Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Renamed user e8LqRIqjJf2zlGDYPSu1aXoc (talk | contribs) at 01:16, 23 July 2019 ({{subst:alert|e-e}}). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Serbs infobox

Hello Mm.srb,

Please visit talk page at article "Serbs", so we can discuss about the images, please don't revert my edit because of stability of the article and edit war. We can sort this out ther. ;)

Regards, --Wustenfuchs 14:29, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

We will discuss this at talk page, so other users can se why some changes happen... --Wustenfuchs 17:01, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

Stefan Lazarević

Hi, Mm.srb!

Yes, it would be great to expand the article. Currently, I'm not very active on[REDACTED] (both sr and en), but I'll ask people there about the translation. Pozdrav Vladimir (talk) 17:06, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

List of Serbs

Zdravo! :) I saw your activity on List of Serbs article, and therefor, i would ask you for some help. As this list is absolutely awful, full of non serbs, povs, and bad style, i started new one that will replace this. My crasy wish is to nominate this new list for FL, so your help is needed. By Art section, you will get the idea how list should look like. So, any comment is good, and any help will be awarded with barn! All best! --WhiteWriter 17:46, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

Well, its a bit problematic for me to write it down on wiki, send me e-mail with your Skype address, and i will find you, or, enable your e-mail address option! :) --WhiteWriter 21:37, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

Message

Please see this. Thanks.Fainites scribs 16:27, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Pozdrav!

I left you a message at my talk page. I´m not sure if I can help you the way you would like. Best regards! FkpCascais (talk) 19:25, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

It is good you started the discussion at Serbs article because that discussion was inevitable, it was just a question of time someone to begin it. We already had a similar discussion at Serbs of Croatia and Serbs of Bosnia and Herzegovina articles, that are still unfinished, although close to be. Take a look at them if you want, and regarding Serbs I already left a comment at the discussion, and I´ll try to see if there are any other important names worth inclusion. FkpCascais (talk) 21:14, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

I see I confused you about the airlines and JAT articles... Sorry, my mistake :) FkpCascais (talk) 06:04, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

Serbs infobox

In a 2007 arbitration case, administrators were given the power to impose discretionary sanctions on any user working on articles concerning the Balkans. Before any such sanctions are imposed, editors are to be put on notice of the decision. This notice is not to be taken as implying any inappropriate behaviour on your part, merely to warn you of the Arbitration Committee's decision. Thank you.

Request for Move

Здраво! Волео бих да се придружиш дискусији у вези промена имена чланака: Talk:Natasa Janics, Talk:Christina Vukicevic, Talk:Milos Raonic, Talk:Kristina Mladenovic, Talk:Alex Bogdanovic, Talk:Irena Pavlovic, Talk:Andrea Petkovic. Поздрав и хвала унапред! :) --Aca Srbin (talk) 21:26, 1 September 2011 (CEST)

Ćao

I have responded to you on "Serbs" talk page, under the "2 pictures" section. And i have provided you with some more candidates for new pictures and some other recommendations. Please check it out, im sure you will like most of it! Greetings! (Правичност (talk) 04:11, 21 February 2013 (UTC))

Your suggestions sound fine and I will make a few versions as soon as I can. Mm.srb (talk) 09:15, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Cool. Oh just one more thing; i remembered about adding Ivo Andrić, i think that would be a great idea, because he was a great writer, since "Croats" article claim him, "Serbs" article should claim him too ... as he declared as a croat only in younger years, after that he declared as a serb and as a serban writer all the way till his death. Thank you, greetings! (Правичност (talk) 01:03, 23 February 2013 (UTC))

Hi Mm. Srb, i have seen your image and it is really great. But When can we expect your new image for Serbs infobox to be put there? (Правичност (talk) 02:11, 4 April 2013 (UTC))

Can't really say because I don't have that kind of editing rights. best regards Mm.srb (talk) 13:37, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Well i think you do, you might be trying to find a way to edit the infobox just like i was. You can edit it here and please feel free to do so, your new image is very good and it should be inputted. Here you go:

Template:Serbs infobox. Ako ja mogu tu editovat, možeš i ti, tu ti je pravi link. Greetings :) (Правичност (talk) 19:18, 4 April 2013 (UTC))

