Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license.
Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat.
We can research this topic together.
This article is rated C-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
This article was accepted on 12 January 2014 by reviewer Aggie80 (talk·contribs).
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 00:14, January 23, 2025 (JST, Reiwa 7) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture
As this map shows, there were two Ozato Castles -- one in the present-day Nanjo City -- Shimjii Ozato Caslte (島添大里城), commonly known as Ozato Castle)-- and another in the present-day Itoman City – Shimajiri Ozato Castle (島尻大里城), commonly known as Nanzan Castle. I suspect that these two are confused in the article.
According to a website by Okinawa Prefectural Board of Education (and several other sources in Japanese), the castle that fell to Sho Hashi in 1429 was Shimajiri Ozato Gusuu.
It appears to me that a castle that ”sat on a hill near the fishing town of Itoman” is much more likely to be Nanzan Castle than Ozato Castle
I also think that the primary school mentioned in the article is likely to be Takamine Elementary school since there seems to be no school around Ozato Uchibaru Park, which I understand is the Ozato Castle ruin site.
I think you have a point. I've only been able to find limited sources on the castles, and the book I based most of the article on only refers to "Ozato Castle" and doesn't distinguish between "Shimashii" and "Shimajiri". I've also found sources referring to "Shimazoe Ōzato". The map you showed is the only confirmation I can find of there location, as most web searches say something like "look for the signs posted" and the castles aren't visible (or labeled) on Google Maps. There needs to be another article for the second castle anyway, and this article needs to be corrected. ミーラー強斗武 (talk) 04:03, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Referencing and citation: criterion met
Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met
