This is an old revision of this page, as edited by GoodDay (talk | contribs) at 10:02, 15 February 2018. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 10:02, 15 February 2018 by GoodDay (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) | The Arbitration Committee has directed that all discussion on the talk pages of this case must be sectioned. When commenting, please use an individual section and comment only in your own section. Clerks and arbitrators are exempted from this requirement. For the Arbitration Committee, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 17:37, 3 February 2018 (UTC) |
Case clerk: TBD Drafting arbitrator: TBD
| Misplaced Pages Arbitration |
|---|
 |
| Open proceedings |
| Active sanctions |
| Arbitration Committee |
Audit
|
| Track related changes |
Behaviour on this page: Arbitration case pages exist to assist the Arbitration Committee in arriving at a fair, well-informed decision. You are required to act with appropriate decorum during this case. While grievances must often be aired during a case, you are expected to air them without being rude or hostile, and to respond calmly to allegations against you. Accusations of misbehaviour posted in this case must be proven with clear evidence (and otherwise not made at all). Editors who conduct themselves inappropriately during a case may be sanctioned by an arbitrator or clerk, without further warning, by being banned from further participation in the case, or being blocked altogether. Personal attacks against other users, including arbitrators or clerks, will be met with sanctions. Behaviour during a case may also be considered by the committee in arriving at a final decision.
Comments by Andy Mabbett
- Please will a clerk remove this egregious falsehood. John doesn't speak for me; and nor does he present any evidence for the allegations he makes about me. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 18:53, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
Comments by Gerda Arendt
 | |
| Lenten rose | |
|---|---|
| Lent begins on Valentine's Day |
Opabinia regalis once asked me to supply cat images to arb cases. Half that way, on Valentine's Day and Ash Wednesday, I come with a flower. I have watched infobox discussions from 2012, so don't know much about the background. Why can these harmless little pieces of information create so much heat?? I believe - spring cleanup - that the topic could be cured completely by applying lots of "assume good faith". An editor asking "where did the infobox go?" may of course be part of a brigade sent out to disturb the peace of our valuable content creators, but it could also just be the person who installed it years ago and wonders what happened. Try AGF. If it doesn't work, try 1RR and 2 comments max per discussion and editor. Happy Valentine's Day, everyone. - Thanks to Casliber who wrote Lenten rose. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:13, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Comments by Carcharoth
Briefly, I was looking at Pilot Officer Geoffrey Lloyd Wells Memorial Seat and thinking that the radio button options to show the maps at the bottom of the infobox (A or B or A+B) would be a really good way to give readers the option to hide or show bits of an infobox. It wouldn't solve all the problems, and I know collapsible infoboxes have been discussed before, but this is the best implementation of hiding and showing different parts of an infobox that I have seen. Slight problem, in that I can't work out how this is done. I presume some magic involving some template magic, but I can't track down what template is actually driving that option. I am sure someone here knows. Carcharoth (talk) 17:40, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Comments by {username}
Editors are free to make relevant comments on this page as necessary.
Meta formatting
Why do we have subheadings marked up like:
:'''Comment by Arbitrators:'''
These should properly be marked up as:
=====Comment by Arbitrators=====
but if that is not possible for some reason, at least:
;Comment by Arbitrators
(with an opening semi-colon). Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 17:50, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
- That is the way the template is set up, isn't it? I believe Template talk:ArbComOpenCase would be a better venue to discuss the formatting as it does not pertain only to this case. –FlyingAce 20:09, 14 February 2018 (UTC)