Misplaced Pages

Mautam

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
(Redirected from Rat flood) Cyclic ecological phenomenon

Flowering bamboo

Mautâm (lit. 'The Finish of Mau Bamboo') is a cyclic ecological phenomenon that occurs every 48–50 years in the northeastern Indian states of Tripura, Mizoram and Manipur, as well as in many places of Assam which are 30% covered by wild bamboo forests, and Chin State in Myanmar, particularly Hakha, Thantlang, Falam, Paletwa and Matupi Townships. It begins with a rat population boom, which in turn creates a widespread famine in those areas.

During mautâm, Melocanna baccifera, a species of bamboo, flowers at one time across a wide area. This event is followed invariably by a plague of black rats in what is called a rat flood. The bamboo flowering brings a temporary windfall of seeds, and rats multiply, exhaust the bamboo seeds, leave the forests, forage on stored grain, and cause devastating famine.

Regular rodent outbreaks associated with bamboo flowering (and subsequent fruiting and seeding) also occur in the nearby Indian states of Arunachal Pradesh, Assam, Manipur, and Nagaland, as well as in Laos, Japan, Madagascar, and South America. Thingtâm, a similar famine, occurs with the flowering of another species of bamboo, Bambusa tulda.

Characteristics

There are two version of these famines. Both concern bamboo plants, one species known as Mau and another known as Thing hence the two famines being known as Mautam and Thingtam. Mautam and thingtam have been observed to strictly alternate, with a gap of 18 years from mautam to thingtam and a gap of 30 years from thingtam to mautam. Local knowledge on the phenomenon describe the swarming of an insect called thangang (locusts) preceding all instances of mautam. Zoologists believe that the flowering of the bamboo attracts the migration of insects into the region hence acting as a signal.

Recorded instances of mautam include 1864, 1910–1912, 1958–1959, and 2007–2008 and those of thingtam include 1880–1884, 1928–1929, and 1976–1977. The next predicted events if this pattern continues are thingtam in 2025–2026 and mautam in 2055–2056.

In 1911 under Superintendent F.C Henniker, the missionary James Herbert Lorrain and Mizo elders, a report on the full extent of mautam and bamboo and associated indigenous knowledge was compiled. The different species of bamboo in the Lushai Hills were recorded and differentiated.

History

Precolonial mautam

Due to the cyclical nature of mautam and thingtam occurring, there is little doubt about famines occurring before 1860. It is speculated for this reason, previous inhabitants of the Lushai Hills left or evacuated due to the pressure of food insecurity.

1860-1861 mautam famine

The British took notice of the bamboo flowering the changes in the Lushai Hills around the time of the first recorded mautam. The British described the bulky survivors as lean and thin beyond description. The observations were validated with a supporting report from Manipur detailing the effects of mautam. Apart from standard observation, the British elaborate little on the early mautam famine. The bamboo flowering affected the Lushai Hills, southern Manipur and the Cachar region. Colonel McCulloch of Manipur reported as early as 1858 on the mass flowering of bamboo and how an increase in rodent population had led to unrest in the region. The onset of the of 1860 mautam famine, led to the dissolution of Old Tualte. Old Tualte was a famous settlement of 1000 households under Chief Vanhnuailiana which declined with the famine.

1881-1882 thingtam famine

The onset of the mautam famine in 1881 led to the end of the East-West War. An immigration of 80 families and around 400 people immigrated out of Khalkam's settlement into the plains. The settlers under Khalkam who belonged to the Rangte subclan arrived in Cachar and settled near the Dharmakal tea estate. Their arrival was followed by another mass migration of men from the chiefs Poiboi,Lalhai and Chunglena. Countless areas such as Tipaimukh, Jalnacherra, Akai settlement, and Hailakandi Valley were settled by Lushai refugees, with some even arriving in rafts from the Tlawng River. The arrival of the refugees alarmed the British administration, whose tea planters considered them synonymous with raiders. The immigrants were investigated and revealed their intention to trade all their products in return for food and rice. Several chiefs sold out their ivory jewellery, guns and rubber deposits from the trees after their jhums had been exhausted. The immigrants themselves traded all their products, such as bamboo, cane and rubber, in return for food. The Western chiefs under Khalkam met with the Eastern chiefs under Poiboi and Lalhai to end the conflict and jointly request British aid for the famine. The upas of the chiefs met with Knox Wight, the deputy commissioner of Cachar. The famine also oversaw a large immigration of Lushais from the hills into regions such as Cachar and Chittagong to offset the famine's effects. Some individuals even agreed to partake as coolies in return for regular payments in rice. As a result, the local officers of Cachar and Chittagong forwarded the matter to Shillong and Calcutta. As a result, the Government of India authorised the Chief Commissioner to take the necessary steps.

The Assistance Commissioner of Cachar, Mr Place and Rai Bahadur Hari Charan Sarma visited the Lushai Hills to report the amount of rice aid required through the observable population. Rai Bahadur was acquainted with the Lushai and knew of their language, customs and their chiefs. Rai Habadur left on 11 November 1881 to conduct a survey of the population. Midway through November the upas from chiefs Lalsavenga, Sailenpui, Banaitangi and Lengpunga met with Rai Bahadur with requests for food. Apart from the rice paddies, the rats had devoured their grain storages as well. Interviews with refugees in Jalnacherra revealed their previous settlement under chieftainess Pibuk (mother of Sukpilal) before moving to Banaitangi and Ratanpui (a son of Sukpilal) upon her death. The refugees requested permission to jhum on British territory but were not permitted to do so. He met with an encampment of 100 households at Pakuacherra who had been without food for two days. Further on his survey, Rai Bahadur met with 100 men on 15 bamboo rafts with sick malnourished children. Ratanpui's settlement of 600 people was reported to be surviving off of leaves, roots and fruits. The chiefs wished the riverine bazaars and traders to reopen their markets and sell them food, which they could repay with the next jhum harvest. Rai Bahadur was appointed in charge of famine relief operations. His experience in famine relief described the deaths of many, the emaciation of the elderly and children and the number of individuals leaving their settlements to the plains to secure better sources of food. His subsequent reports would state that no alternative form of food is available for the Lushais whose crops were destroyed. A report detailed a population of 30,000 in the South Lushai Hills, when accounting for smaller diets in children the number was closed in to 20,000. According to the calculations of half a seer of rice per head, 22500 maunds of rice are required for a period of three months.

British intelligence reports from J. Knox Wight hinted at the desperation of tribes to prepare raiding on the bordering settlements in Cachar, Tripura and Manipur. Further insight revealed that many of the older generations and chiefs were against this way of procuring food. The British provided relief to the refugees but considered the possibility of invading the Lushai Hills and ending all future hostilities the raiders might bring once more. Points against the invasion included helping the chiefs form good relations with the British, preventing permanent settlements of refugees in British territory, requiring the foresight of the Government of India in regard to territory changes and the futility of past expeditions in conquering tribes in the unfamiliar terrain. The British found it advantageous to advance into the Lushai Hills under friendly overtures to study the geography, culture and politics of the unknown frontier. Rai Bahadur supported this plan of action as he was sympathetic to the plight of the Lushais under famine.

The next harvest for the Lushai Hills was estimated to be July 1882. Rai Bahadur further requested aid from the Government of India who obliged. As a result, a budget of r 50,000 was granted for relief operations. Rai Bahadur made suggestions which were followed through, including two warehouses of rice. Each warehouse would have a capacity of storing 1000 maunds of rice paddy. The government of Assam also gave orders to the mirasdars and other well off cultivators to redirect their rice to the Lushai Hills aid relief operations. The rice was awarded to Lushai individuals as loans by the British. Able-bodied Lushai were to be employed as coolies working on the construction of roads in return for payments in rice. The Cachar side famine relief supplied 20,000 maunds of paddy.

