Misplaced Pages

DNA photoionization

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Physical-chemical process

DNA photoionization is the phenomenon according to which ultraviolet radiation absorbed directly by a DNA system (mononucleotide, single or double strand, G-quadruplex…) induces the ejection of electrons, leaving electron holes on the nucleic acid.

The loss of an electron gives rise to a radical cation on the DNA. Radical cations are precursors to oxidative damage, ultimately leading to carcinogenic mutations and cell death. This aspect, detrimental to the health, is exploited in the germicidal equipments using far-UVC lamps. The electric charges photogenarated in DNA could potentially find applications in optoelectronic devices.

Two properties are crucial regarding photoionization. On the one hand, the ionization energy (also called ionization potential, IP), refers to the energy necessary to remove one electron from a molecule; the lowest IP, corresponding to the ejection of a first electron, is the most biologically relevant factor. On the other hand, the photoionization quantum yield Φ, that is the number of electrons that are ejected over the number of absorbed photons; Φ depends on the irradiation wavelength and decreases.

The mechanism underlying DNA ionization depends on the number of photons that provoke the ejection of one electron (one-photon or multiphoton, induced by intense laser pulses). And, in the case of one-photon process, it differs according to the photon energy (high-energy or low-energy). While one- and two-photon ionization in condensed phase (aqueous solutions, cells…) is mainly studied in respect with the UV-induced oxidative damage, multiphoton ionization in the gas phase, often coupled to mass spectroscopy, is used in various techniques in order to obtain broader spectroscopic, analytical, structural or therapeutic information.

Ionization potentials

Since the end of the 20 century, numerous theoretical studies, performed using various types of quantum chemistry methods, focus on the computation of the lowest IP of nucleobases. Particular effort is being dedicated to evaluate environmental effects, such as the presence of water molecules, base-pairing, base stacking or base-sequence. All these studies agree that the IP decreases in the order: thymine, cytosine, adenine, guanine.

Experimentally, IPs are determined by photoelectron spectroscopy. A series of systematic measurements of all the elementary DNA components as well as of genomic DNA in liquid jets, associated with computations, provided important information regarding the ionization in aqueous media. The IP values measured for nucleosides/nucleotides (8.1, 8.1, 7.6 and 7.3 eV for thymidine monophosphate, cytosine, adenosine and guanosine, respectively) match those computed for vertical ionization. The latter corresponds to electron ejection without prior geometrical rearrangement of the molecular framework. Most importantly, it was evidenced that base-pairing and base-stacking do not have any significant effect.

One photon ionization

Photoionization quantum yields

Photoionization quantum yields are determined for DNA in aqueous solution by means of the transient absorption spectroscopy using as excitation source nanosecond laser pulses. The ejected electrons are solvated by the water molecules (hydrated) on the sub-picosecond time scale. As the absorption spectrum of hydrated electrons, peaking 720 nm, is well known, they can be characterized in a quantitative way.

High-energy photoionization

The first experiments were reported in the 1990s using excitation at 193 nm. The quantum yields determined for the nucleobases at this wavelength amount to a few percent. In agreement with the later studies performed by photoelectron spectroscopy, the Φ found for genomic DNA is the linear combination of the quantum yield values of the individual nucleobases, in agreement with the findings of the photoelectron spectroscopy.

Low-energy photoionization

The first studies on low-energy photoionization, occurring at wavelengths for which the photon energy is significantly smaller compared to the lowest ionization potential of DNA, were reported back in 2005 (G-Quadruplexes at 308 nm) and 2006 (single and double strands at 266 nm). But this unexpected phenomenon started to be studied in a systematic way only ten years later. To that effect, specific protocols regarding the purity of the nucleic acids and the ingredients of the aqueous solution as well as the intensity of the exciting laser pulses were established.

Cartoon on low-energy photoionization. Electron (hat) photo-ejection is more efficient in G-Quadruplexes than in duplexes.

In contrast to the high-energy, low-energy photoionization strongly depends on the secondary DNA structure. It is not observed for mononucleosides, mononucleotides or purely stacked single strands (Φ<0.5x10). The quantum yields determined for duplexes fall in the range of (1-2)x10 while the highest Φ values, up to 1.4x10, have been detected for G-Quadruplexes. The photonization quantum yield determined for genomic DNA is similar to that reported for the formation of bipyrimidine photoproducts.

The detailed examination of the structural factors affecting the low-energy photoionization, combined to quantum chemical calculations, indicates that it occurs via a complex mechanism. The latter involves excited charge transfer states, in which an atomic charge is transferred from one nucleobase to a neighboring one; such states are known to be populated during the electronic relaxation following photon absorption. Subsequently, a small population of these states undergoes charge separation. And, eventually, the electron is ejected from the nucleobase bearing the negative charge, because its ionization potential is lower compared to those of neutral nucleobases.

Two-photon ionization

Two-photon photoionization is provoked by intense laser pulses of short duration. In this case, a first photon absorbed by DNA gives rise to an electronic excited state. During its lifetime, the latter may absorb a second photon. The electron is then ejected from this excited state and not from the ground state, as happens for the one-photon ionization. This ionization mode started to be used already from the 1980sin order to characterize chemically the final DNA lesions (single and double strand breaks, 8-oxo-7,8-dihydroguanine,..), stemming from this process. Typically, lasers emitting at 248 or 266 nm have been employed in combination to analytical or biochemical methods. Such measurements are performed both on DNA solutions and on cells.

The need to correlate the observed lesions with the ejected electrons lead to first time-resolved absorption studies on the process triggered by absorption of UV radiation directly by DNA. Thus, signatures of the nucleobase radicals were discovered either in the UV-visible spectral domain or in the infrared.

References

  1. Cadet, J. (2008). "Oxidatively generated damage to the guanine moiety of DNA: Mechanistic aspects and formation in cells". Acc. Chem. Res. 41 (8): 1075–1083. doi:10.1021/ar700245e. PMID 18666785.
  2. Andrés, C. M. C. (2023). "Chemical Insights into Oxidative and Nitrative Modifications of DNA". International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 24 (20): 15240. doi:10.3390/ijms242015240. PMC 10607741. PMID 37894920.
  3. Görlitz, M. (2024). "Assessing the safety of new germicidal far-UVC technologies". Photochem. Photobiol. 100 (3): 501–520. doi:10.1111/php.13866. PMID 37929787.
  4. Markovitsi, Dimitra (2024). "Processes triggered in guanine quadruplexes by direct absorption of UV radiation: From fundamental studies toward optoelectronic biosensors". Photochemistry and Photobiology. 100 (2): 262–274. doi:10.1111/php.13826. PMID 37365765.
  5. Canuel, C. (2006). "Time-resolved photoelectron and photoion fragmentation spectroscopy study of 9-methyladenine and its hydrates: a contribution to the understanding of the ultrafast radiationless decay of excited DNA bases" (PDF). Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 8 (34): 3978–3987. Bibcode:2006PCCP....8.3978C. doi:10.1039/B606437J. PMID 17028688.
  6. Yang, J. (2005). "Characterization of oligodeoxynucleotides by electron detachment dissociation Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry". Analytical Chemistry. 77 (6): 1876–1882. doi:10.1021/ac048415g. PMID 15762599.
  7. Gabelica, V. (2021). "Native Mass Spectrometry and Nucleic Acid G-Quadruplex Biophysics: Advancing Hand in Hand". Acc. Chem. Res. 54 (19): 3691–3699. arXiv:2306.04260. doi:10.1021/acs.accounts.1c00396.
  8. Kenderdine (2023). "The multifaceted roles of mass spectrometric analysis in nucleic acids drug discovery and development". Mass Spectrometry Reviews. 42 (4): 1332–1357. Bibcode:2023MSRv...42.1332K. doi:10.1002/mas.21766. PMC 9218015. PMID 34939674.
  9. Fernando, H. (1998). "Conduction-band-edge ionization thresholds of DNA components in aqueous solution". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 95 (10): 5550–5555. Bibcode:1998PNAS...95.5550F. doi:10.1073/pnas.95.10.5550. PMC 20415. PMID 9576920.
  10. Roca-Sanjuan, D. (2006). "Ab initio determination of the ionization potentials of DNA and RNA nucleobases". J. Chem. Phys. 125 (8): 084302. Bibcode:2006JChPh.125h4302R. doi:10.1063/1.2336217. hdl:10550/2383. PMID 16965007.
  11. Cauet, E. (2006). "Ab initio study of the ionization of the DNA bases: Ionization potentials and excited states of the cations". J. Phys. Chem. A. 110 (29): 9200–9211. Bibcode:2006JPCA..110.9200C. doi:10.1021/jp0617625. PMID 16854034.
  12. Crespo-Hernández, C.E. (2004). "Ab initio ionization energy thresholds of DNA and RNA bases in gas phase and in aqueous solution". J. Phys. Chem. A. 108 (30): 6373–6377. Bibcode:2004JPCA..108.6373C. doi:10.1021/jp049270k.
  13. Pluharova, E. (2011). "Ionization of Purine Tautomers in Nucleobases, Nucleosides, and Nucleotides: From the Gas Phase to the Aqueous Environment". J Phys Chem B. 105 (5): 1294–1305. doi:10.1021/jp110388v. PMID 21247073.
  14. Uddin, I. A. (2024). "Ionization Patterns and Chemical Reactivity of Cytosine-Guanine Watson-Crick Pairs". ChemPhysChem. 25 (9): e202300946. doi:10.1002/cphc.202300946. PMID 38381922.
  15. Sugiyama, H. (1996). "Theoretical studies of GC-specific photocleavage of DNA via electron transfer: Significant lowering of ionization potential and 5'-localization of HOMO of stacked GG bases in B-form DNA". J. Am. Chem. Soc. 118 (30): 7063–7068. Bibcode:1996JAChS.118.7063S. doi:10.1021/ja9609821.
  16. Rooman, M. (2023). "Estimating the Vertical Ionization Potential of Single-Stranded DNA Molecules" (PDF). Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling. 63 (6): 1766–1775. doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.2c01525. PMID 36877828.
  17. Yang, X. (2004). "Direct experimental observation of the low ionization potentials of guanine in free oligonucleotides by using photoelectron spectroscopy". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 101 (51): 17588–17592. Bibcode:2004PNAS..10117588Y. doi:10.1073/pnas.0405157101. PMC 539719. PMID 15591345.
  18. Touboul, D. (2013). "VUV photoionization of gas phase adenine and cytosine: A comparison between oven and aerosol vaporization". Journal of Chemical Physics. 138 (9). Bibcode:2013JChPh.138i4203T. doi:10.1063/1.4793734. PMID 23485287.
  19. Slavicek, P. (2009). "Ionization Energies of Aqueous Nucleic Acids: Photoelectron Spectroscopy of Pyrimidine Nucleosides and ab Initio Calculations". J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131 (18): 6460–6467. Bibcode:2009JAChS.131.6460S. doi:10.1021/ja8091246. PMID 19374336.
  20. Schroeder, C. A. (2015). "Oxidation Half-Reaction of Aqueous Nucleosides and Nucleotides via Photoelectron Spectroscopy Augmented by ab Initio Calculations". J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137 (1): 201–209. Bibcode:2015JAChS.137..201S. doi:10.1021/ja508149e. PMID 25551179.
  21. Pluharova, E. (2013). "Unexpectedly Small Effect of the DNA Environment on Vertical Ionization Energies of Aqueous Nucleobases". J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 4 (21): 3766–3769. doi:10.1021/jz402106h.
  22. Pluharova, E. (2015). "Modelling Photoionization of Aqueous DNA and Its Components". Acc. Chem. Res. 48 (5): 1209–1217. doi:10.1021/ar500366z. PMID 25738773.
  23. Reuther, A. (1996). "Primary photochemical processes in water". Journal of Physical Chemistry. 100 (42): 16794–16800. doi:10.1021/jp961462v.
  24. Assel, M. (1998). "Dynamics of excited solvated electrons in aqueous solution monitored with femtosecond-time and polarization resolution". Journal of Physical Chemistry A. 102 (13): 2256–2262. Bibcode:1998JPCA..102.2256A. doi:10.1021/jp972499y.
  25. Torche, F. (2016). "Direct Evaluation of the Molar Absorption Coefficient of Hydrated Electron by the Isosbestic Point Method". J. Phys. Chem. B. 120 (29): 7201–7206. doi:10.1021/acs.jpcb.6b04796. PMID 27362328.
  26. Candeias, L.P. (1992). "Ionization of purine nucleosides and nucleotides and their components by 193-nm laser photolysis in aqueous solution: model studies for oxidative damage of DNA". J. Am. Chem. Soc. 114 (2): 699–704. Bibcode:1992JAChS.114..699C. doi:10.1021/ja00028a043.
  27. Candeias, L.P. (1992). "Ionization of polynucleotides and DNA in aqueous solution by 193 nm pulsed laser light - identification of base-derived radicals". Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 61 (1): 15–20. doi:10.1080/09553009214550571. PMID 1345926.
  28. Melvin, T. (1995). "193 nm Light Induces Single-strand Breakage of DNA Predominantly at Guanine". Photochem. Photobiol. 61 (6): 584–591. doi:10.1111/j.1751-1097.1995.tb09873.x. PMID 7568405.
  29. Pluharova, E. (2013). "Unexpectedly Small Effect of the DNA Environment on Vertical Ionization Energies of Aqueous Nucleobases". J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 4 (21): 3766–3769. doi:10.1021/jz402106h.
  30. Kawai, K. (2005). "Selective guanine oxidation by UVB-irradiation in telomeric DNA". Chem. Comm. (11): 1476–1477. doi:10.1039/b418000c. PMID 15756341.
  31. Marguet, S. (2006). "One and two photon ionization of DNA single and double helices studied by laser flash photolysis at 266 nm" (PDF). J. Phys. Chem. B. 10 (23): 11037–11039. doi:10.1021/jp062578m. PMID 16771360.
  32. Balanikas, E. (2021). "Guanine Radicals Induced in DNA by Low-Energy Photoionization" (PDF). Acc. Chem. Res. 53 (8): 1511–1519. doi:10.1021/acs.accounts.0c00245. PMID 32786340.
  33. Balanikas, E. (2021). "The Structural Duality of Nucleobases in Guanine Quadruplexes Controls Their Low-Energy Photoionization" (PDF). J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 12 (34): 8309−8313. doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c01846. PMID 34428044.
  34. Douki, T. (2006). "Low ionic strength reduces cytosine photoreactivity in UVC-irradiated isolated DNA". Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 5 (11): 1045–1051. Bibcode:2006PhPhS...5.1045D. doi:10.1039/b604517k. PMID 17077901.
  35. Balanikas, E.; Markovitsi, D. (2021). "DNA photoionization: from high to low energies" (PDF). In DNA Photodamage: From Light Absorption to Cellular Responses and Skin Cancer. Comprehensive Series in Photochemical and Photobiological Science. Vol. 21. pp. 29–50. doi:10.1039/9781839165580. ISBN 978-1-83916-196-4.
  36. Martínez Fernández, Lara; Improta, Roberto (2024). "Computational Studies on Photoinduced Charge Transfer Processes in Nucleic Acids: From Watson–Crick Dimers to Quadruple Helices". Nucleic Acid Photophysics and Photochemistry. Nucleic Acids and Molecular Biology. Vol. 36. pp. 29–50. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-68807-2_2. ISBN 978-3-031-68806-5.
  37. Bucher, D. B. (2014). "Charge separation and charge delocalization identified in long-living states of photoexcited DNA". Proc. Natl. AC. Sci. USA. 111 (12): 4369–4374. Bibcode:2014PNAS..111.4369B. doi:10.1073/pnas.1323700111. PMC 3970531. PMID 24616517.
  38. Schiedt, J. (1998). "Anion spectroscopy of uracil, thymine and the amino-oxo and amino-hydroxy tautomers of cytosine and their water clusters". Chem. Phys. 239 (1–3): 511–524. Bibcode:1998CP....239..511S. doi:10.1016/s0301-0104(98)00361-9.
  39. Gurzadyan, G. G. (1982). "THE STUDY OF FORMATION OF SINGLE-STRAND BREAKS IN THE DNA CHAIN UNDER PICOSECOND LASER UV IRRADIATION". Photobiochemistry and Photobiophysics. 4 (1–2): 87–93. doi:10.1016/S0165-8646(24)00076-X.
  40. Gurzadyan, G. G. (1991). "2-Quantum Photoprocesses in DNA under Picosecond Laser UV Irradiation at 216 and 270 nm". J. Photochem. Photobiol. B-Biol. 11 (3–4): 269–275. Bibcode:1991JPPB...11..269G. doi:10.1016/1011-1344(91)80032-d. PMID 1816362.
  41. Angelov, D. (1997). "igh-intensity UV laser photolysis of DNA and purine 2'-deoxyribonucleosides: Formation of 8-oxopurine damage and oligonucleotide strand cleavage as revealed by HPLC and gel electrophoresis studies". J. Am. Chem. Soc. 119 (47): 11373–11380. Bibcode:1997JAChS.11911373A. doi:10.1021/ja971728r.
  42. Lee, Y. A. (2008). "Oxidation of guanine in G, GG, and GGG sequence contexts by aromatic pyrenyl radical cations and carbonate radical anions: Relationship between kinetics and distribution of alkali-labile lesions". Journal of Physical Chemistry B. 112 (6): 1834–1844. doi:10.1021/jp076777x. PMC 3713794. PMID 18211057.
  43. Arce, R. (1983). "Intermediates in the room temperature flash photolysis of adenine and some of its derivatives". Photochem. Photobiol. 38 (6): 631–637. doi:10.1111/j.1751-1097.1983.tb03593.x.
  44. Wala, M. (1990). "Quantum yields for the generation of hydrated electrons and single strand breaks in poly(C), poly(A) and single-stranded DNA in aqueous solution on 20 ns laser excitation at 248 nm". J. Photochem. Photobiol. A-Chem. 53 (1): 87–108. Bibcode:1990JPPA...53...87W. doi:10.1016/1010-6030(90)87116-S.
  45. Görner, H. (1994). "Photochemistry of DNA and related biomolecules: quantum yields and consequences of photoionization". J. Photochem. Photobiol. B: Biol. 26 (2): 117–139. doi:10.1016/1011-1344(94)07068-7. PMID 7815187.
  46. Reuther, A. (1996). "Primary Photochemical Processes in Thymine in Concentrated Aqueous Solution Studied by Femtosecond UV Spectroscopy". Journal of Physical Chemistry. 100 (13): 5570–5577. doi:10.1021/jp9532881.

Further reading

Reviews and Accounts

Book Chapters

Categories:
DNA photoionization Add topic