Misplaced Pages

United States v. Knights (2001)

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

2001 United States Supreme Court case
United States v. Knights
Supreme Court of the United States
Argued November 6, 2001
Decided December 10, 2001
Full case nameUnited States v. Knights
Citations534 U.S. 112 (more)
Holding
Search of a probationer that is supported by reasonable suspicion and pursuant to a probation condition satisfies the Fourth Amendment.
Court membership
Chief Justice
William Rehnquist
Associate Justices
John P. Stevens · Sandra Day O'Connor
Antonin Scalia · Anthony Kennedy
David Souter · Clarence Thomas
Ruth Bader Ginsburg · Stephen Breyer
Case opinions
MajorityRehnquist, joined by unanimous
ConcurrenceSouter
Laws applied
U.S. Const. amend. IV

United States v. Knights, 534 U.S. 112 (2001), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on December 10, 2001. The court held that the police search of a probationer supported by reasonable suspicion and pursuant to a probation condition satisfied the requirements under the Fourth Amendment.

Background

When Mark James Knights was sentenced to summary probation by a California court for a drug offense, the probation order included one condition: Knights would submit his "person, property, place of residence, vehicle, personal effects, to search at anytime, with or without a search warrant, warrant of arrest or reasonable cause by any probation officer or law enforcement officer.โ€ Several days later, Knights and his friend were suspected of committing arson. Police then searched Knights' apartment without a warrant and discovered items potentially associated with the crime. Knights was later indicted by a federal grand jury "for conspiracy to commit arson, for possession of an unregistered destructive device, and being a felon in possession of ammunition." Knights subsequently filed a motion to suppress the evidence obtained from the search. The District Court granted his motion on the ground that the search was for "investigatory" instead of "probationary" purposes. The Court of Appeals later affirmed.

Result

In a unanimous decision delivered by Justice Rehnquist, the Court reversed the decision of the Court of Appeals and upheld the constitutionality of the warrantless search of Knights' apartment. The Court held that the search was reasonable under the Fourth Amendment due to the search condition in Knights' probation order and the search being supported by reasonable suspicion.

See also

References

  1. 534 U.S. 112
  2. ^ "United States v. Knights, 534 U.S. 112 (2001)". Justia Law. Retrieved August 20, 2023.
  3. Skrmetti, Jonathan T. (2001โ€“2002). "The Keys to the Castle: A New Standard for Warrantless Home Searches in United States v. Knights". Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy. 25: 1201.
  4. "U.S. v. Knights: Supreme Court Rules on Searches of Probationers by Police | Office of Justice Programs". www.ojp.gov. Retrieved February 18, 2024.
  5. "Search and Seizure - Probationer / Parolee / Pretrial Release | Casetext". casetext.com. Retrieved March 8, 2024.

External links

United States Fourth Amendment case law
Scope of the Fourth Amendment
Definition of search
Open-fields doctrine
Aerial surveillance
Third-party doctrine
Definition of seizure
Fourth Amendment standing
Probable cause
Reasonable suspicion: Investigative detentions and frisks
Warrant requirement
Mere evidence rule
Neutral and detached magistrate
Warrants directed at third parties
Knock-and-announce
Exceptions to warrant requirement
Exigent circumstances
Consent searches
Plain view
Vehicle searches
Searches incident to arrest
Breathalyzers, blood samples, DNA
Protective sweeps
Inventory searches
Border searches
Checkpoints
Students, employees, and patients
Property of probationers and parolees
Administrative inspections
Searches in jails and prisons
Warrantless arrests
Seizures
Distinguishing stops and arrests
Seizure of premises awaiting warrant
Detention incident to search
Detention during vehicle stop
Excessive force
Remedies
Exclusionary rule
Origins
Impeachment exception
Good-faith exception
Independent source
Inevitable discovery
Attenuation
No-knock searches
Habeas corpus review
Civil suit
Federal
State
Incorporation against States
Unreasonable search and seizure
Warrant requirements
Categories:
United States v. Knights (2001) Add topic