Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license.
Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat.
We can research this topic together.
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ruggero Santilli article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative views, a collaborative effort to improve Misplaced Pages's coverage of significant alternative views in every field, from the sciences to the humanities. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion.Alternative viewsWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative viewsTemplate:WikiProject Alternative viewsAlternative views
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry
Please stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. If consensus is not reached, other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute.
The following Misplaced Pages contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
Mr RD (talk·contribs) / Brian Buckley Brian Buckley This user has declared a connection. (COI declared at here.)
2014 patent
It's always interesting when a scientist like this gets a patent like this: http://patents.justia.com/patent/9700870
US Patent for Method and apparatus for the industrial production of new hydrogen-rich fuels Patent (Patent # 9,700,870)
Apr 3, 2014 - MAGNEGAS CORPORATION
"A method with various related apparatus polarizes the orbits of atomic electrons by strong magnetic fields creating in the atomic structure a magnetic field. The polarized atoms are introduced onto fuels, improving an efficiency of the fuels, including but not limiting to, new forms of gaseous, liquid and solid fuels with a bonded-in content of Hydrogen, Oxygen and/or other gases to enhance energy output and decrease contaminants in the exhaust. Further, methods of coating computer chips and other surfaces for their protection against oxidation, new fuels with energy content and flame temperatures greater than those of the conventional form of the same fuels, etc." FYI GangofOne (talk) 02:45, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
In a word, no. If the patent is 'important', its importance can be demonstrated by evidence that it has been discussed in depth by third-party reliable sources. 86.169.142.110 (talk) 08:11, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
That's the gist of it. Yes, you can prove that the patent exists, but why would it be mentioned in an encyclopedia? A claim that it proves something is what we call original research and not allowed unless you have multiple reliable sources showing that it is significant. Doug Wellertalk08:41, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
(cur | prev) 20:50, 15 August 2018 David Eppstein (talk | contribs) . . (15,265 bytes) (+3) . . (Undid revision 855083228 by Editorialeffort (talk) I don't think this is an improvement) (undo | thank) (Tag: Undo)
David Eppstein, if you look at the source, that is the only line that reports, no other criticism is listed , so it seems to me that it is an improvement since it is accurate and specific.Criticism is a legitimate activity, calling someone stupid is not, no matter how Pepijn van Erp and cohort pretend that it is freedom of speech. You can leave it, but it is not the reason there is a law suit and you bear the responsibility of the information. Not that it matters, it is just question of integrity of the processEditorialeffort (talk)Editorialeffort
Interesting word choice. Is that a Capracotta accent I hear? 21:24, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
Capracotta does not have an accent, it is only my trying to pick the best words among the three languages I am fluent in..so far it served me well
The published source is the Villamedia article and you need to ask Pepijn van Erp.By the way the article is in Dutch and it is not a good service for the readers of Misplaced PagesEditorialeffort (talk)Editorialeffort
The Villamedia article says that the suit is over a critical article, and in a separate part of the Villamedia article it gives the title of the critical article. Nowhere does it say that the cause of the suit is purely the title of the article. —David Eppstein (talk) 22:15, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
"It is not that I sleep badly, because I have confidence in a good outcome. But it costs a lot of energy. I am most surprised about the fact that such a court in the US does not immediately put such a matter aside. "
Well, it is the standard story of Mr. Van Erp. Always play on the man behind the subject. Discussing and mocking the subject in a blurry way and if possible, the man / woman behind the derided story may also be popular. Boontje comes for his wage ..?
And yes, choose from now 'something more subtle' your words .. ;-)"Editorialeffort (talk)Editorialeffort
One of the following news sites on Santilli's patent on magnecules should be quoted in his Article
The "sources" that each of the accounts have cited are just reprinting the press release. We need actually independent sourcing. WP is not a vehicle for promotion nor a proxy for the company website. Jytdog (talk) 14:31, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=small}
![[REDACTED]](https://u3vuiephb.global.ssl.fastly.net/File:Aristarchos_logo_small.png){kind=link}
