User talk:J. Johnson - Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Skyring (talk | contribs) at 00:25, 31 July 2015 (→Can't see the point: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 00:25, 31 July 2015 by Skyring (talk | contribs) (→Can't see the point: new section)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Misplaced Pages is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review
Miscellaneous
User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

A handy collection of useful links.

Canonical IPCC citations.

The canonical forms for citing the IPCC documents are at:

SAR.
TAR.
AR4.
AR5.

Ask if you have questions or need assistance.

Can't see the point

I won't waste any more space at Talk:Mosdate. I see you as having the type of personality that is reasonably common on Misplaced Pages. Unable to see irony, unable to see the other side of an argument, unable to see that the advice they hand out applies ever more directly to themselves, and most visibly, unable to admit error.

There's no point discussing things with you–apart from entertainment–if you resort to ever-more-tortuous games to avoid admitting that you can be wrong. It's hilarious to see you tell me that I hold a certain view when I know for a fact what is in my own mind, and it is quite different from your claim. You live in a fantasy, and worse, you believe it, especially when challenged.

This is not to say that you cannot be correct and insightful sometimes, and I trust that we can see eye to eye on some things. Cheers. --Pete (talk) 00:25, 31 July 2015 (UTC)