The Chittagong frontier under the Government of Bengal also supported famine relief operations. The Lushai-Kukis in the Chittagong Hill Tracts were also suffering from the local effects of mautam. With the support of F. Knox Wight, the Chief Commissioner of Shillong contacted the Lieutenant Governor of Bengal, Sir Bailey who agreed to help. All of the officers of the Government of Bengal were in agreement on the policy forward with an exception of John Edgar the chief secretary. The lieutenant governor of Bengal, Sir Bayley authorised officers for the creation of grain storages at Demagiri and other stations. The reasoning for the policy centred around an interest to maintain friendly relations with the Lushai frontier. Furthermore, the aid policy would enable the British to bypass the upas of the chiefs and establish karbaris with the chiefs instead. Karbaris were established with the Howlong chiefs and supplied with an allowance. Further reports into the famine, led to the government constructing a map of the affected areas. The famine had affected nearly all of the hills and the encompassed Howlong, Sailo, Thangluaha and Reangs. On 5 March 1882, E. Lowie submitted a report detailing about 3000 houses requiring aid which would amount up to 14000 maunds total. Grain storages were established across sits such as Demagiri, Kassalong, and Fiskisiva.

1910-1911 mautam famine

The 1910-1911 mautam famine was preceded by a locust swarm (thangnang) which engulfed trees and created a noise described as a monsoon. The arrival of Halley's Comet at the same time also induced a bad omen at the time of many chiefs and elders. However, the excessive proliferation of locusts did not see any consumption of food or trees. Individuals would scoop up the locusts in buckets and use the fatty oils or the bugs themselves as delicacies. Following the progression of mautam, the rat population did not boom equally across the Lushai Hills, the inhabitants between the Tuirini and Khawchhak Tuipui rivers were affected first by the mautam famine. However, the successful harvest of the year saw an excess of crops and grains that were stored away and used to offset the effects of the booming rat population. These excess storages however were localised to a few prominent settlements. The remaining rice paddies of the autumn season were devoured by rats. Since the Lushai Hills were under sovereignty of the British Raj the government took initiative in combatting the phenomenon. Rewards were offered to the killing of rats by producing their tails. A report of 1912-1913 detailed that 179015 rat tails were produced as a result. Locally made rat traps were also implemented preemptively of the famine. The excess food stored in Bunghmun village could not be accessed by many other villages at the time. Hence, the government sent food via ferries and boats from Demagiri, Sairang and Tipaimukh to the harder-to-reach areas of the Lushai Hills. The rice was loaned to individuals as a relief; if the interest and principal could not be paid back, then individuals were expected to partake as a coolie in forced labour for the British. The main structures built by the coolies were a water storage tank in Aizawl. In some cases, even if individuals paid off their loan and interest for the rice aid, then they would still be required to partake in forced labour for the British for those who were not able-bodied and failed to pay. The unpopularity of the conditions led to another migration where individuals migrated to Lakhipur in Cachar and Tripura.Hrangvanga Sailo led a migration to Tripura in 1912 where they permanently remained in Tripura even after the decline of the mautam famine.

1959 mautam famine

In 1951 the Anti-Famine Campaign Organization was formed under C. Rokhuma in anticipation of the upcoming mautam. The organisation would be organised with a chairman headed by Lalmawia, a vice chairman headed by H. Khuma, the organising secretary under C. Rokhuma, Pacchunga as treasurer, Lalbiaka as secretary and Vanthuama as a member. As an apolitical organisation it attracted members from the Mizo Union and United Mizo Freedom Organization. In 1954, the AFCO met with the Supply Minister of Assam to warn about the upcoming Mautam. The minister did not heed the warning nor believe that the flowering bamboo lead to a rat population surge to induce a famine. It was instead passed off as a superstition. Assurances were granted that if a famine would occur aid would be provided. In 1957, the rat population in Mizoram had been observed to grow. The district council had also counterintuitively banned pesticides, which was overturned with pressure from the AFCO.

