This is an old revision of this page, as edited by BunnyyHop (talk | contribs) at 19:56, 30 November 2020. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 19:56, 30 November 2020 by BunnyyHop (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
|
RamRaghubn (talk) 16:22, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
October 2020
Hi BunnyyHop! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Slavery that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Misplaced Pages – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. ‡ Єl Cid of Valencia 19:22, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for the warning! BunnyyHop (talk) 19:25, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Vallee01 (talk) 23:54, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
Edit warring at Marxism–Leninism
Hello BunnyyHop. You've been warned for edit warring per a complaint at the noticeboard. You may be blocked if you revert the article again without getting a prior consensus in your favor on the talk page. Let me know if you have any questions. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 18:38, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
- Hello EdJohnston! Thanks for offering your time. An editor as made a comment on the talk page, and I have altered my article according to his concerns.
- I have some questions. When do I know consensus has been reached?
- In the article it's defined as: "Consensus on Misplaced Pages does not mean unanimity (which is ideal but not always achievable), nor is it the result of a vote. Decision making and reaching consensus involve an effort to incorporate all editors' legitimate concerns, while respecting Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. "
- For example, I think I have addressed the concern of this editor, but there's two more (one of them hasn't replied in a while). When do I know it's okay to place it in the main article? If he says he's okay with it today, do I put it in the main page today? Or do I have to wait for the other editors to express themselves? What if this editor who expressed his concerns, or the editors, don't reply in say, two days, do I still have to wait until the day they reply? When I gave one day limits I did that because I thought that way I wouldn't be edit warring, but that's equivocated. What if an editor doesn't give me anything concrete to edit and just delays the conversation for days? BunnyyHop (talk) 21:14, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
- Among those who have expressed their opinion at Talk:Marxism–Leninism, it seems that "At least four other editors have opposed your changes" according to Asarlaí (talk · contribs) and you are the only one in support. So I think it would take at least two people verbally expressing agreement with you on some new wording for the situation to change. You could also just ask on Talk, 'Is there now consensus for XX?' The others seem to believe you are whitewashing Marxism–Leninism, giving it credit for its promises rather than the actuality of how it worked out when it was tried. EdJohnston (talk) 21:42, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you, this was very useful! I have expressed my opinion in the Talk page, and so far the other editor has only protested about 2 minor things which I have already fixed. Seems like it's going in a good route, and I'm happy! BunnyyHop (talk) 22:32, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
- Among those who have expressed their opinion at Talk:Marxism–Leninism, it seems that "At least four other editors have opposed your changes" according to Asarlaí (talk · contribs) and you are the only one in support. So I think it would take at least two people verbally expressing agreement with you on some new wording for the situation to change. You could also just ask on Talk, 'Is there now consensus for XX?' The others seem to believe you are whitewashing Marxism–Leninism, giving it credit for its promises rather than the actuality of how it worked out when it was tried. EdJohnston (talk) 21:42, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
BunnyyHop you are removing sections without a prior consensus
BunnyyHop revert the edit, please do not edit war. Vallee01 (talk) 19:40, 30 November 2020 (UTC):
- Vallee01, express your concerns on the talk page. The forked paragraph was replaced by an already existing article that goes in detail about criticism of communist party rule.BunnyyHop (talk) 19:46, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
- BunnyyHop if there is no consensus, and someone has an issue with your edit you have to revert. BunnyyHop this is a warning. Vallee01 (talk) 19:50, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
- Your objection has already been extensively criticized. I'll keep it in the overview to be altered. BunnyyHop (talk) 19:56, 30 November 2020 (UTC)