This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Hijiri88 (talk | contribs) at 01:20, 14 October 2016 (→Suspected sockpuppets: Adding diff. They had only made one edit outside their own userspace and four edits in total so it seemed unnecessary to provide the diff.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 01:20, 14 October 2016 by Hijiri88 (talk | contribs) (→Suspected sockpuppets: Adding diff. They had only made one edit outside their own userspace and four edits in total so it seemed unnecessary to provide the diff.)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)36hourblock
36hourblock (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
This case was moved to Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/36hourblock from Chie one (talk · contribs). Future cases should be placed there.
14 October 2016
– A user has requested CheckUser. An SPI clerk will shortly look at the case and endorse or decline the request.
Suspected sockpuppets
- Imboredsenseless (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
- Editor interaction utility
The Imboredsenseless (talk · contribs) account was apparently created for the sole purpose of posting on my talk page about an editor I conflicted with a few weeks back. This looked super-suspicious, so I checked to see if anyone else had tried to connect User:Rjensen to a Conservapedia editor before. (I googled site:en.wikipedia.org "Rjensen" "Conservapedia"; for whatever reason I can't copy-paste Google search results on my iPad.) This came up first. The username of the new account is also a pretty clear indicator of sockpuppetry, and the main account, 36hourblock (talk · contribs), very recently emerged from a two-year absence, which gels with the new account's stating that they "use Misplaced Pages every now and then". Even if this wasn't 36hourblock, it is obviously someone, and if it is 36hourblock it seems likely that they've done this before, so requesting CU. Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 00:55, 14 October 2016 (UTC) Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 00:55, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
- By the way: I'm not advocating an indefinite block of the sockmaster, assuming this kind of sockpuppetry on their part is rare. Looking at past interactions between Rjensen and 36hourblock shows a lot of incivility on both sides, and the clean/almost-clean block logs on both sides imply the admin corps has not stepped in to deal with the problem (apparently no such intervention has ever been requested). This means that removing one side from the project for briefly stepping over the line (again, assuming CU doesn't find a massive sock farm!) would serve to vindicate the poor behaviour of the other side. As I pointed out on my talk page, the question of whether either of these accounts has attempted to "out" Rjensen by connecting them to Conservapedia is iffy at best, since Rjensen himself made that connection first (in the second hit on my above-cited search). Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 01:18, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Categories: