This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Shawn à Montréal (talk | contribs) at 21:40, 14 December 2015 (→14 December 2015: comment). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 21:40, 14 December 2015 by Shawn à Montréal (talk | contribs) (→14 December 2015: comment)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Lrednuas Senoroc
Lrednuas Senoroc (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: suspected
For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Lrednuas Senoroc/Archive.
14 December 2015
– This SPI case is open.
- Suspected sockpuppets
- Hassan Rebell (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
- Editor interaction utility
Blocked editor has outed himself. He states at Misplaced Pages:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive907#IP-jumping_editor_with_an_anti-Kurdish_bias that "I wrote articles on Banaz Mahmod..." He makes the very same claim for himself here in attempting to reverse the block on Hassan Rebell, citing this IP edit. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:14, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
- He's aware of the other user and yet referring to himself as "that user" at User_talk:Hassan_Rebell#Sockpuppet_investigation. And he's now accusing the blocking admin of having an anti-Turkish bias. It's all good. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:30, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
- Okay, he's as much as admitted on his talk page this is was a previous account. The problem, for me, was that he had never used {{unblock-un|user=your new username here|reason=your reason here}} as instructed. The accounts were not used simultaneously. However, because he was blocked for disruptive editing and because he's now edited under at least two usernames and a range of IPs, I wonder if these two accounts should not at least be tagged as duplicates? Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:40, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Categories: