Talk:American Arts Commemorative Series medallions

This is the talk page for discussing American Arts Commemorative Series medallions and anything related to its purposes and tasks.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Misplaced Pages? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

American Arts Commemorative Series medallions is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Misplaced Pages community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.

[REDACTED]

This article appeared on Misplaced Pages's Main Page as Today's featured article on December 3, 2017.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
March 13, 2011	Good article nominee	Listed
February 28, 2015	Featured article candidate	Promoted

A fact from this article appeared on Misplaced Pages's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on January 24, 2011.The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that U.S. Senator Jesse Helms suggested a new series of gold medallions that would make it easier for people to buy gold?

Current status: Featured article

This article is rated FA-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Numismatics: American currency Mid‑importance

	Numismatics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Numismatics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of numismatics and currencies on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NumismaticsWikipedia:WikiProject NumismaticsTemplate:WikiProject Numismaticsnumismatic
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the American currency task force.

United States Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.

United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Finance & Investment Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

GA toolbox
Copyvio detector Authorship External links
Reviewing
Templates Criteria Instructions

This review is transcluded from Talk:American Arts Commemorative Series medallions/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 12:14, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: One found, denticle and unlinked as I think neither Dermal denticle nor Pulp stone are meant here. Is this in fact the correct word? Jezhotwells (talk) 12:19, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Linkrot: None found. Jezhotwells (talk) 12:21, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
The medallions were initially sold through mail order by obtaining that day's price by telephone Rather clumsy, can this be re-phrased?

Beginning in 1982, denticles, reeding and a statement of gold content and national origin were added to the medallions. As noted above in the disambiguations section, denticles needs explanation as there is no suitable Misplaced Pages target. Suggest a suitable paraphrase of this source.

Otherwise prose is fine, the lead is short but I believe that it adequately summarises the article.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
References are RS, and those that are on-line support the statements, assume good faith for others, no evidence of OR
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
Covers the subject in sufficent detail, no unnecessary trivia.
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
NPOV
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
Stable
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Licensed and captioned.
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
On hold for seven days for these issues to be addressed. Jezhotwells (talk) 12:37, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
Ok, this is good to go, so I am happy to list. Congratulations! Jezhotwells (talk) 14:22, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for the review! I've fixed the problems you noted above. Rewording the mail order part was a little trickly, but I think it reads a lot better now. Thanks again!-RHM22 (talk) 14:10, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on American Arts Commemorative Series medallions. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:44, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

Width issue

Is there a way to reduce the width of the images in the "Designs and sales figures" so content does not extend beyond the width of my screen? ---Another Believer _(Talk) 21:49, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Categories: