2017 United States Supreme Court case
| Manrique v. United States | |
|---|---|
 Supreme Court of the United States | |
| Decided April 19, 2017 | |
| Full case name | Manrique v. United States |
| Docket no. | 15-7250 |
| Citations | 581 U.S. ___ (more) |
| Holding | |
| A defendant wishing to appeal an order imposing restitution in a deferred restitution case must file a notice of appeal from that order. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | Thomas |
| Dissent | Ginsburg, joined by Sotomayor |
| Gorsuch took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. | |
Manrique v. United States, 581 U.S. ___ (2017), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that a defendant wishing to appeal an order imposing restitution in a deferred restitution case must file a notice of appeal from that order.
References
- Manrique v. United States, No. 15-7250, 581 U.S. ___ (2017).
- "Opinion analysis: Justices require notice of appeal from deferred restitution judgments". SCOTUSblog. April 19, 2017. Retrieved December 4, 2024.
External links
This article incorporates written opinion of a United States federal court. As a work of the U.S. federal government, the text is in the public domain. "he Court is unanimously of opinion that no reporter has or can have any copyright in the written opinions delivered by this Court." Wheaton v. Peters, 33 U.S. (8 Pet.) 591, 668 (1834)
 | This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it. |