This is an old revision of this page, as edited by MediationBot (talk | contribs) at 20:41, 19 February 2016 (Case rejected, adjusting category. Errors? User:MediationBot/shutoff/MedComClerk). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 20:41, 19 February 2016 by MediationBot (talk | contribs) (Case rejected, adjusting category. Errors? User:MediationBot/shutoff/MedComClerk)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Indo-Pakistani War of 1971
The filing party (the editor who opened this request) will add the basic details for this dispute below.- Editors involved in this dispute
- Xtremedood (talk · contribs) – filing party
- Capitals00 (talk · contribs)
- Articles affected by this dispute
- Other attempts at resolving this dispute that you have attempted
- Talk:Indo-Pakistani_War_of_1971#RFC.2C_Should_.22Decisive_victory_of_Provisional_Banlgladesh_Government.22_be_written_in_result.3F
- Talk:Indo-Pakistani_War_of_1971#Revisions_by_Human3015
Issues to be mediated
What is this dispute about? What sections, sentences, or issues in the article(s) can you not agree on? If you are the editor who opened this request, list these issues to be mediated under "Primary issues". If you did not open this request, you can add additional issues to be mediated under "Additional issues". The issues to be mediated would be properly agreed upon later, if this request for mediation is accepted.- Primary issues (added by the filing party)
- Should Bangladesh be included in the results section of the article as a victor?
- Additional issues (added by other parties)
- Additional issue 1
- Additional issue 2
Parties' agreement to mediation
If you are a named party, please sign below and indicate whether you agree or refuse to participate in mediation. Remember that all editors are obliged to resolve disputes about content through discussion, mediation, or other similar means. If you do not wish to participate in mediation, you must arrange another form of dispute resolution. Comments and questions should be made underneath the numbered list below, to avoid confusion.- Agree. Xtremedood (talk) 02:21, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
Decision of the Mediation Committee
This section should only be edited by a mediator. The Mediation Committee's representative will indicate in due course whether the request is accepted (meaning a mediator will be assigned) or rejected (meaning you will have to try a different type of dispute resolution). If the mediator asks you a question in this section, you may edit here.- Reject. No acceptance by responding party within 7 days, fails prerequisite to mediation #5, "A majority of the parties to the dispute consent to mediation". For the Mediation Committee, TransporterMan (TALK) 20:33, 19 February 2016 (UTC) (Chairperson)