This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Aspening (talk | contribs) at 04:22, 26 January 2019 (Requesting semi-protection of Goku. (TW)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 04:22, 26 January 2019 by Aspening (talk | contribs) (Requesting semi-protection of Goku. (TW))(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) Wikimedia noticeboard for requesting protection of pages "WP:RFP" and "WP:RPP" redirect here. You may also be looking for Misplaced Pages:Requests for permissions, Misplaced Pages:Requesting copyright permission, or Misplaced Pages:Random page patrol.| Noticeboards | |
|---|---|
| Misplaced Pages's centralized discussion, request, and help venues. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the dashboard. For a related set of forums which do not function as noticeboards see formal review processes. | |
| General | |
| Articles, content | |
| Page handling | |
| User conduct | |
| Other | |
| Category:Misplaced Pages noticeboards | |
| Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here. | ||
|---|---|---|
|
Shortcuts
Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection) After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:Protectedpages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism.
Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level Request unprotection Request a specific edit to a protected page Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here Request edit | ||
 Archives |
|
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 |
Current requests for increase in protection level
Place requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
ShortcutsPlace requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Droop quota
Reason: Persistent disruptive editing and edit-warring to by a user editing from multiple IPs. User engages in style-warring and tries to remove the most-common definition of the Droop quota by an unregistered editor. IP repeatedly WP:IDHTs when I've explained this on both the article talk and user talk. (The Droop quota is sometimes defined v⁄(k+1) and sometimes v⁄(k+1)+1; user keeps removing or obfuscating the first definition.)
Update: unsurprisingly, despite previous decline of page protection because the user hadn't edited for a week or two, they've gone right back to it within 2 days, continuing a year-long edit war.
Update 2: Despite a clear consensus on the talk for the presentation I suggested, they've continued edit-warring. – Closed Limelike Curves (talk) 21:55, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 22:55, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
Short-form content
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. 💽 🌙Eclipse 💽 🌹 ⚧ (she/they) 22:10, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 23:11, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
List of Good Luck Charlie episodes
Reason: Edit warring. But no time for this, DisneyEditor1 did this also. 2605:59C0:204E:FB10:DC08:9C1F:E2D0:2CFC (talk) 00:49, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
Nosferatu (2024 film)
Reason: Persistent vandalism from IP users. CricketXP (talk) 00:59, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
Nicktoons
Reason: Requesting permanent semi-protection due to high level of IP vandalism. MimirIsSmart (talk) 01:01, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
Marc Elias
Reason: High levels of vandalism. Marc Elias is a progressive voting rights and elections attorney. This page is intentionally being targeted by people who oppose his politics. They are misleading readers regarding Donald Trump's 2020 election loss to Joe Biden and spreading disinformation about Trump associates’ connections to Russian officials and interests. This page needs to be fact checked by serious fact checkers and protected from vandals. 2600:8805:250C:3200:BD90:3AAA:4171:CA5C (talk) 01:26, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
Miss Tennessee
Reason: Too much incorrect information from individuals who know nothing about Miss Tennessee and who intend to turn attention away from the candidates and tarnish the legacy of the Miss Tennessee/Miss America organizations. 2601:483:4584:CB20:296A:DDD2:9FFA:CCCA (talk) 01:27, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
Marc Elias
Reason: High levels of vandalism and false information. The 2016 Trump campaign was linked to Russian officials: https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/03/connections-trump-putin-russia-ties-chart-flynn-page-manafort-sessions-214868/. Attempts to add context were reverted by other user(s). Marc Elias has many followers on social media, and this page could be used to intentionally spread falsehoods. पर्वत चोटी (talk) 02:06, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
Nuri Şahin
Reason: High level of IP vandalism/edit warring by IPs from Malaysia and Turkey since end of December. Despite heroic efforts by an editor to revert these, there were so many bad IP edits that the article still has subtle remnants. Edit warring/vandalism done by at least 3 different IPs from 2 countries so can't just block a single one unfortunately. AncientWalrus (talk) 03:14, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
Ballet dancer
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP socks. TornadoLGS (talk) 04:10, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
Gulf of Mexico
Indefinite full move protection: Contentious topic restriction. Full-move protection should be restored after ECP was added. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk • contribs) 04:10, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
Shaka
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Tons of IP/New User vandalism; in terms of good-faith edits which hadn't also been reverted or undone, I found two (same user & session) over the past three months. ─ ReconditeRodent « talk · contribs » 02:01, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 02:12, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
Ras el hanout
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Largoplazo (talk) 02:34, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
Australian Greens
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – most of the recent edits here are IPs POV pushing and being reverted. Tornado chaser (talk) 02:42, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
List of programs broadcast by 5 Plus
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Aries Andres (talk) 02:44, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
Kids' Choice Awards pages
- 2019 Kids' Choice Awards (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Nickelodeon Kids' Choice Awards (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Long-term semi-protection: Article series has a long history of IP and LTA vandalism (see Gabucho181 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)); the latter has had few new good contribs since the last long-term semi-protect ended at the start of the year, with the former being wild mass guesses at forums, venues and nominees with nothing yet announced. Nate • (chatter) 02:46, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
Department of Justice (Hong Kong)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by multiple IPs. Kevinkwokchuen (talk) 03:15, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
Ever Night
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry (see: User:Jiangye) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.204.44.179 (talk) 03:25, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
All Elite Wrestling
Semi-protection: Lots of unsourced edits, this is a recently started company by three popular people so I am assuming it receives a lot of traffic. STATic message me! 03:42, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
Goku
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from several IPs and new users. Previous 6-month protection expired recently and vandalism has returned; please protect this article long-term. Aspening (talk) 04:22, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
ShortcutsBefore posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
ShortcutsBefore posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
ShortcutsGulf Of Mexico
Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because YOU NEED TO UNLOCK THE GULF OF AMERICA PAGE NOW!! TOO MANY LIBERAL NUTJOBS ARE SAYING ITS CALLED THE GULF OF MEXICO AND IT IS NOT! PRESIDENT TRUMP HAS CHANGED IT EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY!
