This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Tgeorgescu (talk | contribs) at 06:21, 22 December 2018 (→Statement by Tgeorgescu: how do I know). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 06:21, 22 December 2018 by Tgeorgescu (talk | contribs) (→Statement by Tgeorgescu: how do I know)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Shortcut
Requests for arbitration
Arbitration Committee proceedings- recent changes
- purge this page
- view or discuss this template
Request name | Motions | Initiated | Votes |
---|---|---|---|
The Exodus page dispute. | 22 December 2018 | 0/0/0 |
Case name | Links | Evidence due | Prop. Dec. due |
---|---|---|---|
Palestine-Israel articles 5 | (t) (ev / t) (ws / t) (pd / t) | 21 Dec 2024 | 11 Jan 2025 |
No cases have recently been closed (view all closed cases).
Clarification and Amendment requestsRequest name | Motions | Case | Posted |
---|---|---|---|
Amendment request: American politics 2 | none | (orig. case) | 15 January 2025 |
Amendment request: Crouch, Swale ban appeal | none | none | 23 January 2025 |
No arbitrator motions are currently open.
Shortcuts
About this page Use this page to request the committee open an arbitration case. To be accepted, an arbitration request needs 4 net votes to "accept" (or a majority). Arbitration is a last resort. WP:DR lists the other, escalating processes that should be used before arbitration. The committee will decline premature requests. Requests may be referred to as "case requests" or "RFARs"; once opened, they become "cases". Before requesting arbitration, read the arbitration guide to case requests. Then click the button below. Complete the instructions quickly; requests incomplete for over an hour may be removed. Consider preparing the request in your userspace. To request enforcement of an existing arbitration ruling, see Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement. To clarify or change an existing arbitration ruling, see Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment.
Guidance on participation and word limits Unlike many venues on Misplaced Pages, ArbCom imposes word limits. Please observe the below notes on complying with word limits.
General guidance
|
The Exodus page dispute.
Initiated by 123dantek (talk) at 04:56, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
Involved parties
- 123dantek (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), filing party
- Tgeorgescu (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- ] (] · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request
- Confirmation that other steps in dispute resolution have been tried
- https://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Tgeorgescu#Responding_to_your_changing_my_edit_on_The_Exodus_page
Statement by 123dantek
Failing to recognize The Exodus is still being debated and not willing to put in other sources and statements that can provide the reader with this perspective.
Statement by Tgeorgescu
The OP is a WP:SPA, I have reverted him/her once and other two editors have reverted him/her once. He/she should be given time to cool off. Imho, since this is a content dispute, this does not qualify as an arbitration case, but in respect to WP:AE a WP:BOOMERANG would be all right. Oh, by the way, the way I was the only one targeted for arbitration makes you think that he/she is a WP:SOCK with an axe to grind. The "newbie" has found the WP:ARC page very fast, wouldn't you say? Tgeorgescu (talk) 05:20, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
Oh, boy: The Exodus Is Not Fiction An interview with Richard Elliott Friedman
. BernardZ is that you? WP:DENY. You have been banned, you're not allowed in our company. Yup, R.E. Friedman and the Exodus are WP:DUCK for BernardZ. How do I know? Talk:The Exodus/Archive 17#Friedman. Tgeorgescu (talk) 06:21, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
Statement by
Statement by {Non-party}
Other editors are free to make relevant comments on this request as necessary. Comments here should address why or why not the Committee should accept the case request or provide additional information.
The Exodus page dispute.: Clerk notes
- This area is used for notes by the clerks (including clerk recusals).
The Exodus page dispute.: Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter <0/0/0>-The_Exodus_page_dispute.">
Vote key: (Accept/decline/recuse)