The mautam famine occurred earlier than expected in the cyclical phenomenon predictions. The flowers had been observed since 1957. Reports of rat swarms were made from every area of Mizoram were reported in search of bamboo fruits and damages of rice paddies. Fortnightly reports were submitted to the central government on the crop conditions and rat populations. As a result, the plant protection department was created under the suggestion of Sundaram Pillai, the Plant Protection Officer of the North-East region. The Mizo District Council further delegated anti-famine operations to the Anti-Famine Organization. The use, responsibility, procurement and distribution of rat poison was under the organisation's authority. Public service programs educated individuals to use poison baits properly with volunteers spreading the information to village councils. On 29 October 1958, the district council passed a unanimous resolution to source precautionary funds for the famine and to test relief strategies. However, B.P. Chaliha the Chief Minister of Assam who did not cooperate with the Mizo Union ignored it. Most Assamese officials also did not believe that a bamboo flowering could lead to famine at the time and withheld support for precautionary measures.

The famine began in December 1958 and had hit the people east of the Turini River. By 1959 the Assam Government failed to recognise the famine officially. Due to this relief and aid were withheld. The rat population surged devoured the crops and began to destroy rice stockage overnight. A report was made of rats devouring a two acre farmland of crops. Death were beginning to be reported in Souther Mizoram among the Mara and Lai communities. In the east, Chakma and Reang people were reported to be surviving on wild arul (grass). The Assam Government finally responded after a financial commissioner visited Mizoram on 19 January 1959 and reported the conditions. The immediate aid saw 150 jeeps for carrying foods to the famine affected areas. However, the Assam Government officially recognised the famine in Mizoram after Williamson Sangma, the tribal welfare minister brought pressure to recognise the situation. Relief initially came slowly as the Assam Government underestimated the impact of the famine. This raised tensions in which the district council of Mizoram classified the Assam Government as incapable.

The government of Assam took on larger and substantial relief policies between the period of August 1959 to October 1960. Roads were constructed for jeeps and transport to reach settlements to supply emergency food relief. A relief program for the poor was made without any repayment obligations. Subsidies were introduced to increase the affordability of food and rice to increase access to relief. Medical aid for malnutrition and increased exposure to disease was also funded, and nutritious food programs were established for children. Agricultural schemes saw the free distribution of seeds and pesticides as well to encourage harvesting and subsistence farming. Further policies included famine relief vehicles, air dropping of food relief and construction of grain strorages. Planes such as Dakota used in World War Two were used for the airdropping. Supplies also came in by boat but this method was considered slow and inefficient for large scale relief. Roads became the preferred method as infrastructure favoured the major population centres such as Aizawl and Lunglei. Donations were also given from the Governor of Assam Relief fund, Chief Minister B.P. Chaliha, public donations, Indian Peoples Famine Trust Fund and the National Christian Council of India.

The nature of famine relief saw the Assam Government grant direct relief without the district council. Nag argues this was a political scheme to sideline the Mizo Union who were already declining from the 1957 election. When complaints of famine aid and relief raised, Chaliha blamed the Mizo Union for non-cooperation. The Assam Government would subsequently deny cases of starvation deaths reported by the district council. Several factors such as a lack of infrastructure with urban settlements were the reason. Jeeps carrying food aid could only reliably pass through Aizawl and Lungleh. Outer areas such as Demagiri and Champhai, and North Vanlaiphai required to go on foot. At the same time, many complaints stemmed from the Chakma and Reang, who argued that the Mizo Christians were being prioritized over those who were Buddhist and Hindu. As Chaliha continued to offset the Mizo Union's participation in relief efforts, they turned to the newly created Mizo Cultural Council which under Laldenga had been converted to the Mizo National Famine Front.

The MNFF reaped credit for the food relief while being able to spread nationalist messages. Laldenga himself campaigned with a slogan of "Mizoram for Mizos" while distributing food relief. The bulk of the relief fund went into transport subsidies to deliver the food aid. Food aid were also taken as headloads, the difficult terrain meant that the amount food able to be transported by hand would be 25kg at a distance of 15km. While airdropping of food was considered, the packaging was too defective for such an operation and would have led to wastage, the terrain and weather also affected ideal spots for air drops of food to the interior villages and settlements.

