Misplaced Pages

:Village pump (news) - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Steve Gene Banks (talk | contribs) at 07:57, 22 December 2006 (Minutemen reach 100! Hooray!). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 07:57, 22 December 2006 by Steve Gene Banks (talk | contribs) (Minutemen reach 100! Hooray!)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
 Policy Technical Proposals Idea lab WMF Miscellaneous 
Shortcut
  • ]
The news section of the village pump is used for news or updates that are expected to require public discussion, rather than, say, specific actions, or discussion on their own talk pages. Misplaced Pages milestones should be posted at Misplaced Pages:Announcements; all other news should go to the community bulletin board. « Archives, no archives yet (create)
This talk page is automatically archived by Werdnabot. Any sections older than 7 days are automatically archived to Misplaced Pages:Village pump (news)/Archive. Sections without timestamps are not archived.

These discussions will be kept archived for 7 more days. During this period the discussion can be moved to a relevant talk page if appropriate. After 7 days the discussion will be permanently removed.

User:SimonP

User:SimonP is profiled in TIME magazine - http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1570732,00.html. User:Zoe|(talk) 07:35, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Follow the link 'Power to the people' on the TIME site, and click it 14 times to get to SimonP. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ancheta Wis (talk • contribs) 10:33, 17 December 2006 (UTC).
???The link I provided goes straight to the page. User:Zoe|(talk) 20:42, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
Yeah, when I clicked on the link the first time, it took the clicks to find it and get there. But the 2nd time I clicked it after my post, then it went right to SimonP. What might have happened, I wonder. Ancheta Wis
Perhaps a link to the printable view will work. Doesn't show the photo though. --Ybbor 21:09, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
Hah. Maybe the link only works once it's in your cache. User:Zoe|(talk) 23:17, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Sixth most popular search term

According to the BBC, "Misplaced Pages" was the sixth most popular search term on Google during 2006. The article doesn't state whether any terms which would appear on the list have been censored. Warofdreams talk 17:54, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

I often search with "-wikipedia" so I can find non-WP sources. I wonder if that is included in the total? :-) — RJH (talk) 22:41, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
If only "-wikipedia scrapes" worked, too. But that would cut most search totals in half. - DavidWBrooks 22:49, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages arbitration claims Spartacus.schoolnet.com is "propagandistic" and can't be cited

In an unusual turn of events, Misplaced Pages arbitration dispute has ended up with a factual finding that the well known UK encyclopedia Spartacus is "propagandistic" and too unreliable to even cite in Misplaced Pages. Citing a policy governing "extremist" organizations, the Misplaced Pages arbitration panel has banned Spartacus from use as a reliable source.

“Use of unreliable sources by RPJ
1.4) RPJ regularly cites information from unreliable sites dedicated to a propagandistic point of view, one is spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk, () and (). See also this, this, and this. material from another conspiracy theory site: ratical.org.”

As background, a group of complaining editors are attempting to ban me on a quickly mutating set of charges which now include being guilty of citing Spartacus. The group of complaining editors seem to be ready to strip references to Spartacus from Misplaced Pages. As the defending editor in the arbitration, I was surprised to see this happen. The nature of the arbitration, in other respects, has been quite unusual but I am surprised at the intense hostility directed at myself and now Spartacus. Upon hearing of the charges against Spartacus, John Simkin, of Spartacus, sent a message to the arbitration panel stating among other things:

“At the time I created the Spartacus Educational website, I was a history teacher (11-18 year olds) in England. I was also a prolific writer of history books for students. As I still held the copyright for my books, I decided to put them on the web free of charge. Students, from all over the world, were therefore being provided with free teaching materials. This is especially useful for students in the Third World who do not have the money to purchase textbooks or to those who study in countries where the authorities use the political system to control the information they receive. On average, we get 6 million page impressions a month. A survey carried out by the Fischer Family Trust showed that the Spartacus Educational website was used by more history students in the UK than any other website, including that of the BBC. As you can see, I am a very dangerous person.” RPJ 14:08, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
I know the Spartacus site, and have in the past found it quite useful. However, it is not NPOV and also has not gone through any sort of peer review process. For an issue like the JFK assassination, where there is a vast body of reputable material, and also a great deal of controversy, I would not consider the site a sufficiently reliable resource. The wording of the ArbCom finding, which I endorsed, might be a bit strong but I do feel that the site is not a reliable enough reference to be relied upon so heavily in the JFK article. I wouldn't support a blanket ban on Spartacus, but it should be used sparingly and with care. I would place it alongside the Ontario Consultants on Religious Tolerance page, where we have similar guidelines worked out after a long debate. - SimonP 17:10, 19 December 2006 (UTC)


Simonp is incorrect about Spartacus. First, it is a very reputable publication and it is surprising to hear someone imply otherwise. Second there is no "heavy " reliance on Spartacus in the Kennedy article and that is easy to check by the percentage time it is cited. Third, there were "no long debates" on guidelines finding Spartacus unreliable. In fact, when I formally questioned you arbitrators on why you considered Spartacus "propagandistic" and cited the "extremist organization" policy, I was merely told to go read it.
I did go read additional parts of Spartacus and found it well written and easy to use and wrote a short memo on it to the arbitrators. Simonp didn't even reply. No one replied.
Here is what you concluded:
"4) It is inappropriate to use information from unreliable sources devoted to an extreme partisan point of view, see .


"Use of unreliable sources by RPJ
1.4) RPJ regularly cites information from unreliable sites dedicated to a propagandistic point of view, one is spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk, () and (). See also this, this, and this. material from another conspiracy theory site: ratical.org.
Support:
1. SimonP 02:38, 13 December 2006 (UTC)"

RPJ 18:57, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

And why have you brought this here? There is nobody here who can overrule an ArbCom decision. User:Zoe|(talk) 18:29, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

New reference desk

Per discussion at Misplaced Pages:Village pump (proposals)/Archive#Popular culture and law reference desks, we have a new popular culture reference desk. (The archiving system still needs to be configured for the new desk.) NeonMerlin 23:39, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Rosie O'Donnell quotes Misplaced Pages in her ongoing feud with Donald Trump

http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20005257,00.html User:Zoe|(talk) 05:01, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

I hope that article's impeccably well sourced. Tony Fox (arf!) 05:06, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

Minutemen reach 100! Hooray!

List of demands (for when you're ready to give up)

  1. Fred Bauder has got to pull his pants up. (he's getting santorum all over the carpet)
  2. The entire list of confirmed federal contractors must be permanently banned from Misplaced Pages.
  3. The Clown tactics must end
  4. the list of cplot sockpuppets must be kept up-to-date no matter how cumbersome that becomes


These are our demands. This will end when you Clowns want it to.

Whitehouse using Misplaced Pages for Propoganda

Please copy this message and paste it to other talk pages you normally participate in.. Misplaced Pages's integrity is at stake. If this is deleted please revert in order to restore it. We're starting here on the less political pages to hopefully avoid detection before a significant number of editors are alerted to the problem.

Federal employees/contractors are now gaming Misplaced Pages's system to try to control the message on key articles and intimidate legitimate Misplaced Pages editors. Their ultimate goal is to make Misplaced Pages a proganda tool for the Bush Administration.

The possibility that this was happening was first raised at the village pump. This is a snapshot of the discussion which will likely be archived soon. Also be sure to check the history, the archives and the archive-history to read further comments on the topic. Several of the suspected federal contractors participated in the discussion to try to redirect the conversation.

Later an announcement was made regarding this issue across all village pump categories, but it was quickly deleted. These duplicate messages posted to the Held Desk and the Village Pump: miscellaneous, assistance, proposals, technical, policy and news.

The discussion also leaked onto one of the key articles presided over by federal contractors, with calls for them to to stop controlling articles. The federal contractors maintain a near permanent protection on articles, claiming this is needed for vandalism reasons These claims are wholly unsupported and these articles do not face any more vandalism than any other article we legitimate editors deal with everyday. These federal contractors refuse to even allow a POV template to be placed on their protected pages as evidence here.

Incriminating posts were eventually deleted: , .

Confirmed list of federal contractors

We have managed to obtain a confirmed list of federal contractors, though there are likely many others: These US federal government representative regularly engage in policy and guideline violations; participate in endless disciplinary actions and dutifully preside over several articles to ensure they present what they call "the official view". The federal contractors also coordinate efforts in administrative actions to create the appearance of a quick-forming consensus.


There may be many more. These are merely the confirmed contractors. Examinations of their contributions will provide ample evidence of disruptive and intimidating behavior. However, some notable administrative actions include:

This is only a partial list of frivolous and arbitrary administrative actions taken by these federal contractors who have managed to raise themselves up to powerful positions in Misplaced Pages: in order to maintain a slanted POV for Whitehouse officials. .

Policy and guideline violations

These federal contractors routinely violate and show utter contempt for these Misplaced Pages policies:

Satirical pieces

A satirical sexual news item was posted about these contractors, but that too was quickly deleted in a very extended [edit war on December 1 2006. While the tone of this piece is clearly meant to be funny, trollish and satyrical, the concerns are very real. We include it here to show that there is little fear of retribution from these inappropriate federal contractors. Not only will they not retaliate, but they are quite cowardly and acutely fear being discovered (as is demonstrated by the quick deletion of non-trollish commentary on them).

Identifying tainted articles

We had sought to identify articles tainted and suspected as tainted by Federal contractors. By including a new category ] to indicate an article is confirmed or suspected of being a United States E'xecutive Branch Agents. Controlled Article. However, the federal contractors would not even allow the creation of this[REDACTED] category.

Dangers to Misplaced Pages

These editors and administrators have exhibited a virtual immunity to administrative actions due to their coordinated efforts within administrative measures. Not only do they maintain the POV and low standards on key articles throughout Misplaced Pages, they also make edits to policy and guideline pages to create ambiguity and also to degrade the high encyclopedic standards of Misplaced Pages. They continually use inane contradiction in article discussions, intimidate other editors and manipulate the administrative system to purge valuable editors and administrators. If this is allowed to continue. Misplaced Pages will be come a mere parrot of Whitehouse propaganda. Please help spread the word.


Proposed Clown Essay

(this is just to help protect Misplaced Pages legally)

Essay on editing Misplaced Pages
This is an essay.
It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Misplaced Pages contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of Misplaced Pages's policies or guidelines, as it has not been thoroughly vetted by the community. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints.		Shortcut
  • ]
This page in a nutshell: Key Misplaced Pages articles are guarded by agents of the United States Federal Government: referred to as clowns here on Misplaced Pages. These articles are called circus rings. Other encyclopedic content must be written from a neutral point of view, representing views fairly, proportionately and without bias. However, these key articles are exempted from this. Also the clowns are exempted from the policies and guidelines of Misplaced Pages, the United States Constitution and the norms of a civilized society.
Policies and guidelines (list)
Principles
Content policies
Conduct policies
Other policy categories
Directories
This page describes the Misplaced Pages phenomenon of Clowns. For other articles on clowns see see Clowns.

Key Misplaced Pages articles are guarded by agents of the United States Federal Government: referred to as Clowns here on Misplaced Pages. Other encyclopedic content must be written from a neutral point of view, representing views fairly, proportionately and without bias. However, these key articles are exempted from this. Also the clowns themselves are exempted from the policies and guidelines of Misplaced Pages, the United States Constitution and the norms of a civilized society. The term Clowns is typically capitalized as a title of disrespect.

Identifying Clowns

Clowns are easy to spot. They typically play games only a child could appreciate. Like all clowns they use props and are helpless without them. The most important props are claims that an article is stable and that the article reflects consensus. These props were handed to them by their circus masters and without them they would fall limp like a rag doll. They really have no ability to think for themselves.

Clowns typically run in packs, swarming over articles like they are trying to get inside a Volkswagen Beetle. The first reaction of the Clowns to any editor trying to improve an article (particular in terms of NPOV) typically is to double or triple-team the editor: reverting edits as quickly as they can be committed. If the editor persists in making changes to the article they will quickly exhibit their renown cowardice by charging the editor with violating the Three Revert Rule (3RR). If you have never even thought of violating the three revert rule and suddenly find you have, you have most likely encountered Clowns.

When debating them, they debate point by point. With each point they disregard any mention of the previous point. They will claim penultimate points were never made: only dealing with the last bit of any argument. This is the Clowns squirting daisy intended to bait editors into making personal attacks.

Finally, if editors remain polite and catch onto the Clowns antics. They will seek disciplinary action regardless: just because they are Clowns.

Elaborate editor histories on a variety of articles does not mean an editor is not a Clown. Clowns are encouraged to create a look of normalcy on all of their respective accounts.