My bad. Well, the discussion about the infobox image should be finished and we can put the new image later. The problem is that this picture (mosaic) is not used on any other pages beside this one. Mm.srb (talk) 02:01, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Ok i will support it. (Правичност (talk) 22:49, 5 April 2013 (UTC))

I have already inputted it myself and edited the rows, hope you like it. I saw also a similar mosaic look on Dutch people btw. (Правичност (talk) 07:06, 6 April 2013 (UTC))

Concerns about changes

Mm.srb, we have a slight problem.... somebody replaced ivo andrić with marina abramović pic in your mosaic and also replaced miloš Obrenović with some other person i cant recognize... and idk why ... abramović is already on the serbian american article, i dont think she needs to be on serbs too, atleast not of such importance like nikola tesla or some others by my opinion. I think Ivo Andrić and Miloš obrenović are of greater importance and should be returned back on the picture mosaic. (Правичност (talk) 14:44, 12 May 2013 (UTC))

Znam druže. Anyway, I'm working on a new mosaic and Milla Jovovich will be included. I'll probably make two or three versions and my hopes are to upload everything this very evening. Btw, that person which you can't recognize is our Stojan Novaković. Shame on you. :D Mm.srb (talk) 16:39, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

Ahh... pa dobro :D hehe.. mada To sa Millom jovovich mi se inače ne sviđa (ionako je već na Serbian American) ... pošto ona nikad nije istakla svoje srpsko poreklo kolko ja znam, možda je samo pomenula nešto kao "jugoslovenskog porekla da je" a ionako je već na Ukrainians article. Ne znam.. kako hoćeš... ali mislim da ivo Andrić kojeg su hrvati makli sa svog articla zbog nas (a ionako sami priznaju da je se izjašnjavao kao srbin do smrti) i sva njegova dela... mislim da zasluuje da bude na slici pogotovo pošto ga i strani čitatelji poznavaju... Meni je ovaj mozaik naj inače.. Aj pa da vidimo šta ćeš da "mejkaš i aploudaš" :P pozdrav druže :). (Правичност (talk) 19:39, 12 May 2013 (UTC))

June 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Marina Abramović may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Абрамовић), {{IPA-sh|marǐːna abrǎːmoʋitɕ}}; born November 30, 1946 in ], ]) is a ]-based ]<ref>{{cite book|last=van Gelder|first=

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:14, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

pomoć mala

Zdravo druže, možeš li mi molim te kazati ko je osoba između Jovana Dučića i Ive Andrića na tvojim novim slikama ?- osoba izgleda mlada a i ima brkove. veoma mi poznat ali nikako da se setim imena :D (Правичност (talk) 14:54, 22 June 2013 (UTC))

aaa Mlutineeee jao, znači kad je bio mlad, ah kako nisam ukapirao :). Hvala :) I pogledaj na novo , stavio sam novu tvoju sliku gore i uredio imena dole.. pogledaj ako ti se svidi (Правичност (talk) 21:08, 22 June 2013 (UTC))

Pavle Jurišić

Pozdrav druže. Pokušao sam da prenesem jednu od dveh slika sa srpske vikipedije p. jurišića šturma na englesku vikipediju za infobox... ali ne ide nešto... da li bi ti znao nekom metodom preneti sliku s asrpske na englesku vikipediju? ili ako ne... d aje nekako skineš... mislim da je potrebna lepša slika na engleskoj vikipediji za šturma zaista. dve su slike koje bi mogle bit u infoboxu od šturma naći ćeš ih tu: http://sr.wikipedia.org/%D0%9F%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%BB%D0%B5_%D0%88%D1%83%D1%80%D0%B8%D1%88%D0%B8%D1%9B_%D0%A8%D1%82%D1%83%D1%80%D0%BC (Правичност (talk) 01:56, 10 August 2013 (UTC))

I am not sure. Maybe you could try to download it to your destkop and than upload those pictures like any other. Of course, you would have to higlight in the info that it's tranfered from our wiki. Ask somebody else for a second opinion. Mm.srb (talk) 17:03, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

Orders and decorations info

For Serbian Vojvodas and Generals i write down form this and this book and for King Alexander I form this page. I will add for King Peter I in future when i get this book. All of those pictures can be moved to commons since are 70 years + old. 20:01, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

Nadežda Petrović photo

Pomaže Bog! ... I was thinking if you could replace Nadežda`s photo on "Serbs" article infobox picture mosaic with rather this photo (it is more original) .. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/1c/Nadezda_Petrovic.jpg ... Could you do this? Pozdrav! (Правичност (talk) 03:43, 26 January 2014 (UTC))

Ova slika je daleko poznatija a ujedno je i njen autoportret... Jednom prilikom ću zameniti ali za sada mislim da je bolje ovako. pozdrav druže Mm.srb (talk) 13:49, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Može i kasnije, važi tako, pozdrav majstore! (Правичност (talk) 23:14, 26 January 2014 (UTC))

Branko Čopić

Pozdrav majstore. Gledajući u collage slika poznatih Srba u infoboxu, može se reći da jedva postoji koji bosanski Srbin među drugima, sa obzirom da bosanski Srbi odnosno Srbi poreklom iz BiH broje skoro 1/3 svih Srba u svetu mogli bi dodati još koju osobu. Evo recimo ja predlažem i upravo sam samo na njega i mislio- Branka Čopića... Jovan Dučić svakako jeste poštovanja vredan i omenuća, no mislim da je Branko Čopić ipak nekako dalje posegnuo sa svojim delima i dostignućima i poznatije ime. To je moj predlog samo, a ti reci svoje mišljenje. Pozdrav veliki! (Правичност (talk) 03:13, 15 August 2014 (UTC))

An invitation to join the WikiProject Republika Srpska

WikiProject Republika Srpska
Hi, Sadko, you are graciously extended an invitation to join the WikiProject Republika Srpska! WikiProject Republika Srpska is a WikiProject whose aim is to improve the quality and coverage of articles related to Republika Srpska and the Serbs of Bosnia and Herzegovina. It is chiefly designed to help users collaborate on articles, but also to resolve open questions and disputes, to establish project-wide conventions, and to coordinate work on vandalism clean-up. WikiProject Republika Srpska currently covers a total of 0 articles and 0 other related pages on the English Misplaced Pages.
We look forward to welcoming you to the project!

--Anulmanul (talk) 21:51, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Mm.srb. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Mm.srb. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Karl Nesselrode, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Russian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Template:Serbian literature has been accepted

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Misplaced Pages. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Misplaced Pages!

Presidents of Serbian Academy of Sciences and arts moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, . Pls clean up the template. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Misplaced Pages's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA 09:29, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

Hello

Hello, I saw you made contribution on talk page of International recognition of Kosovo in Grenada section. Appropriate amount of time has passed and no counter arguments were given against claim that Grenada revoked its recognition of Kosovo. Therefore I believe Grenada should be moved to the list of countries that have revoked recognition of Kosovo. Could you please move Grenada on that list? 37.1.207.70 (talk) 21:49, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Hi, I'll do it these days; I still want to give them four or five days more to answer, if not, the edit will be made. Best regards Mm.srb (talk) 23:00, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Thanks. 37.1.207.70 (talk) 00:23, 20 November 2018 (UTC)

Done, np. Mm.srb (talk) 14:42, 27 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Mm.srb. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Kosovo Reply

I see you reverted yourself. All I did in my edit was to remove the notes section because somebody removed the Kosovo template from the article, which then created a cite error in the notes section. I see this a lot where Kosovo is mentioned in an article. The note that you added, said do not remove, and I didn't. However, as you can see, the template that you added, does nothing but produce the letter - - with no information provided. I have no idea what that is supposed to mean, but I left it because you said not to remove it. If you want to add the Kosovo note back, there was a special template created just for that note, which can be seen here - Template:Kosovo-note - just follow the instructions, or ping me and I will add it back if you want it in the article, I don't care one way or the other. That note is apparently controversial to certain editors, because I see disputes over it all the time, people will remove that template, but then they don't remove the notes section, which then creates that cite error. If you wanted to create a note about something else, then use the Template:Efn and follow the instructions there, or ping me, and I can help you with that as well. Thanks. Isaidnoway (talk) 03:56, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Milan Kašanin has been accepted

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Misplaced Pages. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Misplaced Pages!

edit warring

Your recent editing history at International recognition of Kosovo shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.Resnjari (talk) 21:04, 2 December 2018 (UTC)

Mihailo Lalić

Brate, video sam sta se desilo. Moram da ti kazem da se nece nista tamo desiti na ANI. Nije ni priblizno nista uradio da bi ga kaznili. Vec sam video slucaje gde cak i psuju pa nista ne bude. On jeste cesto grub, crnogorski je nacionalista, razumem te, ali mislim da si se zaleteo. A druga stvar, nije ti edit dovoljan. Ne znaci da to sto mu je knjiga stampana kod nas da je on srbin. Moras naci izvor gde direktno kaze da je on srbin. Ovim sto imas mozes uvrh glave da kazes da doprinosi srpskoj knjizevnosti. FkpCascais (talk) 01:36, 9 December 2018 (UTC)

Da bi uspeo da ga tuzis, moras da skupis sve kad te je uvredio i stavis linkove. Inace ovako se nece nista desiti. FkpCascais (talk) 01:46, 9 December 2018 (UTC)

У бити не очекујем никакву акцију, али очекујем макар минималну суздржаност и пристојност као резултат. Плус ово ће бити основа уколико буде још испада, са све прошлим испадима. Он може бити српски писац као црногорски националиста и Црногорац (а тада је то био фришак конструкт), његово дело је штампано као део српске књижевности за његовог живота, што је, мислим, довољно само по себи. Хвала на савету, брате. Mm.srb (talk) 17:50, 9 December 2018 (UTC)

Skanderbeg

When content is disputed and consensus discussion is ongoing, restoring the disputed state (as you did) is disruptive. BLDM (talk) 02:08, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

@Mm.srb, show good faith and revert your edit.Resnjari (talk) 03:29, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

Skanderbeg

Hi, I am planning to open a mediation for the Skanderbeg case, because seems obvious those editors opposing my edits are going to do the best to keep that info out of the article. If we gather sources, we have tons of them, and it needs a mediation to inforce the edit and prevent them to erase perfectly valid sourced information just becausee they don´t like it. Do you think is a good idea or you may suggest something else? Who could also be invited to participate? PS: About Tesla, I apologise, but it had to be that way, I will explain it to you one they when dust settles. FkpCascais (talk) 09:49, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

Hi there, it seems like a solid idea. I can't come up with anything better at the moment. I suggest 23 editor, maybe Vanjagenije and No such user. Most of the guys I used to communicate with are now inactive because of various reasons. Good luck with that endeavour, write to me if anything is needed. Np about the Tesla thing. I have also finished my editing - Mihailo Lalić, but that was one uncivil editor and here we have an entire horde on the other side, disregarding anything they don't seem fit. Mm.srb (talk) 16:33, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

December 2018

I noticed that you have posted comments to the page User_talk:FkpCascais in a language other than English. At the English-language Misplaced Pages, we try to use English for all comments. Posting all comments in English makes it easier for other editors to join the conversation and help you. If you cannot avoid using another language, then please provide a translation into English, if you can. If you cannot provide a translation, please go to the list of Wikipedias, look in the list for a Misplaced Pages that is in your language, and edit there instead of here. For more details, see Misplaced Pages:Talk page guidelines. Thank you. Vanjagenije (talk) 18:32, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

Thank you Vanja, now - I know. Mm.srb (talk) 20:18, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dragutin Inkiostri Medenjak, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Split (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

List of Serbs

The next step would be to follow the conclusions of the consensus reached at the talkpage of that article. I am very busy in real life lately so I am not able to do it myself.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 19:02, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

Serbians and Serbs

Hi, could you, please, make some explanation on names for me?

As a non-native speaker I have some difficulty with the difference between English words for Serbians and Serbs – I would think Serbian denotes citizenship (or generally place of living or place of birth) while Serb is a nationality or ethinicity (inherited from parents and more generally from family, but not defined by a place).

However, the redirect List of Serbs → List of people from Serbia seems to translate 'Serbs' to 'people from Serbia', which is opposite to my intuition. Which one is correct? --CiaPan (talk) 15:14, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

Hi @CiaPan:, first of all, thank you for a quick response and good attitude, I did not get such treatmant from 2 other admins I have talked with.

It is a tricky one when translated in English.

Serbian (in our language Srbijanac) denotes a person from Serbia, mostly Serbs from Serbia but other nation as well (some 16% of Serbian population comes from minority groups). Not all Serbs are Serbians. Serbs from other countries (1.1 million of them in Bosnia and Herzegovina for example) are simply - Serbs.

For example Laslo Đere is a Serbian with Hungarian roots, while Jelena Dokic, Australian citizen, is a Serb.

That redirect is making all the trouble.

This means that we have 2 articles on the same topic, that is List of Serbians and List of people from Serbia, which is not good, if you would agree.

Mm.srb (talk) 17:45, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

Hi :) Actually, I am not an admin. I just watch the talkpage of User:Oshwah, sometimes I answer some questions, or comment on requests that appear there. That's why you can see I just explained (as far as I could) some technical background of your problem, but could not offer any help. I hope Oshwah will reply soon to you, he always replies quickly unless the real life takes his attention.

What concerns language, I am familiar with similar difficulties because I belong to a Slavic nation too, and my country was also inhabited by many different nations. There are multiple examples of Jews, Germans, Russians and others, who were Polish citizens, Polish poets, Polish soldiers, Polish sailors, Polish industrialists... On the other hand, there were many Poles who emigrated and were French scientists, Portugal or American generals, Russian musicians or Serbian doctors - although you can sometimes also find those Poles had Jewish, German or other origins.

That's why I was interested in distinguishing what the two words actually mean. I also expected it would help me understand how the two lists are similar, and how they are distinct; and, as a result, whether the difference is big enough to keep them separate.

THANK YOU for your detailed explanation.

If you can't wait for Oshwah to help you get rid of the redirect, you may use this link: Misplaced Pages:Active administrators to find someone to take care of it. As far as I saw recently, Anna Frodesiak is one of many active admins. --CiaPan (talk) 20:55, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

NP, thank YOU! I shall wait for him, that is cool. :) Slawa! Mm.srb (talk) 21:31, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

Copying within Misplaced Pages requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Misplaced Pages. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into List of Serbs. While you are welcome to re-use Misplaced Pages's content, here or elsewhere, Misplaced Pages's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Misplaced Pages, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from ]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. If you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Misplaced Pages:Copying within Misplaced Pages. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:09, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

3RR

You're at WP:3RR. You've been around long enough to know what this warning means. I would discuss with you if I had the time but the issues with what you're doing have already been raised by others it appears. You are inserting your own viewpoint (that such Serbianization is only WP:ALLEGED) in spite of what the cited sources say. You raise your concerns, calmly, on the talk page, and if possible bring forward RS and proposals, rather than condemning the other side. Cheers.--Calthinus (talk) 21:23, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

Zmajević

This is not WP:VANDAL. I see the issue as "Croatian" identity was not sourced, however, it is also problematic to consider him as Serbian instead of Montenegrin as well. The article is not written very well, it lacks citations, reference style, while other Wikipedian articles are not reliable sources for citation/adaptation especially if are from Serbo-Croatian Wikipedias which do not follow basic editing principles and are extremely biased. It does not matter if there is "no doubt" on his identity according to some RS, we follow NPOV, WEIGHT and BALANCE. Very reliable sources, like Croatian encyclopedia (), Hrvatska revija () among others consider him as a Croatian and as such this information should be included in the article, stating something like he is considered as a Croat in Croatia or Croatian historiography or something. I will rewrite the article.--Miki Filigranski (talk) 11:41, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Aleksije Vezilić, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vrbas (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:52, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

ANI Discussion

There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Please see ANI - Vandalism on Ivan Gundulić by Mm.srb — Maile (talk) 13:38, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

Akane Yamaguchi

Hello. Help copy edit for article. Thanks you. Cheung2 (talk) 08:04, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vladan Đorđević, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aleksa Jovanović (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:15, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

Your attention needed at WP:CHU

Hello. A renamer or clerk has responded to your username change request, but requires clarification before moving forward. Please follow up at your username change request entry as soon as possible. Thank you. Aspening (talk) 22:09, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 15

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Dimitrije Nešić (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Ottoman

Jovan Ilić (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Resnik

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:40, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. --Surtsicna (talk) 01:09, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Eastern Europe or the Balkans. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Misplaced Pages's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Template:Z33 —/Mendaliv//_Δ's/ 01:16, 23 July 2019 (UTC)