Misplaced Pages

Judicial review in Sweden

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
Find sources: "Judicial review in Sweden" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (December 2013) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
Politics of Sweden
Basic Laws
Monarchy
Executive
Legislature
Judiciary
Elections
Administrative divisions
Foreign relations



Related topics

Judicial review in Sweden (Swedish: lagprövningsrätt) is a constitutional provision, by which any Swedish court or administrative authority can declare an Act of the Parliament of Sweden to be in violation of the Constitution or a Government Ordinance to be in violation of laws passed by the Riksdag and thus inapplicable in the concrete case. Since 1994, the Constitution has stipulated that no law or other regulation may violate the European Convention (Ch. 2, art. 19 of the Instrument of Government). Traditionally, a more important check on the ability of the Riksdag to pass laws in violation of the rights provided by the Constitution has been the judicial preview exercised by the Council on Legislation. The preview may or may not be respected by the legislator.

See also

References

  1. "The Constitution of Sweden". Sveriges Riksdag. Retrieved 3 August 2017.
  2. "Lagbestämmelser" (in Swedish). Lagrådet (Council on Legislation). Retrieved 18 December 2013.
Stub icon

This Sweden-related article is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it.

Categories:
Judicial review in Sweden Add topic