| Revision as of 15:01, 20 April 2020 view sourceBrowniesandicecreamcake (talk | contribs)390 edits →Candidate← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 20:34, 22 January 2025 view source Rexxx7777 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users9,363 editsNo edit summary | ||
| (545 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{ |
{{Short description|none}} | ||
| {{for|related races|2008 United States elections}} | |||
| {{pp-move}} | |||
| {{short description|56th quadrennial presidential election in the United States}} | |||
| {{pp-vandalism|small=yes}} | |||
| {{Use mdy dates|date=December 2018}} | |||
| {{Use American English|date=March 2021}} | |||
| {{Use mdy dates|date=March 2021}} | |||
| {{Infobox election | {{Infobox election | ||
| | election_name = 2008 United States presidential election | | election_name = 2008 United States presidential election | ||
| | country = United States | | country = United States | ||
| | flag_year = 1960 | |||
| | type = presidential | | type = presidential | ||
| | ongoing = no | |||
| | opinion_polls = Nationwide opinion polling for the 2008 United States presidential election | | opinion_polls = Nationwide opinion polling for the 2008 United States presidential election | ||
| | previous_election = 2004 United States presidential election | | previous_election = 2004 United States presidential election | ||
| Line 13: | Line 16: | ||
| | next_election = 2012 United States presidential election | | next_election = 2012 United States presidential election | ||
| | next_year = 2012 | | next_year = 2012 | ||
| | votes_for_election = 538 members of the ] | | votes_for_election = 538 members of the ] | ||
| | needed_votes = 270 electoral | | needed_votes = 270 electoral | ||
| | turnout = |
| turnout = 61.6%<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.electproject.org/national-1789-present|title=National General Election VEP Turnout Rates, 1789-Present|work=United States Election Project|publisher=]|access-date=February 28, 2023|archive-date=July 25, 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140725110444/http://www.electproject.org/national-1789-present|url-status=live}}</ref>{{increase}} 1.5 ] | ||
| | image_size = 200x200px | | image_size = 200x200px | ||
| | image1 = Obama portrait crop.jpg | |||
| | image1 = BarackObamaportrait.jpg | |||
| | nominee1 = ''']''' | | nominee1 = ''']''' | ||
| | party1 = Democratic Party (United States) | | party1 = Democratic Party (United States) | ||
| Line 25: | Line 27: | ||
| | electoral_vote1 = '''365''' | | electoral_vote1 = '''365''' | ||
| | states_carried1 = '''28 + ] + ]<!-- Nebraska divides its electoral votes based on congressional districts instead of a statewide total, and its 2nd congressional district voted for Obama. -->''' | | states_carried1 = '''28 + ] + ]<!-- Nebraska divides its electoral votes based on congressional districts instead of a statewide total, and its 2nd congressional district voted for Obama. -->''' | ||
| | popular_vote1 = '''69,498,516''' | | popular_vote1 = '''69,498,516'''<ref name="https://www.fec.gov/introduction-campaign-finance/election-results-and-voting-information/federal-elections-2008/" /> | ||
| | percentage1 = '''{{percent|<!-- OBAMA: --> 69,498,516|<!-- TOTAL: --> 131,313,820|1|pad=yes}}''' | | percentage1 = '''{{percent|<!-- OBAMA: --> 69,498,516|<!-- TOTAL: --> 131,313,820|1|pad=yes}}''' | ||
| | image2 = John McCain official portrait 2009 (cropped).jpg | |||
| | image2 = John McCain official portrait 2009.jpg | |||
| | nominee2 = ] | | nominee2 = ] | ||
| | party2 = Republican Party (United States) | | party2 = Republican Party (United States) | ||
| Line 35: | Line 36: | ||
| | electoral_vote2 = 173 | | electoral_vote2 = 173 | ||
| | states_carried2 = 22 | | states_carried2 = 22 | ||
| | popular_vote2 = 59,948,323 | | popular_vote2 = 59,948,323<ref name="FEC 2009" /> | ||
| | percentage2 = {{percent|<!-- MCCAIN: --> 59,948,323|<!-- TOTAL: --> 131,313,820|1|pad=yes}} | | percentage2 = {{percent|<!-- MCCAIN: --> 59,948,323|<!-- TOTAL: --> 131,313,820|1|pad=yes}} | ||
| | map = {{2008 United States presidential election imagemap}} | |||
| | map_size = 350px | | map_size = 350px | ||
| | map_caption = Presidential election results map. <span style="color:darkblue;">Blue</span> denotes states won by Obama/Biden and <span style="color:darkred;">red</span> denotes those won by McCain/Palin. Numbers indicate ] cast by each state and the District of Columbia. | |||
| | map = {{2008 United States presidential election imagemap}} | |||
| | map_caption = Presidential election results map. <span style="color:darkblue;">Blue</span> denotes those won by Obama/Biden, <span style="color:darkred;">red</span> denotes states won by McCain/Palin. Numbers indicate ] allotted to the winner of each state. | |||
| | title = President | | title = President | ||
| | before_election = ] | | before_election = ] | ||
| Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| {{US 2008 presidential elections series}} | {{US 2008 presidential elections series}} | ||
| ] were held in the United States on November 4, 2008. The ] ticket of ], the junior ] from ], and ], the senior ] from ], defeated the ] ticket of ], the senior ] from ], and ], the ] of ]. Obama became the first ] to be elected to the presidency. This was the first election since ] in which neither the incumbent president nor vice president was on the ballot, as well as the first election since ] in which neither ran for the nomination. | |||
| Incumbent Republican |
Incumbent Republican President ] was ineligible to pursue a third term due to the ] established by the ]. McCain secured the ] by March 2008, defeating former governors ], ], and other challengers. The ] were marked by a sharp contest between Obama and the initial front-runner, former first lady and Senator ], as well as other challengers who dropped out before most of the primaries were held, including Senators ] and Obama's future running mate, ]. Clinton's victory in the ] made her the first woman to win a major party's presidential primary.{{refn|group=lower-alpha|] had previously won a contest in New Jersey in 1972 that was a no-delegate-awarding, presidential preference ballot in which the major candidates were not listed; the actual delegate selection vote went to ].<ref name="Sullivan 1">{{cite news |url=https://timesmachine.nytimes.com/timesmachine/1972/06/07/83446893.pdf |title=Dakotan Beats Humphrey By a Big Margin in Jersey |first=Ronald |last=Sullivan |newspaper=The New York Times |date=June 7, 1972 |page=1 |access-date=June 15, 2018 |archive-date=November 9, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211109011016/https://timesmachine.nytimes.com/timesmachine/1972/06/07/83446893.html?pdf_redirect=true&site=false |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="Sanford Is Withdrawing From N.J">{{cite news |url=https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1665&dat=19720515&id=UmlPAAAAIBAJ&pg=7133,1487123 |title=Sanford Is Withdrawing From N.J. |agency=] |newspaper=] |date=May 13, 1972 |page=12 |access-date=October 14, 2020 |archive-date=October 10, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211010021753/https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1665&dat=19720515&id=UmlPAAAAIBAJ&pg=7133%2C1487123 |url-status=live }}</ref>}} After a long primary season, Obama secured the Democratic nomination in June 2008. | ||
| Early campaigning focused heavily on the ] and ]. McCain supported the war, as well as a ] that had begun in 2007, while Obama strongly opposed the war. Bush endorsed McCain, but the two did not campaign together, and Bush did not appear in person at the ]. Obama campaigned on the theme that "] must change |
Early campaigning focused heavily on the ] and ]. McCain supported the war, as well as a ] that had begun in 2007, while Obama strongly opposed the war. Bush endorsed McCain, but the two did not campaign together, and Bush did not appear in person at the ]. Obama campaigned on the theme that "] must change", while McCain emphasized his experience. The campaign was strongly affected by the ]. McCain's decision to suspend his campaign during the height of the financial crisis backfired as voters viewed his response as erratic.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Halloran |first1=Liz |title=McCain Suspends Campaign, Shocks Republicans |url=https://www.usnews.com/news/campaign-2008/articles/2008/09/24/mccain-suspends-campaign-shocks-republicans |website=USNews |access-date=December 5, 2020 |archive-date=October 12, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201012112027/https://www.usnews.com/news/campaign-2008/articles/2008/09/24/mccain-suspends-campaign-shocks-republicans |date=September 24, 2008 |url-status=live}}</ref> | ||
| Obama won a decisive victory over McCain, winning the ] and the ] by a sizable margin, including states that had not voted for the Democratic presidential candidate since 1976 (North Carolina) and 1964 (Indiana and |
Obama won a decisive victory over McCain, winning the ] and the ] by a sizable margin, including states that had not voted for the Democratic presidential candidate since 1976 (North Carolina) and 1964 (Indiana, Virginia, and Nebraska's 2nd congressional district). Obama received the ] won by a Democrat since ] in ] and was the first Democrat to win an outright majority of the popular vote since ] in ]. Obama won every state in the ] and flipped nine states that had voted Republican in ]: ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], and ], as well as ]. As of {{CURRENTYEAR}}, this is the most recent time a Democrat carried Indiana and North Carolina in a presidential election, as well as the most recent presidential election where any candidate received over two-thirds of the electoral vote. | ||
| == Background == | == Background == | ||
| Line 60: | Line 60: | ||
| ] in 2008, ]. His second term expired at noon on January 20, 2009.]] | ] in 2008, ]. His second term expired at noon on January 20, 2009.]] | ||
| ] of the ] |
] says that the ] and ] must be ] of the United States, at least 35 years old, and residents of the United States for at least 14 years. Candidates for president typically seek the nomination of a political party, in which case each party devises a method (such as a ]) to choose a candidate for the position. Traditionally, the primaries are ]s where voters cast ballots for a slate of party delegates pledged to a particular candidate. The party's delegates then officially nominate a candidate to run on the party's behalf. The general election in November is also an indirect election, where voters cast ballots for a slate of members of the ]; these electors in turn directly elect the president and vice president. President ], a ] and former ], was ineligible to seek reelection to a third term due to the ]; in accordance with Section{{nbsp}}1 of the ], his term expired at noon ] on January 20, 2009. | ||
| President ], a ] and former ] of ], was ineligible to seek reelection to a third term due to the ]; in accordance with Section{{nbsp}}1 of the ], his term expired at noon ] on January 20, 2009. | |||
| Also ineligible to run for additional terms as president were past two-term president ]. While neither ran, former presidents ] and ], having each served only one term, were eligible to run for an additional term as president. | |||
| ==Nominations== | ==Nominations== | ||
| ===Democratic Party nomination=== | ===Democratic Party nomination=== | ||
| {{Main|2008 Democratic Party presidential primaries|2008 Democratic National Convention}} | {{Main|Barack Obama 2008 presidential campaign|2008 Democratic Party presidential primaries|2008 Democratic National Convention}} | ||
| ====Candidate==== | ==== Candidate ==== | ||
| {{Main|2008 Democratic Party presidential candidates}} | {{Main|2008 Democratic Party presidential candidates}} | ||
| {{Barack Obama series|expanded=Presidential campaigns}} | |||
| {{Joe Biden series|expanded=Vice presidential campaigns}} | |||
| {| class="wikitable" style="font-size:90%; text-align:center;" | {| class="wikitable" style="font-size:90%; text-align:center;" | ||
| |- | |- | ||
| | style="background:#f1f1f1;" colspan="30"|]<big>'''2008 Democratic Party ticket'''</big> | | style="background:#f1f1f1;" colspan="30"|]<big>'''2008 Democratic Party ticket'''</big> | ||
| |- | |- | ||
| ! style="width:3em; font-size:135%; background:#3333FF; width:200px;"| ] | ! style="width:3em; font-size:135%; background:#3333FF; width:200px;"| ] | ||
| Line 82: | Line 80: | ||
| | style="width:3em; width:200px;"|'''''for Vice President''''' | | style="width:3em; width:200px;"|'''''for Vice President''''' | ||
| |- | |- | ||
| | ] | | ] | ||
| | ] | | ] | ||
| |- | |- | ||
| | ] from ]<br /><small>(2005–2008)</small> | | ]<br />from ]<br /><small>(2005–2008)</small> | ||
| | ] from ]<br /><small>(1973–2009)</small> | | ]<br />from ]<br /><small>(1973–2009)</small> | ||
| |- | |- | ||
| | colspan=2 |] | | colspan=2 |] | ||
| |- | |- | ||
| | colspan=2 |] | | colspan=2 |] | ||
| |} | |} | ||
| ====Withdrawn candidates==== | ====Withdrawn candidates==== | ||
| {| class="wikitable mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" style="font-size:90%" | |||
| * ], U.S. Senator from ] (withdrew on June 7, 2008 and endorsed Barack Obama) | |||
| | colspan="12" style="text-align:center; width:700px; font-size:120%; color:white; background:{{party color|Democratic Party (United States)}};" |''Candidates in this section are sorted by popular vote from the primaries'' | |||
| * ], former U.S. Senator from ] (withdrew on January 30, 2008 and endorsed Barack Obama) | |||
| |- | |||
| * ], Governor of ] (withdrew on January 10, 2008 and endorsed Barack Obama) | |||
| ! scope="col" style="width:3em; font-size:120%;" |''']''' | |||
| * ], U.S. Representative from ] (withdrew on January 24, 2008 and endorsed Barack Obama) | |||
| ! scope="col" style="width:3em; font-size:120%;" |''']''' | |||
| * ], U.S. Senator from ] (withdrew on January 3, 2008 and endorsed Barack Obama) | |||
| ! scope="col" style="width:3em; font-size:120%;" |] | |||
| * ], former U.S. Senator from ] (withdrew on March 25, 2008 to run for the Libertarian Party nomination. After losing the nomination, he endorsed ]) | |||
| ! scope="col" style="width:3em; font-size:120%;" |] | |||
| * ], U.S. Senator from ] (withdrew on January 3, 2008 and endorsed Barack Obama) | |||
| ! scope="col" style="width:3em; font-size:120%;" |] | |||
| * ], U.S. Senator from ] (withdrew on December 15, 2007 and endorsed Hillary Clinton. He later endorsed Barack Obama) | |||
| ! scope="col" style="width:3em; font-size:120%;" |] | |||
| * ], former Governor of ] (withdrew on February 23, 2007 and endorsed Hillary Clinton. He later endorsed Barack Obama) | |||
| ! scope="col" style="width:3em; font-size:120%;" |] | |||
| ! scope="col" style="width:3em; font-size:120%;" |] | |||
| |- | |||
| |] | |||
| |] | |||
| |] | |||
| |] | |||
| |] | |||
| |] | |||
| |] | |||
| |] | |||
| |- style="text-align:center" | |||
| |] <br>from ]<br><small>(2001–2009)</small> | |||
| | ]<br>from ]<br><small>(1999–2005)</small> | |||
| |]<br>]<br><small>(2003–2011)</small> | |||
| |]<br>from ]<br><small>(1997–2013)</small> | |||
| |]<br>from ]<br><small>(1973–2009)</small> | |||
| |]<br>from ]<br><small>(1969–1981)</small> | |||
| |]<br>from ]<br><small>(1981–2011)</small> | |||
| |40th<br>]<br><small>(1999–2007)</small> | |||
| |- | |||
| |] | |||
| |] | |||
| |] | |||
| |] | |||
| |] | |||
| |] | |||
| |] | |||
| |] | |||
| |- style="text-align:center" | |||
| |] | |||
| |] | |||
| |] | |||
| |] | |||
| |] | |||
| |] | |||
| |] | |||
| |] | |||
| |- style="text-align:center" | |||
| |''W: June 7''<br><small>'''17,493,836''' votes</small> | |||
| |''W: Jan 30''<br><small>'''1,009,331''' votes</small> | |||
| |''W: Jan 10''<br>'''106,356''' <small>votes</small> | |||
| |''W: Jan 23''<br>'''104,000''' <small>votes</small> | |||
| |''W: Jan 3''<br>'''81,777''' <small>votes</small> | |||
| |''W: N/A''<br>'''<small>40,263</small>''' <small>votes</small> | |||
| |''W: Jan 3''<br>'''35,284''' <small>votes</small> | |||
| |''W: Feb 23, 2007''<br>'''<small>0</small>''' <small>votes</small> | |||
| |} | |||
| ==== Before the primaries ==== | |||
| <gallery perrow="5" mode="packed" heights="160"> | |||
| Media speculation had begun almost immediately after the results of the ] were released. In the ], the Democrats regained majorities in both houses of the ].<ref>{{cite news |last=Kuhnhenn |first=Jim |title=Democrats win control of Congress |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/11/09/AR2006110900147.html |newspaper=] |agency=AP |date=November 9, 2006 |access-date=September 6, 2012 |archive-date=January 12, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200112163708/https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/11/09/AR2006110900147.html |url-status=live }}</ref> Early polls taken before anyone had announced a candidacy had shown Senators ] and ] as the most popular potential Democratic candidates.<ref name="guardian-2006">{{cite news|last=Borger|first=Julian|title=Now the real race begins...|url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2006/nov/11/midterms2006.usa2|work=The Guardian|date=November 11, 2006|access-date=June 7, 2009|location=London|archive-date=August 16, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210816002106/https://www.theguardian.com/world/2006/nov/11/midterms2006.usa2|url-status=live}}</ref> Nevertheless, the media speculated on several other candidates, including ], the runner-up in the ]; ], the runner-up in the ]; ], Kerry's ] in 2004; Delaware Senator ]; New Mexico Governor ]; Iowa Governor ]; and Indiana Senator ].<ref name="CSM">{{cite web|last=Hughes|first=John|title=With midterms over, all eyes turn to the 2008 presidential race|url=http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/1115/p09s01-cojh.html?s=widep|newspaper=]|date=November 15, 2006|access-date=June 7, 2009|archive-date=May 6, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210506034027/https://www.csmonitor.com/2006/1115/p09s01-cojh.html?s=widep|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
| File:Hillary Rodham Clinton-cropped.jpg|{{center|]<br />''']'''<br />from New York<br />{{small|(])}}<br />{{small|(Withdrew on June 7, 2008)}}}} | |||
| File:John Edwards, official Senate photo portrait.jpg|{{center|Former ]<br />''']'''<br />from ]<br />{{small|(])}}<br />{{small|(Withdrew on January 30, 2008)}}}} | |||
| File:Bill Richardson at an event in Kensington, New Hampshire, March 18, 2006.jpg|{{center|]<br />''']'''<br />of ]<br />{{small|(])}}<br />{{small|(Withdrew on January 10, 2008)}}}} | |||
| File:Dennis Kucinich.jpg|{{center|]<br />''']'''<br />from ]<br />{{small|(])}}<br />{{small|(Withdrew on January 24, 2008)}}}} | |||
| File:Joe Biden, official photo portrait, 111th Congress.jpg|{{center|]<br />''']'''<br />from ]<br />{{small|(])}}<br />{{small|(Withdrew on January 3, 2008, became Vice Presidential nominee)}}}} | |||
| File:Mike Gravel.jpg|{{center|Former ]<br />''']'''<br />from Alaska<br />{{small|(])}}<br />{{small|(Withdrew on March 25, 2008)}}}} | |||
| File:Christopher Dodd official portrait 2-cropped.jpg|{{center|]<br />''']'''<br />from ]<br />{{small|(])}}<br />{{small|(Withdrew on January 3, 2008)}}}} | |||
| File:Evan Bayh official portrait.jpg|{{center|Senator<br />''']'''<br />from ]<br />{{small|(])}}<br />{{small|(Withdrew on December 15, 2007)}}}} | |||
| File:Tom Vilsack, official USDA photo portrait.jpg|{{center|Former ]<br />''']'''<br />of ]<br />{{small|(])}}<br />{{small|(Withdrew on February 23, 2007)}}}} | |||
| </gallery> | |||
| ====Before the primaries==== | |||
| Media speculation had begun almost immediately after the results of the ] were released. In the ], the Democrats regained majorities in both houses of the ].<ref>{{cite news |last=Kuhnhenn |first=Jim |title=Democrats win control of Congress |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/11/09/AR2006110900147.html|publisher=Washington Post |agency=AP |date=November 9, 2006 |accessdate=September 6, 2012}}</ref> Early polls taken before anyone had announced a candidacy had shown Senators ] and ] as the most popular potential Democratic candidates.<ref name="guardian-2006">{{cite news|last=Borger|first=Julian|title=Now the real race begins...|url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2006/nov/11/midterms2006.usa2|publisher=The Guardian|date=November 11, 2006|accessdate=June 7, 2009|location=London}}</ref> Nevertheless, the media speculated on several other candidates, including ], the runner-up in the ]; ], the runner-up in the ]; ], Kerry's ] in 2004; Senator from Delaware ]; New Mexico Governor ]; Iowa Governor ]; and Indiana Senator ].<ref name="CSM">{{cite web|last=Hughes|first=John|title=With midterms over, all eyes turn to the 2008 presidential race|url=http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/1115/p09s01-cojh.html?s=widep|publisher=]|date=November 15, 2006|accessdate=June 7, 2009}}</ref> | |||
| Edwards was one of the first to formally announce his candidacy for the presidency, on December 28, 2006. This run would be his second attempt at the presidency.<ref>{{cite news|last=Balz|first=Dan|title=Edwards Formally Joins 2008 Presidential Race|url= |
Edwards was one of the first to formally announce his candidacy for the presidency, on December 28, 2006. This run would be his second attempt at the presidency.<ref>{{cite news|last=Balz|first=Dan|title=Edwards Formally Joins 2008 Presidential Race|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/2006/12/29/edwards-formally-joins-2008-presidential-race-span-classbankheadex-senator-calls-for-drawdown-in-iraqspan/a8e3bf08-1096-4edb-a684-e95d3b54cc70/|newspaper=]|date=December 29, 2006|access-date=June 7, 2009|archive-date=March 28, 2024|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240328094326/https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/2006/12/29/edwards-formally-joins-2008-presidential-race-span-classbankheadex-senator-calls-for-drawdown-in-iraqspan/a8e3bf08-1096-4edb-a684-e95d3b54cc70/|url-status=live}}</ref> Clinton announced intentions to run in the Democratic primaries on January 20, 2007.<ref>{{Cite web |last1=Liasson |first1=Mara |last2=Simon |first2=Scott |title=Hillary Clinton Enters Race for President |url=https://www.npr.org/2007/01/20/6929745/hillary-clinton-enters-race-for-president |access-date=28 March 2024 |website=NPR |archive-date=March 28, 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240328093216/https://www.npr.org/2007/01/20/6929745/hillary-clinton-enters-race-for-president |url-status=live }}</ref> Obama announced his candidacy on February 10 in his home state of Illinois.<ref>{{Cite news |last1=Nagourney |first1=Adam |last2=Zeleny |first2=Jeff |date=2007-02-11 |title=Obama Formally Enters Presidential Race |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/11/us/politics/11obama.html |access-date=2024-03-28 |work=The New York Times |language=en-US |issn=0362-4331 |archive-date=March 28, 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240328094127/https://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/11/us/politics/11obama.html |url-status=live }}</ref> | ||
| ====Early primaries and caucuses==== | ====Early primaries and caucuses==== | ||
| Early in the year, the support for Barack Obama started to increase in the polls and he passed Clinton for the top spot in Iowa; he ended up winning the caucus in that state, with |
Early in the year, the support for Barack Obama started to increase in the polls and he passed Clinton for the top spot in Iowa; he ended up winning the caucus in that state, with Edwards coming in second and Clinton in third.<ref name=Iowa>{{cite news|first1=Candy|last1=Crowley|first2=Suzanne|last2=Malveaux|first3=Jessica|last3=Yellin|title=Obama wins Iowa as candidate for change|url=http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/01/03/iowa.dems/index.html|website=]|date=January 4, 2008|access-date=June 8, 2009|archive-date=April 13, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210413022749/http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/01/03/iowa.dems/index.html|url-status=live}}</ref> Obama's win was fueled mostly by first time caucus-goers and ] and showed voters viewed him as the "candidate of change".<ref name=Iowa/> Iowa has since been viewed as the state that jump-started Obama's campaign and set him on track to win both the nomination and the presidency.<ref>{{cite news|last=Steinhauser|first=Paul|title=Back to where it began: Obama visits Iowa|url=http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/04/22/obama.iowa/index.html|website=]|date=April 22, 2009|access-date=June 8, 2009|archive-date=April 13, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210413040604/http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/04/22/obama.iowa/index.html|url-status=live}}</ref> After the Iowa caucus, Biden and Connecticut Senator ] withdrew from the nomination contest.<ref name=Iowa/> | ||
| Obama became the new front runner in New Hampshire, when his poll numbers skyrocketed after his Iowa victory<ref name="New Hampshire polls"/> The Clinton campaign was struggling after a huge loss in Iowa and no strategy beyond the early primaries and caucuses. According to '']'', campaign strategists had "mapped a victory scenario that envisioned the former first lady wrapping up the Democratic presidential nomination by Super Tuesday on Feb. 5."<ref>{{cite news|last=Alberts|first=Sheldon|title=Overconfidence, bad strategy doomed Clinton campaign|url=http://www2.canada.com/vancouversun/news/story.html?id=5c4b296c-38e6-454d-9edf-3c03d67aa4bd|publisher=]|date=June 7, 2008| |
Obama became the new front runner in New Hampshire, when his poll numbers skyrocketed after his Iowa victory.<ref name="New Hampshire polls"/> The Clinton campaign was struggling after a huge loss in Iowa and no strategy beyond the early primaries and caucuses. According to '']'', campaign strategists had "mapped a victory scenario that envisioned the former first lady wrapping up the Democratic presidential nomination by Super Tuesday on Feb. 5."<ref>{{cite news|last=Alberts|first=Sheldon|title=Overconfidence, bad strategy doomed Clinton campaign|url=http://www2.canada.com/vancouversun/news/story.html?id=5c4b296c-38e6-454d-9edf-3c03d67aa4bd|publisher=]|date=June 7, 2008|access-date=June 8, 2009|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080611002622/http://www.canada.com/vancouversun/news/story.html?id=5c4b296c-38e6-454d-9edf-3c03d67aa4bd|archive-date=June 11, 2008|df=mdy-all}}</ref> In what is considered a turning point for her campaign, Clinton had a strong performance at the ], ], and ] debates several days before the ] as well as an emotional interview in a public broadcast live on TV.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/us_elections/article3160177.ece|title=Hillary Clinton: my teary moment won me New Hampshire|date=January 9, 2008|author1=Hannah Strange|author2=Philippe Naughton|name-list-style=amp|work=]|access-date=March 14, 2008|location=London|archive-date=April 29, 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110429092256/http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/us_elections/article3160177.ece|url-status=dead}} See also: {{cite web|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dqGl-pDnYMQ |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/varchive/youtube/20211212/dqGl-pDnYMQ| archive-date=2021-12-12 |url-status=live|title=Hillary tears up in New Hampshire Primary 2008|date=January 9, 2008 |format=Video|publisher=YouTube}}{{cbignore}}</ref> Clinton won that primary by 2% of the vote, contrary to the predictions of pollsters who consistently had her trailing Obama for a few days up to the primary date.<ref name="New Hampshire polls">{{cite web|title=2008 New Hampshire Democratic Presidential Primary|url=http://www.pollster.com/polls/nh/08-nh-dem-pres-primary.php|publisher=Pollster.com|access-date=June 8, 2009|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080923001235/http://www.pollster.com/polls/nh/08-nh-dem-pres-primary.php|archive-date=September 23, 2008|url-status=dead|df=mdy-all}}</ref> Clinton's win was the first time a woman had ever won a major American party's presidential primary for the purposes of delegate selection.<ref name="ReferenceA">{{cite web|url=http://www.cawp.rutgers.edu/fast_facts/elections/preswatch_clinton.php |title = Fast Facts - Elections - Election Watch{{!}} Center for American Women and Politics |access-date=May 31, 2015 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090430130147/http://www.cawp.rutgers.edu/fast_facts/elections/preswatch_clinton.php |archive-date=April 30, 2009 }}</ref> | ||
| On January 30, 2008, after placing in third in the New Hampshire and South Carolina primaries, Edwards announced that he was suspending his campaign for the presidency, but he did not initially endorse any remaining candidates.<ref name="CBSend">{{cite news|url= |
On January 30, 2008, after placing in third in the New Hampshire and South Carolina primaries, Edwards announced that he was suspending his campaign for the presidency, but he did not initially endorse any remaining candidates.<ref name="CBSend">{{cite news|url=https://www.cbsnews.com/news/edwards-exits-presidential-race/|title=Edwards exits presidential race|work=CBS News|date=January 30, 2008|access-date=January 30, 2008|archive-date=October 20, 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121020215050/http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/01/30/politics/main3768889.shtml|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSN2964765820080131/|title=Giuliani, Edwards quit White House Race|date=January 30, 2008|access-date=January 30, 2008|publisher=Reuters|first=Steve|last=Holland|archive-date=November 5, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211105190326/https://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSN2964765820080131|url-status=live}}</ref> | ||
| ====Super Tuesday==== | ====Super Tuesday==== | ||
| ] | ] | ||
| ] was February 5, 2008, when the largest-ever number of simultaneous state ] elections was held.<ref name="SJFPPbbc"> | ] was February 5, 2008, when the largest-ever number of simultaneous state ] elections was held.<ref name="SJFPPbbc">{{cite news|last=Greene|first=Richard Allen|title=States jostle for primary power|work=]|date=May 30, 2007|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/6501241.stm|access-date=September 15, 2008|archive-date=August 15, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210815081755/http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/6501241.stm|url-status=live}}</ref> Super Tuesday ended up leaving the Democrats in a virtual tie, with Obama amassing 847 delegates to Clinton's 834 from the 23 states that held Democratic primaries.<ref> | ||
| {{cite news|last=Greene|first=Richard Allen|title=States jostle for primary power|work=]|date=May 30, 2007|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/6501241.stm|accessdate=September 15, 2008}}</ref> Super Tuesday ended up leaving the Democrats in a virtual tie, with Obama amassing 847 delegates to Clinton's 834 from the 23 states that held Democratic primaries.<ref> | |||
| {{cite web | {{cite web | ||
| |title=Presidential primary and caucus dates | |title=Presidential primary and caucus dates | ||
| Line 140: | Line 173: | ||
| |page=1 | |page=1 | ||
| |url=http://archive.stateline.org/flash-data/Primary/2008_presidential_primaries.pdf | |url=http://archive.stateline.org/flash-data/Primary/2008_presidential_primaries.pdf | ||
| | |
|access-date=September 15, 2008 | ||
| |url-status=dead | |url-status=dead | ||
| | |
|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080911154423/http://archive.stateline.org/flash-data/Primary/2008_presidential_primaries.pdf | ||
| | |
|archive-date=September 11, 2008 | ||
| }}</ref> | }}</ref> | ||
| ] was one of the Super Tuesday states that could provide a large number of delegates to the candidates. Obama trailed in the California polling by an average of 6.0% before the primary; he ended up losing that state by 8.3% of the vote.<ref name="fivethirtyeight1">{{cite news|url=http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2008/08/persistent-myth-of-bradley-effect.html|title=The Persistent Myth of the Bradley Effect|author=Nate Silver|date=August 11, 2008}}</ref> Some analysts cited a large ] turnout that voted for Clinton as the deciding factor.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.californiaprogressreport.com/2008/02/clinton_win_in.html| |
] was one of the Super Tuesday states that could provide a large number of delegates to the candidates. Obama trailed in the California polling by an average of 6.0% before the primary; he ended up losing that state by 8.3% of the vote.<ref name="fivethirtyeight1">{{cite news|url=http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2008/08/persistent-myth-of-bradley-effect.html|title=The Persistent Myth of the Bradley Effect|author=Nate Silver|date=August 11, 2008|access-date=August 11, 2008|archive-date=December 2, 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131202235028/http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2008/08/persistent-myth-of-bradley-effect.html|url-status=dead}}</ref> Some analysts cited a large ] turnout that voted for Clinton as the deciding factor.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.californiaprogressreport.com/2008/02/clinton_win_in.html|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080313005908/http://www.californiaprogressreport.com/2008/02/clinton_win_in.html|archive-date=March 13, 2008|title=Clinton Win in California Larger Than Polls Predicted Because of Huge Latino Turnout|author=Frank D. Russo|date=February 6, 2008|access-date=March 14, 2008}}</ref> | ||
| The ], ], ], ], ], the District of Columbia, Maryland, and Virginia primaries and the ] and Maine caucuses all took place after Super Tuesday in February. Obama won all of them, giving him 10 consecutive victories after Super Tuesday.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/primaries/results/state/#ME|title=Election Center 2008: Primary Results from Maine|work=]|date=February 10, 2008| |
The ], ], ], ], ], the District of Columbia, Maryland, and Virginia primaries and the ] and Maine caucuses all took place after Super Tuesday in February. Obama won all of them, giving him 10 consecutive victories after Super Tuesday.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/primaries/results/state/#ME|title=Election Center 2008: Primary Results from Maine|work=]|date=February 10, 2008|access-date=March 14, 2008|archive-date=May 7, 2008|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080507001932/http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/primaries/results/state/#ME|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="msnbc21660914">{{cite news|work=NBC News|title=2008 Primary Results|access-date=March 14, 2008|url=https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna21660914|archive-date=September 23, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200923223214/http://www.nbcnews.com/id/21660914|url-status=live}}</ref> | ||
| ====Ohio, Texas, and Pennsylvania==== | ====Ohio, Texas, and Pennsylvania==== | ||
| On March 4, Hillary Clinton carried ] and ] in the Democratic primaries; some considered these wins, especially Ohio, a "surprise upset" by 10%,<ref>{{cite news|title=Clinton comeback: Fight goes on|work=]|date=March 5, 2008|url=http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/politics/2004261471_elexdems05.html| |
On March 4, Hillary Clinton carried ] and ] in the Democratic primaries; some considered these wins, especially Ohio, a "surprise upset" by 10%,<ref>{{cite news|title=Clinton comeback: Fight goes on|work=]|date=March 5, 2008|url=http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/politics/2004261471_elexdems05.html|access-date=March 5, 2008|archive-date=December 14, 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111214175507/http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/politics/2004261471_elexdems05.html|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://politics.nytimes.com/election-guide/2008/results/votes/|title=2008 Presidential election results|access-date=July 27, 2016|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160726145824/http://politics.nytimes.com/election-guide/2008/results/votes/|archive-date=July 26, 2016|df=mdy-all}}</ref> although she did lead in the polling averages in both states.<ref name="fivethirtyeight1"/><ref name=SuperTuesdayIIresults>{{cite news|title=Clinton wins key primaries, CNN projects; McCain clinches nod|work=]|date=March 5, 2008|url=http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/03/04/march.4.contests/|access-date=March 5, 2008|archive-date=April 13, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210413010400/http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/03/04/march.4.contests/|url-status=live}}</ref> She also carried the ], but Obama won the Texas caucuses held the same day and netted more delegates from the state than Clinton.<ref>{{cite news|title=Election Center 2008 Primaries and Caucuses: Results: Democratic Scorecard|date=August 20, 2008|url=http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/primaries/results/scorecard/#D|work=]|access-date=May 26, 2008|archive-date=June 4, 2008|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080604022436/http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/primaries/results/scorecard/#D|url-status=live}}</ref> | ||
| Only one state held a primary in April. This was ], on April 22. Although Obama made a strong effort to win Pennsylvania, Hillary Clinton won that primary by nearly 10%, with approximately 55% of the vote.<ref name="Clinton Wins PA">{{cite news|author=Jensen, Kristin|author2=Dodge, Catherine|title=Clinton Wins Pennsylvania Vote; Obama Retains Control (Update6)|url=https://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=asAZ87WefY6Y|publisher=]|date=April 23, 2008| |
Only one state held a primary in April. This was ], on April 22. Although Obama made a strong effort to win Pennsylvania, Hillary Clinton won that primary by nearly 10%, with approximately 55% of the vote.<ref name="Clinton Wins PA">{{cite news|author=Jensen, Kristin|author2=Dodge, Catherine|title=Clinton Wins Pennsylvania Vote; Obama Retains Control (Update6)|url=https://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=asAZ87WefY6Y|publisher=]|date=April 23, 2008|access-date=June 8, 2009}}</ref> Obama had outspent Clinton three to one in Pennsylvania, but his comment at a San Francisco fundraiser that small-town Americans "cling" to guns and religion drew sharp criticism from the Clinton campaign and may have hurt his chances in the Keystone State.<ref name="Guns and Religion">{{cite news|author=Oinounou, Mosheh|author2=Bruns, Aaron|title=Obama on Guns and Religion: 'I Didn't Say It as Well as I Should Have'|url=http://www.foxnews.com/politics/elections/2008/04/12/obama-on-guns-and-religion-i-didnt-say-it-as-well-as-i-should-have/|publisher=]|date=April 12, 2008|access-date=June 8, 2009 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090220190748/http://www.foxnews.com/politics/elections/2008/04/12/obama-on-guns-and-religion-i-didnt-say-it-as-well-as-i-should-have/ |archive-date=February 20, 2009|author-link=Mosheh Oinounou}}</ref> In addition, Clinton had several advantages in Pennsylvania. Throughout the primary process, she relied on the support of older, white, working class voters. Pennsylvania held a closed primary, which means that only registered Democrats could vote, and, according to Ron Elving of ], the established Democratic electorate "was older, whiter, more Catholic and more working-class than in most of the primaries to date."<ref>{{cite web|last=Elving|first=Ron|title=Analysis: Clinton Needed Pennsylvania to Carry On|url=https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=89865397|publisher=]|date=April 23, 2008|access-date=June 8, 2009|archive-date=August 16, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210816190910/https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=89865397|url-status=live}}</ref> After Pennsylvania, Obama had a higher number of delegates and popular votes than Clinton did and was still in a stronger position to win the nomination. Clinton, however, had received the endorsement of more superdelegates than Obama.<ref name="Clinton Wins PA"/> | ||
| ====Indiana and North Carolina==== | ====Indiana and North Carolina==== | ||
| On May 6, ] and ] held their Democratic presidential primaries. Clinton and Obama campaigned aggressively there before the voting took place. Polling had shown Obama a few points ahead in North Carolina and Clinton similarly leading in Indiana.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/nc/north_carolina_democratic_primary-275.html|title=Election 2008 – North Carolina Democratic Primary|publisher=RealClearPolitics|date=May 1, 2008| |
On May 6, ] and ] held their Democratic presidential primaries. Clinton and Obama campaigned aggressively there before the voting took place. Polling had shown Obama a few points ahead in North Carolina and Clinton similarly leading in Indiana.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/nc/north_carolina_democratic_primary-275.html|title=Election 2008 – North Carolina Democratic Primary|publisher=RealClearPolitics|date=May 1, 2008|access-date=January 24, 2009|archive-date=April 13, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210413010410/https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/nc/north_carolina_democratic_primary-275.html|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/in/indiana_democratic_primary-639.html|title=Election 2008 – Indiana Democratic Primary|publisher=RealClearPolitics|access-date=January 24, 2009|archive-date=July 15, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210715143948/https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/in/indiana_democratic_primary-639.html|url-status=live}}</ref> In the actual results, Obama outperformed the polls by several points in both states, winning by a significant margin in North Carolina<ref>{{cite web|title=NC—Election Results|url=http://results.enr.clarityelections.com/NC/1875/4822/en/summary.html|publisher=North Carolina State Board of Elections|date=May 7, 2008|access-date=June 8, 2009|archive-date=May 25, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170525040551/http://results.enr.clarityelections.com/NC/1875/4822/en/summary.html|url-status=live}}</ref> and losing by only 1.1% in Indiana (50.56% to 49.44%).<ref>{{cite web|title=Indiana Primary Election, May 6, 2008|url=http://www.in.gov/apps/sos/primary/sos_primary08|publisher=Indiana Secretary of State|date=August 22, 2008|access-date=June 8, 2009|archive-date=August 11, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180811070158/http://www.in.gov/apps/sos/primary/sos_primary08|url-status=live}}</ref> After these primaries, most pundits declared that it had become "increasingly improbable," if not impossible, for Clinton to win the nomination.<ref>{{cite news|last=Rutenberg|first=Jim|title=Pundits Declare the Race Over|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/08/us/politics/07cnd-pundits.html|work=The New York Times|date=May 8, 2008|access-date=June 8, 2009|archive-date=April 25, 2009|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090425033140/http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/08/us/politics/07cnd-pundits.html|url-status=live}}</ref> The small win in Indiana barely kept her campaign alive for the next month.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna24481004|title=NBC: Obama takes N.C. - Decision '08- NBC News|work=NBC News|date=May 7, 2008|access-date=January 24, 2009|archive-date=September 23, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200923223746/http://www.nbcnews.com/id/24481004|url-status=live}}</ref> Although she did manage to win the majority of the remaining primaries and delegates, it was not enough to overcome Obama's substantial delegate lead. | ||
| ====Florida and Michigan==== | ====Florida and Michigan==== | ||
| During late 2007, the two parties adopted rules against states' moving their primaries to an earlier date in the year. For the Republicans, the penalty for this violation was supposed to be the loss of half the state party's delegates to the convention. The Democratic penalty was the complete exclusion from the national convention of delegates from states that broke these rules. The Democratic Party allowed only four states to hold elections before February 5, 2008. |
During late 2007, the two parties adopted rules against states' moving their primaries to an earlier date in the year. For the Republicans, the penalty for this violation was supposed to be the loss of half the state party's delegates to the convention. The Democratic penalty was the complete exclusion from the national convention of delegates from states that broke these rules. The Democratic Party allowed only four states to hold elections before February 5, 2008. Clinton won a majority of delegates and popular votes from both states (though 40% voted uncommitted in Michigan) and subsequently led a fight to seat all the Florida and Michigan delegates.<ref>{{cite magazine|author=Hertzberg, Hendrik|date=June 2, 2008|url=http://www.newyorker.com/talk/comment/2008/06/02/080602taco_talk_hertzberg|title=Memory Lapse|magazine=]|access-date=June 8, 2009|archive-date=March 7, 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140307081344/http://www.newyorker.com/talk/comment/2008/06/02/080602taco_talk_hertzberg|url-status=live}}</ref> | ||
| There was some speculation that the fight over the delegates could last until the convention in August. On May 31, 2008, the Rules and Bylaws Committee of the Democratic Party reached a compromise on the Florida and Michigan delegate situation. The committee decided to seat delegates from Michigan and Florida at the convention in August, but to only award each a half-vote.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://us.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/05/31/dems.delegates/index.html|title=Florida, Michigan get all delegates, but each gets half vote| |
There was some speculation that the fight over the delegates could last until the convention in August. On May 31, 2008, the Rules and Bylaws Committee of the Democratic Party reached a compromise on the Florida and Michigan delegate situation. The committee decided to seat delegates from Michigan and Florida at the convention in August, but to only award each a half-vote.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://us.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/05/31/dems.delegates/index.html|title=Florida, Michigan get all delegates, but each gets half vote|website=]|date=May 31, 2008|access-date=May 31, 2008|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080602222431/http://us.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/05/31/dems.delegates/index.html|archive-date=June 2, 2008}}</ref> | ||
| ====Clinching the nomination==== | ====Clinching the nomination==== | ||
| ] | ] | ||
| The major political party nomination process (technically) continues through June of an election year. In previous cycles, the candidates were effectively chosen by the end of the primaries held in March, but, in this cycle |
The major political party nomination process (technically) continues through June of an election year. In previous cycles, the candidates were effectively chosen by the end of the primaries held in March, but, in this cycle, Barack Obama did not win enough delegates to secure the nomination until June 3, after a 17-month campaign against Hillary Clinton. He had a wide lead in states won, while Clinton had won majorities in several of the larger states. Now, because a form of ] and popular vote decided Democratic state delegate contests, numbers were close between Clinton and Obama.<ref>{{cite web |url= http://www.lib.niu.edu/1991/ii911010.html |title= The 1992 primary: proportional representation for Illinois Democrats |first= John S. |last= Jackson |author2= Barbara Leavitt Brown |work= Illinois Issues |date= October 12, 1991 |access-date= May 18, 2008 |publisher= ] |archive-date= August 23, 2021 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20210823041247/https://www.lib.niu.edu/1991/ii911010.html |url-status= live }}</ref> By May, Clinton claimed to hold a lead in the popular vote, but the ] found that her numbers were "accurate only" in one close scenario.<ref>{{cite news |url= https://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/2008-05-15-495396467_x.htm |title= Fact check: Clinton vote claims under scrutiny |publisher= ] |agency= ] |date= May 15, 2008 |access-date= June 8, 2009 |archive-date= April 28, 2011 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20110428083427/http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/2008-05-15-495396467_x.htm |url-status= live }}</ref> | ||
| In June, after the last of the primaries had taken place, Obama secured the Democratic nomination for |
In June, after the last of the primaries had taken place, Obama secured the Democratic nomination for president, with the help of multiple super delegate endorsements (most of the super delegates had refused to declare their support for either candidate until the primaries were completed).<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna24944453|title=Obama claims Democratic nomination—Decision '08- NBC News|work=NBC News|date=June 4, 2008|access-date=January 24, 2009|archive-date=September 23, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200923223846/http://www.nbcnews.com/id/24944453|url-status=live}}</ref> He was the first African American to win the nomination of a major political party in the United States.<ref>{{cite news|last=Zeleny|first=Jeff|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/04/us/politics/04elect.html|title=Obama Clinches Nomination; First Black Candidate to Lead a Major Party Ticket|work=The New York Times|date=June 4, 2008|access-date=January 24, 2009|archive-date=August 17, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200817103707/https://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/04/us/politics/04elect.html|url-status=live}}</ref> For several days, Clinton refused to concede the race, although she signaled her presidential campaign was ending in a post-primary speech on June 3 in her home state of New York.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0608/10797.html|title=Historic night: Obama clinches nomination—Bill Nichols and Ben Smith|date=June 3, 2008|publisher=Politico.com|access-date=January 24, 2009|archive-date=April 12, 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120412084230/http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0608/10797.html|url-status=live}}</ref> She finally conceded the nomination to Obama on June 7. She pledged her full support to the presumptive nominee and vowed to do everything she could to help him get elected.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/Vote2008/Story?id=5020581&page=1|title=ABC News: Clinton Concedes Democratic Nomination; Obama Leads Party in Fall|publisher=Abcnews.go.com|access-date=January 24, 2009|archive-date=August 16, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210816001241/https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/Vote2008/Story?id=5020581&page=1|url-status=live}}</ref> | ||
| ===Republican Party nomination=== | ===Republican Party nomination=== | ||
| {{Main|2008 Republican Party presidential primaries|2008 Republican National Convention}} | {{Main|John McCain 2008 presidential campaign|2008 Republican Party presidential primaries|2008 Republican National Convention}} | ||
| Not only was the 2008 election the first time since ] that neither the ] president nor the incumbent vice president was a candidate in the general election, but it was also the first time since the ] that neither sought his party's nomination for president; as Bush was term-limited from seeking another nomination, the unique aspect was Vice President Cheney's decision not to seek the Republican nomination.<ref name="harnden2007">{{cite news|first=Toby|last=Harnden|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1435447/The-top-US-conservatives-and-liberals.html|title=The top US conservatives and liberals| |
Not only was the 2008 election the first time since ] that neither the ] president nor the incumbent vice president was a candidate in the general election, but it was also the first time since the ] that neither sought his party's nomination for president; as Bush was term-limited from seeking another nomination, the unique aspect was Vice President Cheney's decision not to seek the Republican nomination.<ref name="harnden2007">{{cite news|first=Toby|last=Harnden|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1435447/The-top-US-conservatives-and-liberals.html |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220110/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1435447/The-top-US-conservatives-and-liberals.html |archive-date=January 10, 2022 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live|title=The top US conservatives and liberals|access-date=September 7, 2008|date=November 13, 2007|publisher=Telegraph.co.uk|location=London}}{{cbignore}}</ref><ref name="artandhistory1925"> {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141106112435/https://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/common/generic/VP_Charles_Dawes.htm |date=November 6, 2014 }}, U.S. Senate.</ref> The 2008 election was also the third presidential election since ] in which neither the incumbent president, the incumbent vice president, nor a current or former member of the incumbent president's ] won the nomination of either major party the others being ] and ].<ref name="cjones1">{{cite journal|last1=Jones|first1=Charles O.|title=Vice Presidents and Other Heirs Apparent: The Historical Experience of Experience|journal=Presidential Studies Quarterly|date=September 2008|volume=38|issue=3|pages=422–432|jstor=41219688|doi=10.1111/j.1741-5705.2008.02653.x | issn = 0360-4918 }}</ref> With no members of the Bush administration emerging as major contenders for the Republican nomination, the Republican race was as open as the Democratic race. | ||
| ====Candidate==== | ====Candidate==== | ||
| {{Main|2008 Republican Party presidential candidates}} | {{Main|2008 Republican Party presidential candidates}} | ||
| {{John McCain series}} | |||
| {{Sarah Palin series}} | |||
| {| class="wikitable" style="font-size:90%; text-align:center;" | {| class="wikitable" style="font-size:90%; text-align:center;" | ||
| |- | |- | ||
| | style="background:#f1f1f1;" colspan="30"|]<big>'''2008 Republican Party ticket'''</big> | | style="background:#f1f1f1;" colspan="30"|]<big>'''2008 Republican Party ticket'''</big> | ||
| |- | |- | ||
| ! style="width:3em; font-size:135%; background:#E81B23; width:200px;"| ] | ! style="width:3em; font-size:135%; background:#E81B23; width:200px;"| ] | ||
| Line 186: | Line 221: | ||
| | style="width:3em; width:200px;"|'''''for Vice President''''' | | style="width:3em; width:200px;"|'''''for Vice President''''' | ||
| |- | |- | ||
| | ] | | ] | ||
| | ] | | ] | ||
| |- | |- | ||
| | ]<br />from ]<br /><small>(1987–2018)</small> | | ]<br />from ]<br /><small>(1987–2018)</small> | ||
| | ]<br />]<br /><small>(2006–2009)</small> | | ]<br />]<br /><small>(2006–2009)</small> | ||
| |- | |- | ||
| | colspan=2 |] | | colspan=2 |] | ||
| Line 198: | Line 233: | ||
| ====Withdrawn candidates==== | ====Withdrawn candidates==== | ||
| {| class="wikitable mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" | |||
| * ], former Governor of ] (withdrew on February 7, 2008 and endorsed John McCain) | |||
| | colspan="5" style="text-align:center; font-size:120%; color:white; background:{{party color|Republican Party (United States)}};" |''Candidates in this section are sorted by popular vote from the primaries'' | |||
| * ], former Governor of ] (withdrew on March 4, 2008 and endorsed John McCain) | |||
| |- | |||
| * ], U.S. Representative from ] (withdrew on June 12, 2008 and endorsed Chuck Baldwin) | |||
| ! scope="col" style="width:3em; font-size:120%;" |] | |||
| * ], former Mayor of ] (withdrew on January 30, 2008 and endorsed John McCain) | |||
| ! scope="col" style="width:3em; font-size:120%;" |] | |||
| * ], former U.S. Senator from ] (withdrew on January 22, 2008 and endorsed John McCain) | |||
| ! scope="col" style="width:3em; font-size:120%;" |] | |||
| * ], former U.S. ] Ambassador from ] (withdrew on April 15, 2008 to run for the Constitution Party nomination. After losing that nomination, he ran as the America's Independent Party nominee.) | |||
| ! scope="col" style="width:3em; font-size:120%;" |] | |||
| * ], U.S. Representative from ] (withdrew on January 19, 2008 and endorsed Mike Huckabee. He later endorsed John McCain) | |||
| ! scope="col" style="width:3em; font-size:120%;" |] | |||
| * ], U.S. Representative from ] (withdrew on December 20, 2007 and endorsed Mitt Romney. He later endorsed John McCain) | |||
| |- | |||
| * ], U.S. Senator from ] (withdrew on October 18, 2007 and endorsed John McCain) | |||
| |] | |||
| * ], former ] (withdrew on August 12, 2007 and endorsed Rudy Giuliani. He later endorsed John McCain) | |||
| |] | |||
| * ], former Governor of ] (withdrew on July 14, 2007 and endorsed John McCain) | |||
| |] | |||
| |] | |||
| <gallery perrow="6" mode="packed" heights="160"> | |||
| |] | |||
| File:Mitt Romney, 2006.jpg|{{center|Former ]<br />''']'''<br />of ]<br />{{small|(])}}<br />{{small|(Withdrew on February 7, 2008)}}}} | |||
| |- style="text-align:center" | |||
| File:Mike Huckabee, speaking to a gathering at the Commonwealth Club in San Francisco.jpg|{{center|Former ]<br />''']'''<br />of ]<br />{{small|(])}}<br />{{small|(Withdrew on March 4, 2008)}}}} | |||
| |70th<br>]<br>]<br><small>(2003–2007)</small> | |||
| File:Ron Paul, official Congressional photo portrait, 2007.jpg|{{center|]<br />''']'''<br />from ]<br />{{small|(])}}<br />{{small|(Withdrew on June 12, 2008)}}}} | |||
| |44th<br>]<br>]<br><small>(1996–2007)</small> | |||
| File:GiulianiPortrait.jpg|{{center|Former ]<br />''']''',<br />from New York<br />{{small|(])}}<br />{{small|(Withdrew on January 30, 2008)}}}} | |||
| |]<br>from ]<br><small>(1996</small><nowiki/><small>–2013)</small> | |||
| File:Fred Thompson onstage.jpg|{{center|Former ]<br />''']'''<br />from ]<br />{{small|(])}}<br />{{small|(Withdrew on January 22, 2008)}}}} | |||
| |107th<br>]<br>]<br><small>(1994–2001)</small> | |||
| File:Alan Keyes.jpg|{{center|Former U.S. ] Ambassador<br />''']''',<br />from ]<br />{{small|(])}}<br />{{small|(Withdrew on April 15, 2008)}}}} | |||
| |]<br>from ]<br><small>(1994–2003)</small> | |||
| File:DuncanHunter.jpg|{{center|]<br />''']'''<br />from ]<br />{{small|(])}}<br />{{small|(Withdrew on January 19, 2008)}}}} | |||
| |- | |||
| File:Tom Tancredo.jpg|{{center|]<br />''']'''<br />from ]<br />{{small|(])}}<br />{{small|(Withdrew on December 20, 2007)}}}} | |||
| |] | |||
| File:Sam Brownback official portrait 2.jpg|{{center|]<br />''']'''<br />from ]<br />{{small|(Withdrew on October 18, 2007)}}}} | |||
| |] | |||
| File:Jim Gilmore by Gage Skidmore 2.jpg|{{center|Former ]<br />''']'''<br />of ]<br />{{small|(])}}<br />{{small|(Withdrew on July 14, 2007)}}}} | |||
| |] | |||
| File:Tommy Thompson 1.jpg|{{center|Former ]<br />''']''',<br />from ]<br />{{small|(])}}<br />{{small|(Withdrew on August 12, 2007)}}}} | |||
| |] | |||
| </gallery> | |||
| |] | |||
| |- style="text-align:center" | |||
| |] | |||
| |] | |||
| |] | |||
| |] | |||
| |] | |||
| |- style="text-align:center" | |||
| |''W: Feb 7''<br><small>'''4,699,788''' votes</small> | |||
| |''W: March 4''<br><small>'''4,276,046''' votes</small> | |||
| |''W: June 12''<br>'''<small>1,160,403</small>''' <small>votes</small> | |||
| |''W: Jan 30''<br>'''<small>597,518</small>''' <small>votes</small> | |||
| |''W: Jan 22''<br>'''<small>292,752</small>''' <small>votes</small> | |||
| |- | |||
| ! scope="col" style="width:3em; font-size:120%;" |] | |||
| ! scope="col" style="width:3em; font-size:120%;" |] | |||
| ! scope="col" style="width:3em; font-size:120%;" |] | |||
| ! scope="col" style="width:3em; font-size:120%;" |] | |||
| ! scope="col" style="width:3em; font-size:120%;" |] | |||
| |- | |||
| |] | |||
| |] | |||
| |] | |||
| |] | |||
| |] | |||
| |- style="text-align:center" | |||
| |16th<br>]<br>]<br><small>(1985–1987)</small> | |||
| |]<br>from ]<br><nowiki/><small>(1981–2009)</small> | |||
| |]<br>from ]<br><small>(1</small><nowiki/><small>999–2009)</small> | |||
| |]<br>from ]<br><small>(1996–2011)</small> | |||
| |68th<br>]<br><small>(1998–2002)</small> | |||
| |- | |||
| |] | |||
| |] | |||
| |] | |||
| |] | |||
| |] | |||
| |- style="text-align:center" | |||
| |] | |||
| |] | |||
| |] | |||
| |] | |||
| |] | |||
| |- style="text-align:center" | |||
| |''W: April 15''<br><small>'''59,636''' votes</small> | |||
| |''W: Jan 19''<br><small>'''39,883''' votes</small> | |||
| |''W: Jan 10''<br>'''<small> 8,595</small>''' <small>votes</small> | |||
| |''W: Oct 18, 2007''<br>'''<small> 2,838</small>''' <small>votes</small> | |||
| |''W: July 14, 2007''<br>'''<small>0</small>''' <small>votes</small> | |||
| |} | |||
| ====Before the primaries==== | ====Before the primaries==== | ||
| Immediately after the 2006 midterm elections, media pundits began speculating, as they did about the Democrats, about potential Republican candidates for |
Immediately after the 2006 midterm elections, media pundits began speculating, as they did about the Democrats, about potential Republican candidates for president in 2008.<ref name="guardian-2006"/> In November 2006, former New York City Mayor ] led in the polls, followed closely by Arizona Senator ].<ref>{{cite news|last=Vardi|first=Nathan|title=President Rudy Giuliani?|url=https://www.forbes.com/2006/11/14/leadership-giuliani-president-lead-manage-cz_nv_1114giuliani.html|work=]|date=November 14, 2006|access-date=June 9, 2009|archive-date=August 16, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210816030145/https://www.forbes.com/2006/11/14/leadership-giuliani-president-lead-manage-cz_nv_1114giuliani.html|url-status=live}}</ref> The media speculated that Giuliani's ] stance on ] and McCain's age and support of the unpopular ] would be detriments to their candidacies.<ref name="guardian-2006"/> Giuliani remained the frontrunner in the polls throughout most of 2007, with McCain and former ] Senator ] fighting for second place.<ref>{{cite web|title=White House 2008: Republican Nomination|url=http://pollingreport.com/wh08rep.htm|publisher=Pollingreport.com|access-date=June 9, 2009|archive-date=June 13, 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160613110212/http://www.pollingreport.com/wh08rep.htm|url-status=live}}</ref> ] Governor ], Giuliani, former ] governor ], and ] Representative ] announced their candidacies on January 28, February 5, February 13, and March 12, respectively.<ref>{{cite news|last=Romano|first=Lois|title=Huckabee Announces Presidential Bit|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/28/AR2007012800482.html|newspaper=The Washington Post|date=January 29, 2007|access-date=June 9, 2009|archive-date=March 9, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210309060620/https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/28/AR2007012800482.html|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|author=Balz, Dan|author2=Cillizza, Chris|title=Giuliani Announces He's In '08 Presidential Race|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/02/05/AR2007020500723_pf.html|newspaper=The Washington Post|date=February 6, 2007|access-date=June 9, 2009|archive-date=January 12, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200112163341/https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/02/05/AR2007020500723_pf.html|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|last=Gonyea|first=Don|title=Romney Announces His Candidacy for 2008|url=https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=7388715|publisher=]|date=February 13, 2007|access-date=June 9, 2009|archive-date=August 18, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210818010250/https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=7388715|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.mysanantonio.com/news/metro/stories/MYSA031207.paul2008.EN.74141d9.html|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070315195015/http://www.mysanantonio.com/news/metro/stories/MYSA031207.paul2008.EN.74141d9.html|archive-date=March 15, 2007|title=Paul formally launches presidential bid|author=Martin, Gary|work=]|date=March 12, 2007|access-date=March 13, 2007}}</ref> McCain officially announced his candidacy on March 1, 2007, after several informal announcements.<ref>{{cite news|last=Parker|first=Jennifer|title=The Art of the Presidential Rollout|url=https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/Story?id=3074824&page=1|work=ABC News|date=April 25, 2007|access-date=June 9, 2009|archive-date=August 14, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210814084204/https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/Story?id=3074824&page=1|url-status=live}}</ref> In the third quarter of 2007, the top four GOP (Republican) fundraisers were Romney, Giuliani, Thompson, and ].<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/11/05/AR2007110501643.html|title=Paul Raises More Than $3.5M in One Day|newspaper=]|access-date=January 28, 2018|archive-date=July 14, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170714135133/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/11/05/AR2007110501643.html|url-status=live}}</ref> MSNBC's Chuck Todd christened Giuliani and ] the front runners after the second Republican presidential debate in early 2007.<ref>{{cite news|last=Todd|first=Chuck|author-link=Chuck Todd|url=http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/05/15/192366.aspx|title=Winners & Losers|publisher=]|date=May 15, 2007|access-date=June 9, 2009|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090531093129/http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/05/15/192366.aspx|archive-date=May 31, 2009|df=mdy-all}}</ref> | ||
| ====Early primaries/caucuses==== | ====Early primaries/caucuses==== | ||
| Huckabee, winner of Iowa, had little to no money and hoped for at least a third-place finish in New Hampshire. McCain eventually displaced Rudy Giuliani and Romney as the front runner in ]. McCain staged a turnaround victory,<ref name="cnn0108008">{{cite news|url=http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/01/08/nh.main/index.html|title=Clinton and McCain the comeback kids|publisher=CNN|date=January 8, 2008| |
Huckabee, winner of Iowa, had little to no money and hoped for at least a third-place finish in New Hampshire. McCain eventually displaced Rudy Giuliani and Romney as the front runner in ]. McCain staged a turnaround victory,<ref name="cnn0108008">{{cite news|url=http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/01/08/nh.main/index.html|title=Clinton and McCain the comeback kids|publisher=CNN|date=January 8, 2008|access-date=January 8, 2008|archive-date=September 12, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200912000610/http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/01/08/nh.main/index.html|url-status=live}}</ref> having been written off by the pundits and polling in single digits less than a month before the race.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.nbcnews.com/id/22641730|title=New poll finds McCain reshaping GOP race|work=NBC News|publisher=New York Times|author1=Robin Toner|author2=Marjorie Connelly|name-list-style=amp|date=January 14, 2008|access-date=March 14, 2008|archive-date=September 23, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200923223353/http://www.nbcnews.com/id/22641730|url-status=dead}} See also: {{cite news|url=http://www.thestar.co.za/index.php?fArticleId=4288771|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080517231623/http://www.thestar.co.za/index.php?fArticleId=4288771|archive-date=May 17, 2008|title=John McCain: Ultimate Survivor|date=March 6, 2008|work=]|access-date=March 14, 2008}}</ref> | ||
| With the Republicans stripping Michigan and Florida of half their delegates for moving their primaries into January 2008 against party rules, the race for the nomination was based there. McCain meanwhile managed a small victory over Huckabee in ],<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/primaries/results/state/#SC|title=Election Center 2008: Primary Results for South Carolina|date=January 19, 2008| |
With the Republicans stripping Michigan and Florida of half their delegates for moving their primaries into January 2008 against party rules, the race for the nomination was based there. McCain meanwhile managed a small victory over Huckabee in ],<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/primaries/results/state/#SC|title=Election Center 2008: Primary Results for South Carolina|date=January 19, 2008|access-date=January 19, 2008|work=CNN|archive-date=May 7, 2008|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080507001932/http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/primaries/results/state/#SC|url-status=live}}</ref> setting him up for a larger and more important victory over Romney in ], which held a closed primary on January 29.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/01/29/fl.primary/index.html|title=McCain wins Florida, CNN projects|publisher=CNN|date=January 29, 2008|access-date=June 9, 2009|archive-date=March 25, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210325190455/http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/01/29/fl.primary/index.html|url-status=live}}</ref> By this time, after several scandals, no success in the early primaries, and a third-place finish in Florida, Giuliani conceded the nomination and endorsed John McCain the next day.<ref>{{cite news|last=Montopoli|first=Brian|title=For Giuliani, A Disappointing Fade To Exit|url=https://www.cbsnews.com/news/for-giuliani-a-disappointing-fade-to-exit/|work=CBS News|date=January 29, 2008|access-date=June 9, 2009|archive-date=February 21, 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110221135000/http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/01/29/politics/main3768035.shtml|url-status=live}}</ref> | ||
| ====Super Tuesday==== | ====Super Tuesday==== | ||
| McCain was also endorsed in February by ] Governor ] before the ] took place on Super Tuesday. This gave him a significant boost in the polls for the state's primary,<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/01/31/mccain.endorsements/index.html|title=Schwarzenegger backs McCain for president|publisher=CNN|date=January 31, 2008| |
McCain was also endorsed in February by ] Governor ] before the ] took place on Super Tuesday. This gave him a significant boost in the polls for the state's primary,<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/01/31/mccain.endorsements/index.html|title=Schwarzenegger backs McCain for president|publisher=CNN|date=January 31, 2008|access-date=May 26, 2010|archive-date=August 16, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210816062350/http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/01/31/mccain.endorsements/index.html|url-status=live}}</ref> which awarded the greatest number of delegates of all the states. On Super Tuesday, McCain won his home state of Arizona, taking all 53 delegates. He also won nearly all of California's 173 delegates, the largest of the Super Tuesday prizes. McCain also scored wins in seven other states, picking up 574 delegates.<ref name="independent">{{cite news|last=Johnson|first=Wesley|title=Super Tuesday results state by state|url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/super-tuesday-results-state-by-state-778654.html |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220501/https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/super-tuesday-results-state-by-state-778654.html |archive-date=May 1, 2022 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live|work=]|date=February 6, 2008|access-date=June 9, 2009|location=London}}{{cbignore}}</ref> Huckabee was the "surprise performer", winning 5 states and 218 delegates.<ref name="independent"/> Romney won 7 states and 231 delegates.<ref name="independent"/> Two days later, Romney suspended his presidential campaign, saying that if he stayed in the race, he would "forestall the launch of a national campaign and be making it easier for Senator Clinton or Obama to win".<ref>{{cite news|title=Romney suspends presidential campaign|work=CNN|date=February 7, 2008|first=John|last=King|url=http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/02/07/romney.campaign/index.html|access-date=June 10, 2009|archive-date=September 2, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210902191057/http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/02/07/romney.campaign/index.html|url-status=live}}</ref> His departure left Huckabee and Paul as McCain's only major challengers in the remaining primaries and caucuses. Romney endorsed McCain on February 14.<ref name="cnn.com">{{cite news|url=http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/02/14/romney.mccain/index.html|title=Romney endorses McCain for GOP nomination|publisher=CNN|date=February 14, 2008|access-date=June 9, 2009|archive-date=April 23, 2009|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090423193808/http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/02/14/romney.mccain/index.html|url-status=live}}</ref> | ||
| Louisiana, the ], ], ], and ] held primaries in February after Super Tuesday. Despite McCain picking up big victories, Huckabee won Louisiana and Kansas. McCain narrowly carried the Washington caucuses over Huckabee and Paul, who amassed a large showing.<ref name="msnbc21660914"/> The ] and ] closed February for the Republicans. After Super Tuesday, John McCain had become the clear front runner, but by the end of February, he still had not acquired enough delegates to secure the nomination. In March, John McCain clinched the Republican nomination after sweeping all four primaries, ], ], ], and ], putting him over the top of the 1,191 delegates required to win the GOP nomination.<ref name=SuperTuesdayIIresults/> Mike Huckabee then conceded the race to McCain, leaving Ron Paul, who had just 16 delegates, as his only remaining opponent.<ref>{{cite news|title=Huckabee bows to 'inevitable,' ends GOP run|work=]|date=March 5, 2008|url=http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/03/05/huckabee/| |
Louisiana, the ], ], ], and ] held primaries in February after Super Tuesday. Despite McCain picking up big victories, Huckabee won Louisiana and Kansas. McCain narrowly carried the Washington caucuses over Huckabee and Paul, who amassed a large showing.<ref name="msnbc21660914"/> The ] and ] closed February for the Republicans. After Super Tuesday, John McCain had become the clear front runner, but by the end of February, he still had not acquired enough delegates to secure the nomination. In March, John McCain clinched the Republican nomination after sweeping all four primaries, ], ], ], and ], putting him over the top of the 1,191 delegates required to win the GOP nomination.<ref name=SuperTuesdayIIresults/> Mike Huckabee then conceded the race to McCain, leaving Ron Paul, who had just 16 delegates, as his only remaining opponent.<ref>{{cite news|title=Huckabee bows to 'inevitable,' ends GOP run|work=]|date=March 5, 2008|url=http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/03/05/huckabee/|access-date=March 5, 2008|archive-date=August 14, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210814100823/http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/03/05/huckabee/|url-status=live}}</ref> Romney would eventually become the Republican presidential nominee ], which he then lost to ]. | ||
| === |
===Third party and other nominations=== | ||
| {{Main|Third-party and independent candidates for the 2008 United States presidential election}} | {{Main|Third-party and independent candidates for the 2008 United States presidential election}} | ||
| Along with the Democratic and Republican parties, three other parties nominated candidates with ballot access in enough states to win the minimum 270 electoral votes needed to win the election. These were the ], the ], and the ]. In addition, independent candidate ] ran his own campaign. | Along with the Democratic and Republican parties, three other parties nominated candidates with ballot access in enough states to win the minimum 270 electoral votes needed to win the election. These were the ], the ], and the ]. In addition, independent candidate ] ran his own campaign. | ||
| The Constitution Party nominated writer, pastor, and conservative talk show host ] for |
The Constitution Party nominated writer, pastor, and conservative talk show host ] for president, and attorney Darrell Castle from Tennessee for vice president.<ref>{{cite news|last=Mannies|first=Jo|title=At KC convention, Constitution Party picks pastor for president|url=http://www.stltoday.com/blogzone/political-fix/political-fix/2008/04/at-kc-convention-constitution-party-picks-pastor-for-president/|archive-url=https://archive.today/20080530214447/http://www.stltoday.com/blogzone/political-fix/political-fix/2008/04/at-kc-convention-constitution-party-picks-pastor-for-president/|url-status=dead|archive-date=May 30, 2008|work=]|date=April 26, 2008|access-date=July 14, 2009}}</ref><ref name=MNA>{{cite news|author=Montana News Association|title=BALDWIN 2008 PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGN KICKS OFF|url=http://www.montanasnews.tv/articles.php?mode=view&id=11063|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110501073923/http://www.montanasnews.tv/articles.php?mode=view&id=11063|url-status=dead|archive-date=May 1, 2011|publisher=Montana News Association |date=May 22, 2008|access-date=July 14, 2009}}</ref> While campaigning, Baldwin voiced his opposition to the ], the ], '']'', the ], and the ].<ref>{{cite news|last=Simon|first=Scott|title=Chuck Baldwin On His Run For President|url=https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=95822850|publisher=]|date=October 18, 2008|access-date=July 14, 2009|archive-date=August 16, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210816060744/https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=95822850|url-status=live}}</ref> | ||
| The Green Party nominated former Democratic |
The Green Party nominated former Democratic representative ] from Georgia for president, and political activist ] from New York for vice president. McKinney campaigned on a platform that supported ], the withdrawal of American troops from Iraq and Afghanistan, reparations for African Americans, and the creation of a Department of Peace.<ref>{{cite news|last=Scott|first=Jeffry|title=McKinney wins Green Party nomination|url=http://www.ajc.com/metro/content/metro/stories/2008/07/12/mckinney_green_nomination.html|work=]|date=July 12, 2008|access-date=July 14, 2009|archive-date=May 29, 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120529073043/http://www.ajc.com/metro/content/metro/stories/2008/07/12/mckinney_green_nomination.html|url-status=live}}</ref> | ||
| The Libertarian Party nominated former Republican |
The Libertarian Party nominated former Republican representative ] from Georgia for president, and his former rival for the Libertarian nomination ] from Nevada, for vice president. During the 2008 presidential campaign, Barr advocated a reworking or abolition of the ]<ref>{{cite news|title=Bob Barr: 'We must both reduce and simplify taxes'|url=http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/06/bob-barr-we-must-both-reduce-and-simplify-taxes/|publisher=Independent Political Report|date=June 5, 2008|access-date=July 14, 2009|archive-date=August 14, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210814111752/https://independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/06/bob-barr-we-must-both-reduce-and-simplify-taxes/|url-status=live}}</ref> and opposed the war in Iraq<ref>{{cite news|last=Galloway|first=Jim|title=Bob Barr thinking 'very serious' thoughts about a presidential race, Iraq, and torture|url=http://www.ajc.com/metro/content/shared-blogs/ajc/politicalinsider/entries/2008/03/26/bob_barr_very_serious_about_a.html|work=]|date=March 26, 2008|access-date=July 14, 2009|archive-date=May 29, 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120529071826/http://www.ajc.com/metro/content/shared-blogs/ajc/politicalinsider/entries/2008/03/26/bob_barr_very_serious_about_a.html|url-status=live}}</ref> and the ].<ref name="Walker2003">{{cite news|first=Jesse|last=Walker|author-link=Jesse Walker|title=Bob Barr, Civil Libertarian. The right wing of the ACLU|url=http://www.reason.com/news/show/28960.html|work=Reason Magazine|date=December 2003|access-date=July 14, 2009|archive-date=September 3, 2009|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090903042812/http://www.reason.com/news/show/28960.html|url-status=live}}</ref> | ||
| ====Candidates gallery==== | ====Candidates gallery==== | ||
| Line 263: | Line 348: | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| * April 23–26, 2008: ] held in ]. | * April 23–26, 2008: ] held in ]. | ||
| * May 23–26, 2008: ], held in ]. | * May 23–26, 2008: ], held in ], Colorado. | ||
| * July 10–13, 2008: ], held in ]. | * July 10–13, 2008: ], held in ], Illinois. | ||
| * August 25–28, 2008: ], held in ]. | * August 25–28, 2008: ], held in ], Colorado. | ||
| * September 1–4, 2008: ], held in ]. | * September 1–4, 2008: ], held in ]. | ||
| ==General election campaign== | ==General election campaign== | ||
| ===Issues=== | ===Issues=== | ||
| ====Iraq==== | ====Iraq==== | ||
| Until the onset of the ], the unpopular ] was a key issue during the campaign. John McCain supported the war while Barack Obama opposed it (Obama's early and strong opposition to the war helped him stand out against the other Democratic candidates during the primaries, as well as stand out to a war-weary electorate during the general campaign). Though McCain meant it as a peacetime presence like the United States maintained in Germany and Japan after ],<ref name="Dallas Morning News">{{cite magazine|title=A Hundred Years' War?|author=Hendrik Hertzberg|magazine=]|date=January 4, 2008|url=http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/hendrikhertzberg/2008/01/a-hundred-years.html|author-link=Hendrik Hertzberg|access-date=March 13, 2009|archive-date=October 18, 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131018171545/http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/hendrikhertzberg/2008/01/a-hundred-years.html|url-status=live}}; video at {{cite web|title=Make It 100| date=January 3, 2008 |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vf7HYoh9YMM |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/varchive/youtube/20211212/vf7HYoh9YMM| archive-date=2021-12-12 |url-status=live|publisher=]}}{{cbignore}}</ref> his statement that the United States could be in Iraq for as much as the next 50 to 100 years would prove costly. Obama used it against him as part of his strategy to tie him to the unpopular President Bush. | |||
| John McCain's support for the troop 'surge' employed by General ], which was one of several factors credited with improving the security situation in Iraq, may have boosted McCain's stance on the issue in voters' minds. McCain (who supported the invasion) argued that his support for the successful surge showed his superior judgment. However, Obama was quick to remind voters that there would have been no need for a "surge" had there been no war at all, thus questioning McCain's judgment. | John McCain's support for the troop 'surge' employed by General ], which was one of several factors credited with improving the security situation in Iraq, may have boosted McCain's stance on the issue in voters' minds. McCain (who supported the invasion) argued that his support for the successful surge showed his superior judgment. However, Obama was quick to remind voters that there would have been no need for a "surge" had there been no war at all, thus questioning McCain's judgment. | ||
| ====Bush's unpopularity==== | ====Bush's unpopularity==== | ||
| George W. Bush had become increasingly unpopular among Americans by late 2005 due in part by the growing unpopularity of the ] domestically and internationally, as well as Bush's |
George W. Bush had become increasingly unpopular among Americans by late 2005 due in part by the growing unpopularity of the ] domestically and internationally, as well as Bush's handling of the ] and ] in 2005. By the time Obama was elected as ] on November 4, 2008, Bush's approval rating was in the low to mid 20s and his disapproval grew increasingly significant, being in the high 60s, and even low 70s in some polls.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Historic Disapproval: Bush Hits All-Time Low Amid Economic Meltdown|url=https://abcnews.go.com/PollingUnit/Politics/story?id=5920248&page=1|access-date=2021-02-08|website=ABC News|language=en|archive-date=August 18, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210818054317/https://abcnews.go.com/PollingUnit/Politics/story?id=5920248&page=1|url-status=live}}</ref> Polls consistently showed that his approval ratings among American voters had averaged around 30 percent.<ref name="gallup.com"> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161118234452/http://www.gallup.com/poll/124922/Presidential-Approval-Center.aspx?ref=interactive |date=November 18, 2016 }} Gallup.com</ref><ref>{{cite news|last=Steinhauser|first=Paul|title=Poll: Bush's popularity hits new low|publisher=CNN|date=March 19, 2008|url=http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/03/19/bush.poll/|access-date=January 10, 2009|archive-date=August 16, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210816185228/http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/03/19/bush.poll/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=Confidence sinks to lowest since 2002 as fear tightens its hold on US consumers|publisher=International Herald Tribune|date=April 11, 2008|url=http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2008/04/11/business/NA-FIN-ECO-US-Consumer-Confidence.php|access-date=January 10, 2009}}</ref> In March 2008, Bush endorsed McCain at the White House,<ref>{{cite news|title=Bush says he wants McCain to win presidency|publisher=CNN|date=March 5, 2008|url=http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/03/05/mccain.bush/index.html|access-date=January 10, 2009|archive-date=March 23, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210323195317/http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/03/05/mccain.bush/index.html|url-status=live}}</ref> but did not make a single appearance for McCain during the campaign. Bush appeared at the 2008 GOP convention only through a live video broadcast. He chose not to appear in person due to disaster events in the Gulf of Mexico in the aftermath of ]. Although he supported the war in Iraq, McCain made an effort to show that he had disagreed with Bush on many other key issues such as climate change. During the entire general election campaign, Obama countered by pointing out in ads and at numerous campaign rallies that McCain had claimed in an interview that he voted with Bush 90% of the time, and congressional voting records supported this for the years Bush was in office.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/08/AR2008020800964_pf.html|title=History and Necessity Unite Bush, McCain|work=Washingtonpost.com|date=February 9, 2008|access-date=January 30, 2009|first1=Peter|last1=Baker|first2=Michael|last2=Abramowitz last3 A Mazhintue|archive-date=December 3, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201203095920/https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/08/AR2008020800964_pf.html|url-status=live}}</ref> | ||
| ====Age issue==== | ====Age issue==== | ||
| Line 284: | Line 367: | ||
| ], September 10, 2008, following the ]]] | ], September 10, 2008, following the ]]] | ||
| Similar to Senator ]'s 1996 presidential campaign, one of the more widely leveled charges against McCain was the issue of his age—he turned 72 in August and there was widespread concern about the idea of electing a man who would be 80 years old if he completed two full terms in office (the oldest president, ], had been a month shy of 78 when he left office in January 1989). In addition, McCain suffered from the ill effects of his captivity in North Vietnam and reportedly had difficulty lifting his arms above his head. His age in particular was considered a liability against the youthful Senator Obama, who was the first ]er to run for president on a major party ticket. McCain for comparison was born before World War II and belonged to the |
Similar to Senator ]'s 1996 presidential campaign, one of the more widely leveled charges against McCain was the issue of his age—he turned 72 in August and there was widespread concern about the idea of electing a man who would be 80 years old if he completed two full terms in office (the oldest president, ], had been a month shy of 78 when he left office in January 1989).<ref>{{Cite news|last=Bouie|first=Jamelle|date=2021-11-23|title=Opinion {{!}} The Ronald Reagan Guide to Joe Biden's Political Future|language=en-US|work=The New York Times|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2021/11/23/opinion/biden-reagan-approval.html|access-date=2021-11-30|issn=0362-4331|archive-date=November 30, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211130143815/https://www.nytimes.com/2021/11/23/opinion/biden-reagan-approval.html|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|last=Nyhan|first=Brendan|date=2014-05-30|title=How Old Is Too Old for President? Depends Who's Running|language=en-US|work=The New York Times|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2014/05/31/upshot/how-old-is-too-old-for-president-depends-whos-running.html|access-date=2021-11-30|issn=0362-4331|archive-date=December 13, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201213151524/https://www.nytimes.com/2014/05/31/upshot/how-old-is-too-old-for-president-depends-whos-running.html|url-status=live}}</ref> In addition, McCain suffered from the ill effects of his captivity in North Vietnam and reportedly had difficulty lifting his arms above his head. His age in particular was considered a liability against the youthful Senator Obama, who was the first ]er to run for president on a major party ticket.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Analysis: Age an issue in the 2008 campaign? - CNN.com|url=https://edition.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/06/15/mccain.age/index.html|access-date=2021-11-30|website=edition.cnn.com|archive-date=January 18, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210118183158/http://edition.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/06/15/mccain.age/index.html|url-status=live}}</ref> McCain for comparison was born before World War II and belonged to the ].<ref>{{Cite news|date=2018-08-26|title=The key moments in John McCain's life|language=en-GB|work=BBC News|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-44009916|access-date=2021-11-30|archive-date=August 24, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210824230208/https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-44009916|url-status=live}}</ref> Much like Bob Dole, McCain attempted to counter these charges by releasing all of his medical records, something Obama did not do. McCain's wife Cindy dismissed concerns about his health by arguing that "We went hiking the ] last summer and did great and had no trouble keeping up with us." McCain also appeared at several campaign stops with his still-active 95-year-old mother. In a speech on the House floor, Pennsylvania Congressman ] criticized McCain's age by saying "Seven presidents have come and gone since I've been in Congress, and I saw the toll the job took on each one of them." If elected, McCain would have been the first president born in the 1930s. McCain ultimately died in 2018,<ref>{{Cite news|date=August 25, 2018|title=John McCain rebelled at the Naval Academy — and as a POW — long before he was a Senate maverick|newspaper=]|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/retropolis/wp/2018/05/03/john-mccain-rebelled-at-the-naval-academy-and-as-a-pow-long-before-he-was-a-senate-maverick/|access-date=November 30, 2021|archive-date=May 27, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190527054724/https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/retropolis/wp/2018/05/03/john-mccain-rebelled-at-the-naval-academy-and-as-a-pow-long-before-he-was-a-senate-maverick/|url-status=live}}</ref> just one year after the completion of Obama's second term. | ||
| Like the Clinton campaign in 1996, Obama avoided discussing McCain's age directly, instead preferring to simply call his ideas and message "old" and "old hat". He also made a strong appeal to youth voters and back during his primary contest with Hillary Clinton, had stated "When I watched the feud between the Clintons and unfold during the 1990s, I was reminded of old quarrels started on college campuses long ago. It's time for a new generation to take over." Obama's active use of a Blackberry and other modern technology also stood in contrast to the Arizona Senator's admission that he did not use a computer or a cell phone. McCain's service in Vietnam, while marketable to baby boomers, was referred to as "unimportant" to younger voters. | Like the Clinton campaign in 1996, Obama avoided discussing McCain's age directly, instead preferring to simply call his ideas and message "old" and "old hat". He also made a strong appeal to youth voters and back during his primary contest with Hillary Clinton, had stated "When I watched the feud between the Clintons and unfold during the 1990s, I was reminded of old quarrels started on college campuses long ago. It's time for a new generation to take over." Obama's active use of a Blackberry and other modern technology also stood in contrast to the Arizona Senator's admission that he did not use a computer or a cell phone. McCain's service in Vietnam, while marketable to baby boomers, was referred to as "unimportant" to younger voters. | ||
| ], Ohio with a "Change We Need" sign]] | ], Ohio with a "Change We Need" sign]] | ||
| Obama promised "universal health care, full employment, a green America, and an America respected instead of feared by its enemies".<ref> |
Obama promised "universal health care, full employment, a green America, and an America respected instead of feared by its enemies".<ref>{{cite journal |id={{ProQuest|200339829}} |last1=Simba |first1=Malik |title=The Obama Campaign 2008: A Historical Overview |journal=Western Journal of Black Studies |volume=33 |issue=3 |date=Fall 2009 |pages=186–191 }}</ref> | ||
| Polls regularly found the general electorate as a whole divided more evenly between 'change' and 'experience' as candidate qualities than the Democratic primary electorate, which split in favor of 'change' by a nearly |
Polls regularly found the general electorate as a whole divided more evenly between 'change' and 'experience' as candidate qualities than the Democratic primary electorate, which split in favor of 'change' by a nearly 2–1 margin.<ref>{{cite news |author1=Perry Bacon |author2=Jennifer Agiesta |url=http://voices.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2008/06/09/change_vs_experience_all_over.html |title=Change vs. Experience All Over Again |newspaper=The Washington Post |date=June 9, 2008 |access-date=January 3, 2009 |archive-date=January 26, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210126100954/http://voices.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2008/06/09/change_vs_experience_all_over.html |url-status=dead }}</ref> Advantages for McCain and Obama on experience and the ability to bring change, respectively, remained steady through the November 4 election. However, final pre-election polling found that voters considered Obama's inexperience less of an impediment than McCain's association with sitting president George W. Bush,<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.quinnipiac.edu/x2882.xml?ReleaseID=1225 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081106060519/http://www.quinnipiac.edu/x2882.xml?ReleaseID=1225 |url-status=dead |archive-date=November 6, 2008 |title=Obama Ends Campaign Ahead In Ohio And Pennsylvania, Quinnipiac University Swing State Poll Finds |publisher=Quinnipiac University Polling Institute |df=mdy-all }}</ref> an association which was rhetorically framed by the Obama campaign throughout the election season as "more of the same". | ||
| McCain appeared to undercut his line of attack by picking first-term Alaska governor ] to be his running mate.<ref>{{cite web |author=James Joyner |url=http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/sarah_palin_-_john_mccains_vp_choice/ |title=Sarah Palin – John McCain's VP Choice |publisher=Outsidethebeltway.com |date=August 29, 2008 | |
McCain appeared to undercut his line of attack by picking first-term Alaska governor ] to be his running mate.<ref>{{cite web |author=James Joyner |url=http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/sarah_palin_-_john_mccains_vp_choice/ |title=Sarah Palin – John McCain's VP Choice |publisher=Outsidethebeltway.com |date=August 29, 2008 |access-date=January 30, 2009 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080919210544/http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/sarah_palin_-_john_mccains_vp_choice/ |archive-date=September 19, 2008 |df=mdy-all }}</ref> Palin had been governor only since 2006, and before that had been a council member and mayor of ]. The choice of Palin was controversial; however, it appeared to solve two pressing concerns—McCain's age and health (since a youthful vice president would succeed him to office if he died or became incapacitated) and appealing to right-wing conservatives, a group that had been comparatively unmoved by McCain. Palin also came off as more down-to-earth and relatable to average Americans than McCain, widely criticized as a "Beltway insider".<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna23137096 |title=Christian evangelicals send McCain a message |agency=Associated Press |work=NBC News |date=February 12, 2008 |access-date=January 30, 2009 |archive-date=September 23, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200923223500/http://www.nbcnews.com/id/23137096 |url-status=live }}</ref> However, media interviews suggested that Palin lacked knowledge on certain key issues, and they cast doubt among many voters about her qualifications to be vice president or president. In this regard, her inexperience was also a liability when McCain's age and health were factored in—there was a higher-than-normal probability of Palin succeeding to the presidency. "One 72-year-old heartbeat away from the presidency" became a popular anti-GOP slogan.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Burns |first=Alexander |date=2008-09-03 |title=McCain and the politics of mortality |url=https://www.politico.com/story/2008/09/mccain-and-the-politics-of-mortality-013096 |access-date=2024-02-19 |website=POLITICO |language=en |archive-date=January 17, 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240117002156/https://www.politico.com/story/2008/09/mccain-and-the-politics-of-mortality-013096 |url-status=live }}</ref> She also came under attack on everything from her 17-year-old daughter giving birth to a child out of wedlock to actively participating in hunting moose and other animals.<ref>{{cite news |title=Palin gets media savaging after faltering interview |publisher=AFP |date=September 26, 2008 |url=http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5i7lJ7uGNOkOTK964WwjybvKVDouA |access-date=December 30, 2008 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081201194353/http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5i7lJ7uGNOkOTK964WwjybvKVDouA |archive-date=December 1, 2008 |df=mdy-all }}</ref> Because of Palin's conservative views, there was also concern that she would alienate independents and moderates, two groups that pundits observed McCain would need to win the election.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/uselection2008/3205619/Sarah-Palin-seen-as-beacon-of-hope-as-defeat-at-poll-looms.html |title=Sarah Palin seen as beacon of hope as defeat at poll looms |work=The Daily Telegraph |location=London |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081017230402/http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/uselection2008/3205619/Sarah-Palin-seen-as-beacon-of-hope-as-defeat-at-poll-looms.html |archive-date=October 17, 2008 |url-status=dead}}</ref> | ||
| ====Economy==== | ====Economy==== | ||
| Polls taken in the last few months of the presidential campaign and exit polls conducted on Election Day showed the economy as the top concern for voters.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.gallup.com/poll/109759/Gallups-Quick-Read-Election.aspx|title=Gallup's Quick Read on the Election|publisher=Gallup.com| |
