This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 7&6=thirteen (talk | contribs) at 10:54, 17 March 2020 (k). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 10:54, 17 March 2020 by 7&6=thirteen (talk | contribs) (k)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)John Trevena (lawyer)
New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- How to contribute
- Introduction to deletion process
- Guide to deletion (glossary)
- Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
- John Trevena (lawyer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Biography of an attorney that does not meet WP:GNG, WP:ANYBIO and also fails WP:BLP1E, WP:BLPCRIME and WP:NOTPROMO. This attorney has had some high-profile cases, but coverage of those cases is not in-depth coverage of the attorney. The attorney also had a domestic violence charge, which was dropped, and followed by a lawsuit. That coverage, however, is all local, and doesn't confer notability per BLP1E and BLPCRIME. Trevena, a private attorney, is not a "public figure", despite having some cases that received media attention. Levivich 16:12, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Levivich 16:12, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. Levivich 16:12, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Levivich 16:12, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. Levivich 16:12, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep This is a WP:POINTy nomination. Regarding the article: The subject passes WP:SIGCOV: the article has 21 reliable sources which include both regional and national news organizations. There is also international coverage which is not yet in the article: (BBC) (the Irish Times). News organizations regularly refer to the subject (John Trevena) as a High Profile Attorney. If the AfD participants feel that the subject fails WP:BLP1E, WP:BLPCRIME for his domestic abuse charges which were later dropped, the section can be removed WP:NOTCLEANUP. The attorney will be no less notable without the section. Contrary to the opinion of the nominator the subject is a public figure. High profile lawyers are notable for high profile cases and this lawyer has had many. Lightburst (talk) 20:38, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
- KEEP He doesn't just get mentioned and quoted as being the lawyer in notable cases. They talk about things dealing with him personally. That and being a notable part of cases deemed notable enough already to have their own Misplaced Pages articles, means he is notable enough to have a Misplaced Pages article. Dream Focus 23:30, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
- Weak keep: so-called international coverage cited by Lightburst is just a couple of passing mentions and short quotes. WP:ROUTINE applies. However, some of the coverage is more substantiative and I think he just skates by GNG. buidhe 10:10, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep MeetS WP:GNG. 10:54, 17 March 2020 (UTC)