During the mautam period of 1958 and 1959 the Mizo National Famine Front (MNFF) was set up to provide relief to the far-flung areas. This body later became the Mizo National Front (MNF), which staged a major uprising in 1966. Under its leader Laldenga (who later became the chief minister of Mizoram), MNF fought a bitter separatist struggle for 20 years against the Indian Army until an accord that guaranteed Mizoram's autonomy as a separate state was signed in 1986.

See also

References

  1. Nag 2008, p. 71.
  2. "Swarms of rats destroy crops in townships in Chin state", Inside Burma, Mizzima.
  3. Rat Attack, Plant vs. Predator, PBS.
  4. Normile, D (February 2010). "Holding back a torrent of rats". Science. 327 (5967): 806–7. Bibcode:2010Sci...327..806N. doi:10.1126/science.327.5967.806. PMID 20150483.
  5. Foster, Peter (14 October 2004), Bamboo threatens to bring Indian famine, Papillons art palace, archived from the original on 20 December 2010, retrieved 4 June 2006.
  6. Rodent problems in India and strategies for their management (PDF), AU: Aciar, archived from the original (PDF) on 8 October 2006, retrieved 4 June 2006.
  7. Rodent outbreaks in the uplands of Laos: analysis of historical patterns and the identity of nuu khii (PDF), AU: Aciar, archived from the original (PDF) on 8 October 2006, retrieved 4 June 2006.
  8. Ram, HY Mohan (2002), "A passion for plant life" (PDF), Journal of Biosciences, 27 (7), IN: IAS: 659–660, doi:10.1007/bf02708373, PMID 12571370, S2CID 35487186.
  9. ^ Nag 2008, p. 65.
  10. ^ Kumawat & Singh 2014.
  11. Nag 2008, p. 68.
  12. Rokhuma 1988, p. 96.
  13. Nag 2008, p. 62.
  14. Lalthangliana 2005.
  15. Lalthangliana 1989, p. 92-93.
  16. ^ Chatterjee 1985, p. 193.
  17. ^ Nag 2008, p. 106.
  18. ^ Nag 2008, p. 101.
  19. Nag 2008, p. 102.
  20. chatterjee 1985, p. 193. sfn error: no target: CITEREFchatterjee1985 (help)
  21. Nag 2008, p. 104.
  22. Nag 2008, p. 105.
  23. ^ Nag 2008, p. 107.
  24. ^ Chatterjee 1985, p. 194.
  25. Rokhuma 1988, p. 98.
  26. ^ Chatterjee 1985, p. 195.
  27. Nag 2008, p. 109.
  28. Rokhuma 1988, p. 100.
  29. Rokhuma 1988, p. 102.
  30. Rokhuma 1988, p. 103.
  31. Rokhuma 1988, p. 104.
  32. Nag 2008, p. 244.
  33. Nag 2008, p. 245.
  34. Rokhuma 1988, p. 140.
  35. ^ Nag 2008, p. 248.
  36. ^ Nag 2008, p. 249.
  37. Rokhuma 1988, p. 142.
  38. Rokhuma 1988, p. 143.
  39. Rokhuma 1988, p. 145.
  40. Rokhuma 1988, p. 146.
  41. Nag 2008, p. 252.
  42. Nag 2008, p. 253.
  43. Nag 2008, p. 254.
  44. Kaminsky, Arnold P; Long, Roger D (30 September 2011). India Today: An Encyclopedia of Life in the Republic: An Encyclopedia of Life in the Republic. ABC-CLIO. pp. 473–. ISBN 978-0-313-37463-0. Retrieved 28 August 2013.

Sources

External links.

Lushai Frontier
1500 - 1898
Lushai chiefs
Early Lushai chiefs
Thangur chiefs
Early Sailo chiefs
Western Lushai chiefs
Eastern Lushai chiefs
Southern Lushai chiefs
British Individuals
British officers
Missionaries
Other
British Expeditions
Military conflicts
Notable settlements
Frontier culture
Categories:
Mautam Add topic