Polls taken in the last few months of the presidential campaign and exit polls conducted on Election Day showed the economy as the top concern for voters.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.gallup.com/poll/109759/Gallups-Quick-Read-Election.aspx|title=Gallup's Quick Read on the Election|date=October 22, 2008|publisher=Gallup.com|access-date=January 30, 2009|archive-date=June 28, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170628223139/http://www.gallup.com/poll/109759/gallups-quick-read-election.aspx|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/11/04/exit.polls/|title=Exit polls: Obama wins big among young, minority voters|publisher=CNN.com|date=November 4, 2008|access-date=January 30, 2009|archive-date=June 8, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210608222610/http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/11/04/exit.polls/|url-status=live}}</ref> In the fall of 2008, many news sources were reporting that the economy was suffering its most serious downturn since the ].<ref>{{cite web|url=https://nationalpost.com/opinion/columnists/story.html?id=058cc3ea-a0f8-4a8c-b767-8cd58f359c82|title=Investors Bail Out: The D word going cheap|publisher=www.nationalpost.com|access-date=February 15, 2009|date=September 16, 2008|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://archive.today/20120904031755/http://www.nationalpost.com/opinion/columnists/story.html?id=058cc3ea-a0f8-4a8c-b767-8cd58f359c82|archive-date=September 4, 2012|df=mdy-all}}</ref> During this period, John McCain's election prospects fell with several politically costly comments about the economy. | ||
| On August 20, John McCain said in an interview with '']'' that he was uncertain how many houses he and his wife, Cindy, owned; "I think—I'll have my staff get to you," he told the media outlet.<ref>{{cite news|last=Martin|first=Jonathan|author2=Allen, Mike|title=McCain unsure how many houses he owns|publisher=Politico|date=August 21, 2008|url=http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0808/12685.html|access-date=December 30, 2008|archive-date=July 24, 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150724211115/http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0808/12685.html|url-status=live}}</ref> Both on the stump and in Obama's political ad, "Seven", the gaffe was used to portray McCain as somebody unable to relate to the concerns of ordinary Americans. This out-of-touch image was further cultivated when, on September 15, the day of the ], at a morning rally in ], McCain declared that "the fundamentals of our economy are strong," despite what he described as "tremendous turmoil in our financial markets and Wall Street."<ref>{{cite news|last=Aigner-Treworgy|first=Adam|title=McCain: Economy still 'strong'|publisher=MSNBC|date=September 15, 2008|url=http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/09/15/1399191.aspx|access-date=December 30, 2008|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081206043223/http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/09/15/1399191.aspx|archive-date=December 6, 2008|df=mdy-all}}</ref> With the perception among voters to the contrary, the comment appeared to cost McCain politically. | |||
| On August 20, John McCain said in an interview with '']'' that he was uncertain how many houses he and his wife, Cindy, owned; "I think—I'll have my staff get to you," he told the media outlet.<ref>{{cite news|last=Martin|first=Jonathan|author2=Allen, Mike | |||
| |title=McCain unsure how many houses he owns|publisher=Politico|date=August 21, 2008|url=http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0808/12685.html|accessdate=December 30, 2008}}</ref> Both on the stump and in Obama's political ad, "Seven", the gaffe was used to portray McCain as somebody unable to relate to the concerns of ordinary Americans. This out-of-touch image was further cultivated when, on September 15, the day of the ], at a morning rally in ], McCain declared that "the fundamentals of our economy are strong," despite what he described as "tremendous turmoil in our financial markets and Wall Street."<ref>{{cite news|last=Aigner-Treworgy|first=Adam|title=McCain: Economy still 'strong'|publisher=MSNBC|date=September 15, 2008|url=http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/09/15/1399191.aspx|accessdate=December 30, 2008|url-status=dead|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20081206043223/http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/09/15/1399191.aspx|archivedate=December 6, 2008|df=mdy-all}}</ref> With the perception among voters to the contrary, the comment appeared to cost McCain politically. | |||
| On September 24, 2008, after the onset of the ], McCain announced that he was suspending his campaign to return to Washington so he could help craft a $700 billion bailout package for the troubled financial industry, and he stated that he would not debate Obama until Congress passed the bailout bill.<ref>{{cite news|title=Obama, McCain Meet In Mississippi|publisher=WAPT.com|date=December 29, 2008|url=http://www.wapt.com/news/18376597/detail.html| |
On September 24, 2008, after the onset of the ], McCain announced that he was suspending his campaign to return to Washington so he could help craft a $700 billion bailout package for the troubled financial industry, and he stated that he would not debate Obama until Congress passed the bailout bill.<ref>{{cite news|title=Obama, McCain Meet In Mississippi|publisher=WAPT.com|date=December 29, 2008|url=http://www.wapt.com/news/18376597/detail.html|access-date=December 30, 2008|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110501071939/http://www.wapt.com/news/18376597/detail.html|archive-date=May 1, 2011|df=mdy-all}}</ref> Despite this decision, McCain was portrayed as somebody not playing a significant role in the negotiations for the first version of the bill, which fell short of passage in the House. He eventually decided to attend the first presidential debate on September 26, despite Congress' lack of immediate action on the bill. His ineffectiveness in the negotiations and his reversal in decision to attend the debates were seized upon to portray McCain as erratic in his response to the economy. Days later, a second version of the original bailout bill was passed by both the House and Senate, with Obama, his vice presidential running mate ], and McCain all voting for the measure (Hillary Clinton would as well).<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=110&session=2&vote=00213 |title=U.S. Senate Roll Call Votes: 110th Congress, 2nd Session |publisher=Senate.gov |access-date=April 2, 2013 |archive-date=May 29, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200529050212/https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=110&session=2&vote=00213 |url-status=live }}</ref> | ||
| All the aforementioned remarks and campaign issues hurt McCain's standing with voters. All these also occurred after the onset of the |
All the aforementioned remarks and campaign issues hurt McCain's standing with voters. All these also occurred after the onset of the ] and after McCain's poll numbers had started to fall. Although sound bites of all of these "missteps" were played repeatedly on national television, many pundits and analysts say that the actual financial crisis and economic conditions caused McCain's large drop in support in mid-September and severely damaged his campaign.<ref>{{cite news |last=Schnur |first=Dan |title=What caused McCain's poll numbers to fall?|url=https://www.latimes.com/la-oew-schnur-cain3-2008nov03-story.html |work=]| date=November 3, 2008 | url-access=limited |archive-date=October 24, 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131024025532/http://www.latimes.com/business/investing/la-oew-schnur-cain3-2008nov03,0,6970010.story|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|last=Nichols|first=Hans|title=McCain May Have Last Chance to Overcome Economy in Final Debate|url=https://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aRnqc1XoUZFU|publisher=Bloomberg|date=October 15, 2008|access-date=January 29, 2009}}</ref> | ||
| ====Health care==== | ====Health care==== | ||
| ]'s proposals focused on open-market competition rather than government funding or control. At the heart of his plan were tax credits – $2,500 for individuals and $5,000 for families who do not subscribe to or do not have access to health care through their employer. To help people who are denied coverage by insurance companies due to pre-existing conditions, McCain proposed working with states to create what he calls a "Guaranteed Access Plan".<ref>Robert E. Moffit and Nina Owcharenko, ], October 15, 2008</ref> | ]'s proposals focused on open-market competition rather than government funding or control. At the heart of his plan were tax credits – $2,500 for individuals and $5,000 for families who do not subscribe to or do not have access to health care through their employer. To help people who are denied coverage by insurance companies due to pre-existing conditions, McCain proposed working with states to create what he calls a "Guaranteed Access Plan".<ref>Robert E. Moffit and Nina Owcharenko, {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151003204435/http://www.heritage.org/Research/HealthCare/upload/bg_2198.pdf |date=October 3, 2015 }} ], October 15, 2008</ref> | ||
| ] called for ]. His health care plan proposed creating a National Health Insurance Exchange that would include both private insurance plans and a Medicare-like government run option. Coverage would be guaranteed regardless of health status, and premiums would not vary based on health status either. It would have required parents to cover their children, but did not require adults to buy insurance. | ] called for ]. His health care plan proposed creating a National Health Insurance Exchange that would include both private insurance plans and a Medicare-like government run option. Coverage would be guaranteed regardless of health status, and premiums would not vary based on health status either. It would have required parents to cover their children, but did not require adults to buy insurance. | ||
| Critics of McCain's plan argued that it would not significantly reduce the number of uninsured Americans, would increase costs, reduce consumer protections and lead to less generous benefit packages.<ref name="Buchmueller et al 2008">Thomas Buchmueller, Sherry A. Glied, Anne Royalty, and Katherine Swartz, '']'', September 16, 2008</ref> |
Critics of McCain's plan argued that it would not significantly reduce the number of uninsured Americans, would increase costs, reduce consumer protections and lead to less generous benefit packages.<ref name="Buchmueller et al 2008">Thomas Buchmueller, Sherry A. Glied, Anne Royalty, and Katherine Swartz, {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080917225606/http://content.healthaffairs.org/cgi/reprint/hlthaff.27.6.w472v1 |date=September 17, 2008 }} '']'', September 16, 2008</ref> Critics of Obama's plan argued that it would increase federal regulation of private health insurance without addressing the underlying incentives behind rising health care spending.<ref name="Antos et al 2008">Joseph Antos, Gail Wilensky, and Hanns Kuttner, {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090821115446/http://content.healthaffairs.org/cgi/reprint/hlthaff.27.6.w462v1 |date=August 21, 2009 }} '']'', September 16, 2008</ref><ref>Robert E. Moffit and Nina Owcharenko, {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121002213521/http://www.heritage.org/Research/HealthCare/upload/bg_2197.pdf |date=October 2, 2012}} ], October 15, 2008</ref> ] suggested that a combination of the two approaches would work better than either one alone.<ref>Mark V. Pauly, {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090205060847/http://content.healthaffairs.org/cgi/reprint/hlthaff.27.6.w482v1 |date=February 5, 2009 }} '']'', September 16, 2008</ref> | ||
| A poll released in early November 2008 found that voters supporting Obama listed health care as their second priority; voters supporting McCain listed it as fourth, tied with the war in Iraq. Affordability was the primary health care priority among both sets of voters. |
A poll released in early November 2008 found that voters supporting Obama listed health care as their second priority; voters supporting McCain listed it as fourth, tied with the war in Iraq. Affordability was the primary health care priority among both sets of voters. Obama voters were more likely than McCain voters to believe government can do much about health care costs.<ref>Robert J. Blendon, Drew E. Altman, John M. Benson, Mollyann Brodie, Tami Buhr, Claudia Deane, and Sasha Buscho, {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090326091432/http://content.nejm.org/cgi/reprint/NEJMsr0807717v1.pdf |date=March 26, 2009 }} '']'' 359;19, November 6, 2008</ref> | ||
| === |
===Presidential debates=== | ||
| {{Main|United States presidential |
{{Main|2008 United States presidential debates}} | ||
| The United States presidential election of 2008 was sponsored by the ] (CPD), a ] organization that sponsored four debates that occurred at various locations around the United States (U.S.) in September and October 2008. Three of the debates involved the presidential nominees, and one involved the vice-presidential nominees.<br /> | The United States presidential election of 2008 was sponsored by the ] (CPD), a ] organization that sponsored four debates that occurred at various locations around the United States (U.S.) in September and October 2008. Three of the debates involved the presidential nominees, and one involved the vice-presidential nominees.<br /> | ||
| {| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
| Line 326: | Line 408: | ||
| !Moderators | !Moderators | ||
| !Participants | !Participants | ||
| !Viewership | !Viewership<br/>(millions) | ||
| (Millions) | |||
| |- | |- | ||
| |P1 | |P1 | ||
| Line 335: | Line 416: | ||
| |] | |] | ||
| |] | |] | ||
| |] | |]<br>] | ||
| |52.4<ref name=":0">{{Cite web|url=https://www.debates.org/index.php?page=2008-debates|title=CPD: 2008 Debates|website=www.debates.org|access-date=2019-01-08|archive-date=January 8, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190108145533/https://www.debates.org/index.php?page=2008-debates|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
| ] | |||
| |52.4<ref name=":0">{{Cite web|url=https://www.debates.org/index.php?page=2008-debates|title=CPD: 2008 Debates|website=www.debates.org|access-date=2019-01-08}}</ref> | |||
| |- | |- | ||
| |VP | |VP | ||
| Line 343: | Line 423: | ||
| |9:00 pm EDT | |9:00 pm EDT | ||
| |] | |] | ||
| |] | |], Missouri | ||
| |] | |] | ||
| |] | |]<br>] | ||
| ] | |||
| |69.9<ref name=":0" /> | |69.9<ref name=":0" /> | ||
| |- | |- | ||
| Line 356: | Line 434: | ||
| |] | |] | ||
| |] | |] | ||
| |] | |]<br>] | ||
| ] | |||
| |63.2<ref name=":0" /> | |63.2<ref name=":0" /> | ||
| |- | |- | ||
| Line 367: | Line 443: | ||
| |] | |] | ||
| |] | |] | ||
| |] | |]<br>] | ||
| ] | |||
| |56.5<ref name=":0" /> | |56.5<ref name=":0" /> | ||
| |} | |} | ||
| <ref>{{cite news|url= |
<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna27007283|title=Vice presidential debate, Oct. 2, 2008|date=October 3, 2008|access-date=July 14, 2009|work=]|archive-date=September 23, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200923224341/http://www.nbcnews.com/id/27007283|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="prep for debates">{{cite news|url=https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/Vote2008/Story?id=5857679&page=1|title=Obama, McCain Prep for Presidential Debates|last=Parker|first=Jennifer|date=September 23, 2008|access-date=July 14, 2009|work=]|archive-date=August 15, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210815130528/https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/Vote2008/Story?id=5857679&page=1|url-status=live}}</ref>{{Location map+|USA|places={{Location map~ | USA | ||
| | label = '''University of Mississippi<br />Oxford, MS''' | | label = '''University of Mississippi<br />Oxford, MS''' | ||
| | label_size = 75 | | label_size = 75 | ||
| Line 399: | Line 473: | ||
| | lat_deg = 40.7168 | | lat_deg = 40.7168 | ||
| | lon_deg = -73.5994 | | lon_deg = -73.5994 | ||
| }}|alt=Map of United States showing debate locations|caption=Sites of the 2008 general election debates|width=320}}Another debate was sponsored by the ] political union and took place there on October 19. All candidates who could theoretically win the 270 electoral votes needed to win the election were invited, and ], ], and ] agreed to attend. ], principal host of '']'', moderated. It was broadcast on cable by ] and on the Internet by Break-the-Matrix.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.freeandequal.org/events.php?id=7|title=Free and Equal|publisher=Freeandequal.org| |
}}|alt=Map of United States showing debate locations|caption=Sites of the 2008 general election debates|width=320}}Another debate was sponsored by the ] political union and took place there on October 19. All candidates who could theoretically win the 270 electoral votes needed to win the election were invited, and ], ], and ] agreed to attend. ], principal host of '']'', moderated. It was broadcast on cable by ] and on the Internet by Break-the-Matrix.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.freeandequal.org/events.php?id=7|title=Free and Equal|publisher=Freeandequal.org|access-date=November 3, 2008|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081019015945/http://www.freeandequal.org/events.php?id=7 |archive-date=October 19, 2008}}</ref> | ||
| ===Campaign costs=== | ===Campaign costs=== | ||
| {{Main|Fundraising for the 2008 United States presidential election}} | {{Main|Fundraising for the 2008 United States presidential election}} | ||
| The reported cost of campaigning for president has increased significantly in recent years. One source reported that if the costs for both Democratic and Republican campaigns were added together (for the presidential primary election, general election, and the political conventions), the costs have more than doubled in only eight years ($448.9 million in 1996, $649.5 million in 2000, and $1.01 billion in 2004).<ref name="Toner">{{cite news|first=Helen|last=Kennedy|title=Wanna be Prez? First get $100M|date=January 14, 2007|work=New York Daily News|url=http://eldraque.newsvine.com/_news/2007/01/14/520561-wanna-be-prez-first-get-100 |
The reported cost of campaigning for president has increased significantly in recent years. One source reported that if the costs for both Democratic and Republican campaigns were added together (for the presidential primary election, general election, and the political conventions), the costs have more than doubled in only eight years ($448.9 million in 1996, $649.5 million in 2000, and $1.01 billion in 2004).<ref name="Toner">{{cite news|first=Helen|last=Kennedy|title=Wanna be Prez? First get $100M|date=January 14, 2007|work=New York Daily News|url=http://eldraque.newsvine.com/_news/2007/01/14/520561-wanna-be-prez-first-get-100|access-date=February 1, 2007|archive-date=November 9, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211109004946/https://www.nbcnews.com/|url-status=live}}</ref> In January 2007, Federal Election Commission Chairman ] estimated that the 2008 race would be a $1 billion election, and that to be taken seriously, a candidate would have needed to raise at least $100 million by the end of 2007.<ref name="1 billion election">{{cite news|first=David|last=Kirkpatrick|title=Death Knell May Be Near for Public Election Funds|date=January 23, 2007|work=]|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/23/us/politics/23donate.html|access-date=September 15, 2008|archive-date=August 15, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210815153555/https://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/23/us/politics/23donate.html|url-status=live}}</ref> | ||
| ====Expense summary==== | ====Expense summary==== | ||
| Line 451: | Line 525: | ||
| |$1.48 | |$1.48 | ||
| |- align=center | |- align=center | ||
| |colspan="5"|Excludes spending by independent expenditure concerns.<br />Source: Federal Election Commission<ref>{{cite web|url=http://query.nictusa.com/cgi-bin/cancomsrs/?_08+00+PR|title=Financial Summary Report Search Results|publisher=fec.gov| |
|colspan="5"|Excludes spending by independent expenditure concerns.<br />Source: Federal Election Commission<ref>{{cite web|url=http://query.nictusa.com/cgi-bin/cancomsrs/?_08+00+PR|title=Financial Summary Report Search Results|publisher=fec.gov|access-date=December 22, 2008|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141208114019/http://query.nictusa.com/cgi-bin/cancomsrs/?_08+00+PR|archive-date=December 8, 2014|df=mdy-all}}</ref> | ||
| |} | |} | ||
| ===Notable expressions and phrases=== | ===Notable expressions and phrases=== | ||
| * ]: Republican self-described energy policy | * ''']''': Republican self-described energy policy | ||
| * ]: Obama's campaign slogan | * ''']''': Obama's campaign slogan | ||
| * That one: McCain's reference to Obama during the 2nd debate. | * '''That one''': McCain's reference to Obama during the 2nd debate. | ||
| * ]: Obama used this phrase to insinuate that any changes that McCain was advocating from the policies of ] would only be slight modifications of Bush's policies but the underlying policies would be the same, and in Obama's opinion, bad. Some called it sexist, claiming it was a reference to Sarah Palin, who cracked a joke during the ] that the only difference between a hockey mom and a pit bull is lipstick.<ref name="BBC">{{cite news|title=Obama rejects 'lipstick' charge|publisher=BBC|date=September 10, 2008|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/7608653.stm}}</ref> | * ''']''': Obama used this phrase to insinuate that any changes that McCain was advocating from the policies of ] would only be slight modifications of Bush's policies but the underlying policies would be the same, and in Obama's opinion, bad. Some called it sexist, claiming it was a reference to Sarah Palin, who cracked a joke during the ] that the only difference between a hockey mom and a pit bull is lipstick.<ref name="BBC">{{cite news|title=Obama rejects 'lipstick' charge|publisher=BBC|date=September 10, 2008|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/7608653.stm|access-date=December 19, 2012|archive-date=July 30, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170730034254/http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/7608653.stm|url-status=live}}</ref> | ||
| === Electoral College forecasts === | |||
| Elections analysts and political pundits issue probabilistic forecasts of the composition of the Electoral College. These forecasts use a variety of factors to estimate the likelihood of each candidate winning the Electoral College electors for that state. Most election predictors use the following ratings: | |||
| * "<u>tossup</u>": no advantage | |||
| * "<u>tilt</u>" (used by some predictors): advantage that is not quite as strong as "lean" | |||
| * "<u>lean</u>" or "<u>leans</u>": slight advantage | |||
| * "<u>likely</u>": significant, but surmountable, advantage | |||
| * "<u>safe</u>" or "<u>solid</u>": near-certain chance of victory | |||
| Below is a list of states considered by one or more forecast to be competitive; states that are deemed to be "safe" or "solid" by forecasters '']'', '']'', and '']''. | |||
| {{sticky header}} | |||
| {| class="wikitable sortable sticky-header" style="font-size:95%; | |||
| |- style="vertical-align:bottom" | |||
| ! State | |||
| ! {{Tooltip|EVs|Electoral votes}} | |||
| ! ]<br />{{small|November 4,<br />2008}}<ref>{{cite web| url = http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/maps/obama_vs_mccain/?map=5| url-status = dead| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20080605003612/http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/maps/obama_vs_mccain/?map=5| archive-date = 2008-06-05| title = RealClearPolitics - Electoral Map}}</ref> | |||
| !]<br />{{small|November 4,<br />2008}}<ref>{{Cite web|date=2009-04-22|title=Vote 2008 - The Takeaway - Track the Electoral College vote predictions|url=http://vote2008.thetakeaway.org/2008/09/20/track-the-electoral-college-vote-predictions/|access-date=2021-08-23|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090422070127/http://vote2008.thetakeaway.org/2008/09/20/track-the-electoral-college-vote-predictions/|archive-date=2009-04-22}}</ref> | |||
| !]<br />{{small|November 4,<br />2008}}<ref>{{Cite web|date=2015-05-05|title=Presidential|url=http://cookpolitical.com/presidential|access-date=2021-08-23|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150505003043/http://cookpolitical.com/presidential|archive-date=2015-05-05}}</ref> | |||
| |- | |||
| ! ] | |||
| | align=center|11 | |||
| <!--RCP--> | {{USRaceRating|Lean|R}} | |||
| <!--Cook--> | {{USRaceRating|Safe|R}} | |||
| <!--538--> | {{USRaceRating|Safe|R}} | |||
| |- | |||
| ! ] | |||
| | align=center|10 | |||
| <!--RCP--> | {{USRaceRating|Lean|R}} | |||
| <!--Cook--> | {{USRaceRating|Tossup}} | |||
| <!--538--> | {{USRaceRating|Safe|R}} | |||
| |- | |||
| ! ] | |||
| | align=center|9 | |||
| <!--RCP--> | {{USRaceRating|Lean|D|flip}} | |||
| <!--Cook--> | {{USRaceRating|Lean|D|flip}} | |||
| <!--538--> | {{USRaceRating|Safe|D|flip}} | |||
| |- | |||
| ! ] | |||
| | align=center|15 | |||
| <!--RCP--> | {{USRaceRating|Tossup}} | |||
| <!--Cook--> | {{USRaceRating|Tossup}} | |||
| <!--538--> | {{USRaceRating|Lean|R}} | |||
| |- | |||
| ! ] | |||
| | align=center|27 | |||
| <!--RCP--> | {{USRaceRating|Tossup}} | |||
| <!--Cook--> | {{USRaceRating|Tossup}} | |||
| <!--538--> | {{USRaceRating|Lean|D|flip}} | |||
| |- | |||
| ! ] | |||
| | align=center|7 | |||
| <!--RCP--> | {{USRaceRating|Safe|D|flip}} | |||
| <!--Cook--> | {{USRaceRating|Lean|D|flip}} | |||
| <!--538--> | {{USRaceRating|Safe|D|flip}} | |||
| |- | |||
| ! ] | |||
| | align=center|11 | |||
| <!--RCP--> | {{USRaceRating|Tossup}} | |||
| <!--Cook--> | {{USRaceRating|Tossup}} | |||
| <!--538--> | {{USRaceRating|Lean|R}} | |||
| |- | |||
| ! ] | |||
| | align=center|17 | |||
| <!--RCP--> | {{USRaceRating|Safe|D}} | |||
| <!--Cook--> | {{USRaceRating|Lean|D}} | |||
| <!--538--> | {{USRaceRating|Safe|D}} | |||
| |- | |||
| ! ] | |||
| | align=center|10 | |||
| <!--RCP--> | {{USRaceRating|Safe|D}} | |||
| <!--Cook--> | {{USRaceRating|Lean|D}} | |||
| <!--538--> | {{USRaceRating|Safe|D}} | |||
| |- | |||
| ! ] | |||
| | align=center|3 | |||
| <!--RCP--> | {{USRaceRating|Tossup}} | |||
| <!--Cook--> | {{USRaceRating|Tossup}} | |||
| <!--538--> | {{USRaceRating|Tossup}} | |||
| |- | |||
| ! ] | |||
| | align=center|11 | |||
| <!--RCP--> | {{USRaceRating|Lean|R}} | |||
| <!--Sabato--> | {{USRaceRating|Solid|R}} | |||
| <!--538--> | {{USRaceRating|Safe|R}} | |||
| |- | |||
| ! ] | |||
| | align=center|5 | |||
| <!--RCP--> | {{USRaceRating|Lean|D|flip}} | |||
| <!--Cook--> | {{USRaceRating|Lean|D|flip}} | |||
| <!--538--> | {{USRaceRating|Lean|D|flip}} | |||
| |- | |||
| ! ] | |||
| | align=center|5 | |||
| <!--RCP--> | {{USRaceRating|Lean|D|flip}} | |||
| <!--Cook--> | {{USRaceRating|Lean|D|flip}} | |||
| <!--538--> | {{USRaceRating|Safe|D|flip}} | |||
| |- | |||
| ! ] | |||
| | align=center|3 | |||
| <!--RCP--> | {{USRaceRating|Tossup}} | |||
| <!--Cook--> | {{USRaceRating|Tossup}} | |||
| <!--538--> | {{USRaceRating|Safe|R}} | |||
| |- | |||
| ! ] | |||
| | align=center|15 | |||
| <!--RCP--> | {{USRaceRating|Tossup}} | |||
| <!--Cook--> | {{USRaceRating|Tossup}} | |||
| <!--538--> | {{USRaceRating|Tossup}} | |||
| |- | |||
| ! ] | |||
| | align=center|20 | |||
| <!--RCP--> | {{USRaceRating|Tossup}} | |||
| <!--Cook--> | {{USRaceRating|Tossup}} | |||
| <!--538--> | {{USRaceRating|Lean|D|flip}} | |||
| |- | |||
| ! ] | |||
| | align=center|21 | |||
| <!--RCP--> | {{USRaceRating|Lean|D}} | |||
| <!--Cook--> | {{USRaceRating|Lean|D}} | |||
| <!--538--> | {{USRaceRating|Lean|D}} | |||
| |- | |||
| ! ] | |||
| | align=center|3 | |||
| <!--RCP--> | {{USRaceRating|Lean|R}} | |||
| <!--Cook--> | {{USRaceRating|Tossup}} | |||
| <!--538--> | {{USRaceRating|Safe|R}} | |||
| |- | |||
| ! ] | |||
| | align=center|5 | |||
| <!--RCP--> | {{USRaceRating|Lean|R}} | |||
| <!--Cook--> | {{USRaceRating|Lean|R}} | |||
| <!--538--> | {{USRaceRating|Lean|R}} | |||
| |- | |||
| ! ] | |||
| | align=center|13 | |||
| <!--RCP--> | {{USRaceRating|Tossup}} | |||
| <!--Cook--> | {{USRaceRating|Lean|D|flip}} | |||
| <!--538--> | {{USRaceRating|Lean|D|flip}} | |||
| |} | |||
| ==Internet campaigns== | ==Internet campaigns== | ||
| Line 465: | Line 682: | ||
| {{see also|Grassroots fundraising}} | {{see also|Grassroots fundraising}} | ||
| ] collected large contributions through the Internet in ]. In 2008, candidates went even further to reach out to Internet users through their own sites and such sites as ], ], and ].<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/07/23/debate.main/|title=Questions, not answers, highlight YouTube debate|work=]|date=July 24, 2007| |
] collected large contributions through the Internet in ]. In 2008, candidates went even further to reach out to Internet users through their own sites and such sites as ], ], and ].<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/07/23/debate.main/|title=Questions, not answers, highlight YouTube debate|work=]|date=July 24, 2007|access-date=March 14, 2008|archive-date=August 16, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210816064744/http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/07/23/debate.main/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="garry">{{cite news|url=http://www.sptimes.com/2007/06/08/State/Candidates_court_youn.shtml|title=Candidates court young voters online|author=Stephanie Garry|work=]|date=June 8, 2007|access-date=September 15, 2008|archive-date=April 15, 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160415025205/http://www.sptimes.com/2007/06/08/State/Candidates_court_youn.shtml|url-status=live}}</ref> | ||
| On December 16, 2007, Ron Paul ], more money on a single day through Internet donations than any presidential candidate in US history.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/election2008/2007-12-17-ronpaul-fundraising_N.htm|title='Money bomb': Ron Paul raises $6 million in 24-hour period|author=Kenneth P. Vogel|publisher=]|work=]| |
On December 16, 2007, Ron Paul ], more money on a single day through Internet donations than any presidential candidate in US history.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/election2008/2007-12-17-ronpaul-fundraising_N.htm|title='Money bomb': Ron Paul raises $6 million in 24-hour period|author=Kenneth P. Vogel|publisher=]|work=]|access-date=March 14, 2008|date=December 17, 2007|author-link=Kenneth P. Vogel|archive-date=March 21, 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120321083450/http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/election2008/2007-12-17-ronpaul-fundraising_N.htm|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2007/12/rp.html|title=Breaking News: Ron Paul campaign donors set a record|work=]|date=December 17, 2007|access-date=September 15, 2008|archive-date=September 17, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210917051521/https://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2007/12/rp.html|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.usadaily.com/article.cfm?articleID=151377|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080112234617/http://www.usadaily.com/article.cfm?articleID=151377|archive-date=January 12, 2008|title=Ron Paul makes fund raising history|author=Larry Fester|publisher=USA Daily|date=November 5, 2007}}</ref> | ||
| ===Promotion=== | ===Promotion=== | ||
| Not only did the Internet allow candidates to raise money, but also it gave them a tool to appeal to newer and younger demographics. Political pundits were now evaluating candidates based on their social media following. | Not only did the Internet allow candidates to raise money, but also it gave them a tool to appeal to newer and younger demographics. Political pundits were now evaluating candidates based on their social media following. | ||
| Senator Barack Obama's victory is credited to his competitive edge in social media and Internet following. Obama had over 2 million American supporters on ] and 100,000 followers on ], while McCain attracted only 600,000 Facebook supporters (likes) and 4,600 followers on Twitter. Obama's YouTube channel held 115,000 subscribers and more than 97 million video views. Obama had maintained a similar advantage over Senator Hillary Clinton in the Democratic |
Senator Barack Obama's victory is credited to his competitive edge in social media and Internet following. Obama had over 2 million American supporters on ] and 100,000 followers on ], while McCain attracted only 600,000 Facebook supporters (likes) and 4,600 followers on Twitter. Obama's YouTube channel held 115,000 subscribers and more than 97 million video views. Obama had maintained a similar advantage over Senator Hillary Clinton in the Democratic primary.<ref>{{cite web|last=Fraser|first=Matthew|title=Barack Obama and the Facebook Election|url=https://www.usnews.com/opinion/articles/2008/11/19/barack-obama-and-the-facebook-election?page=2|publisher=U.S. News & World Report|access-date=2 March 2014|archive-date=April 13, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210413022206/https://www.usnews.com/opinion/articles/2008/11/19/barack-obama-and-the-facebook-election?page=2|url-status=live}}</ref> | ||
| Obama's edge in social media was crucial to the election outcome. According to a study by the Pew Internet and American Life project, 35 percent of Americans relied on online video for election news. Ten percent of Americans used social networking sites to learn about the election.<ref>{{ |
Obama's edge in social media was crucial to the election outcome. According to a study by the Pew Internet and American Life project, 35 percent of Americans relied on online video for election news. Ten percent of Americans used social networking sites to learn about the election.<ref>{{Cite report |url=https://www.conference-board.org/publications/publicationdetail.cfm?publicationid=7078 |title=Social Media and the 2008 U.S. Presidential Election |last1=Maruggi |first1=Albert |last2=Metzgar |first2=Emily |date=2009-07-31 |publisher=Society for New Communications Research |access-date=2023-01-15 |url-access=subscription |archive-date=January 15, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230115205259/https://www.conference-board.org/publications/publicationdetail.cfm?publicationid=7078 |url-status=live }}</ref> The 2008 election showed huge increases in Internet use. | ||
| Another study done after the election gave a lot of insight on young voters. Thirty-seven percent of Americans ages 18–24 got election news from social networking sites. Almost a quarter of Americans saw something about the election in an online video.<ref name="Cain Miller">{{cite news|last=Cain Miller|first=Claire|title=How Obama's Internet Campaign Changed Politics|url=http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/11/07/how-obamas-internet-campaign-changed-politics/| |
Another study done after the election gave a lot of insight on young voters. Thirty-seven percent of Americans ages 18–24 got election news from social networking sites. Almost a quarter of Americans saw something about the election in an online video.<ref name="Cain Miller">{{cite news|last=Cain Miller|first=Claire|title=How Obama's Internet Campaign Changed Politics|url=http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/11/07/how-obamas-internet-campaign-changed-politics/|access-date=1 March 2014|newspaper=The New York Times|date=7 Nov 2008|archive-date=March 31, 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140331225403/http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/11/07/how-obamas-internet-campaign-changed-politics/|url-status=live}}</ref> YouTube and other online video outlets allowed candidates to advertise in ways like never before. The Republican Party in particular was criticized for not adequately using social media and other means to reach young voters. | ||
| Anonymous and semi-anonymous ]s, traditionally done with fliers and ], also spread to the Internet.<ref>{{cite news|title=Palmetto Bugs: Slingers of Slime Step it up in SC|last=Reid|first=Tim|date=November 23, 2007|work=]|url=http://www.nypost.com/seven/11232007/news/nationalnews/palmetto_bugs_188986.htm| |
Anonymous and semi-anonymous ]s, traditionally done with fliers and ], also spread to the Internet.<ref>{{cite news|title=Palmetto Bugs: Slingers of Slime Step it up in SC|last=Reid|first=Tim|date=November 23, 2007|work=]|url=http://www.nypost.com/seven/11232007/news/nationalnews/palmetto_bugs_188986.htm|access-date=September 15, 2008|archive-date=August 27, 2009|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090827222452/http://www.nypost.com/seven/11232007/news/nationalnews/palmetto_bugs_188986.htm|url-status=live}}</ref> Organizations specializing in the production and distribution of ] material, such as ], emerged; such organizations have been said to be having a growing influence on American politics.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/29/us/politics/29opposition.html|work=]|last=Rutenberg|first=Jim|date=June 29, 2008|access-date=October 25, 2008|title=Political Freelancers Use Web to Join the Attack|archive-date=August 14, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210814102943/https://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/29/us/politics/29opposition.html|url-status=live}}</ref> | ||
| ==Controversies== | ==Controversies== | ||
| ===Voter suppression=== | ===Voter suppression allegations=== | ||
| Allegations of voter list purges using unlawful criteria caused controversy in at least six ]: ], ], ], ], ] and ].<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/09/us/politics/09voting.html|title=States' Actions to Block Voters Appear Illegal|work=The New York Times|author=Ian Urbina|date=October 9, 2008| |
Allegations of voter list purges using unlawful criteria caused controversy in at least six ]: ], ], ], ], ] and ].<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/09/us/politics/09voting.html|title=States' Actions to Block Voters Appear Illegal|work=The New York Times|author=Ian Urbina|date=October 9, 2008|access-date=October 15, 2008|archive-date=January 5, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180105104015/http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/09/us/politics/09voting.html|url-status=live}}</ref> On October 5, 2008, the ] Lt. Governor of Montana, ], accused the Montana Republican Party of vote caging to purge 6,000 voters from three counties which trend Democratic.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.mtstandard.com/articles/2008/10/05/opinion/hjjbijjejjigfj.txt|title=Republicans crossed line with voter purge attempt|publisher=The Montana Standard|author=John Bohlinger|date=October 5, 2008|access-date=October 15, 2008|archive-date=November 27, 2008|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081127151204/http://www.mtstandard.com/articles/2008/10/05/opinion/hjjbijjejjigfj.txt|url-status=live}}</ref> Allegations arose in Michigan that the Republican Party planned to challenge the eligibility of voters based on lists of foreclosed homes.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://michiganmessenger.com/4076/lose-your-house-lose-your-vote|title=Lose your house, lose your vote|date=September 10, 2008|publisher=Michigan Messenger|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080923165626/http://michiganmessenger.com/4076/lose-your-house-lose-your-vote|archive-date=September 23, 2008|df=mdy-all}}</ref> The campaign of ] presidential nominee ] filed a lawsuit challenging this. The ] wrote to the ] requesting an investigation.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://judiciary.house.gov/news/080919.html|title=Conyers Calls on McCain to Immediately Halt Republican Vote Suppression Efforts|date=September 19, 2008|publisher=House of Representatives|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080924190743/http://judiciary.house.gov/news/080919.html|archive-date=September 24, 2008|df=mdy-all}}</ref> | ||
| ] candidate ] filed a lawsuit in ] to have Obama and McCain removed from the ballot in that state.<ref>{{cite news|first=Christy|last=Hoppe|title=Libertarian Bob Barr sues to have McCain, Obama cast off Texas' ballot|work=Dallas Morning News|date=September 19, 2008| |
] candidate ] filed a lawsuit in ] to have Obama and McCain removed from the ballot in that state.<ref>{{cite news|first=Christy|last=Hoppe|title=Libertarian Bob Barr sues to have McCain, Obama cast off Texas' ballot|work=Dallas Morning News|date=September 19, 2008|access-date=October 8, 2008|url=http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/news/politics/state/stories/DN-barr_19pol.ART.State.Edition1.268aa61.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080921212445/http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/news/politics/state/stories/DN-barr_19pol.ART.State.Edition1.268aa61.html |archive-date=September 21, 2008}}</ref> His campaign alleged that both of the candidates had missed the August 26 deadline to file and had been included on the ballot in violation of Texas election law. Neither Obama nor McCain had been confirmed as the candidate of their respective parties at the time of the deadline. The ] dismissed the lawsuit without explanation.<ref>{{cite news|first=Adam|last=Young|title=Texas court: McCain, Obama to remain on ballot|work=Daily Toreador|date=September 24, 2008|access-date=October 8, 2008|url=http://media.www.dailytoreador.com/media/storage/paper870/news/2008/09/24/News/Texas.Court.Mccain.Obama.To.Remain.On.Ballot-3447969.shtml|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081006090557/http://media.www.dailytoreador.com/media/storage/paper870/news/2008/09/24/News/Texas.Court.Mccain.Obama.To.Remain.On.Ballot-3447969.shtml|archive-date=October 6, 2008|df=mdy-all}}</ref> | ||
| In ], identified by both parties as a key state, allegations surfaced from both Republicans and Democrats that individuals from out of state were moving to the state temporarily and attempting to vote despite not meeting the state's requirement of permanent residency for more than 29 days. |
In ], identified by both parties as a key state, allegations surfaced from both Republicans and Democrats that individuals from out of state were moving to the state temporarily and attempting to vote despite not meeting the state's requirement of permanent residency for more than 29 days. The Franklin County Board of Elections referred 55 cases of possible voting irregularities to the local prosecutor.<ref name="dispatchpolitics1">{{cite web|last=Niquette|first=Mark|url=http://www.dispatchpolitics.com/live/content/local_news/stories/2009/11/16/copy/voter_fraud.ART_ART_11-16-09_A1_O9FM66J.html?sid=101|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110429011205/http://www.dispatchpolitics.com/live/content/local_news/stories/2009/11/16/copy/voter_fraud.ART_ART_11-16-09_A1_O9FM66J.html?sid=101|url-status=dead|archive-date=April 29, 2011|title=Mark Niquette, "Vote-Fraud Cases Linger from 2008," Columbus Dispatch, November 16, 2008."|publisher=Dispatchpolitics.com|date=November 16, 2009|access-date=June 13, 2010}}</ref> Three groups attracted particular notice: 'Vote from Home,' 'Vote Today Ohio,' and 'Drop Everything and Come to Ohio.' Vote from Home attracted the most attention when thirteen of the group's members moved to the same location in eastern Columbus. Members of the group organized by Marc Gustafson, including several ] and ] scholars studying at ], settled with Franklin County Prosecutor Ron O'Brien to have their challenged ballots withdrawn.<ref>{{cite web|last=Niquette|first=Mark|url=http://www.dispatchpolitics.com/live/content/local_news/stories/2008/10/22/copy/DEMS_STRIKE_BACK.ART_ART_10-22-08_A1_2JBLUBM.html?sid=101|title=Mark Niquette and Jill Riepenhoff, "'Voters' Flocking to Ohio," Columbus Dispatch, October 22, 2008|publisher=Dispatchpolitics.com|date=October 22, 2008|access-date=June 13, 2010|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100812050408/http://www.dispatchpolitics.com/live/content/local_news/stories/2008/10/22/copy/DEMS_STRIKE_BACK.ART_ART_10-22-08_A1_2JBLUBM.html?sid=101|archive-date=August 12, 2010|df=mdy-all}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last=Macintosh |first=Jeane |work=New York Post |date=October 20, 2008 |url=http://www.marcgustafson.com/Marc%20Gustafson's%20Website%20Resume.pdf |title=Gotham-to-Ohio Vote Scam Eyed |access-date=April 17, 2011 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110514042809/http://www.marcgustafson.com/Marc%20Gustafson%27s%20Website%20Resume.pdf |archive-date=May 14, 2011 |df=mdy-all }}</ref> The Obama campaign and others alleged that members of the McCain campaign had also voted without properly establishing residency.<ref name="dispatchpolitics1"/> Since 1953, only six people in Ohio have gone to prison for illegal voting.<ref>{{cite web|last=Riepenhoff|first=Jill|url=http://www.dispatchpolitics.com/live/content/local_news/stories/2008/10/19/copy/Brownlee.ART_ART_10-19-08_A1_72BL2JG.html?adsec=politics&sid=101|title=Jill Riepenhoff, "Illegal Voters, or Just Getting Out the Vote?" Columbus Dispatch, October 19, 2008|publisher=Dispatchpolitics.com|date=October 19, 2008|access-date=June 13, 2010|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100812051133/http://www.dispatchpolitics.com/live/content/local_news/stories/2008/10/19/copy/Brownlee.ART_ART_10-19-08_A1_72BL2JG.html?adsec=politics&sid=101|archive-date=August 12, 2010|df=mdy-all}}</ref> | ||
| ===Media bias=== | ===Media bias=== | ||
| Republicans and independents leveled significant criticism at media outlets' coverage of the presidential election season. An October 22, 2008 ] poll estimated 70% of registered voters believed journalists wanted Barack Obama to win the election, as opposed to 9% for John McCain.<ref>{{cite web|title=Most Voters Say Media Wants Obama to Win|publisher=The Pew Research Center for the People & the Press|date=October 22, 2008|url=http://people-press.org/report/463/media-wants-obama}}</ref> Another Pew survey, conducted after the election, found that 67% of voters thought that the press fairly covered Obama, versus 30% who viewed the coverage as unfair. Regarding McCain, 53% of voters viewed his press coverage as fair versus 44% who characterized it as unfair. Among affiliated Democrats, 83% believed the press fairly covered Obama; just 22% of Republicans thought the press was fair to McCain.<ref> Pew Research Center. Retrieved September 6, 2012.</ref> | Republicans and independents leveled significant criticism at media outlets' coverage of the presidential election season. An October 22, 2008 ] poll estimated 70% of registered voters believed journalists wanted Barack Obama to win the election, as opposed to 9% for John McCain.<ref>{{cite web|title=Most Voters Say Media Wants Obama to Win|publisher=The Pew Research Center for the People & the Press|date=October 22, 2008|url=http://people-press.org/report/463/media-wants-obama|access-date=October 25, 2008|archive-date=March 10, 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110310064355/http://people-press.org/report/463/media-wants-obama|url-status=live}}</ref> Another Pew survey, conducted after the election, found that 67% of voters thought that the press fairly covered Obama, versus 30% who viewed the coverage as unfair. Regarding McCain, 53% of voters viewed his press coverage as fair versus 44% who characterized it as unfair. Among affiliated Democrats, 83% believed the press fairly covered Obama; just 22% of Republicans thought the press was fair to McCain.<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200621142808/https://www.people-press.org/2008/11/13/section-5-the-press-and-campaign-2008/ |date=June 21, 2020 }} Pew Research Center. Retrieved September 6, 2012.</ref> | ||
| At the February debate, ] of ] was criticized for what some perceived as disproportionately tough questioning of Democratic presidential contender ].<ref name="Who Lost" /> Among the questions, Russert had asked Clinton, but not Obama, to provide the name of the new ] (]).<ref name="Who Lost" /> This was later parodied on '']''. In October 2007, ] commentators accused Russert of harassing Clinton over the issue of supporting drivers' licenses for ].<ref name="Backlash Against ABC" /> | At the February debate, ] of ] was criticized for what some perceived as disproportionately tough questioning of Democratic presidential contender ].<ref name="Who Lost" /> Among the questions, Russert had asked Clinton, but not Obama, to provide the name of the new ] (]).<ref name="Who Lost" /> This was later parodied on '']''. In October 2007, ] commentators accused Russert of harassing Clinton over the issue of supporting drivers' licenses for ].<ref name="Backlash Against ABC" /> | ||
| On April 16, ] hosted a debate in ]. Moderators ] and ] were criticized by viewers, ]gers and media critics for the poor quality of their questions.<ref name="Who Lost">{{cite news|first=Jacques|last=Steinberg| |
On April 16, ] hosted a debate in ], Pennsylvania. Moderators ] and ] were criticized by viewers, ]gers and media critics for the poor quality of their questions.<ref name="Who Lost">{{cite news|first=Jacques|last=Steinberg|author-link=Jacques Steinberg|title=Who Lost the Debate? Moderators, Many Say|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/18/us/politics/18moderator.html|work=]|date=April 18, 2008|access-date=April 18, 2008|archive-date=December 11, 2008|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081211163337/http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/18/us/politics/18moderator.html|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="Backlash Against ABC">{{cite news|first=Howard|last=Kurtz|author-link=Howard Kurtz|title=The Backlash Against ABC|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/04/18/AR2008041800912.html|newspaper=]|date=April 18, 2008|access-date=April 18, 2008|archive-date=April 22, 2008|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080422010502/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/04/18/AR2008041800912.html|url-status=live}}</ref> Many viewers said they considered some of the questions irrelevant when measured against the importance of the faltering economy or the ]. Included in that category were continued questions about Obama's former pastor, Senator Hillary Clinton's assertion that she had to duck sniper fire in ] more than a decade ago, and Senator Obama's not wearing an American flag pin.<ref name="Who Lost" /> The moderators focused on campaign gaffes and some believed they focused too much on Obama.<ref name="Backlash Against ABC" /> Stephanopoulos defended their performance, saying "Senator Obama was the front-runner" and the questions were "not inappropriate or irrelevant at all."<ref name="Who Lost" /><ref name="Backlash Against ABC" /> | ||
