Misplaced Pages

User talk:FeloniousMonk

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Pravknight (talk | contribs) at 19:32, 3 November 2006. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 19:32, 3 November 2006 by Pravknight (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

FM cleaning up with style!feloniousmonk

 

Archives

Thanks for un-blanking my user talk page. Despite our disagreements re: NPOV policy, you have always been a gentleman in all other respects. ^_^ --Uncle Ed 15:31, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

I dismiss your RfC

I dismiss your RfC as nothing but harassment pure and simple. Why do you hate religion? Am I not allowed to edit on Misplaced Pages because I am not a radical secularist? I point out that your stereotypes about Evangelicals don't apply to everyone, and what do you do, you remove it? Am I supposed to stop being an Orthodox Catholic to edit Misplaced Pages? Or do you have to be a committed atheist to be "credible"? It seems that you aren't interested in discussing the issues from an uninvolved third-person perspective, but instead it seems you use Misplaced Pages to grind an axe against Christianity. How can you say that the crop of articles your work on are neutral, when there are many inaccuracies and stereotypes, etc. about politically active Christians found within? Christian Reconstructionism is an outgrowth of Calvinist theology, plain an simple. How can you say that I am POV pushing Does NPOV equal secular Leftism? The Dominionism article is heavily slanted to the Left politically, and I haven't violated any rules by posting a POV tag there. Much of what I have read form people such as Yurica, Bokaer, etc., is nothing but guilt by association. The edit warring has come from your side from the beginning. Chip Berlet is a political operative who isn't schooled in theology, and his observations paint with a broad brush, lacking historical insights into Christian views on Church and State. This isn't a personal attack. There shouldn't be a pro- or an anti-Dominionist bias. Your stated commitment to paint "Dominionism" as a threat is hardly NPOV. --Pravknight 19:32, 3 November 2006 (UTC) --Pravknight 19:32, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

User talk:FeloniousMonk Add topic