Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Zad68 (talk | contribs) at 16:05, 28 May 2015 (Changed protection level of User talk:EvergreenFir: harassment from non-confirmed users; sent protection end date ( (expires 04:05, 29 May 2015 (UTC)) (expires 04:05, 29 May 201...). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

EvergreenFir is taking a semi-wikibreak and will fully return to Misplaced Pages later.

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 21, 22, 23, 24

This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present.

Independent Information

This page is unambiguously promotional.However, every time I try and make a page that isn't promotional you delete me while I'm making the page. I'm trying to create a page about my company as a lot of my interns coming from england find it hard to understand the russian website. The page is factual not promotional. Promotional implies bias which it isn't. If you feel I written biased info tell where it is and I'll delete it. I keep having my page deleted by different "monitors" and so I'm to explain myself ever time. Could please help/ Advise me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! yours Independent informtion

Titles of Refs

Re: Talk page FAQs

What the Heck

My information was true considering the fact that a news report confirmed it, so they had no business deleting it, because either way it was true,they probably didn't even try searching it up! Here's the report: http://www.newsnet5.com/entertainment/celebrity/nicki-minaj-gets-animated-for-steven-universe_09416171

If they were following the rules then they could have easily done some research to see if it was true or not. I did.So I hope they got a notification too. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emarldquatz (talk • contribs)

The talk page didn't have any one talking about confirmation on dates that's why I didn't bother! and I did give a source that apparently wasn't "reliable" but yet a News website confirmed it, making what I wrote true. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emarldquatz (talk • contribs)

Thank you

Thank you! that's all I wanted! fans have been waiting for this information for 3 months. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emarldquatz (talk • contribs)

Notice of Neutral point of view noticeboard discussion

Hello, EvergreenFir. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CSDarrow (talk • contribs)

November 2014

Flyer22222

I would just like to let you know that even though i had vandalized a different page, the adjustment to the Anthony jeselnik page was completely valid because he very often in his comedies talks about how awesome he is — Preceding unsigned comment added by Flyer22222 (talk • contribs)

Reverting changes to Statistical correlations of criminal behaviour

Hi EvergreenFir, I just wanted to drop you a note to explain why I'm reverting your recent change to Statistical correlations of criminal behaviour. If you view the page then do a find in your browser for "</ref>", you will see that this text appears at the end of the "Biological" section when it should never be visible to users. My previous edit removed it and your reversion reinstated it. If you take a look at the code for the 2nd & final paragraph of "Biological", you'll see there's one empty reference (after "among criminals") and one with contents (starting "J. Tiihonen" and ending "doi:10.1038/mp.2014.130."). The "</ref>" tag at the end of the paragraph which I removed previously has no matching opening "<ref>" tag and so is invalid, which is why I removed it and am now removing it again.

Re: Endurance International Group

I notice you once again took out the valid data on EIG brands that another editor restored, with no reason given other than pointing to the debate on the talk page. Just debate, no decisions. Time permitting, I plan to add the same section back in, so, I'd suggest doing what I requested last month and asking for a mediation on this matter. You and others feel it does not belong here, I and others feel it does - that's a stalemate. I'm not pleased that valid data is being removed from our project, so, let's have an impartial mediator take a look at this and make suggestions. You have no issue with this do you? 72.234.220.38 (talk) 08:24, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

An IP hopping editor threatening to continue edit warring... joy. Go read WP:CONSENSUS. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 17:46, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

Can I point you to the Misplaced Pages entry on IP addresses and the difference between static and dynamic? Oh, I do get your attempt at a put-down by claiming I'm "IP hopping", but you have nothing to back it up, and my months of edit history from this IP address prove this out. Your type of attitude towards other Misplaced Pages editors and the work they put in is truly horrible. Your lack of transparency and explanations in documenting your reverts is shockingly poor and your waving of WP:CONSENSUS when it is obvious this is an ongoing dispute between those of us who feel this data is fully permissible under Misplaced Pages standards and those, such as yourself, who feel not. There are opinions on both sides of this and if you had any level of non-bullying integrity, you would do the proper thing and call for a mediation on the subject. Let others prove you to be correct, incorrect or to help set out a path to get the reverted information back in. No need to apologize for your attempt at an insult, nor for your heavy-handed methods on this article - but maybe just do the right thing and find a solution to this, try the WP:Mediation process, you may learn something and improve your own work. You should also contemplate about how your attitude and actions have a good chance of disenfranchising other editors and lead to a worse, not better, online encyclopedia. Misplaced Pages does need "policing", but not the type you seem to feel is needed. 72.234.220.38 (talk) 10:06, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Mariolyrics4evr

Due to repeated inane comments and what amounts to harassment, Mariolyrics4evr is not welcome on my talk page for one week. Do not edit here again. Doing so amounts to vandalism. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 18:53, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Just so you know, I've reported this user at WP:ANI for repeatedly vandalising this talkpage. Joseph2302 (talk) 19:28, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Was already reported here and is blocked now. - DVdm (talk) 19:36, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