| In an ] published on April 27, 2008 in '']'', ] wrote that the media covered much more of "the rancor of the campaign" and "amount of money spent" than "the candidates' priorities, policies and principles."<ref>{{cite news|author=Elizabeth Edwards|title=Op-ed: Bowling 1, Health Care 0|work=New York Times|date=April 28, 2008|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/27/opinion/27edwards.html}}</ref> Author ] commented that "our press has become a sea of triviality, meanness and irrelevant chatter."<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/erica-jong/inspiration-versus-degrad_b_98844.html|title=Inspiration Versus Degradation|work=The Huffington Post |
In an ] published on April 27, 2008, in '']'', ] wrote that the media covered much more of "the rancor of the campaign" and "amount of money spent" than "the candidates' priorities, policies and principles."<ref>{{cite news|author=Elizabeth Edwards|title=Op-ed: Bowling 1, Health Care 0|work=]|date=April 28, 2008|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/27/opinion/27edwards.html|access-date=February 23, 2017|archive-date=August 15, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210815083130/https://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/27/opinion/27edwards.html|url-status=live}}</ref> Author ] commented that "our press has become a sea of triviality, meanness and irrelevant chatter."<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/erica-jong/inspiration-versus-degrad_b_98844.html|title=Inspiration Versus Degradation|work=The Huffington Post|first=Erica|last=Jong|date=May 5, 2008|access-date=May 22, 2008|archive-date=May 25, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170525040049/http://www.huffingtonpost.com/erica-jong/inspiration-versus-degrad_b_98844.html|url-status=live}}</ref> A Gallup poll released on May 29, 2008, also estimated that more Americans felt the media was being harder on Hillary Clinton than they were towards Barack Obama. ''Time'' magazine columnist ] stated that the media during the 2008 election had a "blind, almost slavish" worship of Obama.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.gallup.com/poll/107557/public-says-media-harder-clinton-than-obama-mccain.aspx |title=Public Says Media Harder on Clinton Than Obama, McCain |date=May 29, 2008 |publisher=Gallup.com |access-date=July 17, 2011 |archive-date=August 31, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170831182642/http://www.gallup.com/poll/107557/public-says-media-harder-clinton-than-obama-mccain.aspx |url-status=live }}</ref> | ||
| The ] and ]'s ] conducted a study of 5,374 media narratives and assertions about the presidential candidates from January 1 through March 9, 2008. The study found that Obama received 69% favorable coverage and Clinton received 67%, compared to only 43% favorable media coverage of McCain.<ref>{{cite web|title=Character and the Primaries of 2008|publisher=The Project for Excellence in Journalism|date=May 29, 2008|url=http://www.journalism.org/node/11266}}</ref> Another study by the ] at ] found the media coverage of Obama to be 72% negative from June 8 to July 21 compared to 57% negative for McCain.<ref>{{cite web|title=MEDIA BASH BARACK (NOT A TYPO)|publisher=Center for Media and Public Affairs|date=July 28, 2008|url=http://cmpa.com/Studies/Election08/election%20news%207_29_08.htm|url-status=dead| |
The ] and ]'s ] conducted a study of 5,374 media narratives and assertions about the presidential candidates from January 1 through March 9, 2008. The study found that Obama received 69% favorable coverage and Clinton received 67%, compared to only 43% favorable media coverage of McCain.<ref>{{cite web|title=Character and the Primaries of 2008|publisher=The Project for Excellence in Journalism|date=May 29, 2008|url=http://www.journalism.org/node/11266|access-date=June 26, 2008|archive-date=September 10, 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130910011549/http://www.journalism.org/node/11266|url-status=live}}</ref> Another study by the ] at ] found the media coverage of Obama to be 72% negative from June 8 to July 21 compared to 57% negative for McCain.<ref>{{cite web|title=MEDIA BASH BARACK (NOT A TYPO)|publisher=Center for Media and Public Affairs|date=July 28, 2008|url=http://cmpa.com/Studies/Election08/election%20news%207_29_08.htm|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081120200207/http://www.cmpa.com/Studies/Election08/election%20news%207_29_08.htm|archive-date=November 20, 2008|df=mdy-all}}</ref> An October 29 study found 29% of stories about Obama to be negative, compared to 57% of stories about McCain being negative.<ref>{{cite web|title=The Color of News|publisher=Project for Excellence in Journalism|date=October 29, 2008|url=http://journalism.org/node/13436|access-date=November 2, 2008|archive-date=September 26, 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130926204038/http://www.journalism.org/node/13436|url-status=live}}</ref> | ||
| == Timeline == | |||
| {{Main|Timeline of the 2008 United States presidential election}} | |||
| ==Conduct== | ==Conduct== | ||
| Line 514: | Line 734: | ||
| ] was on November 4, 2008. The majority of states allowed early voting, with all states allowing some form of absentee voting.<ref> {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081211174818/http://earlyvoting.net/states/abslaws.php |date=December 11, 2008 }}, from the Early Voting Information Center at Reed College</ref> Voters cast votes for listed presidential candidates but were actually selecting representatives for their state's ] slate. | ] was on November 4, 2008. The majority of states allowed early voting, with all states allowing some form of absentee voting.<ref> {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081211174818/http://earlyvoting.net/states/abslaws.php |date=December 11, 2008 }}, from the Early Voting Information Center at Reed College</ref> Voters cast votes for listed presidential candidates but were actually selecting representatives for their state's ] slate. | ||
| A McCain victory quickly became improbable as Obama amassed early wins in his home state of ], the ], and the critical battleground states of ] (which no Republican has ever been elected |
A McCain victory quickly became improbable as Obama amassed early wins in his home state of ], the ], and the critical battleground states of ] (which no Republican has ever been elected president without winning) and ] by 9:30 pm Eastern Standard Time.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/11/04/1639565.aspx|title=NBC calls Ohio for Obama—First Read—msnbc.com|publisher=]|date=November 4, 2008|access-date=January 24, 2009|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081211211123/http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/11/04/1639565.aspx|archive-date=December 11, 2008|df=mdy-all}}</ref> Obama won the entire Northeast by comfortable margins and the ] of ], ], and ] by double digits. McCain held on to traditionally Republican states like ], ], ] (though notably, Obama did win an electoral vote from Nebraska's 2nd congressional district), ], ], ], ], ], ], and his home state of ]. Out of the southern states, Obama won ], ], ], ], and ]. Obama also won the hotly contested states of ] and ], which ] had won in 2000 and George W. Bush in 2004. Also, for only the second time since ] (] being the other), ] went Democratic, giving Obama all eight Great Lakes states, the first time a presidential candidate had won all of them since ]. | ||
| ] and ] called Virginia for Obama shortly before 11:00 |
] and ] called Virginia for Obama shortly before 11:00 pm, leaving him only 50 electoral votes shy of victory with only six ] states (], ], ], ], ], and ]) still voting. All American networks called the election in favor of Obama at 11:00 pm as the polls closed on the West Coast. Obama was immediately declared the winner in California, Oregon, Washington, and Hawaii, McCain won Idaho, and the Electoral College totals were updated to 297 for Obama and 146 for McCain (270 are needed to win). McCain gave a concession speech half an hour later in his hometown of ].<ref>{{cite news|last=Fouhy|first=Beth|title=McCain concedes presidency, congratulates Obama|url=http://tucsoncitizen.com/morgue/2008/11/05/101691-mccain-concedes-presidency-congratulates-obama/|work=]|date=November 5, 2008|access-date=July 18, 2011|archive-url=https://archive.today/20120716012121/http://tucsoncitizen.com/morgue/2008/11/05/101691-mccain-concedes-presidency-congratulates-obama/|archive-date=July 16, 2012|url-status=dead|df=mdy-all}}</ref> Obama appeared just before midnight Eastern Time in ], ], in front of a crowd of 250,000 people to deliver his ].<ref>{{cite web|first=Paul|last=Meincke|url=https://abc7chicago.com/archive/6490862/|title=Chicago could benefit from Obama election|publisher=]|location=Chicago|date=November 5, 2008|access-date=July 18, 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110629054417/http://abclocal.go.com/wls/story?section=news%2Fpolitics&id=6490862|archive-date=June 29, 2011|url-status=live}}</ref> | ||
| ] of the Electoral Votes for 2008 United States presidential election, each square representing one electoral vote. The map shows the impact of winning ]s. Nebraska, being one of two states that are not winner-take-all, for the first time had its votes split, with its ] voting for Obama.]] | ] of the Electoral Votes for 2008 United States presidential election, each square representing one electoral vote. The map shows the impact of winning ]s. Nebraska, being one of two states that are not winner-take-all, for the first time had its votes split, with its ] voting for Obama.]] | ||
| Following Obama's speech, spontaneous street parties broke out in cities across the United States including ], ], ], ], Chicago, ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], and ]<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.canberratimes.com.au/news/local/news/general/scenes-of-joy-across-the-us/1352918.aspx|title=Scenes of joy across the US—Local News—News—General|publisher=The Canberra Times|date=November 5, 2008| |
Following Obama's speech, spontaneous street parties broke out in cities across the United States including ], ], ], ], Chicago, ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], and ]<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.canberratimes.com.au/news/local/news/general/scenes-of-joy-across-the-us/1352918.aspx|title=Scenes of joy across the US—Local News—News—General|publisher=The Canberra Times|date=November 5, 2008|access-date=January 24, 2009|archive-date=February 19, 2009|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090219001107/http://www.canberratimes.com.au/news/local/news/general/scenes-of-joy-across-the-us/1352918.aspx|url-status=dead}}</ref> and around the world in ]; ]; ]; ]; ]; ]; ]; and ].<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/us_elections/article5087886.ece|title=World celebrates Barack Obama victory|publisher=Times Online|date=November 5, 2008|access-date=January 24, 2009|location=London|first1=Philippe|last1=Naughton|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110429092313/http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/us_elections/article5087886.ece |archive-date=April 29, 2011}}</ref> | ||
| Later on election night, after Obama was named the winner, he picked up several more wins in swing states in which the polls had shown a close race. These included ], ], ], and the western states of ] and ]. All of these states had been carried by Bush in ]. ] and the ] state of ] remained undecided for several days. Eventually Obama was declared the winner in North Carolina and McCain in Missouri, with Obama pulling out a rare win in ]. This put the projected electoral vote count at 365 for Obama and 173 for McCain. Obama's victories in the populous swing states of Florida, Ohio, Pennsylvania, North Carolina, and Virginia contributed to his decisive win. The presidential electors cast their ballots for |
Later on election night, after Obama was named the winner, he picked up several more wins in swing states in which the polls had shown a close race. These included ], ], ], and the western states of ] and ]. All of these states had been carried by Bush in ]. ] and the ] state of ] remained undecided for several days. Eventually Obama was declared the winner in North Carolina and McCain in Missouri, with Obama pulling out a rare win in ]. This put the projected electoral vote count at 365 for Obama and 173 for McCain. Obama's victories in the populous swing states of Florida, Ohio, Pennsylvania, North Carolina, and Virginia contributed to his decisive win. The presidential electors cast their ballots for president and vice president, and Congress tallied these votes on January 8, 2009.<ref name="house floor summary"/> | ||
| ===Turnout=== | ===Turnout=== | ||
| ] | |||
| The ] for this election was broadly predicted to be high by American standards,<ref>{{cite news|url=http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/11/03/expected-high-voter-turnout-government-officials-watchdog-groups-alert/|title=Expected High Voter Turnout Has Government Officials, Watchdog Groups on Alert| |
The ] for this election was broadly predicted to be high by American standards,<ref>{{cite news|url=http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/11/03/expected-high-voter-turnout-government-officials-watchdog-groups-alert/|title=Expected High Voter Turnout Has Government Officials, Watchdog Groups on Alert|access-date=November 7, 2008|date=November 3, 2008|agency=Fox News|quote="The main thing that we all know is that there's going to be a huge turnout. There are going to be long lines, and any problems that occur will exacerbate because of those lines," said Robert M. Brandon, president of the Fair Elections Legal Network.|archive-date=November 6, 2008|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081106160516/http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/11/03/expected-high-voter-turnout-government-officials-watchdog-groups-alert/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|last=Urbina|first=Ian|title=Voting experts say high turnout may add to problems at the polls|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/03/world/americas/03iht-03voting.17464681.html|work=]|date=November 3, 2008|access-date=July 16, 2009|archive-date=August 14, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210814111750/https://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/03/world/americas/03iht-03voting.17464681.html|url-status=live}}</ref> and a record number of votes were cast.<ref>{{cite news |last=Alban |first=Debra |title=Number of votes cast set record, but voter turnout percentage didn't |url=http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/11/06/voter.turnout/index.html |publisher=CNN |date=November 7, 2008 |access-date=July 16, 2009 |archive-date=April 13, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210413013640/http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/11/06/voter.turnout/index.html |url-status=live }}</ref> The final tally of total votes counted was 131.3 million, compared to 122.3 million in 2004 (which also boasted the highest record since ], the last presidential election before the ] was lowered to 18). Expressed as a percentage of eligible voters, 131.2 million votes could reflect a turnout as high as 63.0% of eligible voters, which would be the highest since ].<ref name="i2.cdn.turner.com">{{cite press release|url=http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2008/images/11/06/pdf.gansre08turnout.au.pdf|title=Much-hyped Turnout Record Fails to Materialize|access-date=November 20, 2008|date=November 6, 2008|agency=Center for the Study of the American Electorate, American University|archive-date=March 23, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210323121541/http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2008/images/11/06/pdf.gansre08turnout.au.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="turnout-report final">{{cite press release|url=http://timeswampland.files.wordpress.com/2008/12/2008turnout-report_final11.pdf|title=African-Americans, Anger, Fear and Youth Propel Turnout to Highest Level Since 1964|access-date=December 18, 2008|agency=Center for the Study of the American Electorate, American University|archive-date=December 18, 2008|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081218004523/http://timeswampland.files.wordpress.com/2008/12/2008turnout-report_final11.pdf|url-status=dead}}</ref> This 63.0% turnout rate is based on an estimated eligible voter population of 208,323,000.<ref name="turnout-report final"/> Another estimate puts the eligible voter population at 213,313,508, resulting in a turnout rate of 61.6%, which would be the highest turnout rate since 1968.<ref>{{Cite web|title=2008G - United States Elections Project|url=http://www.electproject.org/2008g|access-date=2020-10-31|website=www.electproject.org|archive-date=August 13, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210813232257/http://www.electproject.org/2008g|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://elections.gmu.edu/Turnout_2008G.html |title=2008 General Election Turnout Vote |publisher=Elections.gmu.edu |date=March 31, 2012 |access-date=December 6, 2012 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130112213711/http://elections.gmu.edu/Turnout_2008G.html |archive-date=January 12, 2013 |df=mdy-all }}</ref> | ||
| Broken down by age group, voters under 35 voted for Obama by a large majority with McCain most popular among voters over 60. Voters between 35 and 59 were nearly split 50/50 between the two candidates. | Broken down by age group, voters under 35 voted for Obama by a large majority with McCain most popular among voters over 60. Voters between 35 and 59 were nearly split 50/50 between the two candidates. | ||
| ]'s Center for the Study of the American Electorate released a report on November 6, 2008, two days after the election, which concluded that the anticipated increase in turnout had failed to materialize.<ref name="i2.cdn.turner.com"/> That report was the basis for some news articles that indicated voter turnout failed to meet expectations.<ref>{{ |
]'s Center for the Study of the American Electorate released a report on November 6, 2008, two days after the election, which concluded that the anticipated increase in turnout had failed to materialize.<ref name="i2.cdn.turner.com"/> That report was the basis for some news articles that indicated voter turnout failed to meet expectations.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/11/06/report-08-turnout-same-or-only-slightly-higher-than-04/|title=Report: '08 turnout same as or only slightly higher than '04|date=November 6, 2008|agency=CNN|access-date=December 8, 2008|archive-date=August 1, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210801163321/https://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/11/06/report-08-turnout-same-or-only-slightly-higher-than-04/|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1108/15422.html|title=That huge voter turnout? Didn't happen|date=November 8, 2008|agency=Politico|access-date=December 9, 2008|archive-date=February 22, 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150222060722/http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1108/15422.html|url-status=live}}</ref> When the remaining votes were counted after the release of the report, the total number of votes cast in the presidential election was raised to 131.2 million, which surpassed the American University report's preliminary estimate of 126.5 to 128.5 million voters by a factor of between 2% and 4%. | ||
| The election saw increased participation from ], who made up |
The election saw increased participation from ], who made up 13.0% of the electorate, versus 11.1% in 2004.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.nonprofitvote.org/download-document/america-goes-to-the-polls-brief-11-19-08-pdf.html|title=America Goes to the Polls|access-date=September 6, 2012|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120416132213/http://www.nonprofitvote.org/download-document/america-goes-to-the-polls-brief-11-19-08-pdf.html|archive-date=April 16, 2012|df=mdy-all}}</ref> According to exit polls, over 95% of African Americans voted for Obama. This played a critical role in Southern states such as North Carolina. 74% of North Carolina's registered African American voters turned out, as opposed to 69% of North Carolinians in general, with Obama carrying 100% (with rounding) of African-American females and African Americans age 18 to 29, according to exit polling.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://wilmingtonjournal.com/News/search/ArchiveContent.asp?NewsID=92721&sID=|title=How Black Democrats won North Carolina and the Election: Massive Turnout, Week of November 13–19, 2008|date=November 24, 2008|agency=The Wilmington Journal|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101202133159/http://wilmingtonjournal.com/News/search/ArchiveContent.asp?NewsID=92721&sID=|archive-date=December 2, 2010|df=mdy-all}}</ref> This was also the case in Virginia, where much higher turnout among African Americans propelled Obama to victory in the former Republican stronghold.<ref name="electionguidevirginia">{{cite news|url=http://elections.nytimes.com/2008/president/states/virginia|title=2008 Presidential Race: Virginia—Election Guide—The New York Times|last=The New York Times|date=November 4, 2008|work=Election Guide 2008 – The New York Times|publisher=The New York Times Company|access-date=June 2, 2009|archive-date=April 15, 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160415030249/http://elections.nytimes.com/2008/president/states/virginia|url-status=live}}</ref> Even in southern states in which Obama was unsuccessful, such as Georgia and Mississippi, due to large African American turnout he was much more competitive than John Kerry in 2004.<ref name="electionguidegeorgia">{{cite news|url=http://elections.nytimes.com/2008/president/states/georgia|title=2008 Presidential Race: Georgia—Election Guide—The New York Times|last=The New York Times|date=November 4, 2008|work=Election Guide 2008 – The New York Times|publisher=The New York Times Company|access-date=June 2, 2009|archive-date=April 15, 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160415030251/http://elections.nytimes.com/2008/president/states/georgia|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="electionguidemississippi">{{cite news|url=http://elections.nytimes.com/2008/president/states/mississippi|title=2008 Presidential Race: Mississippi—Election Guide—The New York Times|last=The New York Times|date=November 4, 2008|work=Election Guide 2008 – The New York Times|publisher=The New York Times Company|access-date=June 2, 2009|archive-date=April 15, 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160415030251/http://elections.nytimes.com/2008/president/states/mississippi|url-status=live}}</ref> | ||
| ===Ballot access=== | ===Ballot access=== | ||
| Line 537: | Line 757: | ||
| !Presidential ticket | !Presidential ticket | ||
| !Party | !Party | ||
| !]<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ballot-access.org/ballot-chart.html|title=2008 PETITIONING FOR PRESIDENT|publisher=Ballot-access.org|date=October 23, 2008| |
!]<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ballot-access.org/ballot-chart.html|title=2008 PETITIONING FOR PRESIDENT|publisher=Ballot-access.org|date=October 23, 2008|access-date=January 24, 2009|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081103041944/http://www.ballot-access.org/ballot-chart.html |archive-date=November 3, 2008}}</ref> | ||
| !Votes | !Votes | ||
| |-{{Party shading/Democratic}} | |-{{Party shading/Democratic}} | ||
| Line 575: | Line 795: | ||
| |242,685 | |242,685 | ||
| |} | |} | ||
| No other candidate had ballot access in enough states to win 270 electoral votes. All six candidates appeared on the ballot for a majority <!-- 59.8% --> of the voters, while the 17 other listed candidates were available to no more than 30% <!-- 26.8% -->of the voters.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/110108.html|title=Ballot Access News – November 1, 2008|publisher=Ballot-access.org|date=March 18, 2008| |
No other candidate had ballot access in enough states to win 270 electoral votes. All six candidates appeared on the ballot for a majority <!-- 59.8% --> of the voters, while the 17 other listed candidates were available to no more than 30% <!-- 26.8% -->of the voters.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/110108.html|title=Ballot Access News – November 1, 2008|publisher=Ballot-access.org|date=March 18, 2008|access-date=February 23, 2010|archive-date=August 16, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210816035202/http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/110108.html|url-status=live}}</ref> | ||
| The following candidates and parties had ballot listing or write-in status in more than one state:<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/110108.html#6|title=Ballot Access News—November 1, 2008|publisher=Ballot-access.org|date=March 18, 2008| |
The following candidates and parties had ballot listing or write-in status in more than one state:<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/110108.html#6|title=Ballot Access News—November 1, 2008|publisher=Ballot-access.org|date=March 18, 2008|access-date=January 24, 2009|archive-date=August 16, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210816035202/http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/110108.html#6|url-status=live}}</ref> | ||
| * ] (America's Independent Party) received 47,746 votes; listed in three states: Colorado and Florida, plus California (listed as American Independent), and also had write-in status in Kentucky, Ohio, Texas, and Utah. | * ] (America's Independent Party) received 47,746 votes; listed in three states: Colorado and Florida, plus California (listed as American Independent), and also had write-in status in Kentucky, Ohio, Texas, and Utah. | ||
| * ] received 42,426 votes; listed in Louisiana (Louisiana Taxpayers) and in Montana (Constitution), with write-in status in California. | * ] received 42,426 votes; listed in Louisiana (Louisiana Taxpayers) and in Montana (Constitution), with write-in status in California. | ||
| * ] (]) received 6,808 votes<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ballot-access.org/pres1.html|title=12/12/92|publisher=Ballot-access.org|date=December 22, 2008| |
* ] (]) received 6,808 votes<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ballot-access.org/pres1.html|title=12/12/92|publisher=Ballot-access.org|date=December 22, 2008|access-date=January 24, 2009|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090204100357/http://ballot-access.org/pres1.html|archive-date=February 4, 2009|df=mdy-all}}</ref> nationally; listed in 12 states: Arkansas, Colorado, Florida, Iowa, Louisiana, New Jersey, New York, Rhode Island, Utah, Vermont, Washington, and Wisconsin. | ||
| * ] (], see ]) received 6,538 votes; listed in eight states: Colorado, Florida, Iowa, New Jersey, Ohio, and Wisconsin, and Tennessee (independent) and Vermont (Liberty Union). He also filed for write-in status in 17 other states: Alaska, Connecticut, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Washington, and Wyoming. | * ] (], see ]) received 6,538 votes; listed in eight states: Colorado, Florida, Iowa, New Jersey, Ohio, and Wisconsin, and Tennessee (independent) and Vermont (Liberty Union). He also filed for write-in status in 17 other states: Alaska, Connecticut, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Washington, and Wyoming. | ||
| * ] (]) received 5,151 votes; listed in ten states. He was listed by name in Delaware, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, and Vermont. James Harris was listed as his stand-in in Colorado, Florida, Iowa, Louisiana, and Washington, and also had write-in status in California. | * ] (]) received 5,151 votes; listed in ten states. He was listed by name in Delaware, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, and Vermont. James Harris was listed as his stand-in in Colorado, Florida, Iowa, Louisiana, and Washington, and also had write-in status in California. | ||
| * ] (]) received 2,422 votes; listed in Colorado and Florida, and in Tennessee (as independent), with write-in status in Arizona, Montana, and Utah. | * ] (]) received 2,422 votes; listed in Colorado and Florida, and in Tennessee (as independent), with write-in status in Arizona, Montana, and Utah. | ||
| * ] (]) received 755 votes; listed in Colorado and Florida. | * ] (]) received 755 votes; listed in Colorado and Florida. | ||
| * ] (]) received 653 votes; listed in Colorado, Florida, and Louisiana. | * ] (]) received 653 votes; listed in Colorado, Florida, and Louisiana. | ||
| * Jonathan Allen (Heartquake) received 483 votes; listed only in Colorado, with write-in status in Arizona, Georgia, Montana, Texas, and other states. | * Jonathan Allen (Heartquake) received 483 votes; listed only in Colorado, with write-in status in Arizona, Georgia, Montana, Texas, and other states. | ||
| Line 594: | Line 814: | ||
| * Jeffrey Wamboldt (]) – Wisconsin; 764 votes. | * Jeffrey Wamboldt (]) – Wisconsin; 764 votes. | ||
| * ] (Vote Here) – New Jersey; 639 votes. | * ] (Vote Here) – New Jersey; 639 votes. | ||
| * |
* George Phillies – New Hampshire (also listed with the label Libertarian); 531 votes. | ||
| * ] (]) – Mississippi; 481 votes. | * ] (]) – Mississippi; 481 votes. | ||
| * ] (]) – Colorado; 110 votes. | * ] (]) – Colorado; 110 votes. | ||
| In Nevada, 6,267 votes were cast for "None |
In Nevada, 6,267 votes were cast for "]".<ref>{{cite web |url=http://nvsos.gov/SOSelectionPages/results/2008StateWideGeneral/ElectionSummary.aspx |title=2008 Official Statewide General Election Results for Nevada |publisher=Nvsos.gov |date=November 4, 2008 |access-date=April 2, 2013 |archive-date=April 13, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210413010353/https://www.nvsos.gov/SOSelectionPages/results/2008StateWideGeneral/ElectionSummary.aspx |url-status=live }}</ref> In the three states that officially keep track of "blank" votes for president, 103,193 votes were recorded as "blank".<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.thegreenpapers.com/G08/President-Details.phtml?n=BLANK|title=2008 Presidential Election by State|publisher=Thegreenpapers.com|date=January 8, 2009|access-date=February 23, 2010|archive-date=August 14, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210814094331/http://www.thegreenpapers.com/G08/President-Details.phtml?n=BLANK|url-status=live}}</ref> More than 100,000 write-in votes were cast and recorded for a scattering of other candidates, including 62 votes for "]" (in ten states) and 11 votes for "]" (in five states).<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.thegreenpapers.com/G08/President-Details.phtml?n=OTHER|title=2008 Presidential Election by State|publisher=Thegreenpapers.com|date=January 8, 2009|access-date=February 23, 2010|archive-date=April 13, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210413023831/http://www.thegreenpapers.com/G08/President-Details.phtml?n=OTHER|url-status=live}}</ref> | ||
| According to the Federal Election Commission, an unusually high number of "miscellaneous" write-ins were cast for president in 2008, including 112,597 tallied in the 17 states that record votes for non-listed candidates.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/020109.html|title=Ballot Access News – February 1, 2009|publisher=Ballot-access.org|date=February 1, 2009| |
According to the Federal Election Commission, an unusually high number of "miscellaneous" write-ins were cast for president in 2008, including 112,597 tallied in the 17 states that record votes for non-listed candidates.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/020109.html|title=Ballot Access News – February 1, 2009|publisher=Ballot-access.org|date=February 1, 2009|access-date=February 23, 2010|archive-date=August 15, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210815184053/http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/020109.html|url-status=live}}</ref> There were more presidential candidates on the ballot than at any other time in U. S. history, except for the ], which also had 23 candidates listed in at least one state. | ||
| ==Results== | ==Results== | ||
| Line 607: | Line 827: | ||
| generally include state only after state officially tallies in--> | generally include state only after state officially tallies in--> | ||
| Of the 3,154 counties/districts/independent cities making returns, McCain won the most popular votes in 2,270 (71.97%) while Obama carried 884 (28.03%). | |||
| Popular vote totals are from the . The results of the electoral vote were certified by Congress on January 8, 2009.<ref name="house floor summary">{{cite web|url=http://clerk.house.gov/floorsummary/floor.html?day=20090108|title=United States House of Representatives floor summary for Jan 8, 2009|publisher=Clerk.house.gov|accessdate=January 30, 2009|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120402071556/http://clerk.house.gov/floorsummary/floor.html?day=20090108|archive-date=April 2, 2012|url-status=dead|df=mdy-all}}</ref> | |||
| Popular vote totals are from the . The results of the electoral vote were certified by Congress on January 8, 2009.<ref name="house floor summary">{{cite web|url=http://clerk.house.gov/floorsummary/floor.html?day=20090108|title=United States House of Representatives floor summary for Jan 8, 2009|publisher=Clerk.house.gov|access-date=January 30, 2009|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120402071556/http://clerk.house.gov/floorsummary/floor.html?day=20090108|archive-date=April 2, 2012|url-status=dead|df=mdy-all}}</ref> | |||
| {{start U.S. presidential ticket box|pv_footnote=|ev_footnote=}} | {{start U.S. presidential ticket box|pv_footnote=|ev_footnote=}} | ||
| {{U.S. presidential ticket box row|name=]|party=]|state=]|pv=69,498,516|pv_pct=52.93%|ev=365|vp_name=]|vp_state=]}} | {{U.S. presidential ticket box row|name=]|party=]|state=]|pv=69,498,516|pv_pct=52.93%|ev=365|vp_name=]|vp_state=]}} | ||
| {{U.S. presidential ticket box row|name=]|party=]|state=]|pv=59,948,323|pv_pct=45.65%|ev=173|vp_name=]|vp_state=]}} | {{U.S. presidential ticket box row|name=]|party=]|state=]|pv=59,948,323|pv_pct=45.65%|ev=173|vp_name=]|vp_state=]}} | ||
| {{U.S. presidential ticket box row|name=]|party=]|state=]|pv=739,034|pv_pct=0.56%|ev=0|vp_name=]|vp_state=]}} | {{U.S. presidential ticket box row|name=]|party=]|state=]|pv=739,034|pv_pct=0.56%|ev=0|vp_name=]|vp_state=]}} | ||
| {{U.S. presidential ticket box row|name=]|party=]|state=]|pv=523,715|pv_pct=0.40%|ev=0|vp_name=]|vp_state=]}} | {{U.S. presidential ticket box row|name=]|party=]|state=]|pv=523,715|pv_pct=0.40%|ev=0|vp_name=]|vp_state=]}} | ||
| {{U.S. presidential ticket box row|name=]|party=]|state=]|pv=199,750|pv_pct=0.15%|ev=0|vp_name= |
{{U.S. presidential ticket box row|name=]|party=]|state=]|pv=199,750|pv_pct=0.15%|ev=0|vp_name=Darrell Castle|vp_state=]}} | ||
| {{U.S. presidential ticket box row|name=]|party=]|state=]|pv=161,797|pv_pct=0.12%|ev=0|vp_name=]|vp_state=]}} | {{U.S. presidential ticket box row|name=]|party=]|state=]|pv=161,797|pv_pct=0.12%|ev=0|vp_name=]|vp_state=]}} | ||
| {{U.S. presidential ticket box row|name=]|party=America's Independent Party|state=]|pv=47, |
{{U.S. presidential ticket box row|name=]|party=America's Independent Party|state=]|pv=47,746|pv_pct=0.04%|ev=0|vp_name=]|vp_state=]}} | ||
| {{U.S. presidential ticket box other|footnote=|pv= |
{{U.S. presidential ticket box other|footnote=|pv=194,939|pv_pct=0.15%}} | ||
| {{end U.S. presidential ticket box|pv=131,313,820|pv_pct=100.00%|ev=538|to_win=270}} | {{end U.S. presidential ticket box|pv=131,313,820|pv_pct=100.00%|ev=538|to_win=270}} | ||
| Line 625: | Line 847: | ||
| |barwidth=410px | |barwidth=410px | ||
| |bars= | |bars= | ||
| {{bar percent|'''Obama'''|{{Democratic Party (US) |
{{bar percent|'''Obama'''|{{party color|Democratic Party (US)}}|52.92}} | ||
| {{bar percent|McCain|{{Republican Party (US) |
{{bar percent|McCain|{{party color|Republican Party (US)}}|45.66}} | ||
| {{bar percent|Nader|{{Independent (US) |
{{bar percent|Nader|{{party color|Independent (US)}}|0.56}} | ||
| {{bar percent|Barr|{{Libertarian Party (US) |
{{bar percent|Barr|{{party color|Libertarian Party (US)}}|0.40}} | ||
| {{bar percent|Baldwin|{{Constitution Party (US) |
{{bar percent|Baldwin|{{party color|Constitution Party (US)}}|0.15}} | ||
| {{bar percent|McKinney|{{Green Party (US) |
{{bar percent|McKinney|{{party color|Green Party (US)}}|0.12}} | ||
| {{bar percent|Keyes|{{ |
{{bar percent|Keyes|{{party color|American Independent Party}}|0.04}} | ||
| {{bar percent|Others|#777777|0. |
{{bar percent|Others|#777777|0.15}} | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| {{bar box | {{bar box | ||
| Line 640: | Line 862: | ||
| |barwidth=410px | |barwidth=410px | ||
| |bars= | |bars= | ||
| {{bar percent|'''Obama'''|{{Democratic Party (US) |
{{bar percent|'''Obama'''|{{party color|Democratic Party (US)}}|67.84}} | ||
| {{bar percent|McCain|{{Republican Party (US) |
{{bar percent|McCain|{{party color|Republican Party (US)}}|32.16}} | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| ===Results by state=== | ===Results by state=== | ||
| {{further|United States presidential election#The popular vote on Election Day}} | {{further|United States presidential election#The popular vote on Election Day}} | ||
| The following table records the official vote tallies for each state for those presidential candidates who were listed on ballots in enough states to have a theoretical chance for a majority in the Electoral College. State popular vote results are from the |
The following table records the official vote tallies for each state for those presidential candidates who were listed on ballots in enough states to have a theoretical chance for a majority in the Electoral College. State popular vote results are from the official Federal Election Commission report.<ref></ref> The column labeled "Margin" shows Obama's margin of victory over McCain (the margin is negative for states and districts won by McCain). | ||
| {|class="wikitable" | {|class="wikitable" style="font-size:90%;line-height:1.2" | ||
| |+ Legend | |||
| |-{{Party shading/Democratic}} | |-{{Party shading/Democratic}} | ||
| |States/districts won by ]/] | |colspan=2|States/districts won by ]/] | ||
| |-{{Party shading/Republican}} | |-{{Party shading/Republican}} | ||
| |States/districts won by ]/] | |colspan=2|States/districts won by ]/] | ||
| |- | |||
| | † || At-large results (for states that split electoral votes) | |||
| |} | |} | ||
| <div style="overflow:auto"> | <div style="overflow:auto"> | ||
| {|class="wikitable sortable" style="text-align:right;" | {|class="wikitable sortable" style="text-align:right;font-size:90%;line-height:1.2" | ||
| |- | |- | ||
| ! colspan=2 | | ! colspan=2 | | ||
| Line 666: | Line 891: | ||
| ! style="text-align:center;" colspan="3"| Others | ! style="text-align:center;" colspan="3"| Others | ||
| ! style="text-align:center;" colspan="2"| Margin | ! style="text-align:center;" colspan="2"| Margin | ||
| ! style="text-align:center;" colspan=" |
! style="text-align:center;" colspan="1"|Margin<br />Swing{{Efn|Percentage point difference in margin from the ]}} | ||
| ! style="text-align:center;" colspan="2"| Total votes | |||
| |- | |- | ||
| ! align=center | State | ! align=center | State/district | ||
| ! style="text-align:center; |
! style="text-align:center;" data-sort-type="number" | {{abbr|EV|electoral votes}} | ||
| ! style="text-align:center;" data-sort- type="number"| # | ! style="text-align:center;" data-sort- type="number"| # | ||
| ! style="text-align:center;" data-sort- type="number"| % | ! style="text-align:center;" data-sort- type="number"| % | ||
| ! style="text-align:center; |
! style="text-align:center;" data-sort-type="number" | {{abbr|EV|electoral votes}} | ||
| ! style="text-align:center;" data-sort- type="number"| # | ! style="text-align:center;" data-sort- type="number"| # | ||
| ! style="text-align:center;" data-sort- type="number"| % | ! style="text-align:center;" data-sort- type="number"| % | ||
| ! style="text-align:center; |
! style="text-align:center;" data-sort-type="number" | {{abbr|EV|electoral votes}} | ||
| ! style="text-align:center;" data-sort- type="number"| # | ! style="text-align:center;" data-sort- type="number"| # | ||
| ! style="text-align:center;" data-sort- type="number"| % | ! style="text-align:center;" data-sort- type="number"| % | ||
| ! style="text-align:center; |
! style="text-align:center;" data-sort-type="number" | {{abbr|EV|electoral votes}} | ||
| ! style="text-align:center;" data-sort- type="number"| # | ! style="text-align:center;" data-sort- type="number"| # | ||
| ! style="text-align:center;" data-sort- type="number"| % | ! style="text-align:center;" data-sort- type="number"| % | ||
| ! style="text-align:center; |
! style="text-align:center;" data-sort-type="number" | {{abbr|EV|electoral votes}} | ||
| ! style="text-align:center;" data-sort- type="number"| # | ! style="text-align:center;" data-sort- type="number"| # | ||
| ! style="text-align:center;" data-sort- type="number"| % | ! style="text-align:center;" data-sort- type="number"| % | ||
| ! style="text-align:center; |
! style="text-align:center;" data-sort-type="number" | {{abbr|EV|electoral votes}} | ||
| ! style="text-align:center;" data-sort- type="number"| # | ! style="text-align:center;" data-sort- type="number"| # | ||
| ! style="text-align:center;" data-sort- type="number"| % | ! style="text-align:center;" data-sort- type="number"| % | ||
| ! style="text-align:center; |
! style="text-align:center;" data-sort-type="number" | {{abbr|EV|electoral votes}} | ||
| ! style="text-align:center;" data-sort- type="number"| # | ! style="text-align:center;" data-sort- type="number"| # | ||
| ! style="text-align:center;" data-sort- type="number"| % | ! style="text-align:center;" data-sort- type="number"| % | ||
| ! style="text-align:center; |
! style="text-align:center;" data-sort-type="number" | {{abbr|EV|electoral votes}} | ||
| ! style="text-align:center;" data-sort- type="number"| # | ! style="text-align:center;" data-sort- type="number"| # | ||
| ! style="text-align:center;" data-sort- type="number"| % | ! style="text-align:center;" data-sort- type="number"| % | ||
| ! style="text-align:center; |
! style="text-align:center;" data-sort- type="number"| % | ||
| ! style="text-align:center;" data-sort-type="number" | # | |||
| ! | ! | ||
| |-{{Party shading/Republican}} | |-{{Party shading/Republican}} | ||
| |style="text-align:left;"|] | |style="text-align:left;"|] | ||
| |9||813,479||38.74%||-||1,266,546||60.32%||9||6,788||0.32%||-||4,991||0.24%||-||4,310||0.21%||-||0||0.00%||-||3,705||0.18%||-||-453,067||-21.58%||2,099,819||AL | |9||813,479||38.74%||-||1,266,546||60.32%||9||6,788||0.32%||-||4,991||0.24%||-||4,310||0.21%||-||0||0.00%||-||3,705||0.18%||-||-453,067||-21.58%||4.04%||2,099,819||AL | ||
| |-{{Party shading/Republican}} | |-{{Party shading/Republican}} | ||
| |style="text-align:left;"|] | |style="text-align:left;"|] | ||
| | 3||123,594||37.89%||-||193,841||59.42%||3||3,783||1.16%||-||1,589||0.49%||-||1,660||0.51%||-||0||0.00%||-||1,730||0.53%||-||-70,247||-21. |
| 3||123,594||37.89%||-||193,841||59.42%||3||3,783||1.16%||-||1,589||0.49%||-||1,660||0.51%||-||0||0.00%||-||1,730||0.53%||-||-70,247||-21.53%||4.01%||326,197||AK | ||
| |-{{Party shading/Republican}} | |-{{Party shading/Republican}} | ||
| |style="text-align:left;"|] | |style="text-align:left;"|] | ||
| |10||1,034,707||45.12%||-||1,230,111||53.64%||10||11,301||0.49%||-||12,555||0.55%||-||1,371||0.06%||-||3,406||0.15%||-||24||0.00%||-||-195,404||-8.52%||2,293,475||AZ | |10||1,034,707||45.12%||-||1,230,111||53.64%||10||11,301||0.49%||-||12,555||0.55%||-||1,371||0.06%||-||3,406||0.15%||-||24||0.00%||-||-195,404||-8.52%||1.95%||2,293,475||AZ | ||
| |-{{Party shading/Republican}} | |-{{Party shading/Republican}} | ||
| |style="text-align:left;"|] | |style="text-align:left;"|] | ||
| |6||422,310||38.86%||-||638,017||58.72%||6||12,882||1.19%||-||4,776||0.44%||-||4,023||0.37%||-||3,470||0.32%||-||1,139||0.10%||-||-215,707||-19. |
|6||422,310||38.86%||-||638,017||58.72%||6||12,882||1.19%||-||4,776||0.44%||-||4,023||0.37%||-||3,470||0.32%||-||1,139||0.10%||-||-215,707||-19.86%||−10.09%||1,086,617||AR | ||
| |-{{Party shading/Democratic}} | |-{{Party shading/Democratic}} | ||
| |style="text-align:left;"|] | |style="text-align:left;"|] | ||
| |55||8,274,473||61.01%||55||5,011,781||36.95%||-||108,381||0.80%||-||67,582||0.50%||-||3,145||0.02%||-||38,774||0.29%||-||57,764||0.43%||-||3,262,692||24.06%||13,561,900||CA | |55||8,274,473||61.01%||55||5,011,781||36.95%||-||108,381||0.80%||-||67,582||0.50%||-||3,145||0.02%||-||38,774||0.29%||-||57,764||0.43%||-||3,262,692||24.06%||14.11%||13,561,900||CA | ||
| |-{{Party shading/Democratic}} | |-{{Party shading/Democratic}} | ||
| |style="text-align:left;"|] | |style="text-align:left;"|] | ||
| |9||1,288,633||53.66%||9||1,073,629||44.71%||-||13,352||0.56%||-||10,898||0.45%||-||6,233||0.26%||-||2,822||0.12%||-||5,895||0.25%||-||215,004||8.95%||2,401,462||CO | |9||1,288,633||53.66%||9||1,073,629||44.71%||-||13,352||0.56%||-||10,898||0.45%||-||6,233||0.26%||-||2,822||0.12%||-||5,895||0.25%||-||215,004||8.95%||13.62%||2,401,462||CO | ||
| |-{{Party shading/Democratic}} | |-{{Party shading/Democratic}} | ||
| |style="text-align:left;"|] | |style="text-align:left;"|] | ||
| |7||997,772||60.59%||7||629,428||38.22%||-||19,162||1.16%||-||0||0.00%||-||311||0.02%||-||90||0.01%||-||34||0.00%||-||368,344||22.37%||1,646,797||CT | |7||997,772||60.59%||7||629,428||38.22%||-||19,162||1.16%||-||0||0.00%||-||311||0.02%||-||90||0.01%||-||34||0.00%||-||368,344||22.37%||12.00%||1,646,797||CT | ||
| |-{{Party shading/Democratic}} | |-{{Party shading/Democratic}} | ||
| |style="text-align:left;"|] | |style="text-align:left;"|] | ||
| |3||255,459||61.94%||3||152,374||36.95%||-||2,401||0.58%||-||1,109||0.27%||-||626||0.15%||-||385||0.09%||-||58||0.01%||-||103,085|| |
|3||255,459||61.94%||3||152,374||36.95%||-||2,401||0.58%||-||1,109||0.27%||-||626||0.15%||-||385||0.09%||-||58||0.01%||-||103,085||24.99%||17.41%||412,412||DE | ||
| |-{{Party shading/Democratic}} | |-{{Party shading/Democratic}} | ||
| |style="text-align:left;"|] | |style="text-align:left;"|] | ||
| |3||245,800||92.46%||3||17,367||6.53%||-||958||0.36%||-||0||0.00%||-||0||0.00%||-||590||0.22%||-||1,138||0.43%||-||228,433||85.92%||265,853||DC | |3||245,800||92.46%||3||17,367||6.53%||-||958||0.36%||-||0||0.00%||-||0||0.00%||-||590||0.22%||-||1,138||0.43%||-||228,433||85.92%||6.08%||265,853||DC | ||
| |-{{Party shading/Democratic}} | |-{{Party shading/Democratic}} | ||
| |style="text-align:left;"|] | |style="text-align:left;"|] | ||
| |27||4,282,074||51.03%||27||4,045,624||48.22%||-||28,124||0.34%||-||17,218||0.21%||-||7,915||0.09%||-||2,887||0.03%||-||6,902||0.08%||-||236,450||2. |
|27||4,282,074||51.03%||27||4,045,624||48.22%||-||28,124||0.34%||-||17,218||0.21%||-||7,915||0.09%||-||2,887||0.03%||-||6,902||0.08%||-||236,450||2.81%||7.83%||8,390,744||FL | ||
| |-{{Party shading/Republican}} | |-{{Party shading/Republican}} | ||
| |style="text-align:left;"|] | |style="text-align:left;"|] | ||
| |15||1,844,123||46.99%||-||2,048,759||52.20%||15||1,158||0.03%||-||28,731||0.73%||-||1,402||0.04%||-||250||0.01%||-||63||0.00%||-||-204,636||-5.21%||3,924,486||GA | |15||1,844,123||46.99%||-||2,048,759||52.20%||15||1,158||0.03%||-||28,731||0.73%||-||1,402||0.04%||-||250||0.01%||-||63||0.00%||-||-204,636||-5.21%||11.39%||3,924,486||GA | ||
| |-{{Party shading/Democratic}} | |-{{Party shading/Democratic}} | ||
| |style="text-align:left;"|] | |style="text-align:left;"|] | ||
| |4||325,871||71.85%||4||120,566||26.58%||-||3,825||0.84%||-||1,314||0.29%||-||1,013||0.22%||-||979||0.22%||-||0||0.00%||-||205,305||45. |
|4||325,871||71.85%||4||120,566||26.58%||-||3,825||0.84%||-||1,314||0.29%||-||1,013||0.22%||-||979||0.22%||-||0||0.00%||-||205,305||45.27%||36.52%||453,568||HI | ||
| |-{{Party shading/Republican}} | |-{{Party shading/Republican}} | ||
| |style="text-align:left;"|] | |style="text-align:left;"|] | ||
| |4||236,440||36.09%||-||403,012||61.52%||4||7,175||1.10%||-||3,658||0.56%||-||4,747||0.72%||-||39||0.01%||-||51||0.01%||-||-166,572||-25.43%||655,122||ID | |4||236,440||36.09%||-||403,012||61.52%||4||7,175||1.10%||-||3,658||0.56%||-||4,747||0.72%||-||39||0.01%||-||51||0.01%||-||-166,572||-25.43%||12.69%||655,122||ID | ||
| |-{{Party shading/Democratic}} | |-{{Party shading/Democratic}} | ||
| |style="text-align:left;"|] | |style="text-align:left;"|] | ||
| |21||3,419,348||61.92%||21||2,031,179||36.78%||-||30,948||0.56%||-||19,642||0.36%||-||8,256||0.15%||-||11,838||0.21%||-||1,160||0.02%||-||1,388,169||25.14%||5,522,371||IL | |21||3,419,348||61.92%||21||2,031,179||36.78%||-||30,948||0.56%||-||19,642||0.36%||-||8,256||0.15%||-||11,838||0.21%||-||1,160||0.02%||-||1,388,169||25.14%||14.80%||5,522,371||IL | ||
| |-{{Party shading/Democratic}} | |-{{Party shading/Democratic}} | ||
| |style="text-align:left;"|] | |style="text-align:left;"|] | ||
| |11||1,374,039||49.95%||11||1,345,648||48.91%||-||909||0.03%||-||29,257||1.06%||-||1,024||0.04%||-||87||0.00%||-||90||0.00%||-||28,391||1. |
|11||1,374,039||49.95%||11||1,345,648||48.91%||-||909||0.03%||-||29,257||1.06%||-||1,024||0.04%||-||87||0.00%||-||90||0.00%||-||28,391||1.04%||21.71%||2,751,054||IN | ||
| |-{{Party shading/Democratic}} | |-{{Party shading/Democratic}} | ||
| |style="text-align:left;"|] | |style="text-align:left;"|] | ||
| |7||828,940||53.93%||7||682,379||44.39%||-||8,014||0.52%||-||4,590||0.30%||-||4,445||0.29%||-||1,423||0.09%||-||7,332||0.48%||-||146,561||9. |
|7||828,940||53.93%||7||682,379||44.39%||-||8,014||0.52%||-||4,590||0.30%||-||4,445||0.29%||-||1,423||0.09%||-||7,332||0.48%||-||146,561||9.54%||10.20%||1,537,123||IA | ||
| |-{{Party shading/Republican}} | |-{{Party shading/Republican}} | ||
| |style="text-align:left;"|] | |style="text-align:left;"|] | ||
