User talk:Nabla/Archive 5 - Misplaced Pages

< User talk:Nabla

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Rezameyqani (talk | contribs) at 09:28, 2 November 2015 (→Laura Rozen Page: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 09:28, 2 November 2015 by Rezameyqani (talk | contribs) (→Laura Rozen Page: new section)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Please keep conversations connected.
I'll likely use the rather nice notifications.
Still, keep a watchlistin'-eye in here, just to be sure.

CAN'T RETIRE Nabla tried to leave Misplaced Pages, but found that he couldn't do so…

Nabla is busy and is going to be on Misplaced Pages in off-and-on doses, and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Kadia (community)

Olá, I just found that you deleted page Kadia (community) - as - A10: Recently created article that duplicates an existing topic: Kadia Kumbhar - I think there was an error of judgement - as the page was not recently created bu several years old - and it was sourced and served as just like as disambiguation page for several communities.

I shall be highly obliged if you can userfy page as I have lost some of the sources. Thanks. Jethwarp (talk) 15:12, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Hi, Jethwarp. The version I deleted was a one liner with no info that was not already at Kadia Kumbhar. I did miss the fact that it was not a recent page, and that it had more content a couple years ago. It cites a single source, and the couple of previous versions I looked at (now) have that one and only source too. Anyway, I presume there is nothing wrong in userfying it, maybe you can make use of some of it. I note that I know nothing about India's groups/clans/castes/communities (except that there seems to be lots of them :-) So a page with this name may be useful, possibly as disambiguation as you say. Page userfyed to User:Jethwarp/Kadia (community). - Nabla (talk) 22:38, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Thanks, I also would like to build it as disambiguation page and recreate it - but after some research - I hope it will be okay. :-). Jethwarp (talk) 01:38, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

A thank-you note

Thank you Nabla for saving my page from speedy deletion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jetfighterace212 (talk • contribs) 21:26, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

@Jetfighterace212: Thank you. Try adding references as soon as you create articles to minimize the chances of quick deletion requests. Including on that one - Nabla (talk) 21:41, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Misplaced Pages talk:Disambiguation

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Misplaced Pages talk:Disambiguation. Legobot (talk) 00:06, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

Hutchison effect page missing

Hi. There seems to have been a page called John Hutchison that was deleted and you said - move to Hutchison effect (currently a redirect to "John Hutchison"), and copyedit accordingly. The effect is mildly notable, the man not really. - Nabla (talk) 22:00, 21 August 2011 (UTC) - But i cant seem to find the other page, the hutchison effect page..all the info is lost, nothing was edited, but completely deleted. 82.26.253.190 (talk)

Hi, 82.26.253.190. I do not recall something from back in 2011... but as far as the records show, both pages, the Hutchison effect and John Hutchison were deleted after a deletion discussion about the John Hutchison article, in August 2011. I have not deleted any of them, on the contrary, I suggested to keep the article on the effect. Currently you may find a article about other people named John Hutchison, and nothing (except a note about the deletion) on the effect. Just follow the links above. What exactly do you want? To improve the article about the Hutchison effect? - Nabla (talk) 11:00, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
- Hi. I know you deidnt delete it. i quoted you move to Hutchison effect (currently a redirect to "John Hutchison"), and copyedit accordingly. The effect is mildly notable, the man not really. . I'm wondering if there is any copy of it remaining about the guy or the effect. Or once its deleted its gone forever? Cause the effect might have had some interesting info on his equipment and materials/samples etc. Is there any way to get it back for editing ? 82.26.253.190 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 10:15, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
  - (Sorry for the delay) No, the content is not lost forever(*), the deleted version is kept on the database and may be undeleted. I think the best place to get that done is asking at Misplaced Pages:Requests for undeletion. Tell me about it, if you do, I might help. - Nabla (talk) 12:09, 30 August 2015 (UTC) (*) It may be deleted from the database, there is no guarantees about that, but I have never noticed any such case.

En1206

	List of Miss World countries
	Hi! I'm user En1206 can you put back the[REDACTED] of List of Miss World countries. Please! And I have a quesion, Why did you delete the List of Miss World countries page in wikipedia? Hope you read this mesage and Please, don't forget to put back the page in[REDACTED] of List of Miss World countries. Nice Greetings! -User:En1206 En1206 (talk) 13:05, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

@En1206: If you click on the redlink - List of Miss World countries - the page shows you a log of the deletions. It was deleted on the 18th after a deletion discussion - Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/List of Miss World countries. Then it was deleted, by me, on wp:CSD request, on the 23rd, because there is nothing there that is not on the main article. Actually it barely had any content - it had a plain text alphabetical list of countries, only from Afghanistan to Brazil. You are free to recreate an article under that title. Please create it with coherent content that addresses the questions raised on the deletion discussion, otherwise it will most likely be quickly deleted again. - Nabla (talk) 12:30, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of 1950 Atlético Mineiro European tour for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 1950 Atlético Mineiro European tour is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/1950 Atlético Mineiro European tour until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – Pee Jay 11:52, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

@PeeJay2K3:. Thank you - Nabla (talk) 20:36, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Legal aspects of ritual slaughter

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Legal aspects of ritual slaughter. Legobot (talk) 00:05, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Take a break...

You logged a TfD into the holding cell with the wrong discussion date, and redirected the template to be deleted to another template where the parameters didn't match up (so the subst just bollixed up). Time for a break and some more caffeine? Bazj (talk) 16:47, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

Bazj, help is always appreciated, thank you for that. Snarky remarks are not appreciated, please, we all do mistakes, don't we? Also, if the subject is a mistake, the subject is the mistake, not "Take a break" - Nabla (talk) 22:32, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

It wasn't intended to be snarky. I'm sorry if it came across that way. Bazj (talk) 08:35, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

...the more I read it the more I see scope for misinterpreting what I meant. Really sorry. Bazj (talk) 08:59, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

Thank you, Bazj. No problem. I was probably a bit harsh too. Too many people play 'shoot-down-the-admin', one gets a little defensive over time; plus I *did* made a few silly mistakes lately (see below... :-) so I was more sensitive than average, but I think I may need *more* practice, not less. Again, tks and sorry - Nabla (talk) 21:45, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

RfD

Template:R from incorrect capitalisation and Template:R from incorrect capitalization still have RfD in them, although the RfD was closed as keep. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 00:29, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

Thank you, GeoffreyT2000. If I recall it well, it took me a while to read it out and decide and when I did I was pressed on time to move on - out of WP - and forgot to clean up, sorry. I hope it is OK now. - Nabla (talk) 21:48, 11 October 2015 (UTC)