Misplaced Pages

User talk:wikiLeon

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by ATS (talk | contribs) at 22:02, 6 February 2015 (→Why full protection?: gracias). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 22:02, 6 February 2015 by ATS (talk | contribs) (→Why full protection?: gracias)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)


Misplaced Pages ad for Misplaced Pages:Signatures
Misplaced Pages adsfile info – show another – #18
Message! Home   Talk   Wikipedians   Userboxes   Ribbons   Awards   Guide   Tasks


SEMI-RETIRED This user is no longer very active on Misplaced Pages.

User talk:WikiLeon/header

Talkback Elizium23

Hello, WikiLeon. You have new messages at Elizium23's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

The Center Line: Fourth Quarter 2014

Volume 7, Issue 4 • Fourth Quarter 2014 • About the Newsletter
Departments
Features
State and national updates
Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS
—MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Imzadi1979 (talk · contribs) 10:38, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

A beer for you!

Thanks for stepping in for the rest of us. A toast unto you! DrWho42 (talk) 08:45, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Justin.tv screenshot.png

⚠
⚠
 Thanks for uploading File:Justin.tv screenshot.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:35, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Template

Information icon Hello, I'm 49.150.87.188. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Template:Iglesia ni Cristo because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! --49.150.87.188 (talk) 10:27, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

HasteurBot CSDs

Hi there, couple points:

  1. The hasteurBot talk page is fully protected to prevent users (like yourself) from accidentally sending messages that will not be read by an automated process. Please undo your additions to the page.
  2. CSD:G13 says any page that has not been edited in the past 6 months prior to the nomination so as to indicate that nominating a page does not instantly make the page ineligible.
  3. The bot takes the even more safe position of only nominating pages that have gone unedited for 6 months + 30 more days to give editors more time to try and save their work by logging a single registered edit.
  4. Misplaced Pages talk:Articles for creation/Dual-Purpose Cowpea was eligible for G13 as of the nomination as the previous edit prior to the G13 nomination was July 3rd 2014 which makes it at least 6 months and 30 days stale.
  5. Misplaced Pages talk:Articles for creation/Fiona Finlay was eligible for G13 as of the nomination as the previous edit prior to the G13 nomination was July 6, 2014 which makes it 6 months and 30 days stale.

If you hare having difficulty with understanding the policy and practice of CSD:G13 either ask questions or stay away from evaluating CSD:G13 nominations. If this behavior of turning down perfectly valid G13 nominations continues I will ask other admins who have evaluated these nominations in the past (such as DGG and Sphilbrick) to help enlighten you on the policy. Hasteur (talk) 11:44, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Duly noted. I must have misread the timestamps from DGG's reviews on both AfCs. My apologies. --w 12:33, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
Happens, no big deal.--S Philbrick(Talk) 13:24, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Why full protection?

Not sure why you felt this was necessary. The article hadn't been edited for nearly 6 hours when you locked it. While there was some back and forth, discussion was being attempted and there really was no disruption there. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 15:26, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

If I may add my voice, I too am concerned about this action and wonder, with respect, whether an adequate investigation of the article's history was performed. There have been false death dates added by some half-dozen editors; hardly an onslaught. There has been (mostly minor) back and forth with respect to (mostly minor) grammatical issues, of which I have been a part; none of this rose to the level of edit-warring, IMHO. In short, Winkelvi is correct, and I request that protection be lifted. —ATinySliver/ 20:12, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

My thanks. —ATinySliver/ 22:02, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

User talk:wikiLeon Add topic