| |6||514,765||41.65%||-||699,655||56.61%||6||10,527||0.85%||-||6,706||0.54%||-||4,148||0.34%||-||35||0.00%||-||36||0.00%||-||-184,890||-14.96%||1,235,872||KS | |6||514,765||41.65%||-||699,655||56.61%||6||10,527||0.85%||-||6,706||0.54%||-||4,148||0.34%||-||35||0.00%||-||36||0.00%||-||-184,890||-14.96%||10.42%||1,235,872||KS | ||
| |-{{Party shading/Republican}} | |-{{Party shading/Republican}} | ||
| |style="text-align:left;"|] | |style="text-align:left;"|] | ||
| |8||751,985||41.17%||-||1,048,462||57.40%||8||15,378||0.84%||-||5,989||0.33%||-||4,694||0.26%||-||0||0.00%||-||112||0.01%||-||-296,477||-16.23%||1,826,620||KY | |8||751,985||41.17%||-||1,048,462||57.40%||8||15,378||0.84%||-||5,989||0.33%||-||4,694||0.26%||-||0||0.00%||-||112||0.01%||-||-296,477||-16.23%||3.63%||1,826,620||KY | ||
| |-{{Party shading/Republican}} | |-{{Party shading/Republican}} | ||
| |style="text-align:left;"|] | |style="text-align:left;"|] | ||
| |9||782,989||39.93%||-||1,148,275||58.56%||9||6,997||0.36%||-||0||0.00%||-||2,581||0.13%||-||9,187||0.47%||-||10,732||0.55%||-||-365,286||-18.63%||1,960,761||LA | |9||782,989||39.93%||-||1,148,275||58.56%||9||6,997||0.36%||-||0||0.00%||-||2,581||0.13%||-||9,187||0.47%||-||10,732||0.55%||-||-365,286||-18.63%||−4.12%||1,960,761||LA | ||
| |-{{Party shading/Democratic}} | |-{{Party shading/Democratic}} | ||
| |style="text-align:left;"|] |
|style="text-align:left;"|]† | ||
| | |
|2||421,923||57.71%||2||295,273||40.38%||-||10,636||1.45%||-||251||0.03%||-||177||0.02%||-||2,900||0.40%||-||3||0.00%||-||126,650||17.33%||8.32%||731,163||ME | ||
| |-{{Party shading/Democratic}} | |||
| |style="text-align:left;"|] | |||
| |1||232,145||60.51%||1||144,604||37.69%||-||5,263||1.37%||-||||||-||||||-||1,362||0.36%||-||252||0.07%||-||87,541||22.82%||10.88%||383,626||ME1 | |||
| |-{{Party shading/Democratic}} | |||
| |style="text-align:left;"|] | |||
| |1||189,778||54.61%||1||150,669||43.35%||-||5,373||1.55%||-||||||-||||||-||1,538||0.44%||-||179||0.05%||-||39,109||11.26%||5.42%||347,537||ME2 | |||
| |-{{Party shading/Democratic}} | |-{{Party shading/Democratic}} | ||
| |style="text-align:left;"|] | |style="text-align:left;"|] | ||
| |10||1,629,467||61.92%||10||959,862||36.47%||-||14,713||0.56%||-||9,842||0.37%||-||3,760||0.14%||-||4,747||0.18%||-||9,205||0.35%||-||669,605||25. |
|10||1,629,467||61.92%||10||959,862||36.47%||-||14,713||0.56%||-||9,842||0.37%||-||3,760||0.14%||-||4,747||0.18%||-||9,205||0.35%||-||669,605||25.45%||12.46%||2,631,596||MD | ||
| |-{{Party shading/Democratic}} | |-{{Party shading/Democratic}} | ||
| |style="text-align:left;"|] | |style="text-align:left;"|] | ||
| |12||1,904,097||61.80%||12||1,108,854||35.99%||-||28,841||0.94%||-||13,189||0.43%||-||4,971||0.16%||-||6,550||0.21%||-||14,483||0.47%||-||795,243||25.81%||3,080,985||MA | |12||1,904,097||61.80%||12||1,108,854||35.99%||-||28,841||0.94%||-||13,189||0.43%||-||4,971||0.16%||-||6,550||0.21%||-||14,483||0.47%||-||795,243||25.81%||0.65%||3,080,985||MA | ||
| |-{{Party shading/Democratic}} | |-{{Party shading/Democratic}} | ||
| |style="text-align:left;"|] | |style="text-align:left;"|] | ||
| |17||2,872,579||57.43%||17||2,048,639||40.96%||-||33,085||0.66%||-||23,716||0.47%||-||14,685||0.29%||-||8,892||0.18%||-||170||0.00%||-||823,940||16.47%||5,001,766||MI | |17||2,872,579||57.43%||17||2,048,639||40.96%||-||33,085||0.66%||-||23,716||0.47%||-||14,685||0.29%||-||8,892||0.18%||-||170||0.00%||-||823,940||16.47%||13.05%||5,001,766||MI | ||
| |-{{Party shading/Democratic}} | |-{{Party shading/Democratic}} | ||
| |style="text-align:left;"|] | |style="text-align:left;"|] | ||
| |10||1,573,354||54.06%||10||1,275,409||43.82%||-||30,152||1.04%||-||9,174||0.32%||-||6,787||0.23%||-||5,174||0.18%||-||10,319||0.35%||-||297,945||10.24%||2,910,369||MN | |10||1,573,354||54.06%||10||1,275,409||43.82%||-||30,152||1.04%||-||9,174||0.32%||-||6,787||0.23%||-||5,174||0.18%||-||10,319||0.35%||-||297,945||10.24%||6.76%||2,910,369||MN | ||
| |-{{Party shading/Republican}} | |-{{Party shading/Republican}} | ||
| |style="text-align:left;"|] | |style="text-align:left;"|] | ||
| |6||554,662||43.00%||-||724,597||56.18%||6||4,011||0.31%||-||2,529||0.20%||-||2,551||0.20%||-||1,034||0.08%||-||481||0.04%||-||-169,935||-13. |
|6||554,662||43.00%||-||724,597||56.18%||6||4,011||0.31%||-||2,529||0.20%||-||2,551||0.20%||-||1,034||0.08%||-||481||0.04%||-||-169,935||-13.18%||6.52%||1,289,865||MS | ||
| |-{{Party shading/Republican}} | |-{{Party shading/Republican}} | ||
| |style="text-align:left;"|] | |style="text-align:left;"|] | ||
| |11||1,441,911||49.29%||-||1,445,814||49.43%||11||17,813||0.61%||-||11,386||0.39%||-||8,201||0.28%||-||80||0.00%||-||0||0.00%||-||-3,903||-0. |
|11||1,441,911||49.29%||-||1,445,814||49.43%||11||17,813||0.61%||-||11,386||0.39%||-||8,201||0.28%||-||80||0.00%||-||0||0.00%||-||-3,903||-0.14%||7.07%||2,925,205||MO | ||
| |-{{Party shading/Republican}} | |-{{Party shading/Republican}} | ||
| |style="text-align:left;"|] | |style="text-align:left;"|] | ||
| |3||231,667||47.25%||-||242,763||49.51%||3||3,686||0.75%||-||1,355||0.28%||-||143||0.03%||-||23||0.00%||-||10,665||2.18%||-||-11,096||-2.26%||490,302||MT | |3||231,667||47.25%||-||242,763||49.51%||3||3,686||0.75%||-||1,355||0.28%||-||143||0.03%||-||23||0.00%||-||10,665||2.18%||-||-11,096||-2.26%||18.24%||490,302||MT | ||
| |-{{Party shading/Republican}} | |||
| |style="text-align:left;"|]† | |||
| |2||333,319||41.60%||-||452,979||56.53%||2||5,406||0.67%||-||2,740||0.34%||-||2,972||0.37%||-||1,028||0.13%||-||2,837||0.35%||-||-119,660||-14.93%||18.29%||801,281||NE | |||
| |-{{Party shading/Republican}} | |||
| |style="text-align:left;"|] | |||
| |1||121,411||44.33%||-||148,179||54.10%||1||1,963||0.72%||-||922||0.34%||-||1,024||0.37%||-||394||0.14%||-||||||-||-26,768||-9.77%||12.50%||273,893||NE1 | |||
| |-{{Party shading/Democratic}} | |||
| |style="text-align:left;"|] | |||
| |1||138,809||49.97%||1||135,439||48.75%||-||1,628||0.59%||-||1,014||0.36%||-||599||0.22%||-||320||0.12%||-||||||-||3,370||1.22%||22.93%||277,809||NE2 | |||
| |-{{Party shading/Republican}} | |-{{Party shading/Republican}} | ||
| |style="text-align:left;"|] |
|style="text-align:left;"|] | ||
| | |
|1||73,099||29.63%||-||169,361||68.64%||1||1,815||0.74%||-||804||0.33%||-||1,349||0.55%||-||314||0.13%||-||||||-||-96,262||-39.01%||12.17%||246,742||NE3 | ||
| |-{{Party shading/Democratic}} | |-{{Party shading/Democratic}} | ||
| |style="text-align:left;"|] | |style="text-align:left;"|] | ||
| |5||533,736||55.15%||5||412,827||42.65%||-||6,150||0.64%||-||4,263||0.44%||-||3,194||0.33%||-||1,411||0.15%||-||6,267||0.65%||-||120,909||12. |
|5||533,736||55.15%||5||412,827||42.65%||-||6,150||0.64%||-||4,263||0.44%||-||3,194||0.33%||-||1,411||0.15%||-||6,267||0.65%||-||120,909||12.50%||15.10%||967,848||NV | ||
| |-{{Party shading/Democratic}} | |-{{Party shading/Democratic}} | ||
| |style="text-align:left;"|] | |style="text-align:left;"|] | ||
| |4||384,826||54.13%||4||316,534||44.52%||-||3,503||0.49%||-||2,217||0.31%||-||226||0.03%||-||40||0.01%||-||3,624||0.51%||-||68,292||9.61%||710,970||NH | |4||384,826||54.13%||4||316,534||44.52%||-||3,503||0.49%||-||2,217||0.31%||-||226||0.03%||-||40||0.01%||-||3,624||0.51%||-||68,292||9.61%||8.24%||710,970||NH | ||
| |-{{Party shading/Democratic}} | |-{{Party shading/Democratic}} | ||
| |style="text-align:left;"|] | |style="text-align:left;"|] | ||
| |15||2,215,422||57.27%||15||1,613,207||41.70%||-||21,298||0.55%||-||8,441||0.22%||-||3,956||0.10%||-||3,636||0.09%||-||2,277||0.06%||-||602,215||15.57%||3,868,237||NJ | |15||2,215,422||57.27%||15||1,613,207||41.70%||-||21,298||0.55%||-||8,441||0.22%||-||3,956||0.10%||-||3,636||0.09%||-||2,277||0.06%||-||602,215||15.57%||8.89%||3,868,237||NJ | ||
| |-{{Party shading/Democratic}} | |-{{Party shading/Democratic}} | ||
| |style="text-align:left;"|] | |style="text-align:left;"|] | ||
| |5||472,422||56.91%||5||346,832||41.78%||-||5,327||0.64%||-||2,428||0.29%||-||1,597||0.19%||-||1,552||0.19%||-||0||0.00%||-||125,590||15.13%||830,158||NM | |5||472,422||56.91%||5||346,832||41.78%||-||5,327||0.64%||-||2,428||0.29%||-||1,597||0.19%||-||1,552||0.19%||-||0||0.00%||-||125,590||15.13%||15.79%||830,158||NM | ||
| |-{{Party shading/Democratic}} | |-{{Party shading/Democratic}} | ||
| |style="text-align:left;"|] | |style="text-align:left;"|] | ||
| |31||4,804,945||62.88%||31||2,752,771||36.03%||-||41,249||0.54%||-||19,596||0.26%||-||634||0.01%||-||12,801||0.17%||-||8,935||0.12%||-||2,052,174||26. |
|31||4,804,945||62.88%||31||2,752,771||36.03%||-||41,249||0.54%||-||19,596||0.26%||-||634||0.01%||-||12,801||0.17%||-||8,935||0.12%||-||2,052,174||26.85%||8.57%||7,640,931||NY | ||
| |-{{Party shading/Democratic}} | |-{{Party shading/Democratic}} | ||
| |style="text-align:left;"|] | |style="text-align:left;"|] | ||
| |15||2,142,651||49.70%||15||2,128,474||49.38%||-||1,448||0.03%||-||25,722||0.60%||-||0||0.00%||-||158||0.00%||-||12,336||0.29%||-||14,177||0. |
|15||2,142,651||49.70%||15||2,128,474||49.38%||-||1,448||0.03%||-||25,722||0.60%||-||0||0.00%||-||158||0.00%||-||12,336||0.29%||-||14,177||0.32%||12.76%||4,310,789||NC | ||
| |-{{Party shading/Republican}} | |-{{Party shading/Republican}} | ||
| |style="text-align:left;"|] | |style="text-align:left;"|] | ||
| |3||141,278||44.62%||-||168,601||53.25%||3||4,189||1.32%||-||1,354||0.43%||-||1,199||0.38%||-||0||0.00%||-||0||0.00%||-||-27,323||-8.63%||316,621||ND | |3||141,278||44.62%||-||168,601||53.25%||3||4,189||1.32%||-||1,354||0.43%||-||1,199||0.38%||-||0||0.00%||-||0||0.00%||-||-27,323||-8.63%||18.73%||316,621||ND | ||
| |-{{Party shading/Democratic}} | |-{{Party shading/Democratic}} | ||
| |style="text-align:left;"|] | |style="text-align:left;"|] | ||
| |20||2,940,044||51.50%||20||2,677,820||46.91%||-||42,337||0.74%||-||19,917||0.35%||-||12,565||0.22%||-||8,518||0.15%||-||7,149||0.13%||-||262,224||4.59%||5,708,350||OH | |20||2,940,044||51.50%||20||2,677,820||46.91%||-||42,337||0.74%||-||19,917||0.35%||-||12,565||0.22%||-||8,518||0.15%||-||7,149||0.13%||-||262,224||4.59%||6.70%||5,708,350||OH | ||
| |-{{Party shading/Republican}} | |-{{Party shading/Republican}} | ||
| |style="text-align:left;"|] | |style="text-align:left;"|] | ||
| |7||502,496||34.35%||-||960,165||65.65%||7||0||0.00%||-||0||0.00%||-||0||0.00%||-||0||0.00%||-||0||0.00%||-||-457,669||-31. |
|7||502,496||34.35%||-||960,165||65.65%||7||0||0.00%||-||0||0.00%||-||0||0.00%||-||0||0.00%||-||0||0.00%||-||-457,669||-31.30%||−0.15%||1,462,661||OK | ||
| |-{{Party shading/Democratic}} | |-{{Party shading/Democratic}} | ||
| |style="text-align:left;"|] | |style="text-align:left;"|] | ||
| |7||1,037,291||56.75%||7||738,475||40.40%||-||18,614||1.02%||-||7,635||0.42%||-||7,693||0.42%||-||4,543||0.25%||-||13,613||0.74%||-||298,816||16.35%||1,827,864||OR | |7||1,037,291||56.75%||7||738,475||40.40%||-||18,614||1.02%||-||7,635||0.42%||-||7,693||0.42%||-||4,543||0.25%||-||13,613||0.74%||-||298,816||16.35%||12.19%||1,827,864||OR | ||
| |-{{Party shading/Democratic}} | |-{{Party shading/Democratic}} | ||
| |style="text-align:left;"|] | |style="text-align:left;"|] | ||
| |21||3,276,363||54.49%||21||2,655,885||44.17%||-||42,977||0.71%||-||19,912||0.33%||-||1,092||0.02%||-||0||0.00%||-||17,043||0.28%||-||620,478||10.32%||6,013,272||PA | |21||3,276,363||54.49%||21||2,655,885||44.17%||-||42,977||0.71%||-||19,912||0.33%||-||1,092||0.02%||-||0||0.00%||-||17,043||0.28%||-||620,478||10.32%||7.82%||6,013,272||PA | ||
| |-{{Party shading/Democratic}} | |-{{Party shading/Democratic}} | ||
| |style="text-align:left;"|] | |style="text-align:left;"|] | ||
| |4||296,571||62.86%||4||165,391||35.06%||-||4,829||1.02%||-||1,382||0.29%||-||675||0.14%||-||797||0.17%||-||2,121||0.45%||-||131,180||27. |
|4||296,571||62.86%||4||165,391||35.06%||-||4,829||1.02%||-||1,382||0.29%||-||675||0.14%||-||797||0.17%||-||2,121||0.45%||-||131,180||27.80%||7.06%||471,766||RI | ||
| |-{{Party shading/Republican}} | |-{{Party shading/Republican}} | ||
| |style="text-align:left;"|] | |style="text-align:left;"|] | ||
| |8||862,449||44.90%||-||1,034,896||53.87%||8||5,053||0.26%||-||7,283||0.38%||-||6,827||0.36%||-||4,461||0.23%||-||0||0.00%||-||-172,447||-8. |
|8||862,449||44.90%||-||1,034,896||53.87%||8||5,053||0.26%||-||7,283||0.38%||-||6,827||0.36%||-||4,461||0.23%||-||0||0.00%||-||-172,447||-8.97%||8.10%||1,920,969||SC | ||
| |-{{Party shading/Republican}} | |-{{Party shading/Republican}} | ||
| |style="text-align:left;"|] | |style="text-align:left;"|] | ||
| |3||170,924||44.75%||-||203,054||53.16%||3||4,267||1.12%||-||1,835||0.48%||-||1,895||0.50%||-||0||0.00%||-||0||0.00%||-||-32,130||-8.41%||381,975||SD | |3||170,924||44.75%||-||203,054||53.16%||3||4,267||1.12%||-||1,835||0.48%||-||1,895||0.50%||-||0||0.00%||-||0||0.00%||-||-32,130||-8.41%||13.06%||381,975||SD | ||
| |-{{Party shading/Republican}} | |-{{Party shading/Republican}} | ||
| |style="text-align:left;"|] | |style="text-align:left;"|] | ||
| |11||1,087,437||41.83%||-||1,479,178||56.90%||11||11,560||0.44%||-||8,547||0.33%||-||8,191||0.32%||-||2,499||0.10%||-||2,337||0.09%||-||-391,741||-15.07%||2,599,749||TN | |11||1,087,437||41.83%||-||1,479,178||56.90%||11||11,560||0.44%||-||8,547||0.33%||-||8,191||0.32%||-||2,499||0.10%||-||2,337||0.09%||-||-391,741||-15.07%||−0.80%||2,599,749||TN | ||
| |-{{Party shading/Republican}} | |-{{Party shading/Republican}} | ||
| |style="text-align:left;"|] | |style="text-align:left;"|] | ||
| |34||3,528,633||43.68%||-||4,479,328||55.45%||34||5,751||0.07%||-||56,116||0.69%||-||5,708||0.07%||-||909||0.01%||-||1,350||0.02%||-||-950,695||-11.77%||8,077,795||TX | |34||3,528,633||43.68%||-||4,479,328||55.45%||34||5,751||0.07%||-||56,116||0.69%||-||5,708||0.07%||-||909||0.01%||-||1,350||0.02%||-||-950,695||-11.77%||11.09%||8,077,795||TX | ||
| |-{{Party shading/Republican}} | |-{{Party shading/Republican}} | ||
| |style="text-align:left;"|] | |style="text-align:left;"|] | ||
| |5||327,670||34.41%||-||596,030||62.58%||5||8,416||0.88%||-||6,966||0.73%||-||12,012||1.26%||-||982||0.10%||-||294||0.03%||-||-268,360||-28. |
|5||327,670||34.41%||-||596,030||62.58%||5||8,416||0.88%||-||6,966||0.73%||-||12,012||1.26%||-||982||0.10%||-||294||0.03%||-||-268,360||-28.17%||17.36%||952,370||UT | ||
| |-{{Party shading/Democratic}} | |-{{Party shading/Democratic}} | ||
| |style="text-align:left;"|] | |style="text-align:left;"|] | ||
| |3||219,262||67.46%||3||98,974||30.45%||-||3,339||1.03%||-||1,067||0.33%||-||500||0.15%||-||66||0.02%||-||1,838||0.57%||-||120,288||37.01%||325,046||VT | |3||219,262||67.46%||3||98,974||30.45%||-||3,339||1.03%||-||1,067||0.33%||-||500||0.15%||-||66||0.02%||-||1,838||0.57%||-||120,288||37.01%||16.87%||325,046||VT | ||
| |-{{Party shading/Democratic}} | |-{{Party shading/Democratic}} | ||
| |style="text-align:left;"|] | |style="text-align:left;"|] | ||
| |13||1,959,532||52.63%||13||1,725,005||46.33%||-||11,483||0.31%||-||11,067||0.30%||-||7,474||0.20%||-||2,344||0.06%||-||6,355||0.17%||-||234,527||6.30%||3,723,260||VA | |13||1,959,532||52.63%||13||1,725,005||46.33%||-||11,483||0.31%||-||11,067||0.30%||-||7,474||0.20%||-||2,344||0.06%||-||6,355||0.17%||-||234,527||6.30%||14.50%||3,723,260||VA | ||
| |-{{Party shading/Democratic}} | |-{{Party shading/Democratic}} | ||
| |style="text-align:left;"|] | |style="text-align:left;"|] | ||
| |11||1,750,848||57.65%||11||1,229,216||40.48%||-||29,489||0.97%||-||12,728||0.42%||-||9,432||0.31%||-||3,819||0.13%||-||1,346||0.04%||-||521,632||17. |
|11||1,750,848||57.65%||11||1,229,216||40.48%||-||29,489||0.97%||-||12,728||0.42%||-||9,432||0.31%||-||3,819||0.13%||-||1,346||0.04%||-||521,632||17.17%||10.00%||3,036,878||WA | ||
| |-{{Party shading/Republican}} | |-{{Party shading/Republican}} | ||
| |style="text-align:left;"|] | |style="text-align:left;"|] | ||
| |5||303,857||42.59%||-||397,466||55.71%||5||7,219||1.01%||-||0||0.00%||-||2,465||0.35%||-||2,355||0.33%||-||89||0.01%||-||-93,609||-13.12%||713,451||WV | |5||303,857||42.59%||-||397,466||55.71%||5||7,219||1.01%||-||0||0.00%||-||2,465||0.35%||-||2,355||0.33%||-||89||0.01%||-||-93,609||-13.12%||−0.26%||713,451||WV | ||
| |-{{Party shading/Democratic}} | |-{{Party shading/Democratic}} | ||
| |style="text-align:left;"|] | |style="text-align:left;"|] | ||
| |10||1,677,211||56.22%||10||1,262,393||42.31%||-||17,605||0.59%||-||8,858||0.30%||-||5,072||0.17%||-||4,216||0.14%||-||8,062||0.27%||-||414,818||13. |
|10||1,677,211||56.22%||10||1,262,393||42.31%||-||17,605||0.59%||-||8,858||0.30%||-||5,072||0.17%||-||4,216||0.14%||-||8,062||0.27%||-||414,818||13.91%||13.52%||2,983,417||WI | ||
| |-{{Party shading/Republican}} | |-{{Party shading/Republican}} | ||
| |style="text-align:left;"|] | |style="text-align:left;"|] | ||
| |3||82,868||32.54%||-||164,958||64.78%||3||2,525||0.99%||-||1,594||0.63%||-||1,192||0.47%||-||0||0.00%||-||1,521||0.60%||-||-82,090||-32.24%||254,658||WY | |3||82,868||32.54%||-||164,958||64.78%||3||2,525||0.99%||-||1,594||0.63%||-||1,192||0.47%||-||0||0.00%||-||1,521||0.60%||-||-82,090||-32.24%||7.55%||254,658||WY | ||
| |-{{Party shading/Democratic}} | |-{{Party shading/Democratic}} | ||
| ! align=left|U.S. Total||538||69,498,516||52.93%||365||59,948,323||45.65%||173||739,034||0.56%||-||523,715||0.40%||-||199,750||0.15%||-||161,797||0.12%||-||242,685||0.18%||-||9,550,193||7.27%||131,313,820||US | ! align=left|U.S. Total||538||69,498,516||52.93%||365||59,948,323||45.65%||173||739,034||0.56%||-||523,715||0.40%||-||199,750||0.15%||-||161,797||0.12%||-||242,685||0.18%||-||9,550,193||7.27%||9.73%||131,313,820||US | ||
| |}</div> | |}</div> | ||
| Note: Maine and Nebraska each allow for their electoral votes to be split between candidates. In both states, two electoral votes are awarded to the winner of the statewide race and one electoral vote is awarded to the winner of each congressional district.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://maine.gov/sos/cec/elec/2008/tabs-can-pr-condistrict-summary-11-08.html|title=Bureau of Corporations, Elections & Commissions, Elections Division|access-date=December 2, 2012|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121104160518/http://www.maine.gov/sos/cec/elec/2008/tabs-can-pr-condistrict-summary-11-08.html|archive-date=November 4, 2012|df=mdy-all}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.sos.ne.gov/elec/pdf/2008%20General%20Canvass%20Book.pdf|title=Official Results of Nebraska General Election – November 4, 2008|access-date=December 2, 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090114195615/http://www.sos.ne.gov/elec/pdf/2008%20General%20Canvass%20Book.pdf|archive-date=January 14, 2009|url-status=dead}}</ref> | |||
| <div style="overflow:auto"> | |||
| {|class="wikitable sortable" style="text-align:right;" | |||
| |- | |||
| !District | |||
| !<SMALL>]</SMALL> | |||
| !]!!% | |||
| !]!!% | |||
| !]!!% | |||
| !]!!% | |||
| !]!!% | |||
| !]!!% | |||
| !Other!!% | |||
| !Margin | |||
| !% | |||
| !Total | |||
| |-{{Party shading/Democratic}} | |||
| |style="text-align:left;"|] | |||
| |1||232,145||60.51%||144,604||37.69%||5,263||1.37%||||||||||1,362||0.36%||252||0.07%||87,541||22.82%||383,626 | |||
| |-{{Party shading/Democratic}} | |||
| |style="text-align:left;"|] | |||
| |1||189,778||54.61%||150,669||43.35%||5,373||1.55%||||||||||1,538||0.44%||179||0.05%||39,109||11.25%||347,537 | |||
| |-{{Party shading/Republican}} | |||
| |style="text-align:left;"|] | |||
| |1||121,411||44.33%||148,179||54.10%||1,963||0.72%||922||0.34%||1,024||0.37%||394||0.14%||||||-26,768||-9.77%||273,893 | |||
| |-{{Party shading/Democratic}} | |||
| |style="text-align:left;"|] | |||
| |1||138,809||49.97%||135,439||48.75%||1,628||0.59%||1,014||0.36%||599||0.22%||320||0.12%||||||3,370||1.21%||277,809 | |||
| |-{{Party shading/Republican}} | |||
| |style="text-align:left;"|] | |||
| |1||73,099||29.63%||169,361||68.64%||1,815||0.74%||804||0.33%||1,349||0.55%||314||0.13%||||||-96,262||-39.01%||246,742 | |||
| |} | |||
| </div> | |||
| ====States and EV districts that flipped from Republican to Democratic==== | |||
| <gallery perrow="3" widths="360px" heights="167px"> | |||
| *] | |||
| File:2008prescountymap.PNG|Popular vote by county. Red represents counties that went for McCain; blue represents counties that went for Obama. Connecticut, Hawaii, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and Vermont had all counties go to Obama. Oklahoma had all counties go to McCain. | |||
| *] | |||
| File:Gastner map purple byarea bycounty.png|Presidential popular votes by county as a scale from red/Republican to blue/Democratic. | |||
| *] | |||
| File:2008CartogramElection.jpg|] of popular vote with each county rescaled in proportion to its population. Deeper blue represents a Democratic majority; brighter red represents a Republican majority.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www-personal.umich.edu/~mejn/election/2008/|title=Election maps|author=|date=|website=www-personal.umich.edu}}</ref> | |||
| *] | |||
| File:US Election04-08shift.png|Voting shifts per county from the 2004 to the 2008 election. Darker blue indicates the county voted more Democratic. Darker red indicates the county voted more Republican. | |||
| *] | |||
| File:2008nationwidecountymapshadedbyvoteshare.svg|Results by county, shaded according to winning candidate's percentage of the vote. | |||
| *] | |||
| File:Presidential Elections 2004-2008 Swing in County Margins.svg| Change in vote margins at the county level from the 2004 election to the 2008 election. Obama made dramatic gains in every region of the country except for Arizona, Appalachia, and the inner South, where McCain improved over Bush. | |||
| *] | |||
| File:2008 United States Presidential Election, Results by Congressional District.png|Results by congressional district. | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| === Cartographic gallery === | |||
| <gallery perrow="3" widths="360" heights="167"> | |||
| File:ElectoralCollege2008-Large.png|Results by state with ]s for the electoral college and popular vote. Note that the depicted split in Nebraska's electoral votes denotes the one electoral vote won by Obama in ] and is not representative of the district's actual geographical boundaries. | |||
| File:2008prescountymap.PNG|Popular vote by county.{{refn|group=lower-alpha|name="county clarification"|Alaska and Louisiana do not have counties. Alaska's ] and Louisiana's ] are pictured.}} Red represents counties that went for McCain; blue represents counties that went for Obama. Connecticut, Hawaii, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and Vermont had all counties go to Obama. Oklahoma had all counties go to McCain. | |||
| File:ElectionMapPurpleCounty.png|Presidential popular votes by county as a scale from red/Republican to blue/Democratic. | |||
| File:2008CartogramElection.jpg|] of popular vote with each county rescaled in proportion to its population. Deeper blue represents a Democratic majority; brighter red represents a Republican majority.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www-personal.umich.edu/~mejn/election/2008/|title=Election maps|website=www-personal.umich.edu|access-date=January 18, 2009|archive-date=September 30, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210930150235/http://www-personal.umich.edu/~mejn/election/2008/|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
| File:2008 United States presidential election results map by county.svg|Results by county,{{refn|group=lower-alpha|name="county clarification"}} shaded according to winning candidate's percentage of the vote. | |||
| File:Presidential Elections 2004-2008 Swing in County Margins.svg|Change in vote margins at the county level from the 2004 election to the 2008 election.{{refn|group=lower-alpha|name="county clarification"}} Obama made dramatic gains in every region of the country except for Arizona (McCain's home state), Alaska (Palin's home state), Appalachia, and the inner South, where McCain improved over Bush. | |||
| File:2008 presidential election, results by congressional district (popular vote percentage).svg|Results by congressional districts, shaded according to winning candidate's percentage of the vote. | |||
| </gallery> | </gallery> | ||
| ===Close states |
===Close states=== | ||
| ] | ] | ||
| Red font color denotes states won by Republican John McCain; blue denotes those won by Democrat Barack Obama. | |||
| States where the margin of victory was under 1% (26 electoral votes; 15 won by Obama, 11 by McCain): | |||
| # '''<span style="color:red;">Missouri, 0.14% (3,903 votes) – 11 electoral votes</span>''' | |||
| # '''<span style="color:blue;">North Carolina, 0.32% (14,177 votes) – 15 electoral votes</span>''' | |||
| States where the margin of victory was between 1% and 5% (62 electoral votes; 59 won by Obama, 3 by McCain): | |||
| # '''<span style="color:blue;">Indiana, 1.04% (28,391 votes) – 11 electoral votes</span>''' | |||
| # '''<span style="color:blue;">Nebraska's 2nd congressional district, 1.22% (3,370 votes) – 1 electoral vote</span>''' | |||
| # '''<span style="color:red;">Montana, 2.26% (11,096 votes) – 3 electoral votes</span>''' | |||
| # '''<span style="color:blue;">Florida, 2.81% (236,450 votes) – 27 electoral votes</span>''' | |||
| # '''<span style="color:blue;">Ohio, 4.59% (262,224 votes) – 20 electoral votes</span>''' | |||
| States/districts |
States/districts where the margin of victory was between 5% and 10% (73 electoral votes; 33 won by Obama, 40 by McCain): | ||
| # '''<span style="color: |
# '''<span style="color:red;">Georgia, 5.21% (204,636 votes) – 15 electoral votes</span>''' | ||
| # '''<span style="color: |
# '''<span style="color:blue;">Virginia, 6.30% (234,527 votes) – 13 electoral votes</span>''' | ||
| # '''<span style="color:red;">South Dakota, 8.41% (32,130 votes) – 3 electoral votes</span>''' | |||
| # '''<span style="color:red;">Arizona, 8.52% (195,404 votes) – 10 electoral votes</span>''' | |||
| # '''<span style="color:red;">North Dakota, 8.63% (27,323 votes) – 3 electoral votes</span>''' | |||
| # '''<span style="color:blue;">Colorado, 8.95% (215,004 votes) – 9 electoral votes</span>''' (] for Obama victory) | |||
| # '''<span style="color:red;">South Carolina, 8.97% (172,447 votes) – 8 electoral votes</span>''' | |||
| # '''<span style="color:blue;">Iowa, 9.54% (146,561 votes) – 7 electoral votes</span>'''(] for McCain victory) | |||
| # '''<span style="color:blue;">New Hampshire, 9.61% (68,292 votes) – 4 electoral votes</span>''' | |||
| # '''<span style="color:red;">Nebraska's 1st congressional district, 9.77% (26,768 votes) – 1 electoral vote</span>''' | |||
| <span style="color:darkblue;">Blue</span> denotes states or congressional districts won by Democrat Barack Obama; <span style="color:red;">red</span> denotes those won by Republican John McCain. | |||
| States/districts in which the margin of victory was under 5% (62 electoral votes): | |||
| # '''<span style="color:darkblue;">Indiana 1.03%</span>''' | |||
| # '''<span style="color:darkblue;">Nebraska's 2nd congressional district 1.21%</span>''' | |||
| # '''<span style="color:darkred;">Montana 2.26%</span>''' | |||
| # '''<span style="color:darkblue;">Florida 2.82%</span>''' | |||
| # '''<span style="color:darkblue;">Ohio 4.59%</span>''' | |||
| ====Statistics==== | |||
| States/districts in which margin of victory was more than 5% but less than 10% (73 electoral votes): | |||
| Counties with highest percentage of Democratic vote:<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210910104629/https://uselectionatlas.org/RESULTS/national.php?year=2008&off=0&elect=0&f=0|date=September 10, 2021}}, Uselectionatlas.org.</ref> | |||
| # '''<span style="color:darkred;">Georgia 5.21%</span>''' | |||
| # '''] 92.46%''' | |||
| # '''<span style="color:darkblue;">Virginia 6.30%</span>''' | |||
| # '''] 88.87%''' | |||
| # '''<span style="color:darkred;">South Dakota 8.41%</span>''' | |||
| # '''] 88.71%''' | |||
| # '''<span style="color:darkred;">Arizona 8.52%</span>''' | |||
| # ''' |
# '''] 88.69%''' | ||
| # '''] 88.64%''' | |||
| # '''<span style="color:darkblue;">Colorado 8.95%</span>''' ''(tipping point state for an Obama victory)'' | |||
| # '''<span style="color:darkred;">South Carolina 8.98%</span>''' | |||
| # '''<span style="color:darkblue;">Iowa 9.53%</span>''' ''(tipping point state for a McCain victory) | |||
| # '''<span style="color:darkblue;">New Hampshire 9.61%</span>''' | |||
| # '''<span style="color:darkred;">Nebraska's 1st congressional district 9.77%</span>''' | |||
| Counties with highest percentage of Republican vote: | |||
| ===International reaction=== | |||
| # '''] 92.64%''' | |||
| {{Main|International reaction to the United States presidential election, 2008}} | |||
| # '''] 92.08%''' | |||
| The American presidential election was followed closely internationally.<ref>{{cite news|last=Coleman|first=Joseph|title=World hopes U.S. election heralds new era|url=http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/11/05/MNNA13U5IS.DTL|work=]|date=November 5, 2008|accessdate=July 17, 2009}}</ref> When it was clear that Obama was victorious, many world leaders sent congratulations and well wishes to the President-elect.<ref>{{cite news|title=World leaders hail Obama triumph|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/us_elections_2008/7711321.stm|publisher=BBC News|date=November 5, 2008|accessdate=August 2, 2009}}</ref> | |||
| # '''] 91.70%''' | |||
| # '''] 90.13%''' | |||
| # '''] 89.25%''' | |||
| ==Voter demographics== | ==Voter demographics== | ||
| Line 1,402: | Line 1,637: | ||
| | style="text-align:right;" | 2 | | style="text-align:right;" | 2 | ||
| | style="text-align:right;" | 85 | | style="text-align:right;" | 85 | ||
| |- | |||
| ! colspan=5|Issue regarded as most important | |||
| |- | |||
| | ] | |||
| | style="text-align:right; background:#b0ceff;"| 53 | |||
| | style="text-align:right; background:#fff3f3;"| 44 | |||
| | style="text-align:right;" | 3 | |||
| | style="text-align:right;" | 63 | |||
| |- | |||
| | ] | |||
| | style="text-align:right; background:#b0ceff;"| 59 | |||
| | style="text-align:right; background:#fff3f3;"| 39 | |||
| | style="text-align:right;" | 2 | |||
| | style="text-align:right;" | 10 | |||
| |- | |||
| | ] | |||
| | style="text-align:right; background:#b0ceff;"| 73 | |||
| | style="text-align:right; background:#fff3f3;"| 26 | |||
| | style="text-align:right;" | 1 | |||
| | style="text-align:right;" | 9 | |||
| |- | |||
| | ] | |||
| | style="text-align:right; background:#f0f0ff;"| 13 | |||
| | style="text-align:right; background:#ffb6b6;"| 86 | |||
| | style="text-align:right;" | 1 | |||
| | style="text-align:right;" | 9 | |||
| |- | |||
| | ] | |||
| | style="text-align:right; background:#b0ceff;"| 50 | |||
| | style="text-align:right; background:#fff3f3;"| 46 | |||
| | style="text-align:right;" | 4 | |||
| | style="text-align:right;" | 7 | |||
| |- | |- | ||
| ! colspan=5|Region | ! colspan=5|Region | ||
| Line 1,449: | Line 1,716: | ||
| | style="text-align:right;" | 21 | | style="text-align:right;" | 21 | ||
| |} | |} | ||
| '''Source:''' Exit polls conducted by Edison Research of ], for the National Election Pool, a consortium of ABC News, Associated Press, CBS News, CNN, Fox News, and NBC News.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/results/polls/#val=USP00p1|title=National Exit Poll|publisher=CNN| |
'''Source:''' Exit polls conducted by Edison Research of ], for the National Election Pool, a consortium of ABC News, Associated Press, CBS News, CNN, Fox News, and NBC News.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/results/polls/#val=USP00p1|title=National Exit Poll|publisher=CNN|access-date=January 28, 2013|archive-date=June 5, 2010|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100605132422/http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/results/polls/#val=USP00p1|url-status=live}}</ref> | ||
| ==Analysis== | ==Analysis== | ||
| Obama, having a ] mother and ]n father of the ],<ref>{{cite news|first=Derek|last=Kilner|title=Kenyans Welcome Obama's Democratic Party Nomination|date=June 4, 2008|url=http://www.voanews.com/english/archive/2008-06/2008-06-04-voa44.cfm?CFID=30257441&CFTOKEN=32989567|archive-url=http://webarchive.loc.gov/all/20100726062355/http://www1.voanews.com/english/archive/2008-06/2008-06-04-voa44.cfm?CFID=30257441&CFTOKEN=32989567|url-status=dead|archive-date=July 26, 2010|publisher=VOA News| |
Obama, having a ] mother and ]n father of the ],<ref>{{cite news|first=Derek|last=Kilner|title=Kenyans Welcome Obama's Democratic Party Nomination|date=June 4, 2008|url=http://www.voanews.com/english/archive/2008-06/2008-06-04-voa44.cfm?CFID=30257441&CFTOKEN=32989567|archive-url=http://webarchive.loc.gov/all/20100726062355/http://www1.voanews.com/english/archive/2008-06/2008-06-04-voa44.cfm?CFID=30257441&CFTOKEN=32989567|url-status=dead|archive-date=July 26, 2010|publisher=VOA News|access-date=June 17, 2008}}</ref> became the first ] as well as the first ] president.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/asection/la-na-assess5-2008nov05,0,6354926.story|title=White Americans play major role in electing the first black president|work=]|date=November 5, 2008|last=Wallsten|first=Peter|access-date=July 16, 2009|archive-date=December 18, 2008|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081218232632/http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/asection/la-na-assess5-2008nov05,0,6354926.story|url-status=live}}</ref> Several black people had previously run for president, including ], ], ], ], ], and ], though Obama was the first one ever to win the nomination of a major party, let alone the general election.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.socialstudiesforkids.com/articles/ushistory/africanamericans_president.htm|title=African-Americans Who Ran for President|publisher=socialstudiesforkids.com|access-date=2016-03-22|archive-date=October 5, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181005012133/http://www.socialstudiesforkids.com/articles/ushistory/africanamericans_president.htm|url-status=dead}}</ref> The Obama-Biden ticket was also the first winning ticket in American history in which neither candidate was a white Protestant, as Biden is ] and the first Roman Catholic to be elected vice president; all previous tickets with Catholic vice presidential candidates had been defeated (], ], ]).<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.america.gov/st/elections08-english/2008/November/20081107132624xjyrrep0.7660639.html|title=America.gov|publisher=America.gov|date=November 7, 2008|access-date=July 16, 2009|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090805090139/http://www.america.gov/st/elections08-english/2008/November/20081107132624xjyrrep0.7660639.html|archive-date=August 5, 2009|df=mdy-all}}</ref> The Obama-Biden ticket was the first winning ticket consisting of two sitting senators since ] (]/]) (in the previous election cycle (]) Democrats also ] two sitting senators, ] of ] and ] of ], but they lost to incumbents Bush and Cheney), and Obama became the first Northern Democratic president since Kennedy. Also, Obama became the first Democratic candidate to win a majority of the popular vote since ] in ], the first to win a majority of both votes and states since Lyndon Johnson in ], and the first Northern Democrat to win a majority of both votes and states since Franklin Roosevelt in ]. Obama became the first Northern Democrat to win any state in the former Confederacy since Hubert Humphrey won Texas in 1968. This was the first presidential election since 1952 in which neither of the major-party nominees was the incumbent president or vice-president. | ||
| ] and 2008. Excluding the candidates' home states, only five states trended more Republican: Arkansas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, Tennessee and West Virginia.]] | ] and 2008. Excluding the candidates' home states, only five states trended more Republican: Arkansas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, Tennessee and West Virginia.]] | ||
| Prior to the election, commentators discussed whether Senator Obama would be able to redraw the electoral map by winning states that had been voting for Republican candidates in recent decades.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.progressillinois.com/2008/05/11/features/obama-over-the-top|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080514024717/http://progressillinois.com/2008/05/11/features/obama-over-the-top|url-status=dead|archive-date=May 14, 2008|title=Obama Over the Top: How New Voters Could Redraw The Electoral Map|publisher=Progress Illinois| |
Prior to the election, commentators discussed whether Senator Obama would be able to redraw the electoral map by winning states that had been voting for Republican candidates in recent decades.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.progressillinois.com/2008/05/11/features/obama-over-the-top|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080514024717/http://progressillinois.com/2008/05/11/features/obama-over-the-top|url-status=dead|archive-date=May 14, 2008|title=Obama Over the Top: How New Voters Could Redraw The Electoral Map|publisher=Progress Illinois|access-date=January 30, 2009}}</ref> In many ways, he was successful. He won every region of the country by double digits except the ], which John McCain won by nine percent, although Obama nonetheless carried ], the ], ], ], ], and ] (the South as defined by the US ]). McCain won every state in the Deep South, where white voters had generally supported Republican candidates by increasingly large margins in the previous few decades.<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131011094602/http://elections.nytimes.com/2008/results/president/national-exit-polls.html |date=October 11, 2013 }}, ''The New York Times'', November 5, 2008.</ref> Obama won all of the 2004 swing states (states that either Kerry or Bush won by less than 5%) by a margin of 8.5 percent or more except for Ohio, which he carried by 4.5 percent. | ||
| Obama also defied political bellwethers, becoming the first person to win the presidency while losing ] since ] and while losing ] and ] since ]. He was the first Democrat to ever win the presidency without carrying Missouri, to win without carrying ] since that state joined the Union in 1836, and the first to win without ] since ] (and, because one West Virginia elector had voted Democratic in 1916, Obama became the first Democrat to win the White House without any of the state's electors since its founding in 1863). ] and ] voted for the Democratic nominee for the first time since ], as did a solitary electoral vote from ]. Indiana would return to being a reliably red state in subsequent elections; Virginia, however, has been won by Democrats in every presidential election since and would grow increasingly Democratic at the state level. ], which Obama was the first Democrat to carry since ], would return to the Republican column in the following elections, though only by narrow margins each time. | |||
| Obama was also relatively competitive in some traditionally Republican states he lost, notably ], which he lost by under 3%, and ], which he lost by just 5%. He is also the only 21st-century Democrat to lose ] and ] by just single digits. | |||
| This was the first presidential election in which ] split its electoral votes between two candidates. Together with ], which would not split its votes until ], Nebraska is one of two states that allow a split in electoral votes without ]s: a candidate receives one electoral vote for each congressional district won (Nebraska has three, Maine two), while the statewide winner receives an additional two electoral votes. Obama won the electoral vote from Nebraska's 2nd congressional district, largely comprising the city of ]. Nebraska's other four electoral votes went to John McCain. This would not happen again until ]. | |||
| {{as of|2024}}, this election is the last time that Indiana or North Carolina voted Democratic, and is also the most recent election where one of the nominees has since died. Until ] this was also the most recent election in which any of the major presidential nominees had any military experience.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2023-07-19 |title=From Marine to politician: An inside look at JD Vance's journey to the RNC stage |url=https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/marine-politician-inside-jd-vances-journey-rnc-stage/story?id=112041974 |access-date=2024-07-19 |website=ABC News |language=en |archive-date=September 21, 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240921110851/https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/marine-politician-inside-jd-vances-journey-rnc-stage/story?id=112041974 |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
| {{as of|2016}}, this election is the last time that Indiana, Nebraska's 2nd Congressional District and North Carolina voted Democratic, and (as of 2019) that one of the nominees died following the election. | |||
| This election exhibited the continuation of some of the polarization trends evident in the ] and 2004 elections.<ref>{{cite web |
This election exhibited the continuation of some of the polarization trends evident in the ] and 2004 elections.<ref>{{cite web|last=Cost|first=Jay|url=http://www.realclearpolitics.com/horseraceblog/2008/11/polarization_continues_under_o.html|title=HorseRaceBlog—Electoral Polarization Continues Under Obama|publisher=RealClearPolitics|date=November 20, 2008|access-date=January 24, 2009|archive-date=February 2, 2009|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090202045534/http://realclearpolitics.com/horseraceblog/2008/11/polarization_continues_under_o.html|url-status=live}}</ref> McCain won whites 55–43 percent, while Obama won blacks 95–4 percent,<ref>{{cite web|author=Kuhn, David Paul|url=http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1108/15297.html|title=Exit polls: How Obama won|work=Politico|date=November 5, 2008|access-date=November 8, 2011|archive-date=November 5, 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111105232041/http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1108/15297.html|url-status=live}}</ref> Hispanics 67–31 percent, and Asians 62–35 percent. Voters aged 18–29 voted for Obama by 66–32 percent while elderly voters backed McCain 53–45 percent.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/results/polls/#USP00p1|title=Exit poll|publisher=CNN|access-date=January 30, 2009|archive-date=June 5, 2010|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100605132422/http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/results/polls/#USP00p1|url-status=live}}</ref> The 25-year age gap between McCain and Obama was the widest in U.S. presidential election history among the top two candidates.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/03/world/americas/03iht-letter.3.9701386.html |title=Obama vs. McCain would be dream match |work=] |date=February 3, 2008 |author=Hunt, Albert R. |access-date=February 23, 2017 |archive-date=November 25, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201125220543/https://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/03/world/americas/03iht-letter.3.9701386.html |url-status=live }}</ref> | ||
| ==See also== | ==See also== | ||
| Line 1,483: | Line 1,754: | ||
| ==Notes== | ==Notes== | ||
| {{reflist|group= |
{{reflist|group=lower-alpha}} | ||
| ==References== | ==References== | ||
| Line 1,490: | Line 1,761: | ||
| ==Further reading== | ==Further reading== | ||
| {{refbegin}} | {{refbegin}} | ||
| * ], and ]. ''The Battle for America 2008: The Story of an Extraordinary Election'' (2009), by leading reporters with inside information | |||
| * Plouffe, David. The Audacity to Win. 2009 | |||
| * Crotty, William. "Policy and Politics: The Bush Administration and the 2008 Presidential Election," ''Polity,'' July 2009, Vol. 41 Issue 3, pp 282–311 {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160404230129/http://www.palgrave-journals.com/polity/journal/v41/n3/abs/pol20093a.html |date=April 4, 2016 }} | |||
| * Balz, Dan, and Haynes Johnson. ''The Battle for America 2008: The Story of an Extraordinary Election'' (2009), by leading reporters with inside information | |||
| * ]. ''Age of Obama: A Reporter's Journey With Clinton, McCain and Obama in the Making of the President in 2008'' (2009) | |||
| * Crotty, William. "Policy and Politics: The Bush Administration and the 2008 Presidential Election," ''Polity,'' July 2009, Vol. 41 Issue 3, pp 282–311 | |||
| * |
* Gidlow, Liette. ''Obama, Clinton, Palin: Making History in Election 2008'' (2012) | ||
| * ]. ''The Elections of 2008'' (2009), factual summary {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110429113223/http://www.amazon.com/dp/0872895696/ |date=April 29, 2011 }} | |||
| * Gidlow, Liette. Obama, Clinton, Palin: Making History in Election 2000 (2012) | |||
| * ]. ''The Audacity to Win: The Inside Story and Lessons of Barack Obama's Historic Victory''. 2009 | |||
| * Nelson, Michael. ''The Elections of 2008'' (2009), factual summary | |||
| * Sussman, Glen. "Choosing a New Direction: The Presidential Election of 2008," ''White House Studies,'' 2009, Vol. 9 Issue 1, pp 1–20 | * Sussman, Glen. "Choosing a New Direction: The Presidential Election of 2008," ''White House Studies,'' 2009, Vol. 9 Issue 1, pp 1–20 | ||
| * Wolffe, Richard. ''Renegade: The Making of a President'' (2010) , narrative | * ]. ''Renegade: The Making of a President'' (2010) {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110429113024/http://www.amazon.com/dp/0307463133/ |date=April 29, 2011 }}, narrative | ||
| ===Voters=== | ===Voters=== | ||
| * Abramson, Paul R., John H. Aldrich, and David W. Rohde. ''Change and Continuity in the 2008 Elections'' (2009) | * ], ], and ]. ''Change and Continuity in the 2008 Elections'' (2009) {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110429111607/http://www.amazon.com/dp/1604265205/ |date=April 29, 2011 }} | ||
| * Corwin E. Smidt and others. ''The Disappearing God Gap? Religion in the 2008 Presidential Election'' (Oxford University Press; 2010) 278 pages. Finds that the gap between church-attending traditionalists and other voters is not closing, as has been claimed, but is changing in significant ways; draws on survey data from voters who were interviewed in the spring of 2008 and then again after the election. | * Corwin E. Smidt and others. ''The Disappearing God Gap? Religion in the 2008 Presidential Election'' (Oxford University Press; 2010) 278 pages. Finds that the gap between church-attending traditionalists and other voters is not closing, as has been claimed, but is changing in significant ways; draws on survey data from voters who were interviewed in the spring of 2008 and then again after the election. | ||
| * Crespino, |
* ]. "The U.S. South and the 2008 Election," ''Southern Spaces'' (2008) {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200808144411/https://southernspaces.org/2008/us-south-and-2008-election/ |date=August 8, 2020 }} | ||
| * Jessee, Stephen A. "Voter Ideology and Candidate Positioning in the 2008 Presidential Election," ''American Politics Research,'' March 2010, Vol. 38 Issue 2, pp 195–210 | * Jessee, Stephen A. "Voter Ideology and Candidate Positioning in the 2008 Presidential Election," ''American Politics Research,'' March 2010, Vol. 38 Issue 2, pp 195–210 | ||
| * Kenski, Kate, Bruce W. Hardy, and Kathleen Hall Jamieson. ''The Obama Victory: How Media, Money, and Message Shaped the 2008 Election'' (Oxford University Press; 2010) 378 pages. Draws on interviews with key campaign advisors as well as the National Annenberg Election Survey. | * Kenski, Kate, Bruce W. Hardy, and ]. ''The Obama Victory: How Media, Money, and Message Shaped the 2008 Election'' (Oxford University Press; 2010) 378 pages. Draws on interviews with key campaign advisors as well as the National Annenberg Election Survey. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190828224412/https://www.amazon.com/dp/0195399560/ |date=August 28, 2019 }} | ||
| * Sabato, Larry. ''The Year of Obama: How Barack Obama Won the White House'' (2009) | * ]. ''The Year of Obama: How Barack Obama Won the White House'' (2009) | ||
| * Stempel III, Guido H. and Thomas K. Hargrove, eds. ''The 21st-Century Voter: Who Votes, How They Vote, and Why They Vote'' (2 vol. 2015). | * ] and Thomas K. Hargrove, eds. ''The 21st-Century Voter: Who Votes, How They Vote, and Why They Vote'' (2 vol. 2015). | ||
| * Todd, Chuck, and Sheldon Gawiser. ''How Barack Obama Won: A State-by-State Guide to the Historic 2008 Presidential Election'' (2009) | * ], and Sheldon Gawiser. ''How Barack Obama Won: A State-by-State Guide to the Historic 2008 Presidential Election'' (2009) {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190828224407/https://www.amazon.com/dp/030747366X/ |date=August 28, 2019 }} | ||
| {{refend}} | {{refend}} | ||
| Line 1,523: | Line 1,794: | ||
| and link back to that category using the {{dmoz}} template. | and link back to that category using the {{dmoz}} template. | ||
| ====={{No more links}}=--> | ====={{No more links}}=--> | ||
| {{Commons category |
{{Commons category}} | ||
| {{Wikinews category|2008 United States presidential election}} | {{Wikinews category|2008 United States presidential election}} | ||
| * {{Britannica|1335480|United States Presidential Election of 2008}} | |||
| * {{Curlie|Regional/North_America/United_States/Government/Elections/President/2008}} | |||
| * —from '']'' | * —from '']'' | ||
| * | * | ||
| * —Michael Sheppard, Massachusetts Institute of Technology | |||
| * | * | ||
| * | * | ||
| Line 1,535: | Line 1,803: | ||
| * Joseph Crespino, , ''Southern Spaces'', December 11, 2008. | * Joseph Crespino, , ''Southern Spaces'', December 11, 2008. | ||
| * | * | ||
| * {{cite episode|title=The Choice 2008|series=Frontline|series-link=Frontline (American TV program)|network=]|station=]|date=October 14, 2008|season=26|number=11|url=https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/documentary/choice2008/|access-date=November 28, 2024}} | |||
| {{United States presidential election, 2008}} | {{United States presidential election, 2008}} | ||
| {{2008 U.S. presidential election |
{{State results of the 2008 U.S. presidential election}} | ||
| {{United States elections, 2008}} | |||
| {{United States presidential elections}} | {{United States presidential elections}} | ||
| {{Barack Obama}} | {{Barack Obama}} | ||
| {{Joe Biden}} | {{Joe Biden}} | ||
| {{John McCain}} | {{John McCain}} | ||
| {{Sarah Palin}} | |||
| {{Use mdy dates|date=November 2013}} | {{Use mdy dates|date=November 2013}} | ||
| {{Authority control}} | {{Authority control}} | ||
| {{DEFAULTSORT:United States Presidential Election, 2008}} | |||
| ] | ] | ||
| ] | |||
| ] | ] | ||
| ] | ] | ||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | ] | ||
| ] | ] | ||
| ] | ] | ||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
Latest revision as of 20:34, 22 January 2025
For related races, see 2008 United States elections.
 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
538 members of the Electoral College 270 electoral votes needed to win | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Opinion polls | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Turnout | 61.6% 1.5 pp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg)
 2008 U.S. presidential election | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic Party | |||
| Republican Party | |||
| Minor parties | |||
| Related races | |||
| |||
Presidential elections were held in the United States on November 4, 2008. The Democratic ticket of Barack Obama, the junior senator from Illinois, and Joe Biden, the senior senator from Delaware, defeated the Republican ticket of John McCain, the senior senator from Arizona, and Sarah Palin, the governor of Alaska. Obama became the first African American to be elected to the presidency. This was the first election since 1952 in which neither the incumbent president nor vice president was on the ballot, as well as the first election since 1928 in which neither ran for the nomination.
Incumbent Republican President George W. Bush was ineligible to pursue a third term due to the term limits established by the Twenty-second Amendment. McCain secured the Republican nomination by March 2008, defeating former governors Mitt Romney, Mike Huckabee, and other challengers. The Democratic primaries were marked by a sharp contest between Obama and the initial front-runner, former first lady and Senator Hillary Clinton, as well as other challengers who dropped out before most of the primaries were held, including Senators John Edwards and Obama's future running mate, Joe Biden. Clinton's victory in the New Hampshire primary made her the first woman to win a major party's presidential primary. After a long primary season, Obama secured the Democratic nomination in June 2008.
Early campaigning focused heavily on the Iraq War and Bush's unpopularity. McCain supported the war, as well as a troop surge that had begun in 2007, while Obama strongly opposed the war. Bush endorsed McCain, but the two did not campaign together, and Bush did not appear in person at the 2008 Republican National Convention. Obama campaigned on the theme that "Washington must change", while McCain emphasized his experience. The campaign was strongly affected by the 2007–2008 financial crisis. McCain's decision to suspend his campaign during the height of the financial crisis backfired as voters viewed his response as erratic.
Obama won a decisive victory over McCain, winning the Electoral College and the popular vote by a sizable margin, including states that had not voted for the Democratic presidential candidate since 1976 (North Carolina) and 1964 (Indiana, Virginia, and Nebraska's 2nd congressional district). Obama received the largest share of the popular vote won by a Democrat since Lyndon B. Johnson in 1964 and was the first Democrat to win an outright majority of the popular vote since Jimmy Carter in 1976. Obama won every state in the Great Lakes region and flipped nine states that had voted Republican in 2004: Colorado, Florida, Indiana, Iowa, Nevada, New Mexico, North Carolina, Ohio, and Virginia, as well as Nebraska's 2nd congressional district. As of 2025, this is the most recent time a Democrat carried Indiana and North Carolina in a presidential election, as well as the most recent presidential election where any candidate received over two-thirds of the electoral vote.
Background
Further information: United States presidential election § Procedure
Article Two of the United States Constitution says that the President and Vice President of the United States must be natural-born citizens of the United States, at least 35 years old, and residents of the United States for at least 14 years. Candidates for president typically seek the nomination of a political party, in which case each party devises a method (such as a primary election) to choose a candidate for the position. Traditionally, the primaries are indirect elections where voters cast ballots for a slate of party delegates pledged to a particular candidate. The party's delegates then officially nominate a candidate to run on the party's behalf. The general election in November is also an indirect election, where voters cast ballots for a slate of members of the Electoral College; these electors in turn directly elect the president and vice president. President George W. Bush, a Republican and former Governor of Texas, was ineligible to seek reelection to a third term due to the Twenty-second Amendment; in accordance with Section 1 of the Twentieth Amendment, his term expired at noon Eastern Standard Time on January 20, 2009.
Nominations
Democratic Party nomination
Main articles: Barack Obama 2008 presidential campaign, 2008 Democratic Party presidential primaries, and 2008 Democratic National ConventionCandidate
Main article: 2008 Democratic Party presidential candidates
| ||
|---|---|---|
|
Personal
Illinois State Senator and U.S. Senator from Illinois 44th President of the United States
Tenure
Policies Appointments Presidential campaigns 
 |
||
| ||
|---|---|---|
|
Personal U.S. Senator from Delaware 47th Vice President of the United States
Vice presidential campaigns 46th President of the United States Tenure
Policies Appointments Presidential campaigns 
|
||
.jpg)
 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Barack Obama | Joe Biden | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| for President | for Vice President | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| U.S. Senator from Illinois (2005–2008) |
U.S. Senator from Delaware (1973–2009) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Campaign | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Withdrawn candidates
| Candidates in this section are sorted by popular vote from the primaries | |||||||||||
| Hillary Clinton | John Edwards | Bill Richardson | Dennis Kucinich | Joe Biden | Mike Gravel | Chris Dodd | Tom Vilsack | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 | ||||
| U.S. Senator from New York (2001–2009) |
U.S. Senator from North Carolina (1999–2005) |
30th Governor of New Mexico (2003–2011) |
U.S. Representative from Ohio (1997–2013) |
U.S. Senator from Delaware (1973–2009) |
U.S. Senator from Alaska (1969–1981) |
U.S. Senator from Connecticut (1981–2011) |
40th Governor of Iowa (1999–2007) | ||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
||||||||
| Campaign | Campaign | Campaign | Campaign | Campaign | Campaign | Campaign | Campaign | ||||
| W: June 7 17,493,836 votes |
W: Jan 30 1,009,331 votes |
W: Jan 10 106,356 votes |
W: Jan 23 104,000 votes |
W: Jan 3 81,777 votes |
W: N/A 40,263 votes |
W: Jan 3 35,284 votes |
W: Feb 23, 2007 0 votes | ||||
Before the primaries
Media speculation had begun almost immediately after the results of the 2004 presidential election were released. In the 2006 midterm elections, the Democrats regained majorities in both houses of the U.S. Congress. Early polls taken before anyone had announced a candidacy had shown Senators Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama as the most popular potential Democratic candidates. Nevertheless, the media speculated on several other candidates, including Al Gore, the runner-up in the 2000 election; John Kerry, the runner-up in the 2004 election; John Edwards, Kerry's running mate in 2004; Delaware Senator Joe Biden; New Mexico Governor Bill Richardson; Iowa Governor Tom Vilsack; and Indiana Senator Evan Bayh.
Edwards was one of the first to formally announce his candidacy for the presidency, on December 28, 2006. This run would be his second attempt at the presidency. Clinton announced intentions to run in the Democratic primaries on January 20, 2007. Obama announced his candidacy on February 10 in his home state of Illinois.
Early primaries and caucuses
Early in the year, the support for Barack Obama started to increase in the polls and he passed Clinton for the top spot in Iowa; he ended up winning the caucus in that state, with Edwards coming in second and Clinton in third. Obama's win was fueled mostly by first time caucus-goers and Independents and showed voters viewed him as the "candidate of change". Iowa has since been viewed as the state that jump-started Obama's campaign and set him on track to win both the nomination and the presidency. After the Iowa caucus, Biden and Connecticut Senator Chris Dodd withdrew from the nomination contest.
Obama became the new front runner in New Hampshire, when his poll numbers skyrocketed after his Iowa victory. The Clinton campaign was struggling after a huge loss in Iowa and no strategy beyond the early primaries and caucuses. According to The Vancouver Sun, campaign strategists had "mapped a victory scenario that envisioned the former first lady wrapping up the Democratic presidential nomination by Super Tuesday on Feb. 5." In what is considered a turning point for her campaign, Clinton had a strong performance at the Saint Anselm College, ABC, and Facebook debates several days before the New Hampshire primary as well as an emotional interview in a public broadcast live on TV. Clinton won that primary by 2% of the vote, contrary to the predictions of pollsters who consistently had her trailing Obama for a few days up to the primary date. Clinton's win was the first time a woman had ever won a major American party's presidential primary for the purposes of delegate selection.
On January 30, 2008, after placing in third in the New Hampshire and South Carolina primaries, Edwards announced that he was suspending his campaign for the presidency, but he did not initially endorse any remaining candidates.
Super Tuesday
Super Tuesday was February 5, 2008, when the largest-ever number of simultaneous state primary elections was held. Super Tuesday ended up leaving the Democrats in a virtual tie, with Obama amassing 847 delegates to Clinton's 834 from the 23 states that held Democratic primaries.
California was one of the Super Tuesday states that could provide a large number of delegates to the candidates. Obama trailed in the California polling by an average of 6.0% before the primary; he ended up losing that state by 8.3% of the vote. Some analysts cited a large Latino turnout that voted for Clinton as the deciding factor.
The Louisiana, Nebraska, Hawaii, Wisconsin, U.S. Virgin Islands, the District of Columbia, Maryland, and Virginia primaries and the Washington and Maine caucuses all took place after Super Tuesday in February. Obama won all of them, giving him 10 consecutive victories after Super Tuesday.
Ohio, Texas, and Pennsylvania
On March 4, Hillary Clinton carried Ohio and Rhode Island in the Democratic primaries; some considered these wins, especially Ohio, a "surprise upset" by 10%, although she did lead in the polling averages in both states. She also carried the primary in Texas, but Obama won the Texas caucuses held the same day and netted more delegates from the state than Clinton.
Only one state held a primary in April. This was Pennsylvania, on April 22. Although Obama made a strong effort to win Pennsylvania, Hillary Clinton won that primary by nearly 10%, with approximately 55% of the vote. Obama had outspent Clinton three to one in Pennsylvania, but his comment at a San Francisco fundraiser that small-town Americans "cling" to guns and religion drew sharp criticism from the Clinton campaign and may have hurt his chances in the Keystone State. In addition, Clinton had several advantages in Pennsylvania. Throughout the primary process, she relied on the support of older, white, working class voters. Pennsylvania held a closed primary, which means that only registered Democrats could vote, and, according to Ron Elving of NPR, the established Democratic electorate "was older, whiter, more Catholic and more working-class than in most of the primaries to date." After Pennsylvania, Obama had a higher number of delegates and popular votes than Clinton did and was still in a stronger position to win the nomination. Clinton, however, had received the endorsement of more superdelegates than Obama.
Indiana and North Carolina
On May 6, North Carolina and Indiana held their Democratic presidential primaries. Clinton and Obama campaigned aggressively there before the voting took place. Polling had shown Obama a few points ahead in North Carolina and Clinton similarly leading in Indiana. In the actual results, Obama outperformed the polls by several points in both states, winning by a significant margin in North Carolina and losing by only 1.1% in Indiana (50.56% to 49.44%). After these primaries, most pundits declared that it had become "increasingly improbable," if not impossible, for Clinton to win the nomination. The small win in Indiana barely kept her campaign alive for the next month. Although she did manage to win the majority of the remaining primaries and delegates, it was not enough to overcome Obama's substantial delegate lead.
Florida and Michigan
During late 2007, the two parties adopted rules against states' moving their primaries to an earlier date in the year. For the Republicans, the penalty for this violation was supposed to be the loss of half the state party's delegates to the convention. The Democratic penalty was the complete exclusion from the national convention of delegates from states that broke these rules. The Democratic Party allowed only four states to hold elections before February 5, 2008. Clinton won a majority of delegates and popular votes from both states (though 40% voted uncommitted in Michigan) and subsequently led a fight to seat all the Florida and Michigan delegates.
There was some speculation that the fight over the delegates could last until the convention in August. On May 31, 2008, the Rules and Bylaws Committee of the Democratic Party reached a compromise on the Florida and Michigan delegate situation. The committee decided to seat delegates from Michigan and Florida at the convention in August, but to only award each a half-vote.
Clinching the nomination
The major political party nomination process (technically) continues through June of an election year. In previous cycles, the candidates were effectively chosen by the end of the primaries held in March, but, in this cycle, Barack Obama did not win enough delegates to secure the nomination until June 3, after a 17-month campaign against Hillary Clinton. He had a wide lead in states won, while Clinton had won majorities in several of the larger states. Now, because a form of proportional representation and popular vote decided Democratic state delegate contests, numbers were close between Clinton and Obama. By May, Clinton claimed to hold a lead in the popular vote, but the Associated Press found that her numbers were "accurate only" in one close scenario.
In June, after the last of the primaries had taken place, Obama secured the Democratic nomination for president, with the help of multiple super delegate endorsements (most of the super delegates had refused to declare their support for either candidate until the primaries were completed). He was the first African American to win the nomination of a major political party in the United States. For several days, Clinton refused to concede the race, although she signaled her presidential campaign was ending in a post-primary speech on June 3 in her home state of New York. She finally conceded the nomination to Obama on June 7. She pledged her full support to the presumptive nominee and vowed to do everything she could to help him get elected.
Republican Party nomination
Main articles: John McCain 2008 presidential campaign, 2008 Republican Party presidential primaries, and 2008 Republican National ConventionNot only was the 2008 election the first time since 1952 that neither the incumbent president nor the incumbent vice president was a candidate in the general election, but it was also the first time since the 1928 election that neither sought his party's nomination for president; as Bush was term-limited from seeking another nomination, the unique aspect was Vice President Cheney's decision not to seek the Republican nomination. The 2008 election was also the third presidential election since 1896 in which neither the incumbent president, the incumbent vice president, nor a current or former member of the incumbent president's Cabinet won the nomination of either major party the others being 1920 and 1952. With no members of the Bush administration emerging as major contenders for the Republican nomination, the Republican race was as open as the Democratic race.
Candidate
Main article: 2008 Republican Party presidential candidates
| ||
|---|---|---|
|
||
  | ||
| ||
|---|---|---|
|
 |
||
_(cropped).jpg)
 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| John McCain | Sarah Palin | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| for President | for Vice President | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
.jpg) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| U.S. Senator from Arizona (1987–2018) |
9th Governor of Alaska (2006–2009) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Campaign | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Withdrawn candidates
| Candidates in this section are sorted by popular vote from the primaries | ||||
| Mitt Romney | Mike Huckabee | Ron Paul | Rudy Giuliani | Fred Thompson |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 |
 |
 |
.jpg) |
 |
| 70th Governor of Massachusetts (2003–2007) |
44th Governor of Arkansas (1996–2007) |
U.S. Representative from Texas (1996–2013) |
107th Mayor of New York City (1994–2001) |
U.S. Senator from Tennessee (1994–2003) |
 |
 |
 | ||
| Campaign | Campaign | Campaign | Campaign | Campaign |
| W: Feb 7 4,699,788 votes |
W: March 4 4,276,046 votes |
W: June 12 1,160,403 votes |
W: Jan 30 597,518 votes |
W: Jan 22 292,752 votes |
| Alan Keyes | Duncan Hunter | Tom Tancredo | Sam Brownback | Jim Gilmore |
.jpg) |
 |
 |
 |
_(cropped).jpg) |
| 16th Assistant Secretary of State for IOA (1985–1987) |
U.S. Representative from California (1981–2009) |
U.S. Representative from Colorado (1999–2009) |
U.S. Senator from Kansas (1996–2011) |
68th Governor of Virginia (1998–2002) |
 |
 |
 |
||
| Campaign | Campaign | Campaign | Campaign | Campaign |
| W: April 15 59,636 votes |
W: Jan 19 39,883 votes |
W: Jan 10 8,595 votes |
W: Oct 18, 2007 2,838 votes |
W: July 14, 2007 0 votes |
Before the primaries
Immediately after the 2006 midterm elections, media pundits began speculating, as they did about the Democrats, about potential Republican candidates for president in 2008. In November 2006, former New York City Mayor Rudolph Giuliani led in the polls, followed closely by Arizona Senator John McCain. The media speculated that Giuliani's pro-choice stance on abortion and McCain's age and support of the unpopular Iraq War would be detriments to their candidacies. Giuliani remained the frontrunner in the polls throughout most of 2007, with McCain and former Tennessee Senator Fred Thompson fighting for second place. Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee, Giuliani, former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney, and Texas Representative Ron Paul announced their candidacies on January 28, February 5, February 13, and March 12, respectively. McCain officially announced his candidacy on March 1, 2007, after several informal announcements. In the third quarter of 2007, the top four GOP (Republican) fundraisers were Romney, Giuliani, Thompson, and Ron Paul. MSNBC's Chuck Todd christened Giuliani and John McCain the front runners after the second Republican presidential debate in early 2007.
Early primaries/caucuses
Huckabee, winner of Iowa, had little to no money and hoped for at least a third-place finish in New Hampshire. McCain eventually displaced Rudy Giuliani and Romney as the front runner in New Hampshire. McCain staged a turnaround victory, having been written off by the pundits and polling in single digits less than a month before the race.
With the Republicans stripping Michigan and Florida of half their delegates for moving their primaries into January 2008 against party rules, the race for the nomination was based there. McCain meanwhile managed a small victory over Huckabee in South Carolina, setting him up for a larger and more important victory over Romney in Florida, which held a closed primary on January 29. By this time, after several scandals, no success in the early primaries, and a third-place finish in Florida, Giuliani conceded the nomination and endorsed John McCain the next day.
Super Tuesday
McCain was also endorsed in February by California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger before the California primary took place on Super Tuesday. This gave him a significant boost in the polls for the state's primary, which awarded the greatest number of delegates of all the states. On Super Tuesday, McCain won his home state of Arizona, taking all 53 delegates. He also won nearly all of California's 173 delegates, the largest of the Super Tuesday prizes. McCain also scored wins in seven other states, picking up 574 delegates. Huckabee was the "surprise performer", winning 5 states and 218 delegates. Romney won 7 states and 231 delegates. Two days later, Romney suspended his presidential campaign, saying that if he stayed in the race, he would "forestall the launch of a national campaign and be making it easier for Senator Clinton or Obama to win". His departure left Huckabee and Paul as McCain's only major challengers in the remaining primaries and caucuses. Romney endorsed McCain on February 14.
Louisiana, the District of Columbia, Kansas, Wisconsin, and Washington held primaries in February after Super Tuesday. Despite McCain picking up big victories, Huckabee won Louisiana and Kansas. McCain narrowly carried the Washington caucuses over Huckabee and Paul, who amassed a large showing. The Virgin Islands and Puerto Rico closed February for the Republicans. After Super Tuesday, John McCain had become the clear front runner, but by the end of February, he still had not acquired enough delegates to secure the nomination. In March, John McCain clinched the Republican nomination after sweeping all four primaries, Texas, Ohio, Vermont, and Rhode Island, putting him over the top of the 1,191 delegates required to win the GOP nomination. Mike Huckabee then conceded the race to McCain, leaving Ron Paul, who had just 16 delegates, as his only remaining opponent. Romney would eventually become the Republican presidential nominee 4 years later, which he then lost to Barack Obama.
Third party and other nominations
Main article: Third-party and independent candidates for the 2008 United States presidential electionAlong with the Democratic and Republican parties, three other parties nominated candidates with ballot access in enough states to win the minimum 270 electoral votes needed to win the election. These were the Constitution Party, the Green Party, and the Libertarian Party. In addition, independent candidate Ralph Nader ran his own campaign.
The Constitution Party nominated writer, pastor, and conservative talk show host Chuck Baldwin for president, and attorney Darrell Castle from Tennessee for vice president. While campaigning, Baldwin voiced his opposition to the Iraq War, the Sixteenth Amendment, Roe v. Wade, the IRS, and the Federal Reserve.
The Green Party nominated former Democratic representative Cynthia McKinney from Georgia for president, and political activist Rosa Clemente from New York for vice president. McKinney campaigned on a platform that supported single-payer universal health care, the withdrawal of American troops from Iraq and Afghanistan, reparations for African Americans, and the creation of a Department of Peace.
The Libertarian Party nominated former Republican representative Bob Barr from Georgia for president, and his former rival for the Libertarian nomination Wayne Allyn Root from Nevada, for vice president. During the 2008 presidential campaign, Barr advocated a reworking or abolition of the income tax and opposed the war in Iraq and the Patriot Act.
Candidates gallery
-
Independent:
Attorney
Ralph Nader
from Connecticut
(campaign) -
Libertarian Party:
Former Representative
Bob Barr
from Georgia
(campaign) -
Constitution Party:
Former Pastor
Chuck Baldwin
from Florida
(campaign) -
Green Party:
Former Representative
Cynthia McKinney
from Georgia
(campaign)
Party conventions
Denver
Saint Paul
Kansas City
Chicagoclass=notpageimage| Sites of the 2008 National Party Conventions
- April 23–26, 2008: 2008 Constitution Party National Convention held in Kansas City, Missouri.
- May 23–26, 2008: 2008 Libertarian National Convention, held in Denver, Colorado.
- July 10–13, 2008: 2008 Green Party National Convention, held in Chicago, Illinois.
- August 25–28, 2008: 2008 Democratic National Convention, held in Denver, Colorado.
- September 1–4, 2008: 2008 Republican National Convention, held in Saint Paul, Minnesota.
General election campaign
Issues
Iraq
Until the onset of the 2007–2008 financial crisis, the unpopular Iraq War was a key issue during the campaign. John McCain supported the war while Barack Obama opposed it (Obama's early and strong opposition to the war helped him stand out against the other Democratic candidates during the primaries, as well as stand out to a war-weary electorate during the general campaign). Though McCain meant it as a peacetime presence like the United States maintained in Germany and Japan after World War II, his statement that the United States could be in Iraq for as much as the next 50 to 100 years would prove costly. Obama used it against him as part of his strategy to tie him to the unpopular President Bush.
John McCain's support for the troop 'surge' employed by General David Petraeus, which was one of several factors credited with improving the security situation in Iraq, may have boosted McCain's stance on the issue in voters' minds. McCain (who supported the invasion) argued that his support for the successful surge showed his superior judgment. However, Obama was quick to remind voters that there would have been no need for a "surge" had there been no war at all, thus questioning McCain's judgment.
Bush's unpopularity
George W. Bush had become increasingly unpopular among Americans by late 2005 due in part by the growing unpopularity of the Iraq War domestically and internationally, as well as Bush's handling of the 2007–2008 financial crisis and Hurricane Katrina in 2005. By the time Obama was elected as President of the United States on November 4, 2008, Bush's approval rating was in the low to mid 20s and his disapproval grew increasingly significant, being in the high 60s, and even low 70s in some polls. Polls consistently showed that his approval ratings among American voters had averaged around 30 percent. In March 2008, Bush endorsed McCain at the White House, but did not make a single appearance for McCain during the campaign. Bush appeared at the 2008 GOP convention only through a live video broadcast. He chose not to appear in person due to disaster events in the Gulf of Mexico in the aftermath of Hurricane Gustav. Although he supported the war in Iraq, McCain made an effort to show that he had disagreed with Bush on many other key issues such as climate change. During the entire general election campaign, Obama countered by pointing out in ads and at numerous campaign rallies that McCain had claimed in an interview that he voted with Bush 90% of the time, and congressional voting records supported this for the years Bush was in office.
Age issue
 | This section needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources in this section. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Find sources: "2008 United States presidential election" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (November 2017) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
Similar to Senator Bob Dole's 1996 presidential campaign, one of the more widely leveled charges against McCain was the issue of his age—he turned 72 in August and there was widespread concern about the idea of electing a man who would be 80 years old if he completed two full terms in office (the oldest president, Ronald Reagan, had been a month shy of 78 when he left office in January 1989). In addition, McCain suffered from the ill effects of his captivity in North Vietnam and reportedly had difficulty lifting his arms above his head. His age in particular was considered a liability against the youthful Senator Obama, who was the first Generation Xer to run for president on a major party ticket. McCain for comparison was born before World War II and belonged to the Silent Generation. Much like Bob Dole, McCain attempted to counter these charges by releasing all of his medical records, something Obama did not do. McCain's wife Cindy dismissed concerns about his health by arguing that "We went hiking the Grand Canyon last summer and did great and had no trouble keeping up with us." McCain also appeared at several campaign stops with his still-active 95-year-old mother. In a speech on the House floor, Pennsylvania Congressman John Murtha criticized McCain's age by saying "Seven presidents have come and gone since I've been in Congress, and I saw the toll the job took on each one of them." If elected, McCain would have been the first president born in the 1930s. McCain ultimately died in 2018, just one year after the completion of Obama's second term.
Like the Clinton campaign in 1996, Obama avoided discussing McCain's age directly, instead preferring to simply call his ideas and message "old" and "old hat". He also made a strong appeal to youth voters and back during his primary contest with Hillary Clinton, had stated "When I watched the feud between the Clintons and unfold during the 1990s, I was reminded of old quarrels started on college campuses long ago. It's time for a new generation to take over." Obama's active use of a Blackberry and other modern technology also stood in contrast to the Arizona Senator's admission that he did not use a computer or a cell phone. McCain's service in Vietnam, while marketable to baby boomers, was referred to as "unimportant" to younger voters.
Obama promised "universal health care, full employment, a green America, and an America respected instead of feared by its enemies".
Polls regularly found the general electorate as a whole divided more evenly between 'change' and 'experience' as candidate qualities than the Democratic primary electorate, which split in favor of 'change' by a nearly 2–1 margin. Advantages for McCain and Obama on experience and the ability to bring change, respectively, remained steady through the November 4 election. However, final pre-election polling found that voters considered Obama's inexperience less of an impediment than McCain's association with sitting president George W. Bush, an association which was rhetorically framed by the Obama campaign throughout the election season as "more of the same".
McCain appeared to undercut his line of attack by picking first-term Alaska governor Sarah Palin to be his running mate. Palin had been governor only since 2006, and before that had been a council member and mayor of Wasilla. The choice of Palin was controversial; however, it appeared to solve two pressing concerns—McCain's age and health (since a youthful vice president would succeed him to office if he died or became incapacitated) and appealing to right-wing conservatives, a group that had been comparatively unmoved by McCain. Palin also came off as more down-to-earth and relatable to average Americans than McCain, widely criticized as a "Beltway insider". However, media interviews suggested that Palin lacked knowledge on certain key issues, and they cast doubt among many voters about her qualifications to be vice president or president. In this regard, her inexperience was also a liability when McCain's age and health were factored in—there was a higher-than-normal probability of Palin succeeding to the presidency. "One 72-year-old heartbeat away from the presidency" became a popular anti-GOP slogan. She also came under attack on everything from her 17-year-old daughter giving birth to a child out of wedlock to actively participating in hunting moose and other animals. Because of Palin's conservative views, there was also concern that she would alienate independents and moderates, two groups that pundits observed McCain would need to win the election.
Economy
Polls taken in the last few months of the presidential campaign and exit polls conducted on Election Day showed the economy as the top concern for voters. In the fall of 2008, many news sources were reporting that the economy was suffering its most serious downturn since the Great Depression. During this period, John McCain's election prospects fell with several politically costly comments about the economy.
On August 20, John McCain said in an interview with Politico that he was uncertain how many houses he and his wife, Cindy, owned; "I think—I'll have my staff get to you," he told the media outlet. Both on the stump and in Obama's political ad, "Seven", the gaffe was used to portray McCain as somebody unable to relate to the concerns of ordinary Americans. This out-of-touch image was further cultivated when, on September 15, the day of the Lehman Brothers bankruptcy, at a morning rally in Jacksonville, Florida, McCain declared that "the fundamentals of our economy are strong," despite what he described as "tremendous turmoil in our financial markets and Wall Street." With the perception among voters to the contrary, the comment appeared to cost McCain politically.
On September 24, 2008, after the onset of the 2007–2008 financial crisis, McCain announced that he was suspending his campaign to return to Washington so he could help craft a $700 billion bailout package for the troubled financial industry, and he stated that he would not debate Obama until Congress passed the bailout bill. Despite this decision, McCain was portrayed as somebody not playing a significant role in the negotiations for the first version of the bill, which fell short of passage in the House. He eventually decided to attend the first presidential debate on September 26, despite Congress' lack of immediate action on the bill. His ineffectiveness in the negotiations and his reversal in decision to attend the debates were seized upon to portray McCain as erratic in his response to the economy. Days later, a second version of the original bailout bill was passed by both the House and Senate, with Obama, his vice presidential running mate Joe Biden, and McCain all voting for the measure (Hillary Clinton would as well).
All the aforementioned remarks and campaign issues hurt McCain's standing with voters. All these also occurred after the onset of the 2007–2008 financial crisis and after McCain's poll numbers had started to fall. Although sound bites of all of these "missteps" were played repeatedly on national television, many pundits and analysts say that the actual financial crisis and economic conditions caused McCain's large drop in support in mid-September and severely damaged his campaign.
Health care
John McCain's proposals focused on open-market competition rather than government funding or control. At the heart of his plan were tax credits – $2,500 for individuals and $5,000 for families who do not subscribe to or do not have access to health care through their employer. To help people who are denied coverage by insurance companies due to pre-existing conditions, McCain proposed working with states to create what he calls a "Guaranteed Access Plan".
Barack Obama called for universal health care. His health care plan proposed creating a National Health Insurance Exchange that would include both private insurance plans and a Medicare-like government run option. Coverage would be guaranteed regardless of health status, and premiums would not vary based on health status either. It would have required parents to cover their children, but did not require adults to buy insurance.
Critics of McCain's plan argued that it would not significantly reduce the number of uninsured Americans, would increase costs, reduce consumer protections and lead to less generous benefit packages. Critics of Obama's plan argued that it would increase federal regulation of private health insurance without addressing the underlying incentives behind rising health care spending. Mark Pauly suggested that a combination of the two approaches would work better than either one alone.
A poll released in early November 2008 found that voters supporting Obama listed health care as their second priority; voters supporting McCain listed it as fourth, tied with the war in Iraq. Affordability was the primary health care priority among both sets of voters. Obama voters were more likely than McCain voters to believe government can do much about health care costs.
Presidential debates
Main article: 2008 United States presidential debatesThe United States presidential election of 2008 was sponsored by the Commission on Presidential Debates (CPD), a bipartisan organization that sponsored four debates that occurred at various locations around the United States (U.S.) in September and October 2008. Three of the debates involved the presidential nominees, and one involved the vice-presidential nominees.
| No. | Date | Time | Host | City | Moderators | Participants | Viewership (millions) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P1 | Friday, September 26, 2008 | 9:00 pm EDT | University of Mississippi | Oxford, Mississippi | Jim Lehrer | Senator Barack Obama Senator John McCain |
52.4 |
| VP | Friday, October 3, 2008 | 9:00 pm EDT | Washington University in St. Louis | St. Louis, Missouri | Gwen Ifill | Senator Joe Biden Governor Sarah Palin |
69.9 |
| P2 | Tuesday, October 7, 2008 | 9:00 pm EDT | Belmont University | Nashville, Tennessee | Tom Brokaw | Senator Barack Obama Senator John McCain |
63.2 |
| P3 | Wednesday, October 15, 2008 | 9:00 pm EDT | Hofstra University | Hempstead, New York | Bob Schieffer | Senator Barack Obama Senator John McCain |
56.5 |
University of MississippiOxford, MS
Belmont UniversityNashville, TN
Washington UniversitySt. Louis, MO
Hofstra UniversityHempstead, NYclass=notpageimage| Sites of the 2008 general election debates
Another debate was sponsored by the Columbia University political union and took place there on October 19. All candidates who could theoretically win the 270 electoral votes needed to win the election were invited, and Ralph Nader, Cynthia McKinney, and Chuck Baldwin agreed to attend. Amy Goodman, principal host of Democracy Now!, moderated. It was broadcast on cable by C-SPAN and on the Internet by Break-the-Matrix.
Campaign costs
Main article: Fundraising for the 2008 United States presidential electionThe reported cost of campaigning for president has increased significantly in recent years. One source reported that if the costs for both Democratic and Republican campaigns were added together (for the presidential primary election, general election, and the political conventions), the costs have more than doubled in only eight years ($448.9 million in 1996, $649.5 million in 2000, and $1.01 billion in 2004). In January 2007, Federal Election Commission Chairman Michael E. Toner estimated that the 2008 race would be a $1 billion election, and that to be taken seriously, a candidate would have needed to raise at least $100 million by the end of 2007.
Expense summary
According to required campaign filings as reported by the Federal Election Commission (FEC), 148 candidates for all parties collectively raised $1,644,712,232 and spent $1,601,104,696 for the primary and general campaigns combined through November 24, 2008. The amounts raised and spent by the major candidates, according to the same source, were as follows:
| Candidate (party) | Amount raised | Amount spent | Votes | Average spent per vote |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barack Obama (D) | $778,642,962 | $760,370,195 | 69,498,516 | $10.94 |
| John McCain (R) | $379,006,485 | $346,666,422 | 59,948,323 | $5.78 |
| Ralph Nader (I) | $4,496,180 | $4,187,628 | 739,034 | $5.67 |
| Bob Barr (L) | $1,383,681 | $1,345,202 | 523,715 | $2.57 |
| Chuck Baldwin (C) | $261,673 | $234,309 | 199,750 | $1.17 |
| Cynthia McKinney (G) | $240,130 | $238,968 | 161,797 | $1.48 |
| Excludes spending by independent expenditure concerns. Source: Federal Election Commission | ||||
Notable expressions and phrases
- Drill, baby, drill: Republican self-described energy policy
- Yes We Can: Obama's campaign slogan
- That one: McCain's reference to Obama during the 2nd debate.
- Lipstick on a pig: Obama used this phrase to insinuate that any changes that McCain was advocating from the policies of George W. Bush would only be slight modifications of Bush's policies but the underlying policies would be the same, and in Obama's opinion, bad. Some called it sexist, claiming it was a reference to Sarah Palin, who cracked a joke during the Republican convention that the only difference between a hockey mom and a pit bull is lipstick.
Electoral College forecasts
Elections analysts and political pundits issue probabilistic forecasts of the composition of the Electoral College. These forecasts use a variety of factors to estimate the likelihood of each candidate winning the Electoral College electors for that state. Most election predictors use the following ratings:
- "tossup": no advantage
- "tilt" (used by some predictors): advantage that is not quite as strong as "lean"
- "lean" or "leans": slight advantage
- "likely": significant, but surmountable, advantage
- "safe" or "solid": near-certain chance of victory
Below is a list of states considered by one or more forecast to be competitive; states that are deemed to be "safe" or "solid" by forecasters The Cook Political Report, RealClearPolitics, and FiveThirtyEight.
| State | EVs | RealClearPolitics November 4, 2008 |
538 November 4, 2008 |
Cook Political Report November 4, 2008 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arkansas | 11 | Lean R | Safe R | Safe R |
| Arizona | 10 | Lean R | Tossup | Safe R |
| Colorado | 9 | Lean D (flip) | Lean D (flip) | Safe D (flip) |
| Georgia | 15 | Tossup | Tossup | Lean R |
| Florida | 27 | Tossup | Tossup | Lean D (flip) |
| Iowa | 7 | Safe D (flip) | Lean D (flip) | Safe D (flip) |
| Indiana | 11 | Tossup | Tossup | Lean R |
| Michigan | 17 | Safe D | Lean D | Safe D |
| Minnesota | 10 | Safe D | Lean D | Safe D |
| Montana | 3 | Tossup | Tossup | Tossup |
| Missouri | 11 | Lean R | Solid R | Safe R |
| Nevada | 5 | Lean D (flip) | Lean D (flip) | Lean D (flip) |
| New Mexico | 5 | Lean D (flip) | Lean D (flip) | Safe D (flip) |
| North Dakota | 3 | Tossup | Tossup | Safe R |
| North Carolina | 15 | Tossup | Tossup | Tossup |
| Ohio | 20 | Tossup | Tossup | Lean D (flip) |
| Pennsylvania | 21 | Lean D | Lean D | Lean D |
| South Dakota | 3 | Lean R | Tossup | Safe R |
| West Virginia | 5 | Lean R | Lean R | Lean R |
| Virginia | 13 | Tossup | Lean D (flip) | Lean D (flip) |
Internet campaigns
Fundraising
See also: Grassroots fundraisingHoward Dean collected large contributions through the Internet in his 2004 primary run. In 2008, candidates went even further to reach out to Internet users through their own sites and such sites as YouTube, MySpace, and Facebook.
