This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Valjean (talk | contribs) at 02:01, 7 April 2015 (AGF). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 02:01, 7 April 2015 by Valjean (talk | contribs) (AGF)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Talk:Evidence AidAmyEBHC (talk) 21:48, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Neutrality tag.
The article seems to have a promotional tone and much of the language used is of a promotional nature. Huddsblue (talk) 22:12, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
The author
Also appears to have very close ties to this company. I have reason to believe that this could be a promotional article. Huddsblue (talk) 22:19, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Unfounded accusation
I have no COI, membership or financial interest in this Evidence Aid org. It is an organization made up of volunteers for disaster relief. I work with none of their people on any common project. The only tie is writing a blog about them. If you would like to point out specific language you feel is of a promotional nature I will correct this. It is all backed up and referenced by accomplished and respected authors in the field of medicine and disaster relief from reputable academic journals. I had it in my sandbox and was advised by Wiki Project Medicine that though not perfect it was ready to be launch as an active page. If you have reasons state them clearly please, otherwise it is just an accusation without evidence. I have reason to believe is not sufficient AmyEBHC (talk) 22:39, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
- Huddsblue, any editor can remove such a tag, especially if it's a bad faith addition. You're supposed to AGF. Making such a charge without evidence is a serious personal attack. Do you have any evidence? If not, please remove the tag, apologize to Amy, and we won't need to visit AN/I. -- BullRangifer (talk) 02:00, 7 April 2015 (UTC)