This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Mike1 (talk | contribs) at 04:15, 20 October 2006 (struck some stuff that's done). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 04:15, 20 October 2006 by Mike1 (talk | contribs) (struck some stuff that's done)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)- the entire article needs to be sectionalized (try more headings and subheadings); it doesn't look or read like a summary.
- all images need sources and fair use rationales.
The section titles are not written with an encyclopedic tone- the sections themselves are extremely long. It seems like they could be reorganized so that instead of a chronology of the band, each section focused on one element of the band and how it changed throught the band's history.
Lead should be a summary of the articles content, and is rather brief considering the length of the article and the 40+ years the band have existedFannish tone.