Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Ihardlythinkso (talk | contribs) at 17:40, 30 January 2018 (→January 2018). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

This user has joined the Eric Corbett initiative to boycott editing articles on Mondays until things change. (You can join too!)

But Monday morning, Monday morning couldn't guarantee That Monday evening, You would still be here with me "Monday, Monday", The Mamas & the Papas, 1966

• "I'll also emplore my fellow editors not to engage in behavior that can be viewed as taunting or otherwise encouraging the continuation of this editor's behavior along these lines. Toddst1 (talk) 19:08, 25 January 2012 (UTC)"
• "I think it's best if you leave them alone, as difficult as that may be. That's what I've done, pretty much--I just stay out of their way. Drmies (talk) 19:01, 11 March 2014 (UTC)"

  Thank you, Toddst1 and Drmies. (One of the most considerate things admins have ever done for me!) Sincere, Ihardlythinkso (talk) 20:38, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

Userboxes vn-13 This user talk page has been vandalized 13 times. This user tries to do the right thing. If he makes a mistake, please let him know. This user does not understand mean people. Please be nice. This user supports the presidency of Donald Trump. INTJ This user has an INTJ Myers–Briggs Type Indicator This user has nibbled The Donut of DOOM FREE PENYULAP

Restore comment

"Any dirtball can file at ANI against any editor for any reason. Any dirtball can file at Arbcom against any editor for any reason. Any dirtball admin (and it's not like they don't exist) can block any reg editor (interesting they don't block other admins, or have I missed that?) for any superficial or plain made-up reason. So all the inuendos, if they are present in even the slightest degree, "if this comes to ANI/Arbcom/block again, boy-oh-boy Joe, you better see to it that it doesn't happen, 'cause that'll be the last straw, we have limited patience to see this go by our eyes anymore, don't say you haven't been warned", is really ... (I'll quit now, do I really have to describe what's wrong?). --IHTS (talk) 18:23, 4 November 2017 (UTC)" --IHTS (talk) 05:05, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewing

Hello, Ihardlythinkso. I've seen you editing recently and you seem knowledgeable about Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. Would you please consider becoming a New Page Reviewer? Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Misplaced Pages policies and guidelines; currently Misplaced Pages needs experienced users at this task. (After gaining the flag, patrolling is not mandatory. One can do it at their convenience). But kindly read the tutorial before making your decision. Thanks. — Insertcleverphrasehere 09:05, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

Nice work on McDonnell Gambit

Cheers, --joe decker 00:48, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

Thx! ;) --IHTS (talk) 00:57, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

Happy New Year!

I remember you wished me a happy (if belated) new year way back in 2013; popping back in five years later to wish you the same, and my talk page is always open should you want to collaborate on any more chess variant articles. ^_^ Double sharp (talk) 14:59, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

Thx, & ditto. ;) --IHTS (talk) 15:11, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

coincidences

I think I'm thinking the same thing you're thinking. 222.153.250.135 (talk) 09:50, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

An add'l theory crossed my mind: that we've been reasoning w/ an Alexa AI. --IHTS (talk) 11:13, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

Our instincts bore out. ;) --IHTS (talk) 20:09, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

thanks for helping to defend the integrity of First-move advantage in chess

Now we know why LithiumFlash wasn't interested in involving others in WP:RFC. Quale (talk) 21:36, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

You guys did the heavy lifting. Don't think we've seen the end of Mr. Mathematical Madness. --IHTS (talk) 23:47, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

Blocked for topic-ban violation

If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Please copy my appeal to the ] or ]. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. ~~~~}}. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page. MastCell  06:01, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" ). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."

• Link to WP:AE thread and administrative consensus: . MastCell  06:01, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

Haven't you figured it out yet, IHTS? The line is currently drawn at "Post-1932", due to the same virulent anti-Trump madness that has the mainstream media putting out 90% negative material. If you were to actually improve the encyclopedia by adding unbiased and objective content to, say, the Herbert Hoover article... a block for disruption would be justified. I see that articles "closely related to American politics" also apply. No slippery slope here! I can't tell you how little I miss this place! I check in once in awhile, and things seem to just get worse. Unless you toe the line. Resistance is futile, IHTS! Just let the babies have their bottles, thinking they are being "encyclopedic" in nature. It's a joke. Cheers! (Doc9871) 69.122.234.2 (talk) 08:55, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

Just look at this POS "article". Not worthy of any encyclopedia of any merit. 69.122.234.2 (talk) 10:15, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for that. (My heart rests a little more peacefully now. Fuck!) --IHTS (talk) 10:24, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

p.s. Yeah, re that POS article, I tried to point out "Mexican" isn't race in these posts and was blocked for it. (If editors consulted a college, or looked things up, they'd learn "Mexican" & "Latino" & "Hispanic" are not only not race, they aren't even ethnicity! (What is this place?! An "encyclopedia"!? How embarrassing. And kill anyone advocating education over misconception. Amazing!) --IHTS (talk) 10:53, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