On December 16, 2007, Ron Paul collected $6 million, more money on a single day through Internet donations than any presidential candidate in US history.
Promotion
Not only did the Internet allow candidates to raise money, but also it gave them a tool to appeal to newer and younger demographics. Political pundits were now evaluating candidates based on their social media following. Senator Barack Obama's victory is credited to his competitive edge in social media and Internet following. Obama had over 2 million American supporters on Facebook and 100,000 followers on Twitter, while McCain attracted only 600,000 Facebook supporters (likes) and 4,600 followers on Twitter. Obama's YouTube channel held 115,000 subscribers and more than 97 million video views. Obama had maintained a similar advantage over Senator Hillary Clinton in the Democratic primary.
Obama's edge in social media was crucial to the election outcome. According to a study by the Pew Internet and American Life project, 35 percent of Americans relied on online video for election news. Ten percent of Americans used social networking sites to learn about the election. The 2008 election showed huge increases in Internet use.
Another study done after the election gave a lot of insight on young voters. Thirty-seven percent of Americans ages 18–24 got election news from social networking sites. Almost a quarter of Americans saw something about the election in an online video. YouTube and other online video outlets allowed candidates to advertise in ways like never before. The Republican Party in particular was criticized for not adequately using social media and other means to reach young voters.
Anonymous and semi-anonymous smear campaigns, traditionally done with fliers and push calling, also spread to the Internet. Organizations specializing in the production and distribution of viral material, such as Brave New Films, emerged; such organizations have been said to be having a growing influence on American politics.
Controversies
Voter suppression allegations
Allegations of voter list purges using unlawful criteria caused controversy in at least six swing states: Colorado, Indiana, Ohio, Michigan, Nevada and North Carolina. On October 5, 2008, the Republican Lt. Governor of Montana, John Bohlinger, accused the Montana Republican Party of vote caging to purge 6,000 voters from three counties which trend Democratic. Allegations arose in Michigan that the Republican Party planned to challenge the eligibility of voters based on lists of foreclosed homes. The campaign of Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama filed a lawsuit challenging this. The House Judiciary Committee wrote to the Department of Justice requesting an investigation.
Libertarian candidate Bob Barr filed a lawsuit in Texas to have Obama and McCain removed from the ballot in that state. His campaign alleged that both of the candidates had missed the August 26 deadline to file and had been included on the ballot in violation of Texas election law. Neither Obama nor McCain had been confirmed as the candidate of their respective parties at the time of the deadline. The Texas Supreme Court dismissed the lawsuit without explanation.
In Ohio, identified by both parties as a key state, allegations surfaced from both Republicans and Democrats that individuals from out of state were moving to the state temporarily and attempting to vote despite not meeting the state's requirement of permanent residency for more than 29 days. The Franklin County Board of Elections referred 55 cases of possible voting irregularities to the local prosecutor. Three groups attracted particular notice: 'Vote from Home,' 'Vote Today Ohio,' and 'Drop Everything and Come to Ohio.' Vote from Home attracted the most attention when thirteen of the group's members moved to the same location in eastern Columbus. Members of the group organized by Marc Gustafson, including several Marshall and Rhodes scholars studying at Oxford University, settled with Franklin County Prosecutor Ron O'Brien to have their challenged ballots withdrawn. The Obama campaign and others alleged that members of the McCain campaign had also voted without properly establishing residency. Since 1953, only six people in Ohio have gone to prison for illegal voting.
Media bias
Republicans and independents leveled significant criticism at media outlets' coverage of the presidential election season. An October 22, 2008 Pew Research Center poll estimated 70% of registered voters believed journalists wanted Barack Obama to win the election, as opposed to 9% for John McCain. Another Pew survey, conducted after the election, found that 67% of voters thought that the press fairly covered Obama, versus 30% who viewed the coverage as unfair. Regarding McCain, 53% of voters viewed his press coverage as fair versus 44% who characterized it as unfair. Among affiliated Democrats, 83% believed the press fairly covered Obama; just 22% of Republicans thought the press was fair to McCain.
At the February debate, Tim Russert of NBC News was criticized for what some perceived as disproportionately tough questioning of Democratic presidential contender Hillary Clinton. Among the questions, Russert had asked Clinton, but not Obama, to provide the name of the new Russian President (Dmitry Medvedev). This was later parodied on Saturday Night Live. In October 2007, liberal commentators accused Russert of harassing Clinton over the issue of supporting drivers' licenses for illegal immigrants.
On April 16, ABC News hosted a debate in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Moderators Charles Gibson and George Stephanopoulos were criticized by viewers, bloggers and media critics for the poor quality of their questions. Many viewers said they considered some of the questions irrelevant when measured against the importance of the faltering economy or the Iraq War. Included in that category were continued questions about Obama's former pastor, Senator Hillary Clinton's assertion that she had to duck sniper fire in Bosnia more than a decade ago, and Senator Obama's not wearing an American flag pin. The moderators focused on campaign gaffes and some believed they focused too much on Obama. Stephanopoulos defended their performance, saying "Senator Obama was the front-runner" and the questions were "not inappropriate or irrelevant at all."
In an op-ed published on April 27, 2008, in The New York Times, Elizabeth Edwards wrote that the media covered much more of "the rancor of the campaign" and "amount of money spent" than "the candidates' priorities, policies and principles." Author Erica Jong commented that "our press has become a sea of triviality, meanness and irrelevant chatter." A Gallup poll released on May 29, 2008, also estimated that more Americans felt the media was being harder on Hillary Clinton than they were towards Barack Obama. Time magazine columnist Mark Halperin stated that the media during the 2008 election had a "blind, almost slavish" worship of Obama.
The Project for Excellence in Journalism and Harvard University's Joan Shorenstein Center on the Press, Politics and Public Policy conducted a study of 5,374 media narratives and assertions about the presidential candidates from January 1 through March 9, 2008. The study found that Obama received 69% favorable coverage and Clinton received 67%, compared to only 43% favorable media coverage of McCain. Another study by the Center for Media and Public Affairs at George Mason University found the media coverage of Obama to be 72% negative from June 8 to July 21 compared to 57% negative for McCain. An October 29 study found 29% of stories about Obama to be negative, compared to 57% of stories about McCain being negative.
Timeline
Main article: Timeline of the 2008 United States presidential electionConduct
Election Day was on November 4, 2008. The majority of states allowed early voting, with all states allowing some form of absentee voting. Voters cast votes for listed presidential candidates but were actually selecting representatives for their state's Electoral College slate.
A McCain victory quickly became improbable as Obama amassed early wins in his home state of Illinois, the Northeast, and the critical battleground states of Ohio (which no Republican has ever been elected president without winning) and Pennsylvania by 9:30 pm Eastern Standard Time. Obama won the entire Northeast by comfortable margins and the Great Lakes states of Michigan, Wisconsin, and Minnesota by double digits. McCain held on to traditionally Republican states like North Dakota, South Dakota, Nebraska (though notably, Obama did win an electoral vote from Nebraska's 2nd congressional district), Kansas, Oklahoma, Montana, Utah, Idaho, Wyoming, and his home state of Arizona. Out of the southern states, Obama won Florida, North Carolina, Delaware, Maryland, and Virginia. Obama also won the hotly contested states of Iowa and New Mexico, which Al Gore had won in 2000 and George W. Bush in 2004. Also, for only the second time since 1936 (1964 being the other), Indiana went Democratic, giving Obama all eight Great Lakes states, the first time a presidential candidate had won all of them since Richard Nixon in 1972.
CNN and Fox News called Virginia for Obama shortly before 11:00 pm, leaving him only 50 electoral votes shy of victory with only six West Coast states (California, Oregon, Washington, Idaho, Alaska, and Hawaii) still voting. All American networks called the election in favor of Obama at 11:00 pm as the polls closed on the West Coast. Obama was immediately declared the winner in California, Oregon, Washington, and Hawaii, McCain won Idaho, and the Electoral College totals were updated to 297 for Obama and 146 for McCain (270 are needed to win). McCain gave a concession speech half an hour later in his hometown of Phoenix, Arizona. Obama appeared just before midnight Eastern Time in Grant Park, Chicago, in front of a crowd of 250,000 people to deliver his victory speech.
Following Obama's speech, spontaneous street parties broke out in cities across the United States including Philadelphia, Houston, Las Vegas, Miami, Chicago, Columbus, Detroit, Boston, Los Angeles, Portland, Washington, D.C., San Francisco, Denver, Atlanta, Madison, and New York City and around the world in London; Bonn; Berlin; Obama, Japan; Toronto; Rio de Janeiro; Sydney; and Nairobi.
Later on election night, after Obama was named the winner, he picked up several more wins in swing states in which the polls had shown a close race. These included Florida, Indiana, Virginia, and the western states of Colorado and Nevada. All of these states had been carried by Bush in 2004. North Carolina and the bellwether state of Missouri remained undecided for several days. Eventually Obama was declared the winner in North Carolina and McCain in Missouri, with Obama pulling out a rare win in Nebraska's 2nd congressional district. This put the projected electoral vote count at 365 for Obama and 173 for McCain. Obama's victories in the populous swing states of Florida, Ohio, Pennsylvania, North Carolina, and Virginia contributed to his decisive win. The presidential electors cast their ballots for president and vice president, and Congress tallied these votes on January 8, 2009.
Turnout
The voter turnout for this election was broadly predicted to be high by American standards, and a record number of votes were cast. The final tally of total votes counted was 131.3 million, compared to 122.3 million in 2004 (which also boasted the highest record since 1968, the last presidential election before the voting age was lowered to 18). Expressed as a percentage of eligible voters, 131.2 million votes could reflect a turnout as high as 63.0% of eligible voters, which would be the highest since 1960. This 63.0% turnout rate is based on an estimated eligible voter population of 208,323,000. Another estimate puts the eligible voter population at 213,313,508, resulting in a turnout rate of 61.6%, which would be the highest turnout rate since 1968.
Broken down by age group, voters under 35 voted for Obama by a large majority with McCain most popular among voters over 60. Voters between 35 and 59 were nearly split 50/50 between the two candidates.
American University's Center for the Study of the American Electorate released a report on November 6, 2008, two days after the election, which concluded that the anticipated increase in turnout had failed to materialize. That report was the basis for some news articles that indicated voter turnout failed to meet expectations. When the remaining votes were counted after the release of the report, the total number of votes cast in the presidential election was raised to 131.2 million, which surpassed the American University report's preliminary estimate of 126.5 to 128.5 million voters by a factor of between 2% and 4%.
The election saw increased participation from African Americans, who made up 13.0% of the electorate, versus 11.1% in 2004. According to exit polls, over 95% of African Americans voted for Obama. This played a critical role in Southern states such as North Carolina. 74% of North Carolina's registered African American voters turned out, as opposed to 69% of North Carolinians in general, with Obama carrying 100% (with rounding) of African-American females and African Americans age 18 to 29, according to exit polling. This was also the case in Virginia, where much higher turnout among African Americans propelled Obama to victory in the former Republican stronghold. Even in southern states in which Obama was unsuccessful, such as Georgia and Mississippi, due to large African American turnout he was much more competitive than John Kerry in 2004.
Ballot access
| Presidential ticket | Party | Ballot access | Votes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Obama / Biden | Democratic | 50+DC | 69,498,516 |
| McCain / Palin | Republican | 50+DC | 59,948,323 |
| Nader / Gonzalez | Independent | 45+DC | 739,034 |
| Barr / Root | Libertarian | 45 | 523,715 |
| Baldwin / Castle | Constitution | 37 | 199,750 |
| McKinney / Clemente | Green | 32 + DC | 161,797 |
| Others—total | (see below) | 242,685 |
No other candidate had ballot access in enough states to win 270 electoral votes. All six candidates appeared on the ballot for a majority of the voters, while the 17 other listed candidates were available to no more than 30% of the voters.
The following candidates and parties had ballot listing or write-in status in more than one state:
- Alan Keyes (America's Independent Party) received 47,746 votes; listed in three states: Colorado and Florida, plus California (listed as American Independent), and also had write-in status in Kentucky, Ohio, Texas, and Utah.
- Ron Paul received 42,426 votes; listed in Louisiana (Louisiana Taxpayers) and in Montana (Constitution), with write-in status in California.
- Gloria La Riva (Party for Socialism and Liberation) received 6,808 votes nationally; listed in 12 states: Arkansas, Colorado, Florida, Iowa, Louisiana, New Jersey, New York, Rhode Island, Utah, Vermont, Washington, and Wisconsin.
- Brian Moore (Socialist Party, see Brian Moore presidential campaign, 2008) received 6,538 votes; listed in eight states: Colorado, Florida, Iowa, New Jersey, Ohio, and Wisconsin, and Tennessee (independent) and Vermont (Liberty Union). He also filed for write-in status in 17 other states: Alaska, Connecticut, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Washington, and Wyoming.
- Róger Calero (Socialist Workers Party) received 5,151 votes; listed in ten states. He was listed by name in Delaware, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, and Vermont. James Harris was listed as his stand-in in Colorado, Florida, Iowa, Louisiana, and Washington, and also had write-in status in California.
- Charles Jay (Boston Tea Party) received 2,422 votes; listed in Colorado and Florida, and in Tennessee (as independent), with write-in status in Arizona, Montana, and Utah.
- Tom Stevens (Objectivist) received 755 votes; listed in Colorado and Florida.
- Gene Amondson (Prohibition) received 653 votes; listed in Colorado, Florida, and Louisiana.
- Jonathan Allen (Heartquake) received 483 votes; listed only in Colorado, with write-in status in Arizona, Georgia, Montana, Texas, and other states.
The following candidates (parties) were listed on the ballot in only one state:
- Richard Duncan (Independent) – Ohio; 3,905 votes.
- John Joseph Polachek (New Party) Illinois; 1,149 votes.
- Frank McEnulty (New American Independent) – Colorado (listed as unaffiliated); 829 votes.
- Jeffrey Wamboldt (We the People) – Wisconsin; 764 votes.
- Jeff Boss (Vote Here) – New Jersey; 639 votes.
- George Phillies – New Hampshire (also listed with the label Libertarian); 531 votes.
- Ted Weill (Reform) – Mississippi; 481 votes.
- Bradford Lyttle (U.S. Pacifist) – Colorado; 110 votes.
In Nevada, 6,267 votes were cast for "None of These Candidates". In the three states that officially keep track of "blank" votes for president, 103,193 votes were recorded as "blank". More than 100,000 write-in votes were cast and recorded for a scattering of other candidates, including 62 votes for "Santa Claus" (in ten states) and 11 votes for "Mickey Mouse" (in five states).
According to the Federal Election Commission, an unusually high number of "miscellaneous" write-ins were cast for president in 2008, including 112,597 tallied in the 17 states that record votes for non-listed candidates. There were more presidential candidates on the ballot than at any other time in U. S. history, except for the 1992 election, which also had 23 candidates listed in at least one state.
Results
Of the 3,154 counties/districts/independent cities making returns, McCain won the most popular votes in 2,270 (71.97%) while Obama carried 884 (28.03%).
Popular vote totals are from the official Federal Election Commission report. The results of the electoral vote were certified by Congress on January 8, 2009.
| Presidential candidate | Party | Home state | Popular vote | Electoral vote |
Running mate | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Count | Percentage | Vice-presidential candidate | Home state | Electoral vote | ||||
| Barack Obama | Democratic | Illinois | 69,498,516 | 52.93% | 365 | Joe Biden | Delaware | 365 |
| John McCain | Republican | Arizona | 59,948,323 | 45.65% | 173 | Sarah Palin | Alaska | 173 |
| Ralph Nader | Independent | Connecticut | 739,034 | 0.56% | 0 | Matt Gonzalez | California | 0 |
| Bob Barr | Libertarian | Georgia | 523,715 | 0.40% | 0 | Wayne Allyn Root | Nevada | 0 |
| Chuck Baldwin | Constitution | Florida | 199,750 | 0.15% | 0 | Darrell Castle | Tennessee | 0 |
| Cynthia McKinney | Green | Georgia | 161,797 | 0.12% | 0 | Rosa Clemente | North Carolina | 0 |
| Alan Keyes | America's Independent Party | New York | 47,746 | 0.04% | 0 | Wiley Drake | Colorado | 0 |
| Other | 194,939 | 0.15% | — | Other | — | |||
| Total | 131,313,820 | 100% | 538 | 538 | ||||
| Needed to win | 270 | 270 | ||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Results by state
Further information: United States presidential election § The popular vote on Election DayThe following table records the official vote tallies for each state for those presidential candidates who were listed on ballots in enough states to have a theoretical chance for a majority in the Electoral College. State popular vote results are from the official Federal Election Commission report. The column labeled "Margin" shows Obama's margin of victory over McCain (the margin is negative for states and districts won by McCain).
| States/districts won by Obama/Biden | |
| States/districts won by McCain/Palin | |
| † | At-large results (for states that split electoral votes) |
| Barack Obama Democratic |
John McCain Republican |
Ralph Nader Independent |
Bob Barr Libertarian |
Chuck Baldwin Constitution |
Cynthia McKinney Green |
Others | Margin | Margin Swing |
Total votes | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| State/district | EV | # | % | EV | # | % | EV | # | % | EV | # | % | EV | # | % | EV | # | % | EV | # | % | EV | # | % | % | # | |
| Alabama | 9 | 813,479 | 38.74% | - | 1,266,546 | 60.32% | 9 | 6,788 | 0.32% | - | 4,991 | 0.24% | - | 4,310 | 0.21% | - | 0 | 0.00% | - | 3,705 | 0.18% | - | -453,067 | -21.58% | 4.04% | 2,099,819 | AL |
| Alaska | 3 | 123,594 | 37.89% | - | 193,841 | 59.42% | 3 | 3,783 | 1.16% | - | 1,589 | 0.49% | - | 1,660 | 0.51% | - | 0 | 0.00% | - | 1,730 | 0.53% | - | -70,247 | -21.53% | 4.01% | 326,197 | AK |
| Arizona | 10 | 1,034,707 | 45.12% | - | 1,230,111 | 53.64% | 10 | 11,301 | 0.49% | - | 12,555 | 0.55% | - | 1,371 | 0.06% | - | 3,406 | 0.15% | - | 24 | 0.00% | - | -195,404 | -8.52% | 1.95% | 2,293,475 | AZ |
| Arkansas | 6 | 422,310 | 38.86% | - | 638,017 | 58.72% | 6 | 12,882 | 1.19% | - | 4,776 | 0.44% | - | 4,023 | 0.37% | - | 3,470 | 0.32% | - | 1,139 | 0.10% | - | -215,707 | -19.86% | −10.09% | 1,086,617 | AR |
| California | 55 | 8,274,473 | 61.01% | 55 | 5,011,781 | 36.95% | - | 108,381 | 0.80% | - | 67,582 | 0.50% | - | 3,145 | 0.02% | - | 38,774 | 0.29% | - | 57,764 | 0.43% | - | 3,262,692 | 24.06% | 14.11% | 13,561,900 | CA |
| Colorado | 9 | 1,288,633 | 53.66% | 9 | 1,073,629 | 44.71% | - | 13,352 | 0.56% | - | 10,898 | 0.45% | - | 6,233 | 0.26% | - | 2,822 | 0.12% | - | 5,895 | 0.25% | - | 215,004 | 8.95% | 13.62% | 2,401,462 | CO |
| Connecticut | 7 | 997,772 | 60.59% | 7 | 629,428 | 38.22% | - | 19,162 | 1.16% | - | 0 | 0.00% | - | 311 | 0.02% | - | 90 | 0.01% | - | 34 | 0.00% | - | 368,344 | 22.37% | 12.00% | 1,646,797 | CT |
| Delaware | 3 | 255,459 | 61.94% | 3 | 152,374 | 36.95% | - | 2,401 | 0.58% | - | 1,109 | 0.27% | - | 626 | 0.15% | - | 385 | 0.09% | - | 58 | 0.01% | - | 103,085 | 24.99% | 17.41% | 412,412 | DE |
| District of Columbia | 3 | 245,800 | 92.46% | 3 | 17,367 | 6.53% | - | 958 | 0.36% | - | 0 | 0.00% | - | 0 | 0.00% | - | 590 | 0.22% | - | 1,138 | 0.43% | - | 228,433 | 85.92% | 6.08% | 265,853 | DC |
| Florida | 27 | 4,282,074 | 51.03% | 27 | 4,045,624 | 48.22% | - | 28,124 | 0.34% | - | 17,218 | 0.21% | - | 7,915 | 0.09% | - | 2,887 | 0.03% | - | 6,902 | 0.08% | - | 236,450 | 2.81% | 7.83% | 8,390,744 | FL |
| Georgia | 15 | 1,844,123 | 46.99% | - | 2,048,759 | 52.20% | 15 | 1,158 | 0.03% | - | 28,731 | 0.73% | - | 1,402 | 0.04% | - | 250 | 0.01% | - | 63 | 0.00% | - | -204,636 | -5.21% | 11.39% | 3,924,486 | GA |
| Hawaii | 4 | 325,871 | 71.85% | 4 | 120,566 | 26.58% | - | 3,825 | 0.84% | - | 1,314 | 0.29% | - | 1,013 | 0.22% | - | 979 | 0.22% | - | 0 | 0.00% | - | 205,305 | 45.27% | 36.52% | 453,568 | HI |
| Idaho | 4 | 236,440 | 36.09% | - | 403,012 | 61.52% | 4 | 7,175 | 1.10% | - | 3,658 | 0.56% | - | 4,747 | 0.72% | - | 39 | 0.01% | - | 51 | 0.01% | - | -166,572 | -25.43% | 12.69% | 655,122 | ID |
| Illinois | 21 | 3,419,348 | 61.92% | 21 | 2,031,179 | 36.78% | - | 30,948 | 0.56% | - | 19,642 | 0.36% | - | 8,256 | 0.15% | - | 11,838 | 0.21% | - | 1,160 | 0.02% | - | 1,388,169 | 25.14% | 14.80% | 5,522,371 | IL |
| Indiana | 11 | 1,374,039 | 49.95% | 11 | 1,345,648 | 48.91% | - | 909 | 0.03% | - | 29,257 | 1.06% | - | 1,024 | 0.04% | - | 87 | 0.00% | - | 90 | 0.00% | - | 28,391 | 1.04% | 21.71% | 2,751,054 | IN |
| Iowa | 7 | 828,940 | 53.93% | 7 | 682,379 | 44.39% | - | 8,014 | 0.52% | - | 4,590 | 0.30% | - | 4,445 | 0.29% | - | 1,423 | 0.09% | - | 7,332 | 0.48% | - | 146,561 | 9.54% | 10.20% | 1,537,123 | IA |
| Kansas | 6 | 514,765 | 41.65% | - | 699,655 | 56.61% | 6 | 10,527 | 0.85% | - | 6,706 | 0.54% | - | 4,148 | 0.34% | - | 35 | 0.00% | - | 36 | 0.00% | - | -184,890 | -14.96% | 10.42% | 1,235,872 | KS |
| Kentucky | 8 | 751,985 | 41.17% | - | 1,048,462 | 57.40% | 8 | 15,378 | 0.84% | - | 5,989 | 0.33% | - | 4,694 | 0.26% | - | 0 | 0.00% | - | 112 | 0.01% | - | -296,477 | -16.23% | 3.63% | 1,826,620 | KY |
| Louisiana | 9 | 782,989 | 39.93% | - | 1,148,275 | 58.56% | 9 | 6,997 | 0.36% | - | 0 | 0.00% | - | 2,581 | 0.13% | - | 9,187 | 0.47% | - | 10,732 | 0.55% | - | -365,286 | -18.63% | −4.12% | 1,960,761 | LA |
| Maine† | 2 | 421,923 | 57.71% | 2 | 295,273 | 40.38% | - | 10,636 | 1.45% | - | 251 | 0.03% | - | 177 | 0.02% | - | 2,900 | 0.40% | - | 3 | 0.00% | - | 126,650 | 17.33% | 8.32% | 731,163 | ME |
| Maine's 1st | 1 | 232,145 | 60.51% | 1 | 144,604 | 37.69% | - | 5,263 | 1.37% | - | - | - | 1,362 | 0.36% | - | 252 | 0.07% | - | 87,541 | 22.82% | 10.88% | 383,626 | ME1 | ||||
| Maine's 2nd | 1 | 189,778 | 54.61% | 1 | 150,669 | 43.35% | - | 5,373 | 1.55% | - | - | - | 1,538 | 0.44% | - | 179 | 0.05% | - | 39,109 | 11.26% | 5.42% | 347,537 | ME2 | ||||
| Maryland | 10 | 1,629,467 | 61.92% | 10 | 959,862 | 36.47% | - | 14,713 | 0.56% | - | 9,842 | 0.37% | - | 3,760 | 0.14% | - | 4,747 | 0.18% | - | 9,205 | 0.35% | - | 669,605 | 25.45% | 12.46% | 2,631,596 | MD |
| Massachusetts | 12 | 1,904,097 | 61.80% | 12 | 1,108,854 | 35.99% | - | 28,841 | 0.94% | - | 13,189 | 0.43% | - | 4,971 | 0.16% | - | 6,550 | 0.21% | - | 14,483 | 0.47% | - | 795,243 | 25.81% | 0.65% | 3,080,985 | MA |
| Michigan | 17 | 2,872,579 | 57.43% | 17 | 2,048,639 | 40.96% | - | 33,085 | 0.66% | - | 23,716 | 0.47% | - | 14,685 | 0.29% | - | 8,892 | 0.18% | - | 170 | 0.00% | - | 823,940 | 16.47% | 13.05% | 5,001,766 | MI |
| Minnesota | 10 | 1,573,354 | 54.06% | 10 | 1,275,409 | 43.82% | - | 30,152 | 1.04% | - | 9,174 | 0.32% | - | 6,787 | 0.23% | - | 5,174 | 0.18% | - | 10,319 | 0.35% | - | 297,945 | 10.24% | 6.76% | 2,910,369 | MN |
| Mississippi | 6 | 554,662 | 43.00% | - | 724,597 | 56.18% | 6 | 4,011 | 0.31% | - | 2,529 | 0.20% | - | 2,551 | 0.20% | - | 1,034 | 0.08% | - | 481 | 0.04% | - | -169,935 | -13.18% | 6.52% | 1,289,865 | MS |
| Missouri | 11 | 1,441,911 | 49.29% | - | 1,445,814 | 49.43% | 11 | 17,813 | 0.61% | - | 11,386 | 0.39% | - | 8,201 | 0.28% | - | 80 | 0.00% | - | 0 | 0.00% | - | -3,903 | -0.14% | 7.07% | 2,925,205 | MO |
| Montana | 3 | 231,667 | 47.25% | - | 242,763 | 49.51% | 3 | 3,686 | 0.75% | - | 1,355 | 0.28% | - | 143 | 0.03% | - | 23 | 0.00% | - | 10,665 | 2.18% | - | -11,096 | -2.26% | 18.24% | 490,302 | MT |
| Nebraska† | 2 | 333,319 | 41.60% | - | 452,979 | 56.53% | 2 | 5,406 | 0.67% | - | 2,740 | 0.34% | - | 2,972 | 0.37% | - | 1,028 | 0.13% | - | 2,837 | 0.35% | - | -119,660 | -14.93% | 18.29% | 801,281 | NE |
| Nebraska's 1st | 1 | 121,411 | 44.33% | - | 148,179 | 54.10% | 1 | 1,963 | 0.72% | - | 922 | 0.34% | - | 1,024 | 0.37% | - | 394 | 0.14% | - | - | -26,768 | -9.77% | 12.50% | 273,893 | NE1 | ||
| Nebraska's 2nd | 1 | 138,809 | 49.97% | 1 | 135,439 | 48.75% | - | 1,628 | 0.59% | - | 1,014 | 0.36% | - | 599 | 0.22% | - | 320 | 0.12% | - | - | 3,370 | 1.22% | 22.93% | 277,809 | NE2 | ||
| Nebraska's 3rd | 1 | 73,099 | 29.63% | - | 169,361 | 68.64% | 1 | 1,815 | 0.74% | - | 804 | 0.33% | - | 1,349 | 0.55% | - | 314 | 0.13% | - | - | -96,262 | -39.01% | 12.17% | 246,742 | NE3 | ||
| Nevada | 5 | 533,736 | 55.15% | 5 | 412,827 | 42.65% | - | 6,150 | 0.64% | - | 4,263 | 0.44% | - | 3,194 | 0.33% | - | 1,411 | 0.15% | - | 6,267 | 0.65% | - | 120,909 | 12.50% | 15.10% | 967,848 | NV |
| New Hampshire | 4 | 384,826 | 54.13% | 4 | 316,534 | 44.52% | - | 3,503 | 0.49% | - | 2,217 | 0.31% | - | 226 | 0.03% | - | 40 | 0.01% | - | 3,624 | 0.51% | - | 68,292 | 9.61% | 8.24% | 710,970 | NH |
| New Jersey | 15 | 2,215,422 | 57.27% | 15 | 1,613,207 | 41.70% | - | 21,298 | 0.55% | - | 8,441 | 0.22% | - | 3,956 | 0.10% | - | 3,636 | 0.09% | - | 2,277 | 0.06% | - | 602,215 | 15.57% | 8.89% | 3,868,237 | NJ |
| New Mexico | 5 | 472,422 | 56.91% | 5 | 346,832 | 41.78% | - | 5,327 | 0.64% | - | 2,428 | 0.29% | - | 1,597 | 0.19% | - | 1,552 | 0.19% | - | 0 | 0.00% | - | 125,590 | 15.13% | 15.79% | 830,158 | NM |
| New York | 31 | 4,804,945 | 62.88% | 31 | 2,752,771 | 36.03% | - | 41,249 | 0.54% | - | 19,596 | 0.26% | - | 634 | 0.01% | - | 12,801 | 0.17% | - | 8,935 | 0.12% | - | 2,052,174 | 26.85% | 8.57% | 7,640,931 | NY |
| North Carolina | 15 | 2,142,651 | 49.70% | 15 | 2,128,474 | 49.38% | - | 1,448 | 0.03% | - | 25,722 | 0.60% | - | 0 | 0.00% | - | 158 | 0.00% | - | 12,336 | 0.29% | - | 14,177 | 0.32% | 12.76% | 4,310,789 | NC |
| North Dakota | 3 | 141,278 | 44.62% | - | 168,601 | 53.25% | 3 | 4,189 | 1.32% | - | 1,354 | 0.43% | - | 1,199 | 0.38% | - | 0 | 0.00% | - | 0 | 0.00% | - | -27,323 | -8.63% | 18.73% | 316,621 | ND |
| Ohio | 20 | 2,940,044 | 51.50% | 20 | 2,677,820 | 46.91% | - | 42,337 | 0.74% | - | 19,917 | 0.35% | - | 12,565 | 0.22% | - | 8,518 | 0.15% | - | 7,149 | 0.13% | - | 262,224 | 4.59% | 6.70% | 5,708,350 | OH |
| Oklahoma | 7 | 502,496 | 34.35% | - | 960,165 | 65.65% | 7 | 0 | 0.00% | - | 0 | 0.00% | - | 0 | 0.00% | - | 0 | 0.00% | - | 0 | 0.00% | - | -457,669 | -31.30% | −0.15% | 1,462,661 | OK |
| Oregon | 7 | 1,037,291 | 56.75% | 7 | 738,475 | 40.40% | - | 18,614 | 1.02% | - | 7,635 | 0.42% | - | 7,693 | 0.42% | - | 4,543 | 0.25% | - | 13,613 | 0.74% | - | 298,816 | 16.35% | 12.19% | 1,827,864 | OR |
| Pennsylvania | 21 | 3,276,363 | 54.49% | 21 | 2,655,885 | 44.17% | - | 42,977 | 0.71% | - | 19,912 | 0.33% | - | 1,092 | 0.02% | - | 0 | 0.00% | - | 17,043 | 0.28% | - | 620,478 | 10.32% | 7.82% | 6,013,272 | PA |
| Rhode Island | 4 | 296,571 | 62.86% | 4 | 165,391 | 35.06% | - | 4,829 | 1.02% | - | 1,382 | 0.29% | - | 675 | 0.14% | - | 797 | 0.17% | - | 2,121 | 0.45% | - | 131,180 | 27.80% | 7.06% | 471,766 | RI |
| South Carolina | 8 | 862,449 | 44.90% | - | 1,034,896 | 53.87% | 8 | 5,053 | 0.26% | - | 7,283 | 0.38% | - | 6,827 | 0.36% | - | 4,461 | 0.23% | - | 0 | 0.00% | - | -172,447 | -8.97% | 8.10% | 1,920,969 | SC |
| South Dakota | 3 | 170,924 | 44.75% | - | 203,054 | 53.16% | 3 | 4,267 | 1.12% | - | 1,835 | 0.48% | - | 1,895 | 0.50% | - | 0 | 0.00% | - | 0 | 0.00% | - | -32,130 | -8.41% | 13.06% | 381,975 | SD |
| Tennessee | 11 | 1,087,437 | 41.83% | - | 1,479,178 | 56.90% | 11 | 11,560 | 0.44% | - | 8,547 | 0.33% | - | 8,191 | 0.32% | - | 2,499 | 0.10% | - | 2,337 | 0.09% | - | -391,741 | -15.07% | −0.80% | 2,599,749 | TN |
| Texas | 34 | 3,528,633 | 43.68% | - | 4,479,328 | 55.45% | 34 | 5,751 | 0.07% | - | 56,116 | 0.69% | - | 5,708 | 0.07% | - | 909 | 0.01% | - | 1,350 | 0.02% | - | -950,695 | -11.77% | 11.09% | 8,077,795 | TX |
| Utah | 5 | 327,670 | 34.41% | - | 596,030 | 62.58% | 5 | 8,416 | 0.88% | - | 6,966 | 0.73% | - | 12,012 | 1.26% | - | 982 | 0.10% | - | 294 | 0.03% | - | -268,360 | -28.17% | 17.36% | 952,370 | UT |
| Vermont | 3 | 219,262 | 67.46% | 3 | 98,974 | 30.45% | - | 3,339 | 1.03% | - | 1,067 | 0.33% | - | 500 | 0.15% | - | 66 | 0.02% | - | 1,838 | 0.57% | - | 120,288 | 37.01% | 16.87% | 325,046 | VT |
| Virginia | 13 | 1,959,532 | 52.63% | 13 | 1,725,005 | 46.33% | - | 11,483 | 0.31% | - | 11,067 | 0.30% | - | 7,474 | 0.20% | - | 2,344 | 0.06% | - | 6,355 | 0.17% | - | 234,527 | 6.30% | 14.50% | 3,723,260 | VA |
| Washington | 11 | 1,750,848 | 57.65% | 11 | 1,229,216 | 40.48% | - | 29,489 | 0.97% | - | 12,728 | 0.42% | - | 9,432 | 0.31% | - | 3,819 | 0.13% | - | 1,346 | 0.04% | - | 521,632 | 17.17% | 10.00% | 3,036,878 | WA |
| West Virginia | 5 | 303,857 | 42.59% | - | 397,466 | 55.71% | 5 | 7,219 | 1.01% | - | 0 | 0.00% | - | 2,465 | 0.35% | - | 2,355 | 0.33% | - | 89 | 0.01% | - | -93,609 | -13.12% | −0.26% | 713,451 | WV |
| Wisconsin | 10 | 1,677,211 | 56.22% | 10 | 1,262,393 | 42.31% | - | 17,605 | 0.59% | - | 8,858 | 0.30% | - | 5,072 | 0.17% | - | 4,216 | 0.14% | - | 8,062 | 0.27% | - | 414,818 | 13.91% | 13.52% | 2,983,417 | WI |
| Wyoming | 3 | 82,868 | 32.54% | - | 164,958 | 64.78% | 3 | 2,525 | 0.99% | - | 1,594 | 0.63% | - | 1,192 | 0.47% | - | 0 | 0.00% | - | 1,521 | 0.60% | - | -82,090 | -32.24% | 7.55% | 254,658 | WY |
| U.S. Total | 538 | 69,498,516 | 52.93% | 365 | 59,948,323 | 45.65% | 173 | 739,034 | 0.56% | - | 523,715 | 0.40% | - | 199,750 | 0.15% | - | 161,797 | 0.12% | - | 242,685 | 0.18% | - | 9,550,193 | 7.27% | 9.73% | 131,313,820 | US |
Note: Maine and Nebraska each allow for their electoral votes to be split between candidates. In both states, two electoral votes are awarded to the winner of the statewide race and one electoral vote is awarded to the winner of each congressional district.
States and EV districts that flipped from Republican to Democratic
- Colorado
- Florida
- Indiana
- Iowa
- Nebraska's 2nd congressional district
- Nevada
- New Mexico
- North Carolina
- Ohio
- Virginia
Cartographic gallery
-
Results by state with pie charts for the electoral college and popular vote. Note that the depicted split in Nebraska's electoral votes denotes the one electoral vote won by Obama in Nebraska's second congressional district and is not representative of the district's actual geographical boundaries.
-
Popular vote by county. Red represents counties that went for McCain; blue represents counties that went for Obama. Connecticut, Hawaii, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and Vermont had all counties go to Obama. Oklahoma had all counties go to McCain.
-
Presidential popular votes by county as a scale from red/Republican to blue/Democratic.
-
Cartogram of popular vote with each county rescaled in proportion to its population. Deeper blue represents a Democratic majority; brighter red represents a Republican majority.
-
Results by county, shaded according to winning candidate's percentage of the vote.
-
Change in vote margins at the county level from the 2004 election to the 2008 election. Obama made dramatic gains in every region of the country except for Arizona (McCain's home state), Alaska (Palin's home state), Appalachia, and the inner South, where McCain improved over Bush.
-
Results by congressional districts, shaded according to winning candidate's percentage of the vote.
.svg)
Close states
States where the margin of victory was under 1% (26 electoral votes; 15 won by Obama, 11 by McCain):
- Missouri, 0.14% (3,903 votes) – 11 electoral votes
- North Carolina, 0.32% (14,177 votes) – 15 electoral votes
States where the margin of victory was between 1% and 5% (62 electoral votes; 59 won by Obama, 3 by McCain):
- Indiana, 1.04% (28,391 votes) – 11 electoral votes
- Nebraska's 2nd congressional district, 1.22% (3,370 votes) – 1 electoral vote
- Montana, 2.26% (11,096 votes) – 3 electoral votes
- Florida, 2.81% (236,450 votes) – 27 electoral votes
- Ohio, 4.59% (262,224 votes) – 20 electoral votes
States/districts where the margin of victory was between 5% and 10% (73 electoral votes; 33 won by Obama, 40 by McCain):
- Georgia, 5.21% (204,636 votes) – 15 electoral votes
- Virginia, 6.30% (234,527 votes) – 13 electoral votes
- South Dakota, 8.41% (32,130 votes) – 3 electoral votes
- Arizona, 8.52% (195,404 votes) – 10 electoral votes
- North Dakota, 8.63% (27,323 votes) – 3 electoral votes
- Colorado, 8.95% (215,004 votes) – 9 electoral votes (tipping-point state for Obama victory)
- South Carolina, 8.97% (172,447 votes) – 8 electoral votes
- Iowa, 9.54% (146,561 votes) – 7 electoral votes(tipping-point state for McCain victory)
- New Hampshire, 9.61% (68,292 votes) – 4 electoral votes
- Nebraska's 1st congressional district, 9.77% (26,768 votes) – 1 electoral vote
Blue denotes states or congressional districts won by Democrat Barack Obama; red denotes those won by Republican John McCain.
Statistics
Counties with highest percentage of Democratic vote:
- Washington, D.C. 92.46%
- Prince George's County, Maryland 88.87%
- Bronx County, New York 88.71%
- Shannon County, South Dakota 88.69%
- Petersburg, Virginia 88.64%
Counties with highest percentage of Republican vote:
- King County, Texas 92.64%
- Roberts County, Texas 92.08%
- Ochiltree County, Texas 91.70%
- Glasscock County, Texas 90.13%
- Beaver County, Oklahoma 89.25%
Voter demographics
| The 2008 presidential vote by demographic subgroup | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Demographic subgroup | Obama | McCain | Other | % of total vote | |||
| Total vote | 53 | 46 | 1 | 100 | |||
| Ideology | |||||||
| Liberals | 89 | 10 | 1 | 22 | |||
| Moderates | 60 | 39 | 1 | 44 | |||
| Conservatives | 20 | 78 | 2 | 34 | |||
| Party | |||||||
| Democrats | 89 | 10 | 1 | 39 | |||
| Republicans | 9 | 90 | 1 | 32 | |||
| Independents | 52 | 44 | 4 | 29 | |||
| Gender | |||||||
| Men | 49 | 48 | 3 | 47 | |||
| Women | 56 | 43 | 1 | 53 | |||
| Marital status | |||||||
| Married | 47 | 52 | 1 | 66 | |||
| Non-married | 65 | 33 | 2 | 34 | |||
| Race | |||||||
| White | 43 | 55 | 2 | 74 | |||
| Black | 95 | 4 | 1 | 13 | |||
| Asian | 62 | 35 | 3 | 2 | |||
| Other | 66 | 31 | 3 | 2 | |||
| Hispanic | 67 | 31 | 2 | 9 | |||
| Religion | |||||||
| Protestant | 45 | 54 | 1 | 54 | |||
| Catholic | 54 | 45 | 1 | 27 | |||
| Jewish | 78 | 21 | 1 | 2 | |||
| Other | 73 | 22 | 5 | 6 | |||
| None | 75 | 23 | 2 | 12 | |||
| Religious service attendance | |||||||
| More than weekly | 43 | 55 | 2 | 12 | |||
| Weekly | 43 | 55 | 2 | 27 | |||
| Monthly | 53 | 46 | 1 | 15 | |||
| A few times a year | 59 | 39 | 2 | 28 | |||
| Never | 67 | 30 | 3 | 16 | |||
| White evangelical or born-again Christian? | |||||||
| White evangelical or born-again Christian | 24 | 74 | 2 | 26 | |||
| Everyone else | 62 | 36 | 2 | 74 | |||
| Age | |||||||
| 18–24 years old | 66 | 32 | 2 | 10 | |||
| 25–29 years old | 66 | 31 | 3 | 8 | |||
| 30–39 years old | 54 | 44 | 2 | 18 | |||
| 40–49 years old | 49 | 49 | 2 | 21 | |||
| 50–64 years old | 50 | 49 | 1 | 27 | |||
| 65 and older | 45 | 53 | 2 | 16 | |||
| Age by race | |||||||
| Whites 18–29 years old | 54 | 44 | 2 | 11 | |||
| Whites 30–44 years old | 41 | 57 | 2 | 20 | |||
| Whites 45–64 years old | 42 | 56 | 2 | 30 | |||
| Whites 65 and older | 40 | 58 | 2 | 13 | |||
| Blacks 18–29 years old | 95 | 4 | 1 | 3 | |||
| Blacks 30–44 years old | 96 | 4 | n/a | 4 | |||
| Blacks 45–64 years old | 96 | 3 | 1 | 4 | |||
| Blacks 65 and older | 94 | 6 | n/a | 1 | |||
| Latinos 18–29 years old | 76 | 19 | 5 | 3 | |||
| Latinos 30–44 years old | 63 | 36 | 1 | 3 | |||
| Latinos 45–64 years old | 58 | 40 | 2 | 2 | |||
| Latinos 65 and older | 68 | 30 | 2 | 1 | |||
| Others | 64 | 33 | 3 | 5 | |||
| First time voter? | |||||||
| First time voter | 69 | 30 | 1 | 11 | |||
| Everyone else | 50 | 48 | 2 | 89 | |||
| Sexual orientation | |||||||
| Gay, lesbian, or bisexual | 70 | 27 | 3 | 4 | |||
| Heterosexual | 53 | 45 | 2 | 96 | |||
| Education | |||||||
| Not a high school graduate | 63 | 35 | 2 | 4 | |||
| High school graduate | 52 | 46 | 2 | 20 | |||
| Some college education | 51 | 47 | 2 | 31 | |||
| College graduate | 50 | 48 | 2 | 28 | |||
| Postgraduate education | 58 | 40 | 2 | 17 | |||
| Education by race/ethnicity | |||||||
| White college graduates | 47 | 51 | 2 | 35 | |||
| White no college degree | 40 | 58 | 2 | 39 | |||
| Non-white college graduates | 75 | 22 | 3 | 9 | |||
| Non-white no college degree | 83 | 16 | 1 | 16 | |||
| Family income | |||||||
| Under $15,000 | 73 | 25 | 2 | 6 | |||
| $15,000–30,000 | 60 | 37 | 3 | 12 | |||
| $30,000–50,000 | 55 | 43 | 2 | 19 | |||
| $50,000–75,000 | 48 | 49 | 3 | 21 | |||
| $75,000–100,000 | 51 | 48 | 1 | 15 | |||
| $100,000–150,000 | 48 | 51 | 1 | 14 | |||
| $150,000–200,000 | 48 | 50 | 1 | 6 | |||
| Over $200,000 | 52 | 46 | 2 | 6 | |||
| Union households | |||||||
| Union | 59 | 39 | 2 | 21 | |||
| Non-union | 51 | 47 | 2 | 79 | |||
| Military service | |||||||
| Veterans | 44 | 54 | 2 | 15 | |||
| Non-veterans | 54 | 44 | 2 | 85 | |||
| Issue regarded as most important | |||||||
| Economy | 53 | 44 | 3 | 63 | |||
| Iraq | 59 | 39 | 2 | 10 | |||
| Health care | 73 | 26 | 1 | 9 | |||
| Terrorism | 13 | 86 | 1 | 9 | |||
| Energy | 50 | 46 | 4 | 7 | |||
| Region | |||||||
| Northeast | 59 | 40 | 1 | 21 | |||
| Midwest | 54 | 44 | 2 | 24 | |||
| South | 45 | 54 | 1 | 32 | |||
| West | 57 | 40 | 3 | 23 | |||
| Community size | |||||||
| Urban | 63 | 35 | 2 | 30 | |||
| Suburban | 50 | 48 | 2 | 49 | |||
| Rural | 45 | 53 | 2 | 21 | |||
Source: Exit polls conducted by Edison Research of Somerville, New Jersey, for the National Election Pool, a consortium of ABC News, Associated Press, CBS News, CNN, Fox News, and NBC News.
