Misplaced Pages

Fleming v Securities Commission

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This article relies largely or entirely on a single source. Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page. Please help improve this article by introducing citations to additional sources.
Find sources: "Fleming v Securities Commission" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (August 2024)
Fleming v Securities Commission
CourtCourt of Appeal of New Zealand
Full case name W D Fleming, P F C Murdock, J Carley v Securities Commission, Taranaki Newspapers Ltd
Decided21 March 1995
Citation 2 NZLR 514
Court membership
Judges sittingCooke P, Richardson J, Casey J, Gault J, Ellis J
Keywords
negligence

Fleming v Securities Commission 2 NZLR 514 is a cited case in New Zealand regarding negligent cases against the government.

Background

Between 1987 and 1988, finance company Star Investments placed adverts for deposits in 2 Taranaki newspapers. These adverts were illegal under the Securities Act on numerous grounds. A concerned local solicitor contacted the Securities Commission, and they commenced an investigation, resulting in the Commission advising both the company and the newspaper to cease advertising the securities.

Despite this, the advertisements continued until the company collapsed.

Three of the investors sued both the Securities Commission and the newspaper

Held

The court of appeal rejected their claim.

References

  1. McLay, Geoff (2003). Butterworths Student Companion Torts (4th ed.). LexisNexis. ISBN 0-408-71686-X.


Stub icon

This article relating to case law in New Zealand is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it.

Categories:
Fleming v Securities Commission Add topic