Misplaced Pages

This article is rated Start-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Firearms Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Firearms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of firearms on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FirearmsWikipedia:WikiProject FirearmsTemplate:WikiProject FirearmsFirearms Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

gun/round

I've written about the gun and the round on the same page. I think technically this page should be about the round but maybe as it grows, someone can break it into the two appropriate pages.

WPMILHIST

The WPMILHIST tag has been removed due to this article not being military related.--Oldwildbill 07:33, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

Most Powerful Handgun Title

Looking at the .500 S&W page there were competing claims. The discussion at the .500 S&W page mentions limiting the "competition" to commercially produced cartridges. This results in the .500 S&W being more powerful than the .460 S&W. Handloading is an area that probably shouldn't be gone into as handloads that may be safe in one gun but not another could result in back and forth "this gun is more powerful". —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.170.23.223 (talk) 03:39, 8 December 2006 (UTC).

It show now just say "fastest big bore" which is more appropriate. Arthurrh 04:39, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

Performance section

What's with the pissing contest going on in the performance paragraph. Put your egos away and clean it up. 24.252.195.3 (talk) 17:42, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

• Start-Class Firearms articles
• Low-importance Firearms articles
• WikiProject Firearms articles