This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Coloursred1 (talk | contribs) at 00:42, 30 December 2019. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 00:42, 30 December 2019 by Coloursred1 (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)2020 Australian Open
Did I not have a discussion already over the Australian Open. Maria is included on the official websites player list, her ranking doesn’t allow her direct entry into the main draw so she’ll receive a wildcard. STOP or I’ll get you blocked from editing. Coloursred1 (talk) 00:11, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
- @Coloursred1: If you were smart you would realise that the list is from last year's Open. It still includes players who have recently retired like Cibulkova and players who aren't even playing like Azarenka. Keroks (talk) 00:16, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
Oh my god your clueless, click onto the players in that list and you’ll see their most recent ranking Coloursred1 (talk) 00:18, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
- @Coloursred1: Sure because Halep is the current no.1??? Also you're not your again ;) Keroks (talk) 00:20, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
Have a look at Sharapova’s, it’ll say 132 which is her ranking. Coloursred1 (talk) 00:21, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
- @Coloursred1: And yet Cibulkova who has retired still has a players page. It means nothing Keroks (talk) 00:22, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
https://ausopen.com/players/romania/simona-halep Click on it you’ll see the ranking,,,, whatever thoughts you have towards Maria need to be put aside. Coloursred1 (talk) 00:23, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
- @Coloursred1: Still you're ignoring the facts about Cibulkova who still has a players profile but is retired. Also I do not have anything towards Maria, I am simply stopping the delusional bias from fans trying to put up unconfirmed information onto Misplaced Pages. Keroks (talk) 00:25, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
You clearly do, attacking her character in an earlier discussion when you clearly don’t know the facts of the case. It’s far from delusional it’s fact, use your brain and get off that high horse Coloursred1 (talk) 00:27, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
- @Coloursred1: You realise Misplaced Pages is a place for REAL and CONFIRMED information. Not just for your assumptions. If YOU want to assume something go to TennisForum or Twitter and spread your information there. Putting FALSE or UNCONFIRMED information on Misplaced Pages is what gives Misplaced Pages a BAD reputation. Keroks (talk) 00:29, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
People like you give players like Maria a bad name for assuming information that was proven false is true. Misplaced Pages can be edited by anyone and the information is true, just you wait. You’ll be eating your words by the end of the next week. Loser Coloursred1 (talk) 00:33, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
- @Coloursred1: If it is true, it will be announced and then therefore you can add it to the list. It is better to be safe than have false information on Misplaced Pages. As for the Mattek-Sands wildcard, you have absolutely no proof about this. Add some proof to it then I will stop removing it. Thanks. Keroks (talk) 00:37, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
It’s already true Coloursred1 (talk) 00:39, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
- @Coloursred1: Nice evidence you have there. Keroks (talk) 00:40, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
Thanks, it’s better than the evidence you have for false assumptions about players 😏 Coloursred1 (talk) 00:42, 30 December 2019 (UTC)