This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Werdnabot (talk | contribs) at 15:13, 15 October 2006 (Automated archival of 1 sections from User talk:Nscheffey). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 15:13, 15 October 2006 by Werdnabot (talk | contribs) (Automated archival of 1 sections from User talk:Nscheffey)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
|
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
October 2006
Make it work
Just to let you know, the lack of effort you used in keeping your new page was not truly the way to go about creating a relationship with a page of such intrest. I see how you want the page to remain usable but i suggest putting more time into making it a strong article. Make it work. It wants to work.sjh.24.176.69.100 20:30, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
Three Kings (film) GA Nomination
Just a heads-up. I put the nomination on hold and left some notes on its talk page of things to add to it. Cbrown1023 00:40, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks, you are completely right about the glaring ommission of a Reception section. I knew this, and had listed it on the talk page under ToDo. Working on it now. By the way, if you dont mind, do you have any other suggestions? Is this getting anywhere near FA? I've never really been through the process. Thanks again, —Nate Scheffey 00:55, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
- As for nearing FA-quality, I would probably have to say no. For a show of what types of information FA-class articles about films should have, you should look at the articles in Category:FA-Class film articles. One other thing you could possibly do to expand the article: Add some more images (this may not be a necessity and may be hard to do). The only other thing to do would be to look at FA film articles (as stated above) to get ideas for other sections that you may want to include (becuase FA articles are not just the bare bones, they are in-depth and include many different topics related to the film). If you have any further questions, you can contact me on my talk page. Cbrown1023 00:25, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
arbitration
Hi, since you were involved with this case at the Administrators'_noticeboard, I would very much appreciate your input at my case at Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_arbitration#Harrassment.2C_talk_page_vandalism.2C_and_non-consensus_changes_to_guideline. Thanks! Fresheneesz 04:59, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
Category: