This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Valoem (talk | contribs) at 21:35, 3 August 2020 (→Omar and Ocasio-Cortez: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 21:35, 3 August 2020 by Valoem (talk | contribs) (→Omar and Ocasio-Cortez: new section)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)The current date and time is 22 January 2025 T 22:01 UTC.
| Discretionary sanctions alerts | ||
|---|---|---|
|
You can email me from this link but in the interests of Wiki-transparency, please message me on this page unless there are pressing reasons to do otherwise.
Comments which I find to be uncivil, full of vulgarities, flame baiting, or that are excessively rude may be deleted without response. If I choose not to answer, that's my right; don't keep putting it back. I'll just delete and get annoyed at you.
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| home |
Talk Page |
Workshop |
Site Map |
Userboxes |
Edits |
Email |
 | This user talk page might be watched by friendly talk page stalkers which means that someone other than me might reply to your query. Their input is welcome and their help with messages that I cannot reply to quickly is appreciated. |
|
Coming here to ask why I reverted your edit? Read this page first... |
Please leave me new messages at the bottom of the page; click here to start a new section at the bottom. I usually notice messages soon. I attempt to keep conversations in one location, as I find it easier to follow them that way when they are archived. If you open a new conversation here, I will respond to you here. Please watchlist this page or check back for my reply. If I have already left a message at your talk page, unless I've requested follow-up here or it is a standard template message, I am watching it. If you leave your reply here, I may respond at your talk page if it seems better for context. If you aren't sure if I'm watching your page, or I'm slow to reply, feel free to approach me here.
| Welcome to my talk page! I am an administrator here on Misplaced Pages. That means I am here to help. It does not mean that I have any special status or something, it just means that I get to push a few extra buttons to help maintain this encyclopedia. If you need help with something, feel free to ask. Click here to start a new topic.
|
| First, please remember that I am not trying to attack you, demean you, or hurt you in any way. I am only trying to protect the integrity of this project. If I did something wrong, let me know, but remember that I am human, and I do make mistakes. Please keep your comments civil. If you vandalize this page or swear at me, you will not only decrease the likelihood of a response, your edits could get you blocked. (see WP:NPA) When posting, do not assume I know which article you are talking about. If you leave a message saying "Why did you revert me?", I will not know what you mean. If you want a response consisting of something other than "What are you talking about", please include links and, if possible, diffs in your message. At the very least, mention the name of the article or user you are concerned with. If you are blocked from editing, you cannot post here, but your talk page is most likely open for you to edit. To request a review of your block, add Administrators: If you see me do something that you think is wrong, I will not consider it wheel-warring if you undo my actions. I would, however, appreciate it if you let me know what I did wrong, so that I can avoid doing it in the future. |
The Da Vinci Globe
Hi Doug, I have an academic relationship with Stefaan Missinne and and I asked for his copyright for this[REDACTED] article and he accepted. how can i solve the many problems i seem to have ? thanks a lot @davidguam
Amendment on Domestic Terrorism
I dont see that the 7.21 Yuen Long Incidents and 8.31 Prince Edward Incidents are commonly recognized as domestic terrorism, and they dont match the definition of "domestic terrorism" at all.
The hong kong protesters are trying to deliver wrong messages to[REDACTED] users.
These two incidents should be removed from the examples.
Proposed deletion of Theories of Pashtun origin
The article Theories of Pashtun origin has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
Russian vote
Vlad does deserve kudos for that, after all he's done, he's able to pull that off. It's as if[REDACTED] was actually able to get enough donations without putting those boxes everywhere. It seems impossible.
American Descendants of Slavery
ANI Notice
There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. :bloodofox: (talk) 05:30, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
Sphinx erosion theory
The point is that Hawass states:"No single artifact, no single inscription, or pottery, or anything has been found until now, in any place to predate the Egyptian civilization more than 5,000 years ago."
That statement is no longer valid because of Göbekli Tepe. There are certainly plenty of sculptures and totem poles etc, there that have been proven to predate the 5,000 year criteria. It is evidence that obviously someone existed at that time capable of building them. Hawass talks about artifacts, pottery, inscription or anything, and in that sense he is wrong. 95kcp (talk) 18:58, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
- @95kcp: did you read that quote in its original context or did you find it somewhere? Doug Weller talk 19:07, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
It looks like it was part of some online Nova interview here It sounds like Hawass answers in broad terms "any place" and then narrows it down to Egypt. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95kcp (talk • contribs) 18:04, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
- @95kcp: that's what is being said at Talk:Sphinx water erosion hypothesis which is probably where you should be commenting. Doug Weller talk 18:12, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
References
Edits with familiar pattern
I've just come across this edit from a 'new' editor with a similarly numerical name to the ones I brought to your attention on 11 July. I checked and there were a whole string of edits from the same source for an outfit called Loyal Books peddling stuff that is readily available elsewhere online. The audio files are better than Ligohi's, apart from a regional accent, but there's no way to link to them directly so you just get a bare URL and than have to search for what the edit promises. I'm wondering how useful all this eager activity is and whether we're dealing with a puppet plague. Sweetpool50 (talk) 05:43, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Sweetpool50: I'm not entirely sure. and like it, but it does have ads. A better rep than Lioghi. They also added a link to Skyhorse Publishing. I didn't have time today to find my old SPI and look at it. Hopefully tomorrow. Doug Weller talk 17:55, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Ash Sarkar edit
Hello Doug. I thought the comment saying she was a communist makes it very clear she is far left. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Comelistentothetruth (talk • contribs) 15:39, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Comelistentothetruth: no, not all Communists want a revolution, and she's a special type of Communist. Also, that would be an interpretation in any case, (see WP:NOR), you'd need multiple mainstream sources specifically calling her far left.
Administrators' newsletter – August 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2020).
Administrator changes
[REDACTED] Oversight changes
![[REDACTED]](https://u3vuiephb.global.ssl.fastly.net/File:Oversight_logo.png){kind=link}
Guideline and policy news
- There is an open request for comment to decide whether to increase the minimum duration a sanction discussion has to remain open (currently 24 hours).
- Speedy deletion criterion T2 (template that misrepresents established policy) has been repealed following a request for comment.
- Speedy deletion criterion X2 (pages created by the content translation tool) has been repealed following a discussion.
- There is a proposal to restrict proposed deletion to confirmed users.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:20, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
User talk:DougWeller
The old redirect on that talk page was erroneous so was removed some time back, then a few users posted there, so I've fixed the redirect and moved the two messages above. —PaleoNeonate – 16:20, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
Request for edit deletion
Hi Doug, I'm HalfdanRagnarsson. This is about a Leeroy-Jenkins character called Avis11, who decided one fine morning that he would change the format of all articles on Roman Emperors to his preferred style. Since then, he has repeatedly edit-warred against multiple editors to keep his preferred format, despite a discussion still going on here. I am the most recent editor whose efforts to restore the status quo have been reverted. I am here because this is not a block request (which is why I did not go to WP:AIV), but simply a request to delete his recent series of reversions from emperors Tiberius to Theodosius I, partly because it is his third or fourth instance of edit-warring on these pages, but mainly because he has slandered me in nearly all of those edits summaries as a "persistently disruptive editor". Thanks.
PS: He seems to have a penchant for abusive language; when someone told him off on his talk page, he called that person "full of crap". HalfdanRagnarsson (talk) 04:20, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
- Halfdan either lies through his teeth or is completely clueless. The discussion he refers to was already dead for weeks, with a majority of editors in favor of my proposed changes. He revived said conversation (adding nothing of worth), and, after twice dismissing my replies, proceeded to unilaterally carry through his changes w/o any discussion on his part whatsoever. 'Full of crap', though hardly abusive language, is an accurate description of the other editor in question: an aloof and obnoxious fence-sitter who decided to weigh in and attack me alone without the right idea of what was on. By rights it's Halfdan who should've gotten all the blame. Avis11 (talk) 14:17, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
- May I add that, of the many editors who could be said to have 'edit-warred', I was the only one to take the issue to the talk page, and actually go through the trouble of discussing it. Halfdan just decided "WP:IDONTLIKEIT" and, like a child, decided to carry out his will regardless of anything else. Avis11 (talk) 14:40, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
- Another thing, Halfdan explicitly said in the very same conversation he linked above that he would not attempt to mass-revert again, presumably until he got support for his position (not forthcoming). A mere sixteen minutes later, here he is, trying to do just that. I'll also point out that this user has himself a penchant for acting in a disruptive fashion. He has been thoroughly uncooperative, dismissive and deceptive, and acts all polite and indignant once called out. Avis11 (talk) 15:41, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Avis11: Yes, I will not mass-revert again. But something must be done about your offensive edit summaries. (Again, no offense to you personally.) Now, I will not clutter Doug's page any further. HalfdanRagnarsson (talk) 15:58, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
Lemuria
The thing is there is no citation for that kumari kandam. I am very surprised that you reversed my edit. EruTheLord (talk) 18:21, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
- @EruTheLord: yes, I wouldn't normally do that and if I'd had time I'd find sources from the KK article. Since there is obviously a connection, can you do that? Or do you really think it's better not mentioned? Or if you insist on no IAR, remove it and hope someone fixes it. But sections need content. Doug Weller talk 18:55, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
- I do observe that there is a connection, let it be there I will put a citation needed tag. If it stays without citation for long time then it can be removed from the page. EruTheLord (talk) 03:11, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
The Signpost: 2 August 2020
- Special report: Misplaced Pages and the End of Open Collaboration?
- COI and paid editing: Some strange people edit Misplaced Pages for money
- News and notes: Abstract Misplaced Pages, a hoax, sex symbols, and a new admin
- In the media: Dog days gone bad
- Discussion report: Fox News, a flight of RfAs, and banning policy
- Featured content: Remembering Art, Valor, and Freedom
- Traffic report: Now for something completely different
- News from the WMF: New Chinese national security law in Hong Kong could limit the privacy of Misplaced Pages users
- Recent research: Receiving thanks increases retention, but not the time contributed to Misplaced Pages
- Obituaries: Hasteur and Brian McNeil
Omar and Ocasio-Cortez
Please let me know if the recent revert are valid. I've added sources that they support this, I cant fathom why it would be reverted unless it is due to politics. Valoem 21:35, 3 August 2020 (UTC)