Analysis
Obama, having a white mother and Kenyan father of the Luo ethnic group, became the first African American as well as the first biracial president. Several black people had previously run for president, including Shirley Chisholm, Jesse Jackson, Lenora Fulani, Carol Moseley Braun, Alan Keyes, and Al Sharpton, though Obama was the first one ever to win the nomination of a major party, let alone the general election. The Obama-Biden ticket was also the first winning ticket in American history in which neither candidate was a white Protestant, as Biden is Roman Catholic and the first Roman Catholic to be elected vice president; all previous tickets with Catholic vice presidential candidates had been defeated (1964, 1972, 1984). The Obama-Biden ticket was the first winning ticket consisting of two sitting senators since 1960 (John F. Kennedy/Lyndon B. Johnson) (in the previous election cycle (2004) Democrats also nominated two sitting senators, John Kerry of Massachusetts and John Edwards of North Carolina, but they lost to incumbents Bush and Cheney), and Obama became the first Northern Democratic president since Kennedy. Also, Obama became the first Democratic candidate to win a majority of the popular vote since Jimmy Carter in 1976, the first to win a majority of both votes and states since Lyndon Johnson in 1964, and the first Northern Democrat to win a majority of both votes and states since Franklin Roosevelt in 1944. Obama became the first Northern Democrat to win any state in the former Confederacy since Hubert Humphrey won Texas in 1968. This was the first presidential election since 1952 in which neither of the major-party nominees was the incumbent president or vice-president.
Prior to the election, commentators discussed whether Senator Obama would be able to redraw the electoral map by winning states that had been voting for Republican candidates in recent decades. In many ways, he was successful. He won every region of the country by double digits except the South, which John McCain won by nine percent, although Obama nonetheless carried Delaware, the District of Columbia, Maryland, North Carolina, Florida, and Virginia (the South as defined by the US Census Bureau). McCain won every state in the Deep South, where white voters had generally supported Republican candidates by increasingly large margins in the previous few decades. Obama won all of the 2004 swing states (states that either Kerry or Bush won by less than 5%) by a margin of 8.5 percent or more except for Ohio, which he carried by 4.5 percent.
Obama also defied political bellwethers, becoming the first person to win the presidency while losing Missouri since 1956 and while losing Kentucky and Tennessee since 1960. He was the first Democrat to ever win the presidency without carrying Missouri, to win without carrying Arkansas since that state joined the Union in 1836, and the first to win without West Virginia since 1916 (and, because one West Virginia elector had voted Democratic in 1916, Obama became the first Democrat to win the White House without any of the state's electors since its founding in 1863). Indiana and Virginia voted for the Democratic nominee for the first time since 1964, as did a solitary electoral vote from Nebraska's 2nd congressional district. Indiana would return to being a reliably red state in subsequent elections; Virginia, however, has been won by Democrats in every presidential election since and would grow increasingly Democratic at the state level. North Carolina, which Obama was the first Democrat to carry since 1976, would return to the Republican column in the following elections, though only by narrow margins each time.
Obama was also relatively competitive in some traditionally Republican states he lost, notably Montana, which he lost by under 3%, and Georgia, which he lost by just 5%. He is also the only 21st-century Democrat to lose North Dakota and South Dakota by just single digits.
This was the first presidential election in which Nebraska split its electoral votes between two candidates. Together with Maine, which would not split its votes until 2016, Nebraska is one of two states that allow a split in electoral votes without faithless electors: a candidate receives one electoral vote for each congressional district won (Nebraska has three, Maine two), while the statewide winner receives an additional two electoral votes. Obama won the electoral vote from Nebraska's 2nd congressional district, largely comprising the city of Omaha. Nebraska's other four electoral votes went to John McCain. This would not happen again until 2020.
As of 2024, this election is the last time that Indiana or North Carolina voted Democratic, and is also the most recent election where one of the nominees has since died. Until 2024 this was also the most recent election in which any of the major presidential nominees had any military experience.
This election exhibited the continuation of some of the polarization trends evident in the 2000 and 2004 elections. McCain won whites 55–43 percent, while Obama won blacks 95–4 percent, Hispanics 67–31 percent, and Asians 62–35 percent. Voters aged 18–29 voted for Obama by 66–32 percent while elderly voters backed McCain 53–45 percent. The 25-year age gap between McCain and Obama was the widest in U.S. presidential election history among the top two candidates.
See also
- Barack Obama religion conspiracy theories
- Barack Obama citizenship conspiracy theories
- First inauguration of Barack Obama
- Newspaper endorsements in the 2008 United States presidential election
- Presidential transition of Barack Obama
- 2008 United States gubernatorial elections
- 2008 United States House of Representatives elections
- 2008 United States Senate elections
- Third-party and independent candidates for the 2008 United States presidential election
Opinion polling
- Nationwide opinion polling for the 2008 United States presidential election
- Statewide opinion polling for the 2008 United States presidential election
- International opinion polling for the 2008 United States presidential election
- Scientific forecasts: FiveThirtyEight
Notes
- Shirley Chisholm had previously won a contest in New Jersey in 1972 that was a no-delegate-awarding, presidential preference ballot in which the major candidates were not listed; the actual delegate selection vote went to George McGovern.
- Percentage point difference in margin from the 2004 election
- ^ Alaska and Louisiana do not have counties. Alaska's boroughs and census areas and Louisiana's parishes are pictured.
References
- "National General Election VEP Turnout Rates, 1789-Present". United States Election Project. CQ Press. Archived from the original on July 25, 2014. Retrieved February 28, 2023.
- Cite error: The named reference
https://www.fec.gov/introduction-campaign-finance/election-results-and-voting-information/federal-elections-2008/was invoked but never defined (see the help page). - Cite error: The named reference
FEC 2009was invoked but never defined (see the help page). - Sullivan, Ronald (June 7, 1972). "Dakotan Beats Humphrey By a Big Margin in Jersey" (PDF). The New York Times. p. 1. Archived from the original on November 9, 2021. Retrieved June 15, 2018.
- "Sanford Is Withdrawing From N.J." The Times-News. Associated Press. May 13, 1972. p. 12. Archived from the original on October 10, 2021. Retrieved October 14, 2020.
- Halloran, Liz (September 24, 2008). "McCain Suspends Campaign, Shocks Republicans". USNews. Archived from the original on October 12, 2020. Retrieved December 5, 2020.
- Kuhnhenn, Jim (November 9, 2006). "Democrats win control of Congress". The Washington Post. AP. Archived from the original on January 12, 2020. Retrieved September 6, 2012.
- ^ Borger, Julian (November 11, 2006). "Now the real race begins..." The Guardian. London. Archived from the original on August 16, 2021. Retrieved June 7, 2009.
- Hughes, John (November 15, 2006). "With midterms over, all eyes turn to the 2008 presidential race". The Christian Science Monitor. Archived from the original on May 6, 2021. Retrieved June 7, 2009.
- Balz, Dan (December 29, 2006). "Edwards Formally Joins 2008 Presidential Race". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on March 28, 2024. Retrieved June 7, 2009.
- Liasson, Mara; Simon, Scott. "Hillary Clinton Enters Race for President". NPR. Archived from the original on March 28, 2024. Retrieved March 28, 2024.
- Nagourney, Adam; Zeleny, Jeff (February 11, 2007). "Obama Formally Enters Presidential Race". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on March 28, 2024. Retrieved March 28, 2024.
- ^ Crowley, Candy; Malveaux, Suzanne; Yellin, Jessica (January 4, 2008). "Obama wins Iowa as candidate for change". CNN. Archived from the original on April 13, 2021. Retrieved June 8, 2009.
- Steinhauser, Paul (April 22, 2009). "Back to where it began: Obama visits Iowa". CNN. Archived from the original on April 13, 2021. Retrieved June 8, 2009.
- ^ "2008 New Hampshire Democratic Presidential Primary". Pollster.com. Archived from the original on September 23, 2008. Retrieved June 8, 2009.
- Alberts, Sheldon (June 7, 2008). "Overconfidence, bad strategy doomed Clinton campaign". The Vancouver Sun. Archived from the original on June 11, 2008. Retrieved June 8, 2009.
- Hannah Strange & Philippe Naughton (January 9, 2008). "Hillary Clinton: my teary moment won me New Hampshire". The Times. London. Archived from the original on April 29, 2011. Retrieved March 14, 2008. See also: "Hillary tears up in New Hampshire Primary 2008" (Video). YouTube. January 9, 2008. Archived from the original on December 12, 2021.
- "Fast Facts - Elections - Election Watch| Center for American Women and Politics". Archived from the original on April 30, 2009. Retrieved May 31, 2015.
- "Edwards exits presidential race". CBS News. January 30, 2008. Archived from the original on October 20, 2012. Retrieved January 30, 2008.
- Holland, Steve (January 30, 2008). "Giuliani, Edwards quit White House Race". Reuters. Archived from the original on November 5, 2021. Retrieved January 30, 2008.
- Greene, Richard Allen (May 30, 2007). "States jostle for primary power". BBC News. Archived from the original on August 15, 2021. Retrieved September 15, 2008.
- "Presidential primary and caucus dates" (PDF). Stateline.org. Pew Research Center. August 30, 2007. p. 1. Archived from the original (PDF) on September 11, 2008. Retrieved September 15, 2008.
- ^ Nate Silver (August 11, 2008). "The Persistent Myth of the Bradley Effect". Archived from the original on December 2, 2013. Retrieved August 11, 2008.
- Frank D. Russo (February 6, 2008). "Clinton Win in California Larger Than Polls Predicted Because of Huge Latino Turnout". Archived from the original on March 13, 2008. Retrieved March 14, 2008.
- "Election Center 2008: Primary Results from Maine". CNN. February 10, 2008. Archived from the original on May 7, 2008. Retrieved March 14, 2008.
- ^ "2008 Primary Results". NBC News. Archived from the original on September 23, 2020. Retrieved March 14, 2008.
- "Clinton comeback: Fight goes on". The Seattle Times. March 5, 2008. Archived from the original on December 14, 2011. Retrieved March 5, 2008.
- "2008 Presidential election results". Archived from the original on July 26, 2016. Retrieved July 27, 2016.
- ^ "Clinton wins key primaries, CNN projects; McCain clinches nod". CNN. March 5, 2008. Archived from the original on April 13, 2021. Retrieved March 5, 2008.
- "Election Center 2008 Primaries and Caucuses: Results: Democratic Scorecard". CNN. August 20, 2008. Archived from the original on June 4, 2008. Retrieved May 26, 2008.
- ^ Jensen, Kristin; Dodge, Catherine (April 23, 2008). "Clinton Wins Pennsylvania Vote; Obama Retains Control (Update6)". Bloomberg L.P. Retrieved June 8, 2009.
- Oinounou, Mosheh; Bruns, Aaron (April 12, 2008). "Obama on Guns and Religion: 'I Didn't Say It as Well as I Should Have'". Fox News. Archived from the original on February 20, 2009. Retrieved June 8, 2009.
- Elving, Ron (April 23, 2008). "Analysis: Clinton Needed Pennsylvania to Carry On". NPR. Archived from the original on August 16, 2021. Retrieved June 8, 2009.
- "Election 2008 – North Carolina Democratic Primary". RealClearPolitics. May 1, 2008. Archived from the original on April 13, 2021. Retrieved January 24, 2009.
- "Election 2008 – Indiana Democratic Primary". RealClearPolitics. Archived from the original on July 15, 2021. Retrieved January 24, 2009.
- "NC—Election Results". North Carolina State Board of Elections. May 7, 2008. Archived from the original on May 25, 2017. Retrieved June 8, 2009.
- "Indiana Primary Election, May 6, 2008". Indiana Secretary of State. August 22, 2008. Archived from the original on August 11, 2018. Retrieved June 8, 2009.
- Rutenberg, Jim (May 8, 2008). "Pundits Declare the Race Over". The New York Times. Archived from the original on April 25, 2009. Retrieved June 8, 2009.
- "NBC: Obama takes N.C. - Decision '08- NBC News". NBC News. May 7, 2008. Archived from the original on September 23, 2020. Retrieved January 24, 2009.
- Hertzberg, Hendrik (June 2, 2008). "Memory Lapse". The New Yorker. Archived from the original on March 7, 2014. Retrieved June 8, 2009.
- "Florida, Michigan get all delegates, but each gets half vote". CNN. May 31, 2008. Archived from the original on June 2, 2008. Retrieved May 31, 2008.
- Jackson, John S.; Barbara Leavitt Brown (October 12, 1991). "The 1992 primary: proportional representation for Illinois Democrats". Illinois Issues. University of Illinois at Springfield. Archived from the original on August 23, 2021. Retrieved May 18, 2008.
- "Fact check: Clinton vote claims under scrutiny". USA Today. Associated Press. May 15, 2008. Archived from the original on April 28, 2011. Retrieved June 8, 2009.
- "Obama claims Democratic nomination—Decision '08- NBC News". NBC News. June 4, 2008. Archived from the original on September 23, 2020. Retrieved January 24, 2009.
- Zeleny, Jeff (June 4, 2008). "Obama Clinches Nomination; First Black Candidate to Lead a Major Party Ticket". The New York Times. Archived from the original on August 17, 2020. Retrieved January 24, 2009.
- "Historic night: Obama clinches nomination—Bill Nichols and Ben Smith". Politico.com. June 3, 2008. Archived from the original on April 12, 2012. Retrieved January 24, 2009.
- "ABC News: Clinton Concedes Democratic Nomination; Obama Leads Party in Fall". Abcnews.go.com. Archived from the original on August 16, 2021. Retrieved January 24, 2009.
- Harnden, Toby (November 13, 2007). "The top US conservatives and liberals". London: Telegraph.co.uk. Archived from the original on January 10, 2022. Retrieved September 7, 2008.
- Charles G. Dawes, 30th Vice President (1925–1929) Archived November 6, 2014, at the Wayback Machine, U.S. Senate.
- Jones, Charles O. (September 2008). "Vice Presidents and Other Heirs Apparent: The Historical Experience of Experience". Presidential Studies Quarterly. 38 (3): 422–432. doi:10.1111/j.1741-5705.2008.02653.x. ISSN 0360-4918. JSTOR 41219688.
- Vardi, Nathan (November 14, 2006). "President Rudy Giuliani?". Forbes. Archived from the original on August 16, 2021. Retrieved June 9, 2009.
- "White House 2008: Republican Nomination". Pollingreport.com. Archived from the original on June 13, 2016. Retrieved June 9, 2009.
- Romano, Lois (January 29, 2007). "Huckabee Announces Presidential Bit". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on March 9, 2021. Retrieved June 9, 2009.
- Balz, Dan; Cillizza, Chris (February 6, 2007). "Giuliani Announces He's In '08 Presidential Race". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on January 12, 2020. Retrieved June 9, 2009.
- Gonyea, Don (February 13, 2007). "Romney Announces His Candidacy for 2008". NPR. Archived from the original on August 18, 2021. Retrieved June 9, 2009.
- Martin, Gary (March 12, 2007). "Paul formally launches presidential bid". San Antonio Express-News. Archived from the original on March 15, 2007. Retrieved March 13, 2007.
- Parker, Jennifer (April 25, 2007). "The Art of the Presidential Rollout". ABC News. Archived from the original on August 14, 2021. Retrieved June 9, 2009.
- "Paul Raises More Than $3.5M in One Day". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on July 14, 2017. Retrieved January 28, 2018.
- Todd, Chuck (May 15, 2007). "Winners & Losers". MSNBC. Archived from the original on May 31, 2009. Retrieved June 9, 2009.
- "Clinton and McCain the comeback kids". CNN. January 8, 2008. Archived from the original on September 12, 2020. Retrieved January 8, 2008.
- Robin Toner & Marjorie Connelly (January 14, 2008). "New poll finds McCain reshaping GOP race". NBC News. New York Times. Archived from the original on September 23, 2020. Retrieved March 14, 2008. See also: "John McCain: Ultimate Survivor". The Star (South Africa). March 6, 2008. Archived from the original on May 17, 2008. Retrieved March 14, 2008.
- "Election Center 2008: Primary Results for South Carolina". CNN. January 19, 2008. Archived from the original on May 7, 2008. Retrieved January 19, 2008.
- "McCain wins Florida, CNN projects". CNN. January 29, 2008. Archived from the original on March 25, 2021. Retrieved June 9, 2009.
- Montopoli, Brian (January 29, 2008). "For Giuliani, A Disappointing Fade To Exit". CBS News. Archived from the original on February 21, 2011. Retrieved June 9, 2009.
- "Schwarzenegger backs McCain for president". CNN. January 31, 2008. Archived from the original on August 16, 2021. Retrieved May 26, 2010.
- ^ Johnson, Wesley (February 6, 2008). "Super Tuesday results state by state". The Independent. London. Archived from the original on May 1, 2022. Retrieved June 9, 2009.
- King, John (February 7, 2008). "Romney suspends presidential campaign". CNN. Archived from the original on September 2, 2021. Retrieved June 10, 2009.
- "Romney endorses McCain for GOP nomination". CNN. February 14, 2008. Archived from the original on April 23, 2009. Retrieved June 9, 2009.
- "Huckabee bows to 'inevitable,' ends GOP run". CNN. March 5, 2008. Archived from the original on August 14, 2021. Retrieved March 5, 2008.
- Mannies, Jo (April 26, 2008). "At KC convention, Constitution Party picks pastor for president". St. Louis Post-Dispatch. Archived from the original on May 30, 2008. Retrieved July 14, 2009.
- Montana News Association (May 22, 2008). "BALDWIN 2008 PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGN KICKS OFF". Montana News Association. Archived from the original on May 1, 2011. Retrieved July 14, 2009.
- Simon, Scott (October 18, 2008). "Chuck Baldwin On His Run For President". NPR. Archived from the original on August 16, 2021. Retrieved July 14, 2009.
- Scott, Jeffry (July 12, 2008). "McKinney wins Green Party nomination". The Atlanta Journal-Constitution. Archived from the original on May 29, 2012. Retrieved July 14, 2009.
- "Bob Barr: 'We must both reduce and simplify taxes'". Independent Political Report. June 5, 2008. Archived from the original on August 14, 2021. Retrieved July 14, 2009.
- Galloway, Jim (March 26, 2008). "Bob Barr thinking 'very serious' thoughts about a presidential race, Iraq, and torture". The Atlanta Journal-Constitution. Archived from the original on May 29, 2012. Retrieved July 14, 2009.
- Walker, Jesse (December 2003). "Bob Barr, Civil Libertarian. The right wing of the ACLU". Reason Magazine. Archived from the original on September 3, 2009. Retrieved July 14, 2009.
- Hendrik Hertzberg (January 4, 2008). "A Hundred Years' War?". The New Yorker. Archived from the original on October 18, 2013. Retrieved March 13, 2009.; video at "Make It 100". YouTube. January 3, 2008. Archived from the original on December 12, 2021.
- "Historic Disapproval: Bush Hits All-Time Low Amid Economic Meltdown". ABC News. Archived from the original on August 18, 2021. Retrieved February 8, 2021.
- Presidential Job Approval Center Archived November 18, 2016, at the Wayback Machine Gallup.com
- Steinhauser, Paul (March 19, 2008). "Poll: Bush's popularity hits new low". CNN. Archived from the original on August 16, 2021. Retrieved January 10, 2009.
- "Confidence sinks to lowest since 2002 as fear tightens its hold on US consumers". International Herald Tribune. April 11, 2008. Retrieved January 10, 2009.
- "Bush says he wants McCain to win presidency". CNN. March 5, 2008. Archived from the original on March 23, 2021. Retrieved January 10, 2009.
- Baker, Peter; Abramowitz last3 A Mazhintue, Michael (February 9, 2008). "History and Necessity Unite Bush, McCain". Washingtonpost.com. Archived from the original on December 3, 2020. Retrieved January 30, 2009.
{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link) - Bouie, Jamelle (November 23, 2021). "Opinion | The Ronald Reagan Guide to Joe Biden's Political Future". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on November 30, 2021. Retrieved November 30, 2021.
- Nyhan, Brendan (May 30, 2014). "How Old Is Too Old for President? Depends Who's Running". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on December 13, 2020. Retrieved November 30, 2021.
- "Analysis: Age an issue in the 2008 campaign? - CNN.com". edition.cnn.com. Archived from the original on January 18, 2021. Retrieved November 30, 2021.
- "The key moments in John McCain's life". BBC News. August 26, 2018. Archived from the original on August 24, 2021. Retrieved November 30, 2021.
- "John McCain rebelled at the Naval Academy — and as a POW — long before he was a Senate maverick". The Washington Post. August 25, 2018. Archived from the original on May 27, 2019. Retrieved November 30, 2021.
- Simba, Malik (Fall 2009). "The Obama Campaign 2008: A Historical Overview". Western Journal of Black Studies. 33 (3): 186–191. ProQuest 200339829.
- Perry Bacon; Jennifer Agiesta (June 9, 2008). "Change vs. Experience All Over Again". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on January 26, 2021. Retrieved January 3, 2009.
- "Obama Ends Campaign Ahead In Ohio And Pennsylvania, Quinnipiac University Swing State Poll Finds". Quinnipiac University Polling Institute. Archived from the original on November 6, 2008.
- James Joyner (August 29, 2008). "Sarah Palin – John McCain's VP Choice". Outsidethebeltway.com. Archived from the original on September 19, 2008. Retrieved January 30, 2009.
- "Christian evangelicals send McCain a message". NBC News. Associated Press. February 12, 2008. Archived from the original on September 23, 2020. Retrieved January 30, 2009.
- Burns, Alexander (September 3, 2008). "McCain and the politics of mortality". POLITICO. Archived from the original on January 17, 2024. Retrieved February 19, 2024.
- "Palin gets media savaging after faltering interview". AFP. September 26, 2008. Archived from the original on December 1, 2008. Retrieved December 30, 2008.
- "Sarah Palin seen as beacon of hope as defeat at poll looms". The Daily Telegraph. London. Archived from the original on October 17, 2008.
- "Gallup's Quick Read on the Election". Gallup.com. October 22, 2008. Archived from the original on June 28, 2017. Retrieved January 30, 2009.
- "Exit polls: Obama wins big among young, minority voters". CNN.com. November 4, 2008. Archived from the original on June 8, 2021. Retrieved January 30, 2009.
- "Investors Bail Out: The D word going cheap". www.nationalpost.com. September 16, 2008. Archived from the original on September 4, 2012. Retrieved February 15, 2009.
- Martin, Jonathan; Allen, Mike (August 21, 2008). "McCain unsure how many houses he owns". Politico. Archived from the original on July 24, 2015. Retrieved December 30, 2008.
- Aigner-Treworgy, Adam (September 15, 2008). "McCain: Economy still 'strong'". MSNBC. Archived from the original on December 6, 2008. Retrieved December 30, 2008.
- "Obama, McCain Meet In Mississippi". WAPT.com. December 29, 2008. Archived from the original on May 1, 2011. Retrieved December 30, 2008.
- "U.S. Senate Roll Call Votes: 110th Congress, 2nd Session". Senate.gov. Archived from the original on May 29, 2020. Retrieved April 2, 2013.
- Schnur, Dan (November 3, 2008). "What caused McCain's poll numbers to fall?". Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on October 24, 2013.
- Nichols, Hans (October 15, 2008). "McCain May Have Last Chance to Overcome Economy in Final Debate". Bloomberg. Retrieved January 29, 2009.
- Robert E. Moffit and Nina Owcharenko, "The McCain Health Care Plan: More Power to Families," Archived October 3, 2015, at the Wayback Machine The Heritage Foundation, October 15, 2008
- Thomas Buchmueller, Sherry A. Glied, Anne Royalty, and Katherine Swartz, "Cost And Coverage Implications Of The McCain Plan To Restructure Health Insurance," Archived September 17, 2008, at the Wayback Machine Health Affairs, September 16, 2008
- Joseph Antos, Gail Wilensky, and Hanns Kuttner, "The Obama Plan: More Regulation, Unsustainable Spending," Archived August 21, 2009, at the Wayback Machine Health Affairs, September 16, 2008
- Robert E. Moffit and Nina Owcharenko, "The Obama Health Care Plan: More Power to Washington," Archived October 2, 2012, at the Wayback Machine The Heritage Foundation, October 15, 2008
- Mark V. Pauly, "Blending Better Ingredients For Health Reform," Archived February 5, 2009, at the Wayback Machine Health Affairs, September 16, 2008
- Robert J. Blendon, Drew E. Altman, John M. Benson, Mollyann Brodie, Tami Buhr, Claudia Deane, and Sasha Buscho, "Voters and Health Reform in the 2008 Presidential Election," Archived March 26, 2009, at the Wayback Machine New England Journal of Medicine 359;19, November 6, 2008
- ^ "CPD: 2008 Debates". www.debates.org. Archived from the original on January 8, 2019. Retrieved January 8, 2019.
- "Vice presidential debate, Oct. 2, 2008". NBC News. October 3, 2008. Archived from the original on September 23, 2020. Retrieved July 14, 2009.
- Parker, Jennifer (September 23, 2008). "Obama, McCain Prep for Presidential Debates". ABC News. Archived from the original on August 15, 2021. Retrieved July 14, 2009.
- "Free and Equal". Freeandequal.org. Archived from the original on October 19, 2008. Retrieved November 3, 2008.
- Kennedy, Helen (January 14, 2007). "Wanna be Prez? First get $100M". New York Daily News. Archived from the original on November 9, 2021. Retrieved February 1, 2007.
- Kirkpatrick, David (January 23, 2007). "Death Knell May Be Near for Public Election Funds". The New York Times. Archived from the original on August 15, 2021. Retrieved September 15, 2008.
- "Financial Summary Report Search Results". fec.gov. Archived from the original on December 8, 2014. Retrieved December 22, 2008.
- "Obama rejects 'lipstick' charge". BBC. September 10, 2008. Archived from the original on July 30, 2017. Retrieved December 19, 2012.
- "RealClearPolitics - Electoral Map". Archived from the original on June 5, 2008.
- "Vote 2008 - The Takeaway - Track the Electoral College vote predictions". April 22, 2009. Archived from the original on April 22, 2009. Retrieved August 23, 2021.
- "Presidential". May 5, 2015. Archived from the original on May 5, 2015. Retrieved August 23, 2021.
- "Questions, not answers, highlight YouTube debate". CNN. July 24, 2007. Archived from the original on August 16, 2021. Retrieved March 14, 2008.
- Stephanie Garry (June 8, 2007). "Candidates court young voters online". St. Petersburg Times. Archived from the original on April 15, 2016. Retrieved September 15, 2008.
- Kenneth P. Vogel (December 17, 2007). "'Money bomb': Ron Paul raises $6 million in 24-hour period". USA Today. The Politico. Archived from the original on March 21, 2012. Retrieved March 14, 2008.
- "Breaking News: Ron Paul campaign donors set a record". Los Angeles Times. December 17, 2007. Archived from the original on September 17, 2021. Retrieved September 15, 2008.
- Larry Fester (November 5, 2007). "Ron Paul makes fund raising history". USA Daily. Archived from the original on January 12, 2008.
- Fraser, Matthew. "Barack Obama and the Facebook Election". U.S. News & World Report. Archived from the original on April 13, 2021. Retrieved March 2, 2014.
- Maruggi, Albert; Metzgar, Emily (July 31, 2009). Social Media and the 2008 U.S. Presidential Election (Report). Society for New Communications Research. Archived from the original on January 15, 2023. Retrieved January 15, 2023.
- Cain Miller, Claire (November 7, 2008). "How Obama's Internet Campaign Changed Politics". The New York Times. Archived from the original on March 31, 2014. Retrieved March 1, 2014.
- Reid, Tim (November 23, 2007). "Palmetto Bugs: Slingers of Slime Step it up in SC". New York Post. Archived from the original on August 27, 2009. Retrieved September 15, 2008.
- Rutenberg, Jim (June 29, 2008). "Political Freelancers Use Web to Join the Attack". The New York Times. Archived from the original on August 14, 2021. Retrieved October 25, 2008.
- Ian Urbina (October 9, 2008). "States' Actions to Block Voters Appear Illegal". The New York Times. Archived from the original on January 5, 2018. Retrieved October 15, 2008.
- John Bohlinger (October 5, 2008). "Republicans crossed line with voter purge attempt". The Montana Standard. Archived from the original on November 27, 2008. Retrieved October 15, 2008.
- "Lose your house, lose your vote". Michigan Messenger. September 10, 2008. Archived from the original on September 23, 2008.
- "Conyers Calls on McCain to Immediately Halt Republican Vote Suppression Efforts". House of Representatives. September 19, 2008. Archived from the original on September 24, 2008.
- Hoppe, Christy (September 19, 2008). "Libertarian Bob Barr sues to have McCain, Obama cast off Texas' ballot". Dallas Morning News. Archived from the original on September 21, 2008. Retrieved October 8, 2008.
- Young, Adam (September 24, 2008). "Texas court: McCain, Obama to remain on ballot". Daily Toreador. Archived from the original on October 6, 2008. Retrieved October 8, 2008.
- ^ Niquette, Mark (November 16, 2009). "Mark Niquette, "Vote-Fraud Cases Linger from 2008," Columbus Dispatch, November 16, 2008."". Dispatchpolitics.com. Archived from the original on April 29, 2011. Retrieved June 13, 2010.
- Niquette, Mark (October 22, 2008). "Mark Niquette and Jill Riepenhoff, "'Voters' Flocking to Ohio," Columbus Dispatch, October 22, 2008". Dispatchpolitics.com. Archived from the original on August 12, 2010. Retrieved June 13, 2010.
- Macintosh, Jeane (October 20, 2008). "Gotham-to-Ohio Vote Scam Eyed" (PDF). New York Post. Archived from the original (PDF) on May 14, 2011. Retrieved April 17, 2011.
- Riepenhoff, Jill (October 19, 2008). "Jill Riepenhoff, "Illegal Voters, or Just Getting Out the Vote?" Columbus Dispatch, October 19, 2008". Dispatchpolitics.com. Archived from the original on August 12, 2010. Retrieved June 13, 2010.
- "Most Voters Say Media Wants Obama to Win". The Pew Research Center for the People & the Press. October 22, 2008. Archived from the original on March 10, 2011. Retrieved October 25, 2008.
- High Marks for the Campaign, a High Bar for Obama Archived June 21, 2020, at the Wayback Machine Pew Research Center. Retrieved September 6, 2012.
- ^ Steinberg, Jacques (April 18, 2008). "Who Lost the Debate? Moderators, Many Say". The New York Times. Archived from the original on December 11, 2008. Retrieved April 18, 2008.
- ^ Kurtz, Howard (April 18, 2008). "The Backlash Against ABC". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on April 22, 2008. Retrieved April 18, 2008.
- Elizabeth Edwards (April 28, 2008). "Op-ed: Bowling 1, Health Care 0". The New York Times. Archived from the original on August 15, 2021. Retrieved February 23, 2017.
- Jong, Erica (May 5, 2008). "Inspiration Versus Degradation". The Huffington Post. Archived from the original on May 25, 2017. Retrieved May 22, 2008.
- "Public Says Media Harder on Clinton Than Obama, McCain". Gallup.com. May 29, 2008. Archived from the original on August 31, 2017. Retrieved July 17, 2011.
- "Character and the Primaries of 2008". The Project for Excellence in Journalism. May 29, 2008. Archived from the original on September 10, 2013. Retrieved June 26, 2008.
- "MEDIA BASH BARACK (NOT A TYPO)". Center for Media and Public Affairs. July 28, 2008. Archived from the original on November 20, 2008.
- "The Color of News". Project for Excellence in Journalism. October 29, 2008. Archived from the original on September 26, 2013. Retrieved November 2, 2008.
- Absentee and Early Voting Laws Archived December 11, 2008, at the Wayback Machine, from the Early Voting Information Center at Reed College
- "NBC calls Ohio for Obama—First Read—msnbc.com". MSNBC. November 4, 2008. Archived from the original on December 11, 2008. Retrieved January 24, 2009.
- Fouhy, Beth (November 5, 2008). "McCain concedes presidency, congratulates Obama". Tucson Citizen. Archived from the original on July 16, 2012. Retrieved July 18, 2011.
- Meincke, Paul (November 5, 2008). "Chicago could benefit from Obama election". Chicago: WLS-TV. Archived from the original on June 29, 2011. Retrieved July 18, 2011.
- "Scenes of joy across the US—Local News—News—General". The Canberra Times. November 5, 2008. Archived from the original on February 19, 2009. Retrieved January 24, 2009.
- Naughton, Philippe (November 5, 2008). "World celebrates Barack Obama victory". London: Times Online. Archived from the original on April 29, 2011. Retrieved January 24, 2009.
- ^ "United States House of Representatives floor summary for Jan 8, 2009". Clerk.house.gov. Archived from the original on April 2, 2012. Retrieved January 30, 2009.
- "Expected High Voter Turnout Has Government Officials, Watchdog Groups on Alert". Fox News. November 3, 2008. Archived from the original on November 6, 2008. Retrieved November 7, 2008.
"The main thing that we all know is that there's going to be a huge turnout. There are going to be long lines, and any problems that occur will exacerbate because of those lines," said Robert M. Brandon, president of the Fair Elections Legal Network.
- Urbina, Ian (November 3, 2008). "Voting experts say high turnout may add to problems at the polls". The New York Times. Archived from the original on August 14, 2021. Retrieved July 16, 2009.
- Alban, Debra (November 7, 2008). "Number of votes cast set record, but voter turnout percentage didn't". CNN. Archived from the original on April 13, 2021. Retrieved July 16, 2009.
- ^ "Much-hyped Turnout Record Fails to Materialize" (PDF) (Press release). Center for the Study of the American Electorate, American University. November 6, 2008. Archived (PDF) from the original on March 23, 2021. Retrieved November 20, 2008.
- ^ "African-Americans, Anger, Fear and Youth Propel Turnout to Highest Level Since 1964" (PDF) (Press release). Center for the Study of the American Electorate, American University. Archived from the original (PDF) on December 18, 2008. Retrieved December 18, 2008.
- "2008G - United States Elections Project". www.electproject.org. Archived from the original on August 13, 2021. Retrieved October 31, 2020.
- "2008 General Election Turnout Vote". Elections.gmu.edu. March 31, 2012. Archived from the original on January 12, 2013. Retrieved December 6, 2012.
- "Report: '08 turnout same as or only slightly higher than '04". CNN. November 6, 2008. Archived from the original on August 1, 2021. Retrieved December 8, 2008.
- "That huge voter turnout? Didn't happen". Politico. November 8, 2008. Archived from the original on February 22, 2015. Retrieved December 9, 2008.
- "America Goes to the Polls". Archived from the original on April 16, 2012. Retrieved September 6, 2012.
- "How Black Democrats won North Carolina and the Election: Massive Turnout, Week of November 13–19, 2008". The Wilmington Journal. November 24, 2008. Archived from the original on December 2, 2010.
- The New York Times (November 4, 2008). "2008 Presidential Race: Virginia—Election Guide—The New York Times". Election Guide 2008 – The New York Times. The New York Times Company. Archived from the original on April 15, 2016. Retrieved June 2, 2009.
- The New York Times (November 4, 2008). "2008 Presidential Race: Georgia—Election Guide—The New York Times". Election Guide 2008 – The New York Times. The New York Times Company. Archived from the original on April 15, 2016. Retrieved June 2, 2009.
- The New York Times (November 4, 2008). "2008 Presidential Race: Mississippi—Election Guide—The New York Times". Election Guide 2008 – The New York Times. The New York Times Company. Archived from the original on April 15, 2016. Retrieved June 2, 2009.
- "2008 PETITIONING FOR PRESIDENT". Ballot-access.org. October 23, 2008. Archived from the original on November 3, 2008. Retrieved January 24, 2009.
- "Ballot Access News – November 1, 2008". Ballot-access.org. March 18, 2008. Archived from the original on August 16, 2021. Retrieved February 23, 2010.
- "Ballot Access News—November 1, 2008". Ballot-access.org. March 18, 2008. Archived from the original on August 16, 2021. Retrieved January 24, 2009.
- "12/12/92". Ballot-access.org. December 22, 2008. Archived from the original on February 4, 2009. Retrieved January 24, 2009.
- "2008 Official Statewide General Election Results for Nevada". Nvsos.gov. November 4, 2008. Archived from the original on April 13, 2021. Retrieved April 2, 2013.
- "2008 Presidential Election by State". Thegreenpapers.com. January 8, 2009. Archived from the original on August 14, 2021. Retrieved February 23, 2010.
- "2008 Presidential Election by State". Thegreenpapers.com. January 8, 2009. Archived from the original on April 13, 2021. Retrieved February 23, 2010.
- "Ballot Access News – February 1, 2009". Ballot-access.org. February 1, 2009. Archived from the original on August 15, 2021. Retrieved February 23, 2010.
- official Federal Election Commission report
- "Bureau of Corporations, Elections & Commissions, Elections Division". Archived from the original on November 4, 2012. Retrieved December 2, 2012.
- "Official Results of Nebraska General Election – November 4, 2008" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on January 14, 2009. Retrieved December 2, 2012.
- "Election maps". www-personal.umich.edu. Archived from the original on September 30, 2021. Retrieved January 18, 2009.
- Archived September 10, 2021, at the Wayback Machine, Uselectionatlas.org.
- "National Exit Poll". CNN. Archived from the original on June 5, 2010. Retrieved January 28, 2013.
- Kilner, Derek (June 4, 2008). "Kenyans Welcome Obama's Democratic Party Nomination". VOA News. Archived from the original on July 26, 2010. Retrieved June 17, 2008.
- Wallsten, Peter (November 5, 2008). "White Americans play major role in electing the first black president". Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on December 18, 2008. Retrieved July 16, 2009.
- "African-Americans Who Ran for President". socialstudiesforkids.com. Archived from the original on October 5, 2018. Retrieved March 22, 2016.
- "America.gov". America.gov. November 7, 2008. Archived from the original on August 5, 2009. Retrieved July 16, 2009.
- "Obama Over the Top: How New Voters Could Redraw The Electoral Map". Progress Illinois. Archived from the original on May 14, 2008. Retrieved January 30, 2009.
- Exit Polls Archived October 11, 2013, at the Wayback Machine, The New York Times, November 5, 2008.
- "From Marine to politician: An inside look at JD Vance's journey to the RNC stage". ABC News. July 19, 2023. Archived from the original on September 21, 2024. Retrieved July 19, 2024.
- Cost, Jay (November 20, 2008). "HorseRaceBlog—Electoral Polarization Continues Under Obama". RealClearPolitics. Archived from the original on February 2, 2009. Retrieved January 24, 2009.
- Kuhn, David Paul (November 5, 2008). "Exit polls: How Obama won". Politico. Archived from the original on November 5, 2011. Retrieved November 8, 2011.
- "Exit poll". CNN. Archived from the original on June 5, 2010. Retrieved January 30, 2009.
- Hunt, Albert R. (February 3, 2008). "Obama vs. McCain would be dream match". The New York Times. Archived from the original on November 25, 2020. Retrieved February 23, 2017.
Further reading
- Balz, Dan, and Haynes Johnson. The Battle for America 2008: The Story of an Extraordinary Election (2009), by leading reporters with inside information
- Crotty, William. "Policy and Politics: The Bush Administration and the 2008 Presidential Election," Polity, July 2009, Vol. 41 Issue 3, pp 282–311 online Archived April 4, 2016, at the Wayback Machine
- Curtis, Mark. Age of Obama: A Reporter's Journey With Clinton, McCain and Obama in the Making of the President in 2008 (2009)
- Gidlow, Liette. Obama, Clinton, Palin: Making History in Election 2008 (2012)
- Nelson, Michael. The Elections of 2008 (2009), factual summary except and text search Archived April 29, 2011, at the Wayback Machine
- Plouffe, David. The Audacity to Win: The Inside Story and Lessons of Barack Obama's Historic Victory. 2009
- Sussman, Glen. "Choosing a New Direction: The Presidential Election of 2008," White House Studies, 2009, Vol. 9 Issue 1, pp 1–20
- Wolffe, Richard. Renegade: The Making of a President (2010) excerpt and text search Archived April 29, 2011, at the Wayback Machine, narrative
Voters
- Abramson, Paul R., John H. Aldrich, and David W. Rohde. Change and Continuity in the 2008 Elections (2009) excerpt and text search Archived April 29, 2011, at the Wayback Machine
- Corwin E. Smidt and others. The Disappearing God Gap? Religion in the 2008 Presidential Election (Oxford University Press; 2010) 278 pages. Finds that the gap between church-attending traditionalists and other voters is not closing, as has been claimed, but is changing in significant ways; draws on survey data from voters who were interviewed in the spring of 2008 and then again after the election.
- Crespino, Joseph. "The U.S. South and the 2008 Election," Southern Spaces (2008) online Archived August 8, 2020, at the Wayback Machine
- Jessee, Stephen A. "Voter Ideology and Candidate Positioning in the 2008 Presidential Election," American Politics Research, March 2010, Vol. 38 Issue 2, pp 195–210
- Kenski, Kate, Bruce W. Hardy, and Kathleen Hall Jamieson. The Obama Victory: How Media, Money, and Message Shaped the 2008 Election (Oxford University Press; 2010) 378 pages. Draws on interviews with key campaign advisors as well as the National Annenberg Election Survey. excerpt and text search Archived August 28, 2019, at the Wayback Machine
- Sabato, Larry. The Year of Obama: How Barack Obama Won the White House (2009)
- Stempel III, Guido H. and Thomas K. Hargrove, eds. The 21st-Century Voter: Who Votes, How They Vote, and Why They Vote (2 vol. 2015).
- Todd, Chuck, and Sheldon Gawiser. How Barack Obama Won: A State-by-State Guide to the Historic 2008 Presidential Election (2009) excerpt and text search Archived August 28, 2019, at the Wayback Machine
External links
- Beyond Red and Blue: 7 Ways to View the Presidential Election Map—from Scientific American
- Campaign commercials from the 2008 election
- US Election 2008 Web Monitor
- 2008 Electoral Map
- "Behind the Results", USA Today election coverage
- Joseph Crespino, "The U.S. South and the 2008 Election", Southern Spaces, December 11, 2008.
- Election of 2008 in Counting the Votes
- "The Choice 2008". Frontline. Season 26. Episode 11. October 14, 2008. PBS. WGBH. Retrieved November 28, 2024.
| State and district results of the 2008 United States presidential election | ||
|---|---|---|
|  | |
| United States presidential elections | |
|---|---|
| Elections by year |
|
| Elections by state |
|
| Primaries and caucuses | |
| Nominating conventions | |
| Electoral College and popular vote | |
| Related | |
| Barack Obama | |||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||
| Joe Biden | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||
| Early career | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Presidency |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| Elections |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| Family |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| Writings | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Speeches |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| Media depictions | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Related |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| John McCain | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
| Life |  | ||
| Political activities |
| ||
| Media |
| ||
| Family |
| ||
| Sarah Palin | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
| Politics |  | ||||||
| Elections |
| ||||||
| Books and media by Sarah Palin | |||||||
| Book and media coverage | |||||||
| Parodies | |||||||
| Family |
| ||||||
| Related | |||||||
![[REDACTED]](https://u3vuiephb.global.ssl.fastly.net/File:Obama_Biden_logo.svg){kind=link}
![[REDACTED]](https://u3vuiephb.global.ssl.fastly.net/File:Hillary_Clinton_presidential_campaign_logo,_2008.svg){kind=link}
![[REDACTED]](https://u3vuiephb.global.ssl.fastly.net/File:Bill_Richardson_2008_campaign_logo.svg){kind=link}
![[REDACTED]](https://u3vuiephb.global.ssl.fastly.net/File:Chris_Dodd_2008_campaign_logo.svg){kind=link}
![[REDACTED]](https://u3vuiephb.global.ssl.fastly.net/File:Tom_Vilsack_2008_campaign_logo.svg){kind=link}
![[REDACTED]](https://u3vuiephb.global.ssl.fastly.net/File:McCain_Palin_logo.svg){kind=link}
![[REDACTED]](https://u3vuiephb.global.ssl.fastly.net/File:Mitt_Romney_for_president_logo_2008.svg){kind=link}
![[REDACTED]](https://u3vuiephb.global.ssl.fastly.net/File:Mike_Huckabee_2008_campaign_logo.svg){kind=link}
![[REDACTED]](https://u3vuiephb.global.ssl.fastly.net/File:Tom_Tancredo_2008_presidential_campaign_logo.svg){kind=link}
![[REDACTED]](https://u3vuiephb.global.ssl.fastly.net/File:Gilmore_logo.jpg){kind=link}
Categories:
- 2008 United States presidential election
- Barack Obama 2008 presidential campaign
- John McCain 2008 presidential campaign
- Barack Obama
- John McCain
- Joe Biden
- Sarah Palin
- November 2008 events in the United States
- Impacts of the Iraq War
- Post–civil rights era in African-American history
- Presidency of George W. Bush
- Presidency of Barack Obama