The "narrative" is simple. Trump is a "white supremacist". Hates all "non-whites". It's just absurd. 69.122.234.2 (talk) 11:21, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

I've asked people in real life: "What if one of your parents is black, and the other is white? What then?" Confused silence. Why is "the race card" pulled? For votes? For Democrats? Jus' sayin'... 69.122.234.2 (talk) 11:28, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

The race card is signal the Dems are out of stuff. Absurd yes, laughable too, because hatred & desperation drives them irrational. (Like a demon crying for exorcism. "This was a 'white-lash'!" Can't wait for Maxine Waters's response-speech to State of the Union! ) p.s. It's more than 90% neg. ABC, NBC, CBS, PBS, CNN, MSNBC are all non-stop anti-Trump propaganda. But it's really not funny after Rachel Maddow pumped up a Bernie supporter who tried to assassinate Republican ballplayers and messed up Scalise badly. Still, Maddow & others continue in same vein w/o hesitation. (Immorality capable only from the Left.) HC hasn't accepted her loss yet, that'd be funny too, if it wasn't just plain sicko. --IHTS (talk) 11:48, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

How about the resident White House physician, appointed in 2013, treated with utter incredulity that Trump is not just simply a blithering idiot teetering on the very edge of insanity. "So, what you're saying, right now, is that he's not completely unfit?!" No. Ouch!!! Doc talk 12:05, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

Yeah. The WH press conferences w/ Huckabee show the press for what they are. (See how instead of using it as a window to ask Qs & get answers what the administration is doing, they attempt to grandstand, argue, & debate Sarah! Half the Qs asked are so dumb it's unbelievable they were asked. A quarter of the Qs asked were asked previously and have answer already known by the asker. It's so childish they might as well say right-out: "I already know the answer to this stupid Q, but I'm asking anyway to give you an opportunity to step in a cowpie I'm laying in front of you. And if you do slip-up then I'll be famous since it'll be on frontpage tomorrow morning." It's an abuse of the press conferences. Photo-ops for evening news the same day.) And don't you just love the brainless meme, that if Trump gives criticism to the MSM they so vastly deserve, it's because he "doesn't believe in a free press "!? And how they credit themselves w/ "defending democracy"!? (God! Puke!) --IHTS (talk) 12:38, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

SHS is such a badass!!! Love her!!! Snowflakes don't even dare really to watch her. They are way too wimpy, really. Idiots like Cher tell her not to dress like a "sister-wife". ...Cher. Who the fuck wants her in office?! Doc talk 12:44, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

Funny! But it's pathetic because she gets "real" questions less than 5% of the time. The rest are laden w/ Trump-indicting language she has to peel off as more cowpie offered her, before responding. Actors like Streep, Hanks, De Niro ... who do they think they are, "People's representatives"?! They drip w/ sheltered self-entitled attitude, I wouldn't even call it "opinion". Gawd they wanted Oprah as their gladiator. (Funny!) --IHTS (talk) 12:57, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

So much "butt hurt" from these folks. De Niro: "He's a punk. He's a mutt." This ain't "Goodfellas", dude! The smarmy smugness of the left is revolting. The audacity of them to silence their opposition whilst screaming injustice is absolutely sickening. Doc talk 13:19, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

I've never met a liberal who is tolerant of non-liberal ideology. It's black and white there. Literally. Doc talk 13:22, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

I remember Chuck Todd on Meet the Press honoring an Antifa member (who was there for authoring an Antifa "Manifesto") with extreme politeness & reverence as though he were the Pope, giving him "equal time" in a discussion with a Republican senator sitting alongside. (This was before Antifa was recognized as a domestic terror group.) As though beating up people for their views is a possible legitimate position to assume, if in Antifa's mind those views are "neo-Nazi". Then all the while Todd claiming that administration remarks condemning both sides in Charlottesville was "normalizing" and encouraging white supremacism! Amazing. (How hypocritical & unself-reflective can he be!? And how different from Maddow pumping up the assassin!?) --IHTS (talk) 09:18, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

It's amazing what's going on now. Our FBI is being slowly purged of corruption (political weaponization by Dem admin operatives). This is really historic. (I'm an improved-over-time WP editor so know the diff between "historic" & "historical". I'm also a conscientious WP editor and know when I'm "ranting" & when I'm not, when I'm endeavoring to "promote" & when I'm not. ;) ) If I weren't agnostic I'd suggest it is a good time for prayer for our country. --IHTS (talk) 10:30, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

