This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Human3015 (talk | contribs) at 22:01, 15 November 2015 (→Hi: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 22:01, 15 November 2015 by Human3015 (talk | contribs) (→Hi: new section)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
 Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Statement at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Genetically modified organisms
Hi Semitransgenic. You recently added a statement at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Genetically modified organisms. The case has been opened and new statements are no longer allowed. Evidence is welcome at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Genetically modified organisms/Evidence until 12 October 2015. Thanks, L235 (t / c / ping in reply) 20:39, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
Re: Removal of sourced content from Electronic dance music
Since there isn't an article on EDM festivals as a concept in general, I think the removal of that information was simply arbitrary because you didn't like the EDM page to be used as an "anti-drug platform". These issues emphasize a major contrast between these commercially-sanctioned events and the unsanctioned rave culture of the past. ViperSnake151 Talk 20:25, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
Reverting edits
Please refrain from reverting my edits. The AFDs are justified, and if you are positive of the articles' notability, then you have nothing to worry about. I, on the other hand, have deemed those articles as dubious in the own right, and symptomatic of a much larger music genre issue at Misplaced Pages and think it is something the community should discuss.--Coin945 (talk) 13:56, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
I have since withdrawn all of my AFDs. Thanks.--Coin945 (talk) 14:47, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi
Your recent editing history at Shah Rukh Khan shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --Human3015 22:01, 15 November 2015 (UTC)