you and I, which is unwarranted (and, personally disheartening to me) given our long history of cooperative editing. Cheers. Abecedare (talk) 06:01, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

October 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ego death may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• {{reflist|group=web|refs=

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:10, 25 October 2014 (UTC)