This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 68.46.28.103 (talk) at 00:47, 26 December 2016 (→Regarding the Kay Parker page). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 00:47, 26 December 2016 by 68.46.28.103 (talk) (→Regarding the Kay Parker page)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Regarding the Kay Parker page
thank you for at least attempting consistency, but you're not paying attention. I removed all uncited statements, and THOSE CHANGES WERE REVERTED. So okay, then, I put in the most obvious thing about Kay Parker, that she was in Taboo, and THAT was reverted. All I want (now) is consistency. I again deleted the uncited stuff--I assume you will support me in making sure that info does not return.
(if you have any interest in making WP better instead of this stupid crap that makes it a laughing stock, the only thing Kay Parker is known for is Taboo. Removing a reference to Taboo would be like removing any reference to Star Wars from Carrie Fisher's page because it's not cited.
If you don't see show stupid being dogmatic about this stuff is, you are contributing to the problem, not the solution.
By the way, I certainly don't have a problem with wikipedia! That was an outrageous thing to say. I have a problem with wikifascists who are literally destroying the value of WP.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.46.28.103 (talk) 2016-12-25T10:21:49
Thank you for writing back about Kay Parker, because now I can point out to you PRECISELY how you are being a bad WP citizen. I gave TWO CITATIONS demonstrating that she was in the movie Taboo. You didn't like how I WORDED the statement that she was in the movie. SO YOU DELETED THE INFORMATION THAT IS TRUE AND USEFUL FOR SOMEONE LOOKING UP HER INFO. YOU DELETED INFORMATION THAT WOULD HAVE MADE HER PAGE USEFUL.
And you are not doing this because you want Parker's page to be correct--you don't give a shit about her page being useful or correct. You have engaged in an asinine argument with me, which is precisely what you are not supposed to be doing. Rather than correcting the WORDING of my change, YOU DELETED RELEVANT INFORMATION. You are an example of what is destroying WP.
You accuse me of not "assuming good faith"?! No, sweetie, I ASSUMED good faith, which you have since proven wrong over and over and over. CONTRIBUTE TO IMPROVING WP OR GET THE EFF OFF AND LEAVE IT TO OTHERS.