This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Mirv (talk | contribs) at 06:26, 4 December 2004. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 06:26, 4 December 2004 by Mirv (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)The schism in question here is said, as is commonly done, to begin in 1054. Would it not be appropriate to say more of the antagonists at that time, as well as something more of the historical context? Also, should it not be mentioned that other important parts of the Eastern Church, such as that of Antioch, never did explicitly participate in the excommunications of 1054? Michael Gilligan 68.79.140.104 06:17, 4 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Yes. Be bold.