Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Rationalobserver (talk | contribs) at 19:55, 17 November 2015 (→One way interaction ban: not my point). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Now that Sarah is trying to get me topic banned from GAN and FAC () (and throwing around yet another empty socking allegation), I've decided that the best solution here is for me to retire. The clique that wants me gone won't ever stop, and nobody will ever have the courage to stop them. Anthonyhcole keeps saying that I linked a private picture to Godot's account, but I didn't. Godot submitted it for all to see. Godot's also lying about his financial connection to currency, so the An/I thread is a total fabrication, and my assumptions were correct. I'm deeply sad for Misplaced Pages, but this isn't my fight. Good luck! RO 17:07, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

One way interaction ban

If you refer, anywhere, directly or indirectly, to Godot13, you will be blocked indefinitely, with talk page access removed. Retire if you want to retire, stay if you want to stay (if the ANI thread allows you to), but you're finished talking about Godot13. --Floquenbeam (talk) 19:42, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

The very basis of the An/I is that I made baseless claims and assumptions, and now you are making it impossible for me to address that accusation. RO 19:44, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

If you want to think about it that way, that's OK with me. --Floquenbeam (talk) 19:44, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

He lied about me though, and you are making it impossible for me to address his accusations. RO 19:45, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

• 28bytes, Floq just made it impossible for me to defend myself against the ongoing An/I. RO 19:46, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
• RO: it's worth remembering that the Wikicup is pretty much just an on-wiki contest for imaginary points; the purpose of the Wikicup to begin with is just to result in Misplaced Pages having better content, there's no actual award. It's not something worth stressing over, and even if you disagree with the contest's rules, well, it's still a contest for imaginary points ;). It also doesn't stop you from participating in the AN/I thread as a whole. Kevin Gorman (talk) 19:53, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

This isn't really about the Wikicup, which I don't care about. There were lies used to form the basis of that An/I, and now they cannot be addressed. I was not wrong and my assumptions were not unfounded or baseless, so the very title of that report is a lie. Doesn't that matter? RO 19:55, 17 November 2015 (UTC)