MastCell

• At the risk of playing into your narrative, please remember that because of your previous behavior, both of you are topic-banned from using Misplaced Pages as a platform for any edits related to modern American politics. These topic bans explicitly extend to usertalk pages, so this thread constitutes a topic-ban violation on both of your parts. It seems reasonable to extend some leeway for passing comments that touch on politics, but these sorts of partisan rants clearly violate your sanctions. I understand that you share an interest in excoriating the left-wing campaign to destroy American values and freedoms, but please pursue this shared interest via email, or elsewhere on the Web (surely there are at least a handful of Web sites which exist to promote and reinforce such viewpoints). MastCell  18:21, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

  Hey MastCell, just because you're attempting to appear oh-so polite & objective here, let me point out how you're not: 1) Calling my shared opinion and Doc's shared opinions "rants", is ... (can you figure it out? -- it's both insulting, and adding innuendo that our expressions here have been irrational or emotional -- neither is true, both are insulting, why do you choose to insult? -- gee let me guess!) 2) Suggesting that I re-locate my shared opinions on website(s) that "exist to promote and reinforce such viewpoints" is also insulting (can you see why? -- it's insulting because I have no interest to "promote" any political view anywhere, and neither am I interested in any site that exists to "promote and reinforce"; in fact, I'm not aware of any, 'cause I wouldn't be interested in them if I knew of them; I'm not a sheep, MastCell, and I doubt Doc is either.) And BTW, my "behavior" on Donald Trump that inhereted a political article ban, was no worse re Clinton than the awful things said re Trump on that page which went overlooked & unenforced (which is why I made my comments there in the first place -- for 'equal time'), and if you wanted to exercise your admin warnings here why not there; where were you or any admin when Trump has been repeatedly trashed on Talk:Donald Trump??? --IHTS (talk) 08:58, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

  Doc & I have come to logical completion of our little chat. (We established we're on same wavelength re vastly important issues that are tearing the USA apart if unresolved. That's not ranting or promoting, or pumping each other up as MSNBC/Maddow unknowingly did w/ the devotee turned Republican assassin.) --IHTS (talk) 10:38, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

  Bishzilla threatens me with an indef. Not one more peep outta you! Unclean hands. Doc talk 10:52, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

  Also: "Modern" American politics. Hmmm. Anything post-1932 is now considered "modern". Maybe it's time to move the goalposts? Doc talk 10:59, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

  I can see why Alex Jones named his site InfoWars. (An indef block is the equivalent of an "info-bullet" to silence someone, like Seth Rich, permanently.) --IHTS (talk) 11:05, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

  FDR? I think he was a pretty good president.

  Oops! Damn! I just violated my topic ban by commenting on post-1932 American Politics. Fuck me. Doc talk 11:09, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

  I hate you! (Wasn't FDR a Bernie-type socialist? Didn't he want law or constitutional amendment guaranteeing citizens a job, a house, and a car!?) --IHTS (talk) 11:13, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

  The Civil Rights Act of 1964? I think it was a very important, benchmark decision that was long overdue. Oh, dang! We got a Topic Ban violation over here! Doc talk 11:37, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

  Sinner! Repent before you go to Wiki-Hell. --IHTS (talk) 11:43, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

  I'm thinking of perusing the "handful of Web sites which exist to promote and reinforce such viewpoints" that MastCell says are out there. Now, as a stereotypically toothless, inbred, cross-burning Trump supporter, I may need some help negotiatin' da intranets. Lil' help? Doc talk 11:51, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

  Your behavior also evinces that of an editor who is a deplorable & irredeemable homophobe, sexist, racist, misogynist, Islamophobe, & xenophobe. And also an editor who calls people names--shame! --IHTS (talk) 12:06, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

  "Don't put me in the basket, Man! Don't put me in the basket!" A funny guy I know would actually say this to this liberal freakshow who would mentally dismiss and put people in "the basket of deplorables" when discussing politics. Who even comes up with such a stupid concept? The one who lost? Yes!!!! Doc talk 12:16, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

  If the basket don't work, we can always impeach you for being unfit. (Or a Russkie.) --IHTS (talk) 12:22, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

  I wish Dianne Feinstein would get the "unfit" label as well. 84 years fuckin' old. Corrupt as hell, wanting re-election. Career Dems are the worst. Doc talk 12:30, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

  "Make America White Again". "This is Armageddon." If President Bush would only stop egging Nancy on! --IHTS (talk) 13:51, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

January 2018

If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Please copy my appeal to the ] or ]. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. ~~~~}}. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page. GoldenRing (talk) 13:56, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" ). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."

Why do I feel nothing, except humor? --IHTS (talk) 16:18, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

--IHTS (talk) 17:40, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

WP:AE

There's a thread about Doc's posts here that has morphed into one about you too. If you wish to comment, you can make a comment here, and if it is appropriate, it can be transferred there. --Floquenbeam (talk) 17:39, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

• Wikipedians who are not a Wikipedian