@DVdm and Joseph2302: Thank you both for those reverts. Much appreciated. The AN3 report I filed was taking way too long and glad they got blocked by Writ Keeper. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 19:50, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Hello

IMDB is listed on those pages. And they do exist. Just let me keep them and I find a source. --ACase0000 (talk) 17:16, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

I have added sources to both articles. --ACase0000 (talk) 17:48, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Episode descriptions

Regarding my edits to List of Steven Universe episodes, previous episodes had descriptions but weren't removed without violation of copyright. So what's the difference between then and now? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.121.53.75 (talk) 03:15, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

If you identify an episode description that is a copyright violation, please remove it or reword it. They absolutely must not be allowed to remain. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 03:24, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

Hey

Just my advice, stick to editing. Whenever someone makes a bold move there are sometimes going to be forces that go against you. Remember that if you really didn't know what you were talking about chances are the admin would pay no mind to it and it would be dismissed. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 14:00, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for the advice. I've been trying to focus on editing more, but I'm not afraid of Corbett or his fan club. It was a clear violation. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 17:24, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

There is definitely more to it going on, the last time he was blocked my talk-page was also slammed with similar IP posts in support of EC. Anyways I am going back to editing, hopefully everyone else can too rather than ranting and raving. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 19:16, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

• Hey, if this is the kind of thing you think improves our project, please don't bother me again with requests. You got one of our best editors blocked for a week on some bullshit: congratulations. Please don't ping me again, unless it is to show me you asked for an unblock. And no, you are not being oppressed. Drmies (talk) 08:07, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

@Drmies: what an entirely inappropriate post for an admin. Corbett for himself blocked. I just asked for enforcement. How sad that you feel it necessary to comment here and bait me with something like this. If you are unable to fulfill your duties as am admin, which includes enforcing topic bans from arb com regardless of how much you like or dislike the individual editor, step down. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 11:47, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

• It improves the project as it is disruptive, turns out the GGTF was both on his watchlist and includes his edit summary (which nobody wants to address on why he made it). I want to say had it not been Evergreen and another editor editors over at EC's page would be trying to dig up reasons why the editor is only here to bring down Misplaced Pages, it happened last time with Coffee. There are many good editors here Drmies so rather than bite Evergreen's head off here why don't you look at why the topic ban was put into effect in the first place? - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 11:47, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

• I am among those who have asked you to step away before, KK, but still you persist. Where is the evidence that it was on his watchlist? Have you seen what I said there? (Sorry to butt in, EvergreenFir, but feel free to tell on KK's absurdities across numerous dramas as well as Corbett's. If you do not, I probably will because enough is enough.) - Sitush (talk) 12:00, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

• I linked to the discussion with more than one admin involved mentioning it. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 12:05, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

• Not what I asked. I asked where is the evidence? There is none in that thread and I have supplied a perfectly valid alternate rationale. I'm going to start compiling something for ANI because it really is ridiculous that you conduct these running commentaries all over the place, often with only a scant amount of the knowledge that your username proclaims. No more from me here: thanks for bearing with me, EF. - Sitush (talk) 12:08, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

• I didn't ask for your comment, anyways EF as I said just ignore it and continue editing, you might even want to just delete all of this nonsense. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 13:10, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

• Inappropriate my ass. Crying to mommy is inappropriate. Getting editors blocked for a single comment is inappropriate. I've helped you in the past: next time find a better admin to help you out, an admin who does meet your high standards--one who doesn't care if editors stab each other in the back. Or maybe you should run for admin yourself, and put down in your request that you want to make goddamn sure that folks abide by The Law. And mention that you believe that every admin should always enforce every single fucking rule, no matter how boneheaded; that we shouldn't talk, that we shouldn't allow for things, that we should just bring the hammer down every single time we can--and if an admin doesn't want to, they should step down. Tell you what, why don't you propose that we make every single block indefinite, with appeal to be made only to ArbCom--perhaps that's a nice Brave New World you can live in.

  Now, since you are such an enforcer of civility and blah blah blah, try to act better than me and fulfill one simple, friendly request: don't fucking ping me unless...wait, I asked this already. Drmies (talk) 12:31, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

User Talk page protected

I've temporarily semi-protected this User Talk page. Zad68 19:07, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

@Zad68: Thank you. I was going to request the protection if the disruption continued, but I appreciate you doing it anyway. Cheers. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 19:38, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages GF

	Resiliency award
	For someone who has the tenacity to go on dealing with all the different levels/textures, yet still manages to come up smelling of roses. The hard work you put into keepin' 'em honest does not go unnoticed. You know that you continue to earn my respect and esteem. Bugs (big hugs)! Iryna Harpy (talk) 04:46, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

Jamie Dornan's image

There has been a conflict over the use of the infobox image in the Jamie Dornan page, I'm hoping that a vote to choose a preferred image would settle the dispute. I am therefore writing to those editors who have ever edited Jamie Dornan page to voice their opinion in the Jamie Dornan Talk page so we can reach a consensus. I would welcome your opinion. Hzh (talk) 13:24, 28 May 2015 (UTC)