User talk:Rationalobserver - Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by EChastain (talk | contribs) at 21:00, 27 February 2015 (→a head's up: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 21:00, 27 February 2015 by EChastain (talk | contribs) (→a head's up: new section)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Archives

Archive 1	Archive 2	Archive 3
Archive 4	Archive 5

This page has archives. Sections older than 15 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present.

Hello, Rationalobserver, and welcome to Misplaced Pages!

Thank you for your contributions to this 💕. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 23:18, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Misplaced Pages The five pillars of Misplaced Pages How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Misplaced Pages
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory Help directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Misplaced Pages etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 23:18, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 February 2015

News and notes: Questions raised over WMF partnership with research firm

Op-ed: Text from Misplaced Pages good enough for Oxford University Press to claim as own

In the media: WikiGnomes and Bigfoot

Featured content: The Moon, Mars, Venus, and Saturn, in no particular order. Also, Kaiser Kong.

Gallery: Far from home

Traffic report: Fifty Shades of... self-denial?

Recent research: Gender bias, SOPA blackout, and a student assignment that backfired

WikiProject report: Be prepared... Scouts in the spotlight

Blog: Join the Wikimedia strategy consultation

Considering your unblock

As I'm getting lit up to some degree for accepting your unblock request... I wanted to formally warn you that if any (and I mean any) type of disruptive behavior comes from you again, you will be blocked by me personally for 6 months. I'll be keeping an eye on you, so I hope you truly hold to your promise to edit in accordance with our policies. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 20:55, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

I accept that, Coffee. No problem; you don't have to worry about me. Rationalobserver (talk) 20:57, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

a head's up

Are you aware that Charles Dickens, where you are now editing, is an article where John is a principal editor. Maybe that's not a good idea considering this? Also, Victoriaearle is among the top seven editors, and you've already had a dustup at Talk:Saint Francis Receiving the Stigmata (van Eyck)on Source integrity issues. Perhaps it would be a good idea to find an article to work on that's completely unrelated to these editors and others you've commented on. Just a suggestion. EChastain (talk) 21:00, 27 February 2015 (UTC)