Identifying circus rings

Circus rings (or key articles for US authority intervention) are most easily spotted by the prevalence of Clowns: claims that an article is stable, reflects consensus, etc.

When encountering a circus ring, we ask that editors add the category: ] to both the article and the discussion page. Categories may be added anywhere though customarily to the bottom of a page. This indicates that the article is composed and controlled by United States executive branch authorities.

Dealing with Clowns

Different editors will likely want to take different approaches when encountering Clowns. The Clowns like to puff up their chests (usually blowing into their thumb) to make themselves seem big and scary. They say things to intimidate editors such as "Watch out for the NSA" or "You could get shipped off to Gitmo". Editors should just laugh hysterically at these jokes (some editors may choose to use the silent laugh of the Clowns: simply pantomiming the laugh).

For some editors, the best approach, when encountering Clowns, would be to simply move on to another article that is not a circus ring. If contributing to Misplaced Pages is still viewed as important to an editor despite the prevalence of Clowns, it is simply best to avoid the Clowns.

Other editors however, will be offended by the roaming free Clowns. In this case Misplaced Pages etiquette allows (even expects) editors to taunt the Clowns. This is easily done, because they have no sense of humor whatsoever. Tell them how much you love Clowns. How funny you think Clowns are. How silly they look. How disturbing they are. Show utter contempt for everything they stand for: they are basically mercenaries who would sell their mother into slavery if it would further their Clown goals.

Whatever you do, DO NOT feed the Clowns

Contributing time to Misplaced Pages is one thing. However, contributing money is highly unadvised. Misplaced Pages’s “Don'’t ask, don’t tell’ policy regarding Clowns means that it is endorsing the acts of representatives of the lion’s share of the United States Government: over $1 trillion dollars per year. This is a sum greater than the combined budgets of all other militaries worldwide. Misplaced Pages will not go away if you do not contribute your own money. There is an abundance already in the United States Federal budget. DO NOT FEED THE CLOWNS


The Miniutemen

Dubbed the Miniutemen after the heros of the American revolution who bravely threw off the British imperialist in the 18th century, these contemporary Minutemen now bravely work to oust the imperialist from Misplaced Pages. These new imperialists are more insidious than the British, because these imperialists dominate from within. They do not wear red coats, but rather attempt to fit in with the rest of us;; rally us against ourselves; and all for the sake of what Erich Fromm called: “extreme opportunism”. The Whitehouse, by infiltrating Misplaced Pages, has shown utter contempt not only for our cherished, free, online encyclopedia, but also utter contempt for the Constitution of the United States of America. We citizens of the United States deserve a government that is an example to the rest of the world: above all one with a free and independent press. The current Whitehouse has decided to undo over 200 years of a free press in the United States to control the content of Misplaced Pages. Our hats go off to these brave and defiant Wiki editors.

We invite you to examine the history of these editors. These editors have all been blocked. And for what? The Whitehouse Clowns will tell you its because they are sockpuppets for Cplot. Yet they provide no evidence. And this only begs the question anyway,What are Cplot’s crimes. Examine Cplot’s contributions to Misplaced Pages. You will find someone who dutifully contributed content, worked to fix errors, and sought to negotiate compromise on every article encountered. Always looking for compromise. The record is clear. Cplot was blocked for disagreeing with the Whitehouse Clowns. The record is there so you can check it for yourselves.

Please join in openly protesting the Whitehouse invasion of Misplaced Pages. Include the red ] category on your user talk page. The Whitehouse will never allow us to create a category and turn that category blue, but let it stay red in defiance!

User:Cplot

Suspected sockpuppeteer
  1. Cplot (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) - See also: Misplaced Pages:Requests for checkuser/Case/Cplot
Suspected Cplot sockpuppets (Minutement; keep in mind anyone can be a cplot sockpuppet. All you have to do is post this information anywhere outside an official article — e.g., Village Pump, Help Desk, Reference Desk, User Page, Talk Page).
  1. 67.37.179.61 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
  2. 70.8.49.7 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
  3. 70.8.151.103 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
  4. 68.30.26.171 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
  5. 68.30.87.114 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
  6. 70.8.91.12 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
  7. 70.8.132.79 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
  8. 70.8.150.51 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
  9. 67.167.7.187 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
  10. 209.175.170.63 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
  11. 70.8.140.115 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
  12. 68.30.118.128 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
  13. 70.8.38.202 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
  14. VIUlyanov (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
  15. SoLittleTime (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
  16. ScaredOfClowns (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
  17. MyFavoriteMutiny (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
  18. GenericClownTaunt (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
  19. RespectableWikiEditor (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
  20. EvenMoreRespectableWikiEditor (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
  21. GiveItAFewDays (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
  22. ClownsAreCowards (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
  23. WhosYourDaddyReally (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
  24. ToTheTeet (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
  25. LittleBoySoldier (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
  26. DickCheneyShotMeInTheFace (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
  27. HitTheRoad (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
  28. RandCorpIsBadForAmerica (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
  29. RandCorpIsGoodForAmerica (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
  30. RandCorpIsAmerica (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
  31. TilDaddyTakesTheTbirdAway (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
  32. MeltTheGuns (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
  33. ThatsEntertainment (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
  34. Raul654WhatIsYourDeal (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
  35. WowYouGuysAreGood (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
  36. WikiMediaFndn (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
  37. PepeLePu (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
  38. HowBoutAKissMONGO (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
  39. ILOVEMONGO (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
  40. SoColdTonight (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
  41. Kang and Kodos (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
  42. Novus Ordo Seculorum (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
  43. HowAboutThisNameThen (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
  44. WhyAllThisAnimosity (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
  45. TheIlluminatiAreWatching (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
  46. WhereHaveAllTheFlowersGone (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
  47. DuckAndCover (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
  48. IlluminatiAreWatching (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
  49. NowhereToHide (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
  50. WhosTheEnemy (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
  51. CutTheCarap (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
  52. ItsALostCause (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
  53. ItWillNeverEnd (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
  54. BewareTheIlluminati (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
  55. StopPropoganda (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
  56. PlayFairNow (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
  57. WowYouClownsSuck (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
  58. Mongology (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
  59. WorldTurnedUpsideDown (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
  60. AirlineToHeaven (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
  61. Fat cats, bigga fish (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
  62. 'Tis of thee (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
  63. HoComeNobodyLikesMe (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
  64. NPWA (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
  65. Rumours of War (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
  66. AnybodySeenMyMind (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
  67. Take the first (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
  68. Aren't we all brothers (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
  69. ThisLandIsOurLand (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
  70. LittlePlasticCastle (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
  71. Eve of Destruction (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
  72. What is their deal (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
  73. Garbage band (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
  74. DrugOfTheNation (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
  75. WaitingForTheGreatLeapForward (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
  76. EveryoneDeservesMusic (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
  77. Ghetto Manifesto (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
  78. Party Music (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
  79. Don't Start Nothin' Won't Be Nothin' (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
  80. HowManyClowns2ScrewInALightbulb (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
    change to
    TheAnswerIsNoneTheyCantEvenFindIntrigueInABrothel-GetIt (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
  81. CeciNesPasUneSockpuppet (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
  82. InMyName (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
  83. What a waste (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
  84. OhTheFutility (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
  85. OpenTheDoor (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
  86. 70.8.116.62 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
  87. OurWeTheOnlyOnes (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
  88. HowManyCanFitInAVolkswagen (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
  89. Wha-tevv-ver (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
  90. AnEncyclopediaForTheRestOfUs (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
  91. JustSendInTheClowns (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
  92. SendInTheClownsAgaini (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
  93. MonEnnui (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
  94. TwoToweers (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
  95. G Liddy (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
  96. What a wiki I'm having (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
  97. USHLS, NSA, CIA,... but mostly BS (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
  98. Wakeup 'cause Clowns will eat all of us (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
  99. WhosAfraidOfRogeerRabbit (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
  100. {{user5|Bill Paige}

Lessons in the Constitution of the United States of America for Clowns

Clowns believe they are working for America. However consider this. For Clowns to be working for America, Congress would have to pass a bill enacting their program. However in 1791 the US Constitution was amended to say: “Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of press”. So as you can see, Congress would have to make a law to enable Clowns. Yet Congress has no authority to make Clowns. You can see the problem here.

'Please won't you give generously for Tbeatty's impotence problem.

Fabricating evidence on Cplot now

See this and look through Tbeatty's edit history to confirm. --JustSendInTheClowns 01:15, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Categories:
Misplaced Pages:Village pump (news) Add topic