This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Lectonar (talk | contribs) at 13:45, 8 August 2017 (Reverted edits by 2605:6000:D486:800:E404:3F7:E8BB:A1CE (talk) to last version by ClueBot III). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 13:45, 8 August 2017 by Lectonar (talk | contribs) (Reverted edits by 2605:6000:D486:800:E404:3F7:E8BB:A1CE (talk) to last version by ClueBot III)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Global city article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
This article was nominated for deletion on October 16, 2006. The result of the discussion was keep. |
Archives | |||||||
Index
|
|||||||
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Gallery of images
I have removed the gallery section in this edit. It seems to have been recently added. Does anybody think it is required here? --Lemongirl942 (talk) 08:11, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
Haute qualite pe, I see that you are adding images. It would be helpful if you discuss here. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 08:33, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Global city. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131020223227/http://www.atkearney.com/documents/10192/dfedfc4c-8a62-4162-90e5-2a3f14f0da3a to http://www.atkearney.com/documents/10192/dfedfc4c-8a62-4162-90e5-2a3f14f0da3a
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140709133545/http://www.economistinsights.com/sites/default/files/downloads/Hot%20Spots.pdf to http://www.economistinsights.com/sites/default/files/downloads/Hot%20Spots.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:33, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
To Those Inquiring About Ranking
On the GaWC website, ranking terminology is clearly defined as well as the criteria a city must meet to reach a certain level. New York City and London represent global centers of trade, economy, culture, and language, and are categorized as such. The information on this page is directly from the GaWC website, any grievances should be addressed accordingly.
As for the other listings, please note the order in which Alpha, Beta, and Gamma cities appear does NOT reflect a list ranking. All cities in a certain list category list should be treated as equals. For example, although Bangalore is at the beginning of the Beta City list and Beirut is at the end, that does NOT classify Bangalore higher than Beirut. Both cities are ranked equally.
Please also note: the order in which cities are categorized (+/-) and listed in the categories are as they appear on the GaWC official ranking page
Many also need to realize that since the West is generally the center of global trade and economic growth, more Western cities will appear on the list and ranked accordingly. Simply because a city has major cultural significance to a local population or country, does not mean it is a major player in the global system. Cities such as Rome, Cologne, and Islamabad all represent portals in which the local populace interacts with the world.
SortaScience (talk) 16:51, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
Probably one of the most stupid articles on Misplaced Pages
Why are we using a ranking system that is not commonly used? Forget arguing whether it is arbitrary or not (you can apply criteria objectively, but who decides what is in the criteria?) - it is trivial and pompous as it is pointless.
Every time I go to a Misplaced Pages article about a city I roll my eyes whenever the introduction makes reference to this dim-witted ranking system, in between far more vital facts about its population, history etc.
Kransky (talk) 11:44, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
San Jose
The list of Beta cities includes San Jose, which is a link to a disambiguation page. Is this intended to refer to the city in California? That the other most likely possibility, the city in Costa Rica, is already on the Gamma list suggests that it probably is, but the source was unclear. Egsan Bacon (talk) 20:42, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
- The 2012 list is currently used and the source shows "San Jose (Ca)" below an unspecified "San Jose" which can only be Costa Rica. I have fixed the article. PrimeHunter (talk) 22:00, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
- All unassessed articles
- C-Class Globalization articles
- High-importance Globalization articles
- C-Class International relations articles
- Mid-importance International relations articles
- WikiProject International relations articles
- C-Class Urban studies and planning articles
- Mid-importance Urban studies and planning articles
- C-Class WikiProject Cities articles
- All WikiProject Cities pages
- C-Class Economics articles
- Mid-importance Economics articles
- WikiProject Economics articles
- C-Class sociology articles
- Unknown-importance sociology articles