Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs) at 03:42, 24 April 2020 (Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Discrimination/Archive 4) (bot). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject Discrimination and anything related to its purposes and tasks.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Misplaced Pages? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5Auto-archiving period: 12 months

• WT:DISCR

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5

This page has archives. Sections older than 360 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present.

Article alerts

Would you like to have article alerts added to this project's page? See: Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Discrimination/Article alerts.

Origins of the word "discrimination".

As it had been told here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Talk:Discrimination&oldid=881402175

I believe people of the world are mislead by improper and blind usage of word discrimination. Let's try to unwind the roots of this word!

if CRIME is deed.

and CRIMINAL - is doer.

then IN-CRIMINATE - is to accuse of crime.

and then DIS-CRIMINATE - is to drop charges of crime.

IN and DIS are opposite prefixes, prefixes with opposite meaning.

And, I still don't understand why people remove meaningful contributions, without meaningful argumentation.

MfD nomination of Portal:Discrimination

Portal:Discrimination, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Discrimination and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Discrimination during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Guilherme Burn (talk) 17:24, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

Suidlanders discussion could use more input

If anyone would like to weigh in on whether a group should be called racist, here is an ongoing discussion. -Furicorn (talk) 18:04, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

Bigoted comments in Talk sections

Sorry if I'm not asking this in the right place, but I'm not sure how this works. I just saw a minor but decidedly antisemitic remark at the bottom of the talk section of the Cliff Robertson article (someone wrote, "Typical Hollywood Jewish producers!") and I was wondering what the Misplaced Pages policy is about dealing with racist, antisemitic, and other hate speech-type comments in the Talk sections. Do you have a procedure for removing them, or do you allow them in the spirit of free speech? Embram (talk) 14:33, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

I went ahead and deleted it. WanderingWanda (talk) 16:36, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

Okay, if that's the accepted procedure. I did not know deleting someone's comment in a "Talk" section was allowed. I don't have an encyclopedic knowledge of Misplaced Pages rules and I didn't want to get on Misplaced Pages's Sheiße list. Embram (talk) 17:06, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

Deleting talk page comments is usually best avoided but in this case the post was clearly harmful with no value to the encyclopedia. WP:TPO says that it is OK to cautiously remove harmful posts, including personal attacks, trolling, and vandalism. WanderingWanda (talk) 17:53, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

Good to know. Thank you! Embram (talk) 23:13, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

Harry Hay

Hi, I found some content that seemed wrong on Harry Hay and opened NAMBLA content on Harry Hay. Any interest is appreciated. Gleeanon409 (talk) 12:56, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

NPOV/n discussion on inclusion of Islamophobia/Antisemitism/religious hate in Racism in X articles

Misplaced Pages:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard#Islamophobia, Antisemitism, and other religious hate in "racism in X" articles may be of interest to talk page watchers here. The issue is whether to include Islamophobia, Antisemitism, and other religious hate in Racism in country X articles. Icewhiz (talk) 19:33, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

Merge discussion for Expulsion of Jews from Spain

An article of interest to this project—Expulsion of Jews from Spain—has been proposed for merging from Alhambra decree. Your feedback would be welcome at the merge discussion. Thank you. Mathglot (talk) 00:56, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

"Great Replacement" move discussion

Interested users may wish to join a requested move discussion at Talk:The Great Replacement that concerns this project. Thank you. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 09:02, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

Request for information on WP1.0 web tool

Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.

We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

Ageism

Do folks on this project believe the article on the ageist dismissal, OK Boomer should be part of this project's purview? Toddst1 (talk) 03:13, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Referring to ships as "she"

Please see Misplaced Pages talk:Manual of Style#"She" vs. "it" for ships. This is a perennial discussion that never seems to reach consensus. Notice of this round of discussion was sort of spammed to various ship- and military-related projects and pages (i.e., places of strong concentration of fans of using "she" for ships, and of male editors in particular), so I'm notifying some other wikiprojects and such that are apt to have wider views and demographics, for balance.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  09:30, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

RfC on the talk page of the article Race and Intelligence

In the hope of getting more editors involved and getting a consensus on an NPOV-compliant lede, I started an RfC about the first paragraph of the lede at Talk:Race and intelligence#RfC about lede of Race and intelligence. More eyes welcome. NightHeron (talk) 15:12, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

AfD discussion of Race and intelligence

A discussion is taking place of whether to delete the article Race and intelligence, see . NightHeron (talk) 12:19, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

• Project-Class Discrimination pages
• NA-importance Discrimination pages
• WikiProject Discrimination articles