Talk:.357 Remington Maximum

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the .357 Remington Maximum article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Misplaced Pages? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is rated Start-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Firearms Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Firearms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of firearms on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FirearmsWikipedia:WikiProject FirearmsTemplate:WikiProject FirearmsFirearms
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Dead link

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

http://www.accuratepowder.com/data/PerCaliber2Guide/Handgun/Standarddata/35738Cal(9.2mm)/357%20Remington%20Maximum%20page%20105.pdf
- In .357 Remington Maximum on 2011-05-20 21:37:04, 404 Not Found
- In .357 Remington Maximum on 2011-05-31 12:44:03, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 12:44, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

Ruger Super Blackhawk

Please excuse me for using the talk section for research, but I have examined several Ruger 357Max silhouette guns, and they appear to have come from the factory highly tuned for precise work with top loads. Does anyone know what Ruger's policy was regarding special handling of these guns? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.215.115.31 (talk) 16:09, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

Categories: