Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Light2021 (talk | contribs) at 16:45, 3 October 2016 (→TheCommunity.com). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

TheCommunity.com

TheCommunity.com (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional in nature. References are given to coverage not related to the article. Nothing significant or notable so far about the website to be here. Article goes on writing about coverage. Not notable. Light21 07:27, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. North America 09:44, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. North America 09:45, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. North America 09:45, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

• delete nothing about the site itself or why it's noteworthy - David Gerard (talk) 17:06, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
• Keep: Influential organization that organizes Nobel laureates and other public figures into notable petition drives. Safehaven86 (talk) 22:30, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
  • This says nothing about the organisation, however. If cut to RSes the article would be about a sentence - David Gerard (talk) 22:52, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Once in a lifetime coverage, nothing Encyclopedic genuine. Only thing written about website in NYTimes is " he joint letter was organized by two of the laureates, Archbishop Desmond Tutu of South Africa and former President José Ramos-Horta of East Timor, and is part of a broader online petition campaign at TheCommunity.com, whose chairman is Mr. Ramos-Horta. An advance copy was provided to The New York Times." Something is associated with something does not make it significant itself. Light2021 (talk) 07:02, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

• Weak delete Not seeing any WP:CORPDEPTH; having Nobel prize winners on an advisory board is laudable but not enough to satisfy WP:GNG. OhNoitsJamie 14:31, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

I am understanding your concern here, Every comment or AfD selection I made either its a "week delete" or "week keep" (in majority)? How helping is it? this logic will make Misplaced Pages, PR channel, or either newspaper. Which it is definitely not. I am analyzing your vote mechanism, as mentioned earlier. Its biased in nature even being an administrators. You want to contribute Misplaced Pages or simply want to prove me wrong or just trying to dispute my selections? I do not know. Apologies if I said something wrong here. Thanks for your analysis anyway. Light2021 (talk) 16:44, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

• AfD debates (Web or Internet)
• AfD debates
• Relisted AfD debates