LET US PATRIOTS CHANGE IT NOW! IT IS A VIOLATION OF AMERICAN LAW TO CALL IT “THE GULF OF MEXICO” (SIC) FROM THIS DAY FORWARD....... . 74.118.126.34 (talk) 00:05, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
Not done – Muboshgu (talk) 00:12, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
Joe Biden
Indefinite semi-protection: No longer necessary. This article should be reduced to semi-protection per consistency with articles, such as Barack Obama and George W. Bush. Biden is also no longer the president so it makes sense to make this happen. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk • contribs) 04:06, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
Further information: Misplaced Pages:Edit requests ShortcutIdeally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Misplaced Pages:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Misplaced Pages:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Misplaced Pages:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Misplaced Pages:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Israel–Hamas war
Currently, the lede states "On 7 October 2023, Hamas-led militant groups launched a surprise attack on Israel, taking 251 captive, against which Israelis responded applying the controversial Hannibal Directive, resulting in the death of 1,195 Israelis and foreign nationals, among which 815 civilians.". This implies that the majority of the casualties were caused by Israel applying the Hannibal Directive, and despite some cases of casualties due to this, no credible source has made the claim that the majority of casualties originate from it. I suggest changing the lede back to what it was before it was randomly edited to the current lede without any discussion on the talk page about it, to "On 7 October 2023, Hamas-led militant groups launched a surprise attack on Israel, killing 1,195 Israelis and foreign nationals and taking 251 captive." Aradkipod (talk) 12:29, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
Israel–Hamas war
In the section labeled "Initial Israeli counter-operation (October 2023)" it states the following: "A July 2024 Haaretz investigation revealed that the IDF ordered the Hannibal Directive to be used, killing many Israeli civilians and soldiers. An ABC News (Australia) investigation reported that at least 13 civilians were killed in a 'Hannibal' incident in Beeri."
These sentences are incorrect and not supported by the sourced references. First off, the word "many" in the first sentence is gratuitous, misleading, and, perhaps most importantly, not supported by the Haaretz article it references, which never concludes that any citizens were killed as a direct result of a so-called "Hannibal" directive. Nowhere in the article does it state that the Hannibal directive can be tied to *any* deaths, let alone "many" deaths. Any reference in the article to potential deaths caused by a Hannibal directive are stated as questions, or that investigations are forthcoming. (e.g., "Haaretz does not know whether or how many civilians and soldiers were hit due to these procedures, but the cumulative data indicates that many of the kidnapped people were at risk, exposed to Israeli gunfire, even if they were not the target.") Either way, it certainly does not conclude that "many" deaths were tied to the use of the "Hannibal directive" which is highly misleading.
Similarly, as to the second sentence, the ABC News (Australia) does not conclude that " at least 13 civilians were killed in a 'Hannibal' incident in Beeri". It discusses a tank shooting at a house in Kibbutz Berri , but never states that there is evidence that the IDF tank fire resulted in the death of 13 civilians -- as opposed to the 40 Hamas gunmen who were holding them captive and engaged in a "firefight" with the IDF at the time of the tank fire. The 40 Hamas gunmen could just as easily have killed them as opposed to tank fire. Indeed, an eyewitness stated "Mr Shifroni's aunt Ayala and her grand-niece Liel and grand-nephew Yanai were all killed at Pessi's house — he believes by terrorists", not by the IDF and ""There are a few others that we still don't know and we may never know what exactly killed them." Later on in the article, it states "The team determined that most of the hostages were likely murdered by the terrorists, and further inquiries and reviews of additional findings are necessary.".
I propose that the sentences be re-worded as follows: "A July 2024 Haaretz investigation revealed that the IDF ordered the Hannibal Directive to be used at three locations, putting the lives of some Israeli civilians being held by Hamas at those locations at risk.. An ABC News (Australia) investigation reported that after a prolonged firefight in Kibbutz Be'eri with around 40 Hamas gunmen who had been holding 15 hostages inside and outside, 13 of the hostages may have been killed by either the Hamas captors or IDF tank fire."
Apndrew (talk) 05:07, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
Israel–Hamas war
Since I cannot reply to my original request on this, I am starting a new request with a different source for the request and a revised sentence:
In the fourth paragraph of the entry, it states."A case accusing Israel of committing genocide is being reviewed by the International Court of Justice,...."
This should be changed to "Cases accusing both Israel and Hamas of committing genocide have been lodged with or are being reviewed by the International Court of Justice,..."
This change is supported by multiple references: https://www.timesofisrael.com/9-bereaved-israeli-families-bring-icc-war-crime-genocide-complaint-against-hamas/ "The families of nine Israeli victims of the October 7 Hamas massacre have lodged a complaint at the International Criminal Court (ICC) for suspected war crimes."
and
The change is necessary for accuracy, balance, and neutral point of view.
Apndrew (talk) 06:16, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
Mount Denali
Change Denali to McKinley https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/restoring-names-that-honor-american-greatness/ Fyndoro (talk) 23:31, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
Create a level 3 header with a link to the article in question, then a {{Pagelinks}} template and then the reason. It looks like this:
Example (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) your request here. ~~~~
Handled requests
A rolling archive of the last seven days of protection requests can be found at Misplaced Pages:Requests for